[News] Venezuela’s Bolivarian Revolution in the Crosshairs of US Imperialism
news at freedomarchives.org
Fri Jun 7 11:21:37 EDT 2019
Venezuela’s Bolivarian Revolution in the Crosshairs of US Imperialism
by Roger Harris <https://www.counterpunch.org/author/roger-harris/> -
June 7, 2019
With the likes of John Bolton and Elliot Abrams directing US foreign
policy, the US government has abandoned all pretense of “plausible
denial” for its illegal regime-change initiatives. The “humanitarian”
bombs may not be falling but, make no mistake, the US is waging a
full-bore war against the Bolivarian Revolution in Venezuela.
Back in 1998, Venezuela had had nearly a half a century of two-party
rule. A duopoly, not unlike the Republican and Democratic parties in the
US, alternated in power imposing a neoliberal order. Poor and working
people experienced deteriorating conditions of austerity regardless of
which party was in power.
Then third-party candidate Hugo Chávez was elected president. HeH He
initiated what has become known as the Bolivarian Revolution, which has
inspired the peoples of the world while engendering the enmity of both
the US imperialists and the Venezuelan elites.
This article explores the contributions, shortcomings, and lessons of
the Bolivarian Revolution’s two decades, in the context of the US
regime-change efforts from its inception to current attempts by the US
to install the unelected Juan Guaidó as Venezuela’s president.
*Forging a new national identity based on a people’s history. *
History, it is said, is written by the victors. The historical narrative
typically reflects the class that enslaved the Africans, dispossessed
the Indigenous, and exploited the workers. There are exceptions. In the
US, we have the legacy of Howard Zinn’s /People’s History of the United
In Venezuela, Chávez revised his country’s history and thereby wrought a
sea change of national consciousness. Prior to Chávez, Venezuela was
arguably the most sycophantically pro-US country in South America. Miami
was looked to for cultural affirmation; baseball was the national pastime.
Chávez took special inspiration from the leader of the South American
struggle against Spanish colonialism and named his project after Simón
Bolívar, known as the “Liberator.” Bolívar was not merely a national
leader, but a true internationalist. The Bolivarian project is about the
integration of nations based on mutual respect and sovereignty. Bolívar
presciently declared in 1829: “The United States appears to be destined
by Providence to plague Latin America with misery in the name of liberty.”
This new Venezuelan national identity and consciousness, based on their
history told from the bottom up, may prove to be the most lasting legacy
of the Bolivarian Revolution.
Fundamental to the Bolivarian project has been the inclusion of the
formerly dispossessed: especially women, people of color, and youth.
As professor of Latin American history at NYU Greg Grandin observed,
this inclusiveness has awakened “a deep fear of the primal hatred,
racism, and fury of the opposition, which for now is directed at the
agents of Maduro’s state but really springs from Chávez’s expansion of
the public sphere to include Venezuela’s poor.”
For example, when an opposition demonstration came upon an
Afro-descendent street peddler, he was presumed to be a /chavista/
because he was dark-skinned and poor. The opposition demonstrators
poured gasoline over him and set him on fire. Then the horrific image
was posted on social media.
A less gruesome example occurred at the Venezuelan Embassy in
Washington, DC. North American activists in solidarity with the
Bolivarian government protected the embassy in accordance with
international law from being usurped by representatives of US-backed
Juan Guaidó for 36 days. Before the protectors were evicted by the US
Secret Service on May 16, counter-protesting opposition expatriate
Venezuelans would wave bananas at African American solidarity activists,
chanting “go back to the zoo.” Such is the racist loathing that fuels
the Venezuelan opposition.
*Special option for poor and working people. *
Why should a state of all the people have a special option for those who
are poor and working? Because these are the people who most need the
social welfare services of the state. Billionaires don’t need government
schools, hospitals, and housing, but the masses of Venezuelan people do.
The Bolivarian project had halved poverty and cut extreme poverty by
two-thirds, while providing free health care and education. On May 27,
the United Nations cited Venezuela as one of the top countries for
guaranteeing the right to housing, recognizing the over 2.5 million
public housing units built.
