Search Results
![Press Conference 12/1](images/fileicons/nodigital.png)
Date: 12/1/1966Call Number: CE 761Format: 1/4 3 3/4 ipsProducers: Colin EdwardsCollection: Colin Edwards Free Speech Movement
Audio from a press conference with participants in the strike and the previous day's action. This Q&A session took place before noon on December 1st (before strikers decided whether to continue the strike). Mario Savio and an unidentified student speak on the efficacy of a strike, the cause of the strike, demands, amnesty for the arrested demonstrators, the possibility of an investigation by the state (threatened by Governor Reagan), whether demonstrators seek to "destroy the university," and other questions.
![UC Noon Rally Reel 1](images/fileicons/nodigital.png)
Date: 12/1/1966Call Number: CE 762Format: 1/4 3 3/4 ipsProducers: Colin EdwardsCollection: Colin Edwards Free Speech Movement
Reel 1 of audio from the the noon rally at which the strikers were to decide whether to continue the strike. Students and faculty as well as grad students speak at the rally, all of whom are essentially for continuing the strike. Robert Mundy from the strike committee talks about education, law, the administration, etc. Announcement is made that there was a rumor that Mario Savio would be arrested if he came on campus, so if he did come, he was to get the mic straight away before the police got him. A speaker from SDS talks about the Navy table incident. Hal Draper discusses demands, amnesty, Navy recruitment, and non-students. Dan McIntosh, president of the ASUC, talks about the ASUC vote to support the strike and announces support from the National Student Association. Bob Atkins from the AFT (TA union) talks about the effect of a labor union striking. Two professors (Rogen and Hearst?) speak on the role of faculty. At the end, the group votes to maintain the same demands.
![UC Noon Rally Reel 2](images/fileicons/nodigital.png)
Date: 12/1/1966Call Number: CE 763Producers: Colin EdwardsCollection: Colin Edwards Free Speech Movement
Reel 2 of audio from the noon rally on December 1st, 1966 determining whether or not to continue the strike into the next day.
![UC December 1st 1966 Speakers](images/fileicons/nodigital.png)
Date: 12/1/1966Call Number: CE 765Format: 1/4 3 3/4 ipsProducers: Colin EdwardsCollection: Colin Edwards Free Speech Movement
Interviews with individuals present at the ASUC building before, during, and after the Navy table incident. Mike Lerner, a graduate student, describes the Navy table incident in good detail, giving a clear chronology of events. Professor Linden, a visiting law professor from Toronto, describes the frustration and lack of trust between students and the administration, the idealism of students versus the administration "trying to do their jobs," and describes the police incident. He says that faculty probably won't support student demands, but are concerned about the use of police. Frank Bardackey as well as three students interviewed together (Leni, Sandra, and Rod) and student Ray Neinstein all describe the Navy table and police incidents from their perspectives. A statement by Mike Parker of the steering committee of the GCC and a member of the strike committee is played. Finally, Colleen Goldstick, a member of Women for Peace who helped set up the anti-draft table, is interviewed about her experience.
![December 2nd Heyns Conference](images/fileicons/nodigital.png)
Date: 12/2/1966Call Number: CE 766Producers: Colin EdwardsCollection: Colin Edwards Free Speech Movement
Audio from the December 2nd 1966 conference with chancellor Heyns
![12/2 Press Conference Negotiating Committee](images/fileicons/nodigital.png)
Date: 12/2/1966Call Number: CE 767Format: 1/4 3 3/4 ipsProducers: Colin EdwardsCollection: Colin Edwards Free Speech Movement
Press conference with three participants in the strike: Dan Rosenthal, a representative from the AFT (TA union) and another participant. They discuss and answer questions about the administration's refusal to negotiate with the strike's negotiating committee. Negotiations could not begin at the time because the administration refused to negotiate with the strike committee since it contained one non-student (Mario Savio). The AFT would not negotiate without the strike committee, and the ASUC agreed not to engage in negotiations.
![Strike Rally in Pauley Ballroom Noon 12/2](images/fileicons/nodigital.png)
Date: 12/2/1966Call Number: CE 768Format: 1/4 3 3/4 ipsProducers: Colin EdwardsCollection: Colin Edwards Free Speech Movement
Audio from a strike rally in Pauley Ballroom on the second day of the strike (December 2nd). Statements are made by Hal Draper, a representative of SDS, a representative of the AFT (TA union), a representative from Stanford's student body, a student named John O'Shea, a faculty member from the math and statistics epartment, and others. Most are in favor of the continuing strike and the demands of the students, except John O'Shea, who thinks that students should put more thought into their demands and their ultimate ramifications.
![December 5th 1966 Rally Reel 1](images/fileicons/nodigital.png)
Date: 12/5/1966Call Number: CE 769Format: 1/4 7 1/2 ipsProducers: Colin EdwardsCollection: Colin Edwards Free Speech Movement
Audio from December 5, 1966 rally
![December 5th 1966 Rally Reel 2](images/fileicons/nodigital.png)
Date: 12/5/1966Call Number: CE 770Format: 1/4 7 1/2 ipsProducers: Colin EdwardsCollection: Colin Edwards Free Speech Movement
Audio from December 5, 1966 rally.
![December 5th 1966 Rally Reel 3](images/fileicons/nodigital.png)
Date: 12/5/1966Call Number: CE 771Format: 1/4 7 1/2 ipsProducers: Colin EdwardsCollection: Colin Edwards Free Speech Movement
Audio from December 5, 1966 rally