[News] Playing the Anti-Semitism Card Against Venezuela
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Fri Sep 4 12:29:17 EDT 2009
Playing the Anti-Semitism Card Against Venezuela
https://nacla.org/node/6106
Sep 3 2009
Eric Wingerter and Justin Delacour
In the early morning hours of January 31, vandals
broke into Tiferet Israel, a Sephardic synagogue
in Caracas. They strewed sacred scrolls on the
floor and scribbled Death to the Jews and other
anti-Semitic epithets on the walls, before making
off with computer equipment and historical
artifacts. Understandably, the incident
frightened and upset many in the Venezuelan
Jewish community. Right away, U.S. news outlets,
including The New York Times and The Miami
Herald, linked the incident to Venezuelas
increasingly strained relations with Israel,
after the two countries suspended diplomatic
relations two weeks earlier over Israels bombing
of Gaza, then still under way.
A Herald editorial went so far as to describe an
official policy of anti-Semitism in Venezuela
and implied that Chávezs foreign policy had
unleashed a wave of anti-Semitic violence in the
country, culminating in the assault on the
synagogue.1 Some international NGOs were no more
nuanced. Just hours after the break-in, the
U.S.-based Anti-Defamation League (ADL) was
already implicitly comparing the Chávez
government to the Nazis, calling the synagogue
attack a modern-day Kristallnacht.2
But the Caracas police investigation bore out a
different story. Authorities quickly realized
that the synagogues security fence had been cut
from the inside, prompting detectives to
investigate the break-in as an inside job. Within
the week it became clear that the attack had in
fact been a robbery disguised as anti-Semitic
vandalism, carried out by the synagogues
privately contracted security team. Eleven men
were arrested for their role in the plot, and
their statements to the police indicated that the
graffiti and desecration were intended to throw off investigators.3
Although the arrests helped ease the anxieties of
Venezuelas Jewish community, the international
media pressed on with the storyline of a
politically motivated attack. The very week that
the Venezuelan Israelite Association issued a
statement praising the swift and successful
investigation, The Washington Post ran an
editorial titled Mr. Chavez vs. the Jews, which
again blamed the robbery on the government, or,
more specifically, on an ugly comment left on a
pro-government Web site, demanding that
citizens publicly challenge every Jew that you
find in the street, shopping center or park and
called for a boycott of Jewish-owned businesses,
seizures of Jewish-owned property and a
demonstration at Caracass largest synagogue.4
The editorial concluded that the synagogue was
then duly attacked.5 The idea that the sacking
of the Caracas synagogue was based purely on
anti-Semitism has persisted, even showing up in a
recent piece authored by two academics in the
high-brow Boston Review. The authors claim the
attack is a sign of state-directed anti-Semitism.6
Such hyperbolic media coverage exemplifies the
tendency of the U.S. press to portray
left-leaning Latin American governments as
hotbeds of anti-Semitism. In the case of
Venezuela, where the government has never made
any overtly anti-Semitic public statements, much
less enacted policies targeting its Jewish
citizens, the storyline has been promoted in
three key ways: (1) attributing anti-Semitic acts
or statements by private citizens to the
government, (2) conflating legitimate criticism
of Israeli policy with anti-Semitism, and (3)
relying on press statements by U.S.-based Jewish
organizations like the ADL or the Simon
Wiesenthal Center, often at the expense of
Venezuelan Jewish organizations, which regularly
complain that their views are misrepresented,
even flatly contradicted, by U.S. groups pursuing their own agendas.
