Search Results
![Segments of 1st Part of KPFA program on November 30th UC disturbance](images/fileicons/nodigital.png)
Call Number: CE 748Format: 1/4 3 3/4 ipsProducers: Colin EdwardsProgram: KPFACollection: Colin Edwards Free Speech Movement
Audio from the demonstration after the November 30th incident involving students protesting a Navy recruitment table. Mario Savio and other students try to decide whether to occupy the building past its closing time and how to deal with a demonstration divided by police. Police begin making arrests and an administrator talks about having an open forum.
Speed changes partway through.
![November 30th Revolt: Participant reflections](images/fileicons/nodigital.png)
Call Number: CE 749Format: 1/4 7 1/2 ipsProducers: Colin EdwardsCollection: Colin Edwards Free Speech Movement
Interview with Leo Bach, general manager of the Berkeley Free Press, who had been in the downstairs of the student union on 11/30/66. He describes the series of events that unfolded around student opposition to a Navy recruitment table, police violence (including encouraging violence by football players against progressive students), and arrests. Interviews with several students who were present and describe their experiences with police violence and the variety of police forces and agencies present, including the FBI. Leo Bach’s interview plays at 7½ ips while the rest of the tape is 3¾.
![Main Floor ASUC November 30 1966 Reel 1](images/fileicons/nodigital.png)
Date: 11/30/1966Call Number: CE 753Format: 1/4 7 1/2 ipsProducers: Colin EdwardsCollection: Colin Edwards Free Speech Movement
Discussion from within the main floor of the ASUC building during the November 30th, 1966 demonstration. About twelve people, mostly students and one faculty member, discuss the possibility of a strike the following day and how to organize it. Most students are in favor of the strike and talk about how to set up picket lines as well as involve the TAs and faculty.
Has many splices that can break.
![Main Floor ASUC November 30 1966 Reel 2](images/fileicons/nodigital.png)
Date: 11/30/1966Call Number: CE 754Format: 1/4 7 1/2 ipsProducers: Colin EdwardsCollection: Colin Edwards Free Speech Movement
More discussion from within the demonstration in the ASUC building on November 30th, 1966. Students and faculty continue to talk about the possibility of striking the following day. Professor Henkin tried to call a vote on postponing the strike, which students called a "cheap demagogic trick." They discuss the Mulford Act arrests of non-students and the status of non-students. Students find out that ASUC voted to strike if two demands were not met before the following morning. Speakers who are opposed to the idea of a strike are given the stage to talk.
![Main Floor Discussion](images/fileicons/nodigital.png)
Date: 11/30/1966Call Number: CE 755Format: 1/4 3 3/4 ipsProducers: Colin EdwardsCollection: Colin Edwards Free Speech Movement
Parts of Main Floor Reel 2, beginning with the speaker who is a non-student talking about the problems with admissions, ending slightly after the last speaker from Main Floor Reel 2, with less than a minute of the moderator's voice.
![Main Floor ASUC November 30 1966 Reel 3](images/fileicons/nodigital.png)
Date: 11/30/1966Call Number: CE 756Format: 1/4 7 1/2 ipsProducers: Colin EdwardsCollection: Colin Edwards Free Speech Movement
More discussion from within the demonstration in the ASUC building on November 30th, 1966. Students and faculty continue to talk about the possibility of striking the following day. Speakers discuss how leaders have been singled out, the campus issues that students disagree with, the faculty's inaction, the willingness of graduate students to help with a strike, as well as reasons not to strike. The third speaker announces that bail has been set at $3300 per person for the three non-students who had been arrested. He presents the three demands for the strike: No police on campus, amnesty for participants in the demonstration, and student power on campus.
![UC Noon Rally Reel 2](images/fileicons/nodigital.png)
Date: 12/1/1966Call Number: CE 763Producers: Colin EdwardsCollection: Colin Edwards Free Speech Movement
Reel 2 of audio from the noon rally on December 1st, 1966 determining whether or not to continue the strike into the next day.
![UC December 1st 1966 Speakers](images/fileicons/nodigital.png)
Date: 12/1/1966Call Number: CE 765Format: 1/4 3 3/4 ipsProducers: Colin EdwardsCollection: Colin Edwards Free Speech Movement
Interviews with individuals present at the ASUC building before, during, and after the Navy table incident. Mike Lerner, a graduate student, describes the Navy table incident in good detail, giving a clear chronology of events. Professor Linden, a visiting law professor from Toronto, describes the frustration and lack of trust between students and the administration, the idealism of students versus the administration "trying to do their jobs," and describes the police incident. He says that faculty probably won't support student demands, but are concerned about the use of police. Frank Bardackey as well as three students interviewed together (Leni, Sandra, and Rod) and student Ray Neinstein all describe the Navy table and police incidents from their perspectives. A statement by Mike Parker of the steering committee of the GCC and a member of the strike committee is played. Finally, Colleen Goldstick, a member of Women for Peace who helped set up the anti-draft table, is interviewed about her experience.
![December 5th 1966 Rally Reel 1](images/fileicons/nodigital.png)
Date: 12/5/1966Call Number: CE 769Format: 1/4 7 1/2 ipsProducers: Colin EdwardsCollection: Colin Edwards Free Speech Movement
Audio from December 5, 1966 rally
![December 5th 1966 Rally Reel 2](images/fileicons/nodigital.png)
Date: 12/5/1966Call Number: CE 770Format: 1/4 7 1/2 ipsProducers: Colin EdwardsCollection: Colin Edwards Free Speech Movement
Audio from December 5, 1966 rally.