Search Results
3 Documents Found
![Academic Senate Debates 1](images/fileicons/nodigital.png)
Date: 12/8/1964Call Number: CE 706Format: 1/4 7 1/2 ipsCollection: Colin Edwards Free Speech Movement
The discussion revolved around the proposal of the senate's academic freedom committee endorsing the Free Speech Movement's basic positions on the disciplinary proceedings and the time, place, and content of speech and advocacy.
Lewis Feuer of philosophy and Nathan Glazer of sociology opposed the committee's proposal. Feuer offered an amendment that committed the university to nonintervention in matters of speech and advocacy only when they were "directed to no immediate act of force and violence."
![Academic Senate Debates 2](images/fileicons/nodigital.png)
Date: 12/8/1964Call Number: CE 707Format: 1/4 7 1/2 ipsCollection: Colin Edwards Free Speech Movement
Continuation of previous recording. The discussion on the resolution and the amendment continues as various professors speak for and against the motions.
![Academic Senate Debates 3](images/fileicons/nodigital.png)
Date: 12/8/1964Call Number: CE 708Format: 1/4 7 1/2 ipsCollection: Colin Edwards Free Speech Movement
Conclusion of academic senate debate/meeting.
The Feuer amendment was defeated 737 to 284; the vote on the original proposals carried 824 to 115.
3 Documents Found