Perhaps the most egregious example of this
disconnect occurred in January 2006, when the New
York Daily News, the Los Angeles Times, and The
Wall Street Journal all reported that Chávez,
during a Christmas Eve speech, had invoked an
age-old anti-Semitic slur, labeling Jews as
Christ killers.7 The story originated with an
alert circulated by the Simon Wiesenthal Center,
but on closer inspection it became clear that the
group had deliberately edited the speech to
manufacture the slur. The original speech
contained a long riff in which Chávez decried the
unequal distribution of global wealth:
The world has enough for everybody, but it turned
out that a few minoritiesthe descendants of
those who crucified Christ, the descendants of
those who expelled Bolívar from here, and also
those who in a certain way crucified him in Santa
Marta, there in Colombiaa minority took
possession of the planets gold, silver,
minerals, water, good lands, oil, and they have
concentrated all the riches in the hands of a
few: Less than 10% of the world population owns
more than half of the riches of the world.8
The reference to the betrayal of Latin American
liberation hero Simón Bolívar by some leaders
after the War of Independence indicates that
Chávez was speaking metaphorically about wealthy
elites in general, rather than any group in
particular. But the translation published by the
Wiesenthal Center shortened the statement
significantly and altered its meaning as follows:
. . . the world has wealth for all, but some
minorities, the descendants of the same people
that crucified Christ, have taken over all the wealth of the world.9
The centers editing job included quotation
marks, implying that it was a direct quote, but
failed to include ellipses, which would have
signaled to readers that words had been removed.
The Confederation of Jewish Associations of
Venezuela (CAIV), the nations largest Jewish
organization, was swift and severe in condemning
the Wiesenthal Center, issuing a public letter
complaining that the U.S. organization had
interfered in the political status, in the
security, and in the well-being of our
community. The group added: You have acted on
your own, without consulting us, on issues that
you dont know or understand.10
But in the three years since the Christ killer
incident, some U.S. NGOs, media, and politicians
have continued to neglect Venezuelan Jewish
organizations while persisting in their attempts
to demonize the Chávez government. In May,
Representative Connie Mack (R-Fla.) introduced a
House resolution condemning the Venezuelan
government as anti-Semitic in response to the
synagogue break-in.11 Once again, Venezuelan
Jewish organizations were forced to mobilize. As
CAIV explained to the Pittsburgh-based Jewish
Chronicle, the resolution may have derailed an
ongoing dialogue that had been initiated between
the Venezuelan government and the Jewish
community in the months since the break-in. Fred
Pressner, former president of CAIV, pointed out
that Venezuelas government had reacted well to
the earlier attacks, noting that all of our
institutions are protected by the policewe cannot complain about that.12
Pressner and the CAIV worked with House Democrats
to block Macks resolution. In the end, the
conservative congressman pulled the language from
consideration, but he has indicated that he will
seek to reintroduce it again soon, whether or not
it is opposed by Venezuelas Jewish leadership.13
*
This is not the first time that U.S.-based
propagandists have sought to portray a
left-leaning Latin American government as
anti-Semitic. In May 1983, the ADL issued a
meagerly sourced report claiming that Nicaraguas
Sandinista government systematically repressed
and forced into exile the countrys tiny Jewish
community.14 Eager to garner U.S. congressional
funding for a brutal mercenary campaign to topple
Nicaraguas government, President Ronald Reagan
promptly added the charge of anti-Semitism to his
propaganda offensive against the Sandinistas.
However, subsequent investigations by U.S. Jewish
leaders found that, among the estimated 50
practicing Jews who lived in Nicaragua at the
time of the Sandinista revolution, most had ties
to the toppled dictatorship of Anastasio Somoza
and left the country of their own accord.15 Rabbi
Gerald Serotta, a Jewish chaplain at George
Washington University who traveled with a
delegation to Nicaragua in 1984, told The
Washington Post that there wasnt one person in
the country with whom we met who believes there
was special discrimination against the Jewish
community.16 Serotta added that we are
convinced that whatever lack of due process there
was during the revolutionary period . . . was not
especially discriminatory to Jews.
