[News] Mexico's Most Toxic Presidential Race Ever
Anti-Imperialist News
News at freedomarchives.org
Thu Apr 6 19:18:48 EDT 2006
http://counterpunch.com/ross04062006.html
April 6, 2006
Mexico's Most Toxic Presidential Race Ever
All Against Lopez Obrador
By JOHN ROSS
Mexico City.
Splattered as it is with libelous calumnies, dark
threats, smarmy insinuation, and stridently
accusatory television spots, the run-up to the
July 2 elections here constitutes the most toxic
presidential race of the five this reporter has
covered during decades on the ground in Mexico.
Indeed, both the campaigns of once-upon-a-time
ruling PRI party candidate Roberto Madrazo and
the right-wing PAN's Felipe Calderon boil down to
one theme: everything and anything against
frontrunner Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador (AMLO),
the former mayor of Mexico City and the standard
bearer for the pseudo-leftist Party of the
Democratic Revolution (PRD) who has led the pack
by as much as 18 points ever since 2003 mid-term
elections. AMLO's lead has held steady around eight for months.
The bi-partisan anti-AMLO assault is an extension
of PRI-PAN complicity to eliminate Lopez Obrador
from the competition by hook or by crook. The
onslaught began in early 2004 with the release of
incriminating videotapes showing members of the
PRD receiving cash payouts from a construction
tycoon whom AMLO had denied city contracts. Lopez
Obrador would later tie the release of the videos
(which were aired ad nauseam on Mexico's
two-headed television monopoly Televisa and TV
Azteca) to ex-president Carlos Salinas, a
personal nemesis in AMLO's mindset akin to
Sherlock Holmes' great foe, Prof. Moriarty.
Having failed to blacken Lopez Obrador's name via
the videos, President Vicente Fox's PAN party
sought to take advantage of widespread crime and
violence in Mexico City by organizing a march in
June 2004 to repudiate the then-mayor. But the
huge mobilization was swelled by AMLO supporters
who turned their rage on President Fox.
In early 2005, the PAN and the PRI again ganged
up on Lopez Obrador for having defied a court
order by trying to build an access road to a
hospital that may or may not have skirted private
property, and sought to remove the immunity from
prosecution that his office guaranteed him Had
the plot succeeded, Lopez Obrador would have been
jailed and barred from the ballot. Nonetheless,
after 1.3 million AMLO loyalists marched through
Mexico City last April to protest the
persecution, Fox got cold feet and shelved the charges.
Now his rivals are clobbering Lopez Obrador with
the fearsome specter of none other than
Venezuela's outspoken president Hugo Chavez. The
connection between AMLO and Chavez has long been
floated by Washington. Charges that Chavez was
financing AMLO's campaign re-emerged after the
Mexico City daily Cronica, a paper said to be
financed by the Salinas family, "infiltrated"
"Bolivarian Cells" (they are 'circles' not
'cells'), an organization of Mexican citizens who
stand in solidarity with Chavez's Venezuela, and
"discovered" that some Chavez supporters also
supported Lopez Obrador! Although Cronica offered
no other proof of links between the left
candidate and the Venezuelan leader, German
Martinez, the PAN representative before the
Federal Electoral Institute called upon IFE
president Luis Carlos Ugalde to probe Chavista
"subversion" in AMLO's campaign. Ugalde
subsequently turned the matter over to the Interior Ministry for investigation.
Meanwhile, the PAN deluged Televisa and TV Azteca
screens with primetime spots that cut back and
forth between Lopez Obrador and an arm-flailing
Hugo Chavez just to underscore the
unsubstantiated connection between the two. The
spots seemed to irritate the Venezuelan president
more than they did Lopez Obrador. On his weekly
TV show "Alo Senor Presidente", Chavez lashed out
at the PAN, accusing the right-wingers of using
his image to smear the Mexican Left in order to
prevent Lopez Obrador's election in July. The PAN
campaign, said Chavez, was just one more example
of the Washington-orchestrated conspiracy against his person,
The Venezuelan president's outburst further
fueled the anti-AMLO inquisition. Now the PAN
insisted that Fox lodge a diplomatic protest
against Venezuela for having "interfered" in the
Mexican election, a crime delineated in Article
33 of the constitution. The IFE's Ugalde, who
frequently seems to side with the PAN, splashed
petrol on the bonfire by labeling Chavez's
intervention "imprudent and undesirable" and
petitioned the foreign ministry to demand redress.
