[News] Venezuela’s Upcoming Double Confrontation
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Fri Jan 15 13:13:37 EST 2016
Venezuela’s Upcoming Double-Confrontation
*http://venezuelanalysis.com/analysis/11816*
<http://venezuelanalysis.com/printmail/11816><http://venezuelanalysis.com/print/11816>
By Gregory Wilpert – TeleSUR English , January 14th 2016
Following the Venezuelan opposition’s recent electoral victory in the
Dec. 6 parliamentary elections, the opposition seems to be more
determined than ever to steer towards an outright confrontation with the
president. The goal is to destabilize the government as much as
possible, with the aim of achieving his ouster before the end of the year.
The new National Assembly president said that his aim is to have a plan
in place for president Maduro’s ouster within the first six months of
2016. Ramos Allup furthered this confrontation Jan. 6, when he swore in
three opposition members as representatives, whose election the Supreme
Court had previously put on hold due to electoral irregularities. On
Monday, January 11, the Supreme Court thus declared that the National
Assembly president had acted in defiance of the Court and that from now
on all laws that the National Assembly passes are null and void, since
the assembly had incorporated members into its body that should not be
there.
The political confrontation between the legislature and the executive is
thus programmed. The next conflict will be about the amnesty law, by
which the opposition intends to free all so-called political prisoners,
that is, all opposition figures who have been involved in violent
protest of one kind or another, many of whom have been held responsible
for deaths of innocent bystanders. Ramos Allup already warned Maduro
that if he and the Supreme Court do not implement the amnesty law, he
will begin removing ministers from Maduro’s cabinet: “Whether or not he
accepts [the amnesty law] will not matter, to which we will say, ‘We do
not accept his naming of ministers.’”
The options for the new opposition-dominated National Assembly to get
rid of Maduro are several. As mentioned above, it can remove not only
the ministers and the vice-president (though this could lead to new
National Assembly elections if the vice president is removed three times
in a row), remove the heads of other branches of government, such as the
Supreme Court, the attorney general, or the National Electoral Council
(with prior approval from either the Supreme Court or the attorney
general), amend or reform the constitution (which then has to be
submitted to a referendum), or call for a constitutional assembly
(followed by a referendum).
Also, there is a lot of speculation that the opposition might try to
organize a recall referendum against Maduro, but doing so would require
the collection of 20 percent of registered voters’ signatures, which
amounts over 3.8 million signatures. This latter course is a difficult
undertaking. In comparison, when the opposition organized the recall
referendum against president Chávez in 2004, it had to collect only 2.5
million signatures because the electorate was substantially smaller.
Aside from the project to remove Maduro and to give amnesty to its
law-breaking supporters, the oppositional National Assembly also plans
to introduce a number of laws that could undermine the Maduro
presidency. A populist measure that the opposition has wanted to pass
for a long time is to give ownership titles to the beneficiaries of the
housing mission. Over the past five years the government has constructed
one million public homes, which it has essentially leased to families in
perpetuity, but without giving them a title that can be bought and sold.
The reasoning behind this is to avoid the development of a speculative
housing market of homes built with public funds. The opposition is
betting that most public housing beneficiaries would prefer a saleable
ownership title, so that they can sell the home and thereby possibly
make a profit from it.
Another law that would probably get the president into trouble is a
rumored project to dollarize the economy. It is obvious to everyone in
Venezuela that the current economic situation of high inflation,
frequent shortages of basic goods, long lines at supermarkets, and a
massive black market for price-controlled products, is not sustainable.
One “solution” to these problems that some opposition leaders have
favored it to simply get rid of the local currency, the bolivar, and
base the entire economy on dollars, just as Ecuador did in 2001. Aside
from undermining the country’s economic sovereignty, such a move would
also almost definitely mean major painful displacements for economy,
leading to increased inequality and unemployment. No doubt the
opposition would then try to blame Maduro for this, but it is possible
of course that they themselves would end up carrying a large part of the
blame, which is why the opposition will enter into this project neither
unambiguously nor unanimously.
Other major projects on the opposition docket include the repeal of a
wide variety of progressive laws that were passed during the Chavez and
Maduro presidencies, beginning with the land reform, re-privatization of
key industries, and the dismantling of price controls, among other things.
Finally, the opposition has also announced that it will convoke special
investigation commissions. Among these are commissions to investigate
corruption within the executive and another to investigate the
credentials of newly appointed Supreme Court judges. The investigation
of the judges could lead to the removal of several of these because the
Supreme Court law allows for the removal of judges who do not meet the
fairly tough requirements for appointment.
On the Chavista side of the confrontation the options for maneuvering
are even tougher. Here the foremost issue for the government is how to
deal with the on-going economic crisis, which is bound to get worse
especially since the price of oil is tumbling. While the price of an
average Venezuelan barrel of oil reached a high of US$55 per barrel in
early 2015, the most recent figures point to half that amount, at US$27
per barrel. Unless this price recovers, this could be devastating for
Venezuela, especially since 95 percent of the country’s export earnings
and 50 percent of its fiscal budget come from the sale of oil.
The 50 percent collapse in the price of oil over the past eight months,
however, means a far larger collapse in revenues because a large
proportion of Venezuela’s oil is extra-heavy oil that is expensive to
extract, reaching a high of around US$20-$25 per barrel, leaving
relatively little to no profit at such low prices. In other words, a 50
percent drop in the price of oil represents a far larger than 50
percent drop in revenues for the state.
Maduro recently named a new cabinet, reshuffling many positions, but in
the key position of vice president for the economic area, Luis Salas,
Maduro appointed someone considered to be a proponent of the same
policies as before, who says that price controls and the currency
control must be maintained and that the government’s main weakness has
been in the area of enforcement of existing policies. In other words,
even though the country is now waiting for the announcement of a
promised “economic emergency plan,” it seems doubtful that this plan
will signal a significant departure from the economic policies so far.
The drop in revenues, combined with an inflationary spiral that the
economic war of smuggling, hoarding, and speculation and that the black
market for dollars have inflicted on Venezuela, signal a very difficult
near-term future for Venezuela’s economy and everyone in it. Some
economists warn of possible hyperinflation and of an inability to pay
its foreign bills (balance of payments crisis).
In short, Venezuela is heading towards two confrontations
simultaneously, where each threatens to exacerbate the other: one
economic and the other political. What the prospects are for overcoming
these confrontations is impossible to predict at this moment. Within the
chavista social movements and the governing party, the PSUV (United
Socialist Party of Venezuela), more and more voices are calling on the
government to organize a massive consultation process with the
grassroots, which is something that Maduro has endorsed, but it remains
an open question whether these will happen in time and if it does,
whether it will be able to provide solutions that will allow the
Bolivarian Revolution to move forwards, despite the reinvigorated
opposition in parliament.
--
Freedom Archives 522 Valencia Street San Francisco, CA 94110 415
863.9977 www.freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20160115/ced2f3f4/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list