*Democracy promotion. *
The role of a state aspiring to be socialist is not simply to provide
social welfare, but to empower the people.
The Bolivarian project has experimented in what is called “protagonistic
democracy”: cooperatives, citizens councils, and communes. Some
succeeded; others did not. One of the first priorities was to eradicate
illiteracy. The Bolivarian state has promoted community radio stations,
low-cost computers, internet cafés for senior citizens, and other venues
for popular expression. Venezuela now has one of the highest rates of
higher education attendance in the world. These are not the hallmarks of
*21^st century socialism. *
More than even Bernie Sanders, the Bolivarian Revolution put socialism
on the agenda for the 21^st century. For this we owe the Venezuelans a
debt of gratitude, not for providing us with a playbook to be copied,
but for demonstrating that the creation of a better world is principally
This was not the primary transgression placing Venezuela in the
crosshairs of US imperialism. Promoting socialism may be regarded as
blasphemy, but the original sin is the following.
*Multi-polar world and regional integration. *
The greatest challenge to the Empire, to the world’s sole superpower, is
a multi-polar world based on regional integration. In 1999, Chávez
helped strengthen OPEC (Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries).
In 2004, he helped initiate ALBA (Alliance for Our Peoples of America),
followed by PetroCaribe in 2005, UNASUR (Union of South American
Nations) in 2008, and CELAC (Community of Latin American and Caribbean
States) in 2011. Venezuela has consistently demonstrated solidarity with
the Palestinian struggle and other oppressed peoples.
When the small fish organize, the big fish gets nasty. Above all, this
is why the world’s hegemon has targeted Venezuela.
*The traumatic transition from Chávez to Maduro*
Chávez, suffering from cancer, died on March 5, 2013. The reaction in
Venezuela was polarized. The elites danced in the street. The majority,
composed mainly of poor and working people, were traumatized.
The bully to the north, smelling blood, saw an opportunity. The US had
conspired to overthrow the Bolivarian Revolution from the beginning,
backing a short-lived coup in 2002 followed by a boss’s strike. With the
passing of Chávez, the imperialist offensive doubled down.
A snap election was called according to the Venezuelan Constitution for
April 14 to replace the deceased president. Chávez, anticipating his
demise, had designated Nicolás Maduro as his successor. Although polls
had shown Maduro with a 10% lead going into the election campaign, he
won with a narrow 1.5% margin.
I was in Caracas as an election observer when Maduro won. My observation
of the election was like that of former US President Jimmy Carter, who
had declared a year before that of the 92 elections the Carter Center
had observed, “The election process in Venezuela is the best in the world.”
Within minutes of the announcement of Maduro’s victory, the main
opposition candidate, Henrique Capriles, came on TV to denounce the
election as fraudulent and call on the people to “show their rage.” Thus
began the opposition’s violent offensive, the /guarimbas, /to achieve by
violence what they could not achieve in democratic elections.
The opposition charges of fraud were investigated by Venezuela’s
National Electoral Council (CNE) and found groundless, based on a 100%
audit of the electronic vote backed up with paper receipts. Capriles
still maintained the charge of fraud, and the US became the sole nation
to refuse to recognize the Maduro presidency. The opposition violence
continued, taking over 40 lives.
Upon assuming the presidency, Maduro inherited existing problems of
crime, inefficiency, corruption, inflation, and a dysfunctional currency
exchange system. These were problems that existed during the Chávez
period and even prior to that. These problems persist in varying degrees
to the present, despite concerted programs to address them.
President Maduro has had his feet held to the fire by the imperialists
from the get-go. Far from having a respite, shortly into his presidency,
Venezuela was hit with petroleum prices plummeting from a high of nearly
$125/barrel to a low of close to $25/barrel. Despite efforts to
diversify the economy, Venezuela remains dependent on oil exports for
most of its foreign exchange, which is used to fund the social programs.
