[News] Time for New Palestinian Political Strategy
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Tue Oct 12 11:52:03 EDT 2010
Dr. Elias Akleh: Time for New Palestinian Political Strategy
Posted: 11 Oct 2010 07:46 PM PDT
http://www.intifada-palestine.com/2010/10/dr-elias-akleh-time-for-new-palestinian-political-strategy/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+intifada-palestine%2FyTiY+%28Intifada+Palestine%29
By Dr. Elias Akleh
Palestinians had long lost confidence in their
Palestinian Authority as their representative,
who was supposed to defend their rights and work
to achieve their statehood. Mahmoud Abbas, the
Palestinian President, was imposed on the
Palestinians in the 2005 election when the
Israeli forces had arrested and restricted the
movements of other Palestinian candidates and his
campaign was given 94% of TV coverage. Although
his presidency had expired in January of 2009 he
is still, illegally and unconstitutionally,
occupying his position. Polls had shown that his popularity is very low.
Palestinian Prime Minister, Salam Fayyad, and his
government were also imposed on Palestinians when
Abbas appointed him to the position after the
democratically elected Hamas government foiled an
<http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/gaza200804>American
coup détat that eventually caused a division between the Palestinians.
The Palestinians were deceived by the signing of
the 1993 Oslo Accords. They were misled that the
Accords would be merely the first step in a plan
that would eventually lead to Israeli withdrawal
back to the 1967 Armistice Lines and to the
establishment of a Palestinian State in the West
Bank and Gaza Strip by 1995. Thus Yasser Arafat
had dramatically altered the charter of the
Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) to
reflect a new strategy of denouncing the
legitimate armed resistance (labeled violence at
the time), abandoning the liberation of all
Palestine, accepting and recognizing the
existence of the Israeli state on 78% of
Palestine, and announcing peaceful negotiations
as the only strategic choice for solving the Palestinian/Israeli conflict.
Arafat and his PLO were allowed to enter the West
Bank, and to establish a Palestinian Authority
(PA), whose job was to administer the Palestinian
affairs during the interim period until
statehood. Without an independent economy, and
being under the mercy of the American-controlled
Quartet funding the PA had no power and no
autonomy and eventually, under western pressure
to fulfill the conditions of the Oslo Accord and
the Road Map, functioned as an Israeli tool and a
front line to guarantee Israeli security by
quelling any Palestinian resistance to expanding
Israeli colonization (settlements) in the West
Bank. It further served to legitimize political
concessions given to Israel in the hope for achieving the illusive statehood.
Although the PA had fulfilled the conditions of
the Oslo Accord and all the other agreements that
followed, the successive Israeli governments did
not withdraw an inch from the Occupied
Territories; rather, they adopted more aggressive expansionist policies.
Finally, recognizing that negotiations are not
getting him even the smallest gain that he could
show to his people, Arafat stopped cooperating
and refused to give any more concessions. Western
pressure was applied forcing him to accept the
assignment of Mahmoud Abbas as the Prime Minister
of the Palestinian Authority in 2003. Abbas was
set to continue the negotiations. When Arafat did
not grant Abbas any real power causing him to
resign he was assassinated by poisoning. Abbas,
then, took his place and continued the charade of futile negotiations.
The PA was established basically to enter into
peace negotiations with Israel. Unfortunately its
negotiating team is very weak since the PA had
burnt all its bargaining chips by denouncing
armed struggle, pursuing Palestinian freedom
fighters and imprisoning them, being divided into
Gaza Strip and Western Bank, and not having
serious support from the rest of the Arab
countries. On the other hand Israel holds all the
cards; the Israeli army has total military
control of all Palestine, controls the movement
of Palestinians through hundreds of check points,
controls all borders and determines who could
leave or come into territories including all the
Palestinian officials, controls all the
Palestinian resources especially water, imprisons
1.5 million Gazans into an open prison besides
the 11 thousand prisoners in Israeli jails, and
encourages and finances extremist armed settlers,
who routinely terrorize Palestinian civilians and
build their own colonies on stolen Palestinian
land. On top of all that Israel has the
financial, military and political support of the US.
Lately the international civil communities in
Europe and in the US started to sympathize with
the Palestinian cause and to join a campaign of
boycotting and divesting out of Israeli companies
and Israeli educational systems especially after
witnessing the latest crimes against humanity of
Israeli governments committed against
Palestinians in general, their war crimes in Gaza
Strip, their crimes of international political
assassinations, and their open sea piracy and
flagrant violations of international laws and many UN resolutions.
Re-engaging into the futile theatrical charade of
peace negotiations with the Palestinians has
become a necessity for the Israeli government to
give the impression that Israel is seeking peace.
Of course Israel will impose its impossible to
accept conditions in order to accuse Palestinians
of being an obstacle to peace.
Lacking any bargaining power and without any
serious support from their brethren Arab leaders
or from the US controlled international political
community the Palestinian negotiating team could
do nothing except appeal to the Israeli sense of
fairness to achieve any political gain. But
Israeli governments have no sense of fairness or
justice and aspire only for more expansion and
for the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.
