Search Results
4 Documents Found
![Academic Senate Debates 1](images/fileicons/nodigital.png)
Date: 12/8/1964Call Number: CE 706Format: 1/4 7 1/2 ipsCollection: Colin Edwards Free Speech Movement
The discussion revolved around the proposal of the senate's academic freedom committee endorsing the Free Speech Movement's basic positions on the disciplinary proceedings and the time, place, and content of speech and advocacy.
Lewis Feuer of philosophy and Nathan Glazer of sociology opposed the committee's proposal. Feuer offered an amendment that committed the university to nonintervention in matters of speech and advocacy only when they were "directed to no immediate act of force and violence."
![Faculty Interviews Nov. 30th Reel 1](images/fileicons/nodigital.png)
Call Number: CE 751Format: 1/4 7 1/2 ipsProducers: Colin EdwardsCollection: Colin Edwards Free Speech Movement
Colin Edwards interviews three faculty members regarding the events of November 1966. Professor Peter Scott talks about football players working with the police and the role of non-students in the protest as well as explaining what that term actually means. Professor Zelnick talks about student, faculty, regent, administration views on the December 8th resolutions supposedly providing more power to the faculty and students for example regarding disciplinary issues.
![Faculty Interviews Nov. 30th Reel 2](images/fileicons/nodigital.png)
Call Number: CE 752Format: 1/4 7 1/2 ipsProducers: Colin EdwardsCollection: Colin Edwards Free Speech Movement
Part 2 of Colin Edwards interview with three faculty members following the November 30th 1966 events. Professor Stocking talks about his definition of the term non-student, talks about the cultural situation on the Berkeley campus and how the administration continues to misread the culture, and that the leaders of the protests are some of Berkeley's best and brightest students. The interview concludes with conversations on student amnesty, police brutality, faculty divisions and the fear of UC Berkeley of outside political forces.
![UC Noon Rally Reel 1](images/fileicons/nodigital.png)
Date: 12/1/1966Call Number: CE 762Format: 1/4 3 3/4 ipsProducers: Colin EdwardsCollection: Colin Edwards Free Speech Movement
Reel 1 of audio from the the noon rally at which the strikers were to decide whether to continue the strike. Students and faculty as well as grad students speak at the rally, all of whom are essentially for continuing the strike. Robert Mundy from the strike committee talks about education, law, the administration, etc. Announcement is made that there was a rumor that Mario Savio would be arrested if he came on campus, so if he did come, he was to get the mic straight away before the police got him. A speaker from SDS talks about the Navy table incident. Hal Draper discusses demands, amnesty, Navy recruitment, and non-students. Dan McIntosh, president of the ASUC, talks about the ASUC vote to support the strike and announces support from the National Student Association. Bob Atkins from the AFT (TA union) talks about the effect of a labor union striking. Two professors (Rogen and Hearst?) speak on the role of faculty. At the end, the group votes to maintain the same demands.
4 Documents Found