*US regime-change war intensifies*
The US regime-change war continues to intensify with increasingly harsh
sanctions. These unilateral measures are illegal under the charters of
the United Nations and the Organization of American States, because they
constitute collective punishment. Trump’s security advisor, John Bolton,
elucidates: “It’s like in /Star Wars/, when Darth Vader grips someone.
That’s what we’re doing economically with the (Venezuelan) regime.”
In 2013, the US waited until after the presidential election in
Venezuela to declare it fraudulent. Taking no chances, the US declared
the 2018 election fraudulent four months before it was held. Joining
Trump in this rush to pre-judgement were eleven Democratic senators
including Bernie Sanders.
The charges of fraud were based on three issues: setting the date of the
election, disqualifying opposition parties, and barring opposition
candidates. Maduro had continually called for dialogue with the
opposition to set the election date. But each time a date was mutually
agreed upon, the opposition backed out after their US handlers
intervened. As for the disqualified parties, they had lost their ballot
status because they had boycotted past elections. They then refused to
reapply for ballot status, because their intention was not to
participate in the electoral process.
Opposition candidates, namely Leopoldo López and Henrique Capriles, were
barred from running, because they had committed criminal acts that
warranted their exclusion. López clearly incited violence that resulted
in deaths and would have received far harsher treatment had he committed
such acts in the US. Capriles was convicted of economic fraud,
“administrative irregularities,” during his tenure as a state governor.
While the courts found Capriles guilty, this action against a political
opponent damaged the Maduro government’s international image.
Overall, the charges of fraud by the radical right opposition were
mainly pretenses to delegitimize the upcoming election. However, several
moderate opposition candidates did run, defying the US demand that the
election be boycotted.
Henri Falcón was the leading opposition candidate to run in 2018,
championing a neoliberal platform of privatization, austerity for
workers, and subservience to the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The
US, which would ordinarily gleefully embrace such a platform, instead
threatened Falcón with sanctions for breaking the election boycott.
The explanation for this seemingly anomalous behavior by the US
government is that the stakes in Venezuela are much higher than just the
presidency. The regime-change project is to exterminate the Bolivarian
Revolution, reverse its social gains, and return Venezuela to a
subservient client state where the world’s largest oil reserves would be
freely exploited by US corporations.
*Orwellian world of US foreign policy*
As CEO of the capitalist world order (that is what is meant by
exercising “American world leadership”), then US President Obama
declared in 2015 that Venezuela constituted an imminent and
extraordinary threat to US national security. He didn’t mean a military
or even an economic threat. That would have been preposterous. What
Obama was implicitly confirming is that Venezuela poses a “threat of a
good example.” Venezuela is at the top of US imperialism’s hit list
because of the good things, not for its faults.
President Trump has intensified Obama’s regime-change policies aimed at
Venezuela. Condemning the Bolivarian Revolution, Trump opined:
“Socialism is not about justice, it’s not about equality, it’s not about
lifting up the poor.” Might he have been really thinking of capitalism?
His national security advisor John Bolton tweeted that removing the
democratically elected President Maduro by violent coup and installing
the US-anointed and unelected Guaidó is protecting the Venezuelan
On the other side of the aisle, Senator Sanders accused Chávez of being
a “dead communist dictator.” Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez described the US
regime-change war as a contest of “authoritarian regime versus
democracy,” with the questionable presumption that the US is the democracy.
In the Orwellian terminology of US politicians and corporate media, a
/fraudulent election/ is one where the people vote their choice. A
/dictator/ is the democratically elected choice of the people. And the
so-called dictator is an /authoritarian/ if he resists rather than
surrenders to the bullying power.
Surrender does not appear to be on the agenda for the Bolivarian
Revolution, with US asset Guaidó forced to negotiate in Norway after his
failed coup attempts. Despite the suffocating sanctions and threats of
military action, the poor and working people in Venezuela who are most
adversely affected by the US war against them remain the strongest
supporters of their elected government.
Make Orwell fiction again!
*/Roger Harris /*/is on the board of the Task Force on the Americas
<http://taskforceamericas.org/>, a 32-year-old anti-imperialist human
Freedom Archives 522 Valencia Street San Francisco, CA 94110 415
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the News