The demands of the Palestinian negotiating team
had shrunk dramatically. From the original
struggle for liberating whole Palestine the PLO
had downgraded its aspiration and strategy to
acceptance of the Israeli occupation in the hope
of establishing a Palestinian State on the meager
22% of original Palestine and then lately to a
mere freeze of colonization (settlements) for
just few months. It seems that the whole
Palestinian cause has been summarized in
settlements only. They have forgotten all other
forms of Israeli occupation, oppression and
terror such as the siege of Gaza, the arrest of
civilians including women and children in mass,
the theft of land, the terror of extremist
religious settlers against Palestinian
communities, the demolition of Palestinian homes
especially in Jerusalem, the eviction of
Palestinian Jerusalemites from their homes and
the burning of Islamic mosques among the numerous other crimes.
The Israelis had stalled all peace negotiations.
They never stopped their aggression against
Palestinians; rather they intensified their
oppression and their colonization specifically
during peace talks. According to Ansar Al-Asra, a
Palestinian human rights organization, Israel had
focused its aggression towards Palestinian
children targeting them for arrest, imprisonment,
and torture in an attempt to break the spirit of
resistance since childhood. Israelis never
stopped expansion but increased it particularly
during negotiations. They never dismantled any
check point despite their claim of doing so. They
continued imposing unacceptable pr-conditions to
sabotage negotiations. Their so-called late
freeze of settlement, which excluded settlements
in East Jerusalem and the already ongoing
settlements, came only to pull the legs of
Palestinians into negotiations in an attempt to
improve their internationally tarnished
reputations after their piracy against the
international humanitarian flotilla. Once
negotiations started the settlements frenzy continued.
<http://www.middleeastmonitor.org.uk/news/middle-east/1561-statistics-show-that-120-jewish-settlements-expanded-during-the-qfreezeq>Statistics
released by Land Research Centre show that during
the 10 months of alleged freeze 120 illegal
Israeli colonies were expanded , 1520 housing
units were built, more Palestinian land was
usurped, agricultural land was destroyed, 280
homes and other structures were demolished, and
13 Palestinian homes were seized by extremist
settlers. On September 28th the Israeli high
court gave a judgment for settlers to evacuate
tens more of Palestinian families from their
homes in Sheikh Jarrah, a Jerusalem neighborhood,
to be occupied by Israeli settlers. On October
10th the Israeli Knesset succumbed to the demands
of the extremist Avigdor Liebermans Yisrael
Beitenu Party and approved the racist
<http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2010/10/2010101013028364300.html>loyalty
oath bill demanding every new immigrant to swear
loyalty to the Jewish democratic Israel. Such
bill comes as a first step of transferring more Palestinians out of Israel.
For almost the last 20 years of peace talks
between Palestinian negotiating team and the
successive Israeli governments the Palestinians
kept yielding one concession after the other
while Israel kept expanding one settlement after
the other. Israelis had never missed any
opportunity to reject every Arab peace offer
including the best offer Arabs could give, the
2002 Arab Peace Initiative that would guarantee
Israeli security and normalize relationship with
all its Arab nations providing Israel withdraws
to pre-1967 borders. Peace contradicts with the
Zionist expansionist dream in the Arab World.
There is a consensus that the path of peace
negotiations has miserably failed and would never
yield peace, yet members of the Palestinian
negotiating team insist on negotiating because it
secures their positions. Arab leaders support
negotiations in the hope of containing the
Arab/Israeli conflict in Palestine only. Israel
wants negotiations to extract more political
concessions. The US calls for negotiations in
order to appear as an honest peace broker while
at the same time guarantees Israeli military
superiority in the region. The losers are
Palestinians themselves; negotiations had harmed
their cause; they have lost more land and more rights.
There is a dire need for an immediate new more
assertive Palestinian political strategy. There
is an urgent need for a new more effective
Palestinian election, involving not only
Palestinians under Israeli occupation, but also
Palestinians in all Palestinian refugee camps and
in exile, to choose a more representing political
body, who would sincerely and assertively fight
for the Palestinian rights on the international
arena. The 17 years old Palestinian negotiating
team with its futile negotiate-only mindset needs
to be dismantled and be replaced with another
team who is ready to negotiate only after Israel
withdraws back to 1967 borders. The
effectiveness of this new Palestinian body
depends on the Arab League re-instating the
Palestinian issue as the major Arab cause in
totality and to support Palestinians in every form of resistance.
Further, and most important, the legitimate armed
resistance to Israeli occupation must be
re-introduced alongside the political struggle as
an indispensable method for liberation.
Aggressive armed resistance to the Israeli
occupation is the only deterrent Palestinians
have to stop Israeli expansion. The Egyptian
October 1973 War liberating Suez Canal and
Hezbollahs liberation of south Lebanon in 2000
serve as good examples for the saying what was
stolen by force could not be regained except by force.
Dr. Elias Akleh is an Arab writer from a
Palestinian descent born in the town of Beit
Jala. His family was first evicted from Haifa
after the Nakba of 1948, then from Beit Jala
after the Nakseh of 1967. He lives now in the
US, and publishes his articles on the web in both English and Arabic.
Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
415 863-9977
www.Freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20101012/3a2a1056/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list