Other sources corroborated Serottas
observations. For example, the University of
Central Americas Historical Institute noted that
Nicaraguans with strong ties to Somoza left the
country during the revolution, and that the
Jewish people who left in 1979 were part of a
larger exodus from Nicaragua of those who felt
their future would be uncertain with changes by
the revolutionary government.17 At no point was
credible evidence presented that religious
intolerance and/or ethnic persecution caused the
departure of Jews from Nicaragua. In fact, not
even Anthony Quainton, the U.S. ambassador to
Nicaragua, could produce evidence to support the
charges of anti-Semitism. In a confidential cable
from Quainton to Secretary of State George Shultz
in 1983, the ambassador noted that the evidence
fails to demonstrate that the Sandinistas have
followed a policy of anti-Semitism or have
persecuted Jews solely because of their religion.18
There are a number of parallels between Reagans
charges against the Sandinistas and the more
recent claims against Venezuelas government. In
both cases, the claims are rooted not in facts
but in the desire of interested parties to
publicly censure Latin American governments they
dislike. In the case of Nicaragua, the Reagan
administration methodically tailored its
narrative to appeal to various religious
constituencies within the United States.19
Because a factual storyline would have had little
propaganda value, the administration favored wild
tales about Marxist-Leninist Sandinistas
suppressing not only Jews but also Christians.
However, leading Evangelicals and Jesuit
scholars, like the Jewish delegation that found
the charges of anti-Semitism unsubstantiated,
rejected Reagans assertions that the Sandinistas
persecuted Protestants and Catholics for their religious beliefs.20
Yet given that large segments of the U.S. public
have always been poorly informed about Latin
America, it was not such a stretch for the Reagan
administration to spread outlandish tales of
religious persecution as a means of rallying
conservative constituencies behind its wars in
Central America. In the political culture of the
United States during the Reagan years, the
Marxist-Leninist label served as an epithet whose
purpose was to project an image of a society
where all forms of freedomincluding religious
freedomwere under attack. Naturally, Reagans
propaganda offensive got an important boost from
his allies in the media and the foreign-policy
establishment. Conservative media fed the
hysteria about the Sandinistas alleged
persecution of Jews and Christians, while the ADL
continued promoting its storyline in letters to The New York Times.21
In this regard, the confluence of interests
between the ADL and right-wing U.S. politicians
has become a marriage of convenience. The ADL and
other groups often use charges of anti-Semitism
as a form of subterfuge designed to sully the
image of governments and intellectuals who
criticize the policies of the Israeli government.
Meanwhile, right-wing U.S. politicians can use
the anti-Semitism claims as a means of attacking the left more generally.
As its treatment of Venezuela and Nicaragua
suggests, the ADL and likeminded groups tend to
make accusations that are not supported by facts,
indicating that their motives have less to do
with confronting anti-Semitism than with
attacking those who do not share their enthusiasm
for Israeli policies. Both the Sandinistas and
the Chávez government have been sympathetic to
the plight of Palestinians and critical of
Israeli policy in the occupied territories, but
their differences with Israellike their
differences with the United Stateshave deeper
roots in U.S.-Israeli complicity in the
repression of Latin American social movements and the left.
As the NACLA Report made clear in its March/April
1987 issue, Israel provided military assistance
to the Somoza dictatorship from the 1950s right
up to the Sandinistas overthrow of Somoza in
1979.22 The journalist Christopher Dickey once
noted that, even as Somozas defeated National
Guardsmen scurried to leave Nicaragua in July
1979, they looked nothing so much as Israeli
soldiers, with their Israeli Galil rifles, and
for those who had not thrown them away, their
Israeli paratrooper helmets.23 Then, in the
mid-1980s, Israeli arms dealers funneled weapons
to right-wing Nicaraguan mercenariesmostly
Somozas former National Guardsmenwho fought to overthrow the Sandinistas.24
Israels complicity in Latin American human
rights abuses was most glaring in Guatemala,
where more than 200,000 people, mostly Mayans,
were killed over the course of the countrys
36-year civil war.25 At the height of the
Guatemalan militarys atrocities in the early
1980s, the countrys military government was
largely isolated internationally, relying
exclusively on Israel for military training and
assistance.26 In February 1983, CBS anchorman Dan
Rather pointedly observed that Israel has helped
[Guatemala] wage a war with no questions asked.27
Norman Finkelstein, a Jewish American political
scientist and expert on the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict, has documented how certain zealous
supporters of the Israeli state seek to
discredit all criticism of Israeli policy as
motivated by an irrational loathing of Jews.28
But clearly many Central Americans have
historical grievances with the Israeli state,
grievances that cannot be dismissed as
anti-Semitism. Given the legacy of U.S.-Israeli
complicity in the repression of the Latin
American left, it is hardly surprising that
left-leaning governments in the region would tend
to empathize with others who have suffered Israeli-sponsored repression.