In late February, Ugalde refused to intervene
when the PAN flew former right-wing Spanish prime
minister Jose Maria Aznar to the Mexican capital
to endorse Calderon, diss Lopez Obrador by name,
and warn that his election would bring down
Mexico, a much more obvious violation of Article
33 than Chavez might or might not have perpetrated.
Not since the Salinas years when the IFE was
created to legitimize questionable federal
elections has the nation's maximum electoral
authority appeared so patently partisan.
Both Fox, the PAN and the PRI (the "PRIAN" dixit
AMLO) concur with the Bush White House assessment
that Lopez Obrador, like Hugo Chavez, is a
dangerous demogogue spreading dread "populism" in
his efforts to attend to the basic needs of the
poor. This past March, the Bush regime issued a
reaffirmation of its strategy of "preventive" war
that pointed to pockets of "extreme populism" as
likely targets for U.S. "preventive" attack in Latin America.
The Fox-White House obsession with the
Chavez-Lopez Obrador connection was on exhibit at
the April 1st tri-national summit in Cancun.
Asked if he and George Bush had discussed the
Mexican election, Fox told Televisa news that
yes, the two had talked about "Venezuela." The
U.S. State Department accuses Chavez of meddling
in elections in Bolivia, Peru, and Ecuador.
Despite this latest "zipizapi" (ruckus) between
Vicente Fox and Hugo Chavez, relations between
Venezuela and Mexico could not get much worse at
this point. Both countries withdrew ambassadors
after Chavez dubbed Fox "a puppy of Yanqui
imperialism" following last November's Summit of the Americas in Argentina.
Although he is barred from re-election, Fox's
incessant stump speeches packed with veiled
references to AMLO amount to bald-faced
intervention in the presidential race by a
sitting president, the PRD insists - a charge
Mexico's Supreme Court ratified, warning Fox that
he could be forced to resign should he continue to push the envelope.
According to the Fox gospel, Lopez Obrador is an
unstable would-be 'caudillo' (strongman) who will
destroy the economic achievements of the Fox
administration and bankrupt the country with his
populist schemes. "Callese Chachalaca!" AMLO
mocks back, "Shut up, you garrulous bird!" Such
is the abysmal level of campaign debate in Mexico
with less than a hundred days until the election.
Media hype has been even more malignantly
excessive in 2006 than it was six years ago when
Fox rode negative spots designed by ex-Clinton
strategist Dick Morris to victory. Televisa,
which dominates 85% of the Mexican market, and
its junior partner TV Azteca, are crucial to the
anti-AMLO crusade's success. No matter who
actually wins the election, the big winners will
be Televisa and Azteca â*" both networks stand to
garner the lion's share of the 13,000.000.000
pesos being shelled out by the IFE to subsidize
the parties, much of it being spent on airing
venomous spots against Lopez Obrador (one shows
AMLO's Mexico City crumbling to the ground with
the word DANGER stamped across the screen.)
In an effort to consolidate PAN support for a
"reform" of laws governing radio and television
that would grant Televisa and Azteca 40 year
concessions and eliminate the competition from a
rapidly digilitizing spectrum, PAN president
Manuel Espino summoned the party's senators
together last month (March) to explain how the
so-called "ley Televisa" would enhance the
fortunes of their candidate. Televisa had
promised to pump up the increasingly shrill
Calderon until he caught Lopez Obrador and then
double its efforts to put him ahead, the PAN
president had told the solons, according to what
one anonymous senator later leaked to the
national (left-wing) daily La Jornada.
Televisa's handling of the presidential race has
been tilted to the right ever since the
candidates kicked off their campaigns in January
and the network covered live Calderon's
investiture as the PAN nominee, a favor not
extended to either Madrazo or Lopez Obrador.
Televisa coverage of