As Finkelstein notes, Whenever Israel comes
under international pressure to resolve its
conflicts with the Palestinians diplomatically or
faces a public relations debacle, its apologists
mount a campaign alleging that the world is awash
in a new anti-Semitism.29 Finkelstein makes a
strong case that to conflate empathy for the
victims of Israeli policy with anti-Semitism is
itself a form of defamation, one that helps
sustain Israeli repression in the occupied territories.
Of course, to point out that some groups misuse
charges of anti-Semitism is not to deny the
existence of retrograde attitudes toward Jews in
Latin America. Indeed, anti-Semitic attitudes and
stereotypes are not uncommon in the region. The
Chávez government, for its part, has consistently
drawn a distinction between its criticisms of
Israeli policy and the anti-Jewish bigotry that
some of the governments supporters sometimes
display. For example, after Venezuela suspended
diplomatic relations with Israel over the bombing
of Gaza, the Venezuelan Ministry of Foreign
Affairs was careful to point out that Chávez has
always opposed anti-Semitism and all forms of
discrimination and racism.30 Just three weeks
before the diplomatic break with Israel, the
World Jewish Congress issued a press release
congratulating Chávez for supporting a clear
condemnation of anti-Semitism in a joint
declaration with the presidents of Argentina and Brazil.31
The sad irony is that unsubstantiated charges of
anti-Semitism serve very few interests. Certainly
the cheap comparison of the Caracas synagogue
burglary with the Kristallnacht only trivializes
one of the most horrific events of the last
century. And by refusing to consult local Jewish
leadersor worse, by directly contradicting
themgroups like the ADL and the Wiesenthal
Center risk exacerbating the struggles of the
communities they ostensibly represent. Moreover,
accusing anyone of anti-Semitism without
bothering to provide plausible evidence does more
harm than good to the cause of fighting anti-Semitism.
On the policy front, the problem goes far beyond
a simple distortion of history. The deliberate
misrepresentation of events in Latin America has
had disastrous consequences for the region and
its people. In their haste to demonize the
Sandinistas in the 1980s, some U.S. media and
public figures helped lay the ideological
groundwork for a U.S.-sponsored Nicaraguan war,
whose legacy of violence and impoverishment
persists. To continue making unsubstantiated
accusations of anti-Semitism against left-leaning
Latin American governments will only generate further misunderstanding today.
----------
Eric Wingerter is a freelance writer living in
Washington. His blog, BoRev.net, focuses on
Venezuela and U.S. media coverage of Latin
America. Justin Delacour is a doctoral candidate
in the Political Science Department at the University of New Mexico.
----------
1. Commentary: Venezuela Sees Rise in
Anti-Semitism, The Miami Herald, February 9, 2009.
2. ADL Condemns Violent Attack on Caracas
Synagogue, press release, including statement by
Abraham H. Foxman, national director of the
Anti-Defamation League, January 31, 2009.
3. James Suggett, Robbery, Not Anti-Semitism,
Motive for Attack on Venezuelan Synagogue,
Venezuelanalysis.com, February 10, 2009.
4. James Suggett, Venezuelan Jewish Community
Profoundly Grateful and Moved by Governments
Efforts, Venezuelanalysis.com, February 13, 2009.
5. Mr. Chavez vs. the Jews, editorial, The
Washington Post, February 12, 2009.
6. Claudio Lomnitz and Rafael Sánchez, United by
Hate: The Uses of Anti-Semitism in Chávezs
Venezuela, Boston Review, July/August 2009.
7. Editing Chavez to Manufacture a Slur, media
advisory, Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, January 23, 2006.
8. Thierry Meyssan and Cyril Capdevielle, ¿Hay
que quemar a Hugo Chávez? Voltaire Network, January 18, 2006.
9. For more on this, see Rod Stoneman, Chávez:
The Revolution Will Not Be TelevisedA Case Study
of Politics and the Media (London and New York: Wallflower Press, 2008), 103.
10. Marc Perlman, Venezuelas Jews Defend
Leftist President in Flap Over Remarks, The Forward, January 12, 2006.
11. Mack Introduces Resolution Supporting
Venezuelan Jewish Community, press release, the
office of Congressman Connie Mack, May 12, 2009.
12. Eric Fingerhut, Jewish Reps Oppose House
Resolution Supporting Venezuelan Jews, The Jewish Chronicle, June 4, 2009.
13. Ibid.
14. Edward Cody, Managuas Jews Reject
Anti-Semitism Charge; Sandinistas, U.S. Embassy
Dispute Rabbis Widely Circulated Report, The
Washington Post, August 29, 1983.
15. Rabbi Disputes Reagan Point About the Jews
in Nicaragua, The New York Times, March 19, 1986.
16. Marjorie Hyer, Jewish Group Finds No
Anti-Semitism by Sandinista Regime, The Washington Post, August 25, 1984.
17. Cody, Managuas Jews Reject Anti-Semitism Charge.
18. Michael McDowell, Jesuit Says Sandinistas
Backed, The Globe and Mail (Toronto), October 29, 1983.
19. Cody, Managuas Jews Reject Anti-Semitism Charge.
20. Marjorie Hyer, Nicaraguan Minister Opposes
Aid to Contras, The Washington Post, March 15,
1986; McDowell, Jesuit Says Sandanistas Backed.
21. Morton Rosenthal, Nicaraguas Chance to End
Anti-Semitism, letter to the editor, The New
York Times, September 27, 1983; Nathan
Perlmutter, So Are the Sandinistas Anti-Semitic?
Of Course, They Are, letter to the editor, The New York Times, April 5, 1986.
22. Milton Jamail and Margo Gutierrez, Getting
Down to Business, NACLA Report on the Americas
21, no. 2 (March/April 1987): 2538.
23. Christopher Dickey, With the Contras: A
Reporter in the Wilds of Nicaragua (Simon and Schuster, 1985), 41.
24. The Israeli Connection: Deadly Trade, NACLA
Report on the Americas 21, no. 2 (March/April 1987): 13.
25. Weekly News Update on the Americas,
Rigoberta Menchú Files Genocide Charges in
Spain, NACLA Report on the Americas 33, no. 4 (January/February 2000): 2, 4.
26. Milton Jamail and Margo Gutierrez,
Guatemala: The Paragon, NACLA Report on the
Americas 21, no. 2 (March/April 1987): 3136.
27. Ibid.
28. Norman Finkelstein, Beyond Chutzpah: On the
Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History
(Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005), xxxiii.
29. Ibid.
30. Tamara Pearson, Venezuela Expels Israeli
Ambassador in Solidarity With Palestinian
People, Venezuelanalysis.com, January 7, 2009.
31. World Jewish Congress Welcomes Clear
Commitment by Latin American Leaders, press
release, World Jewish Congress, December 18, 2008.
Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
415 863-9977
www.Freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20090904/d30b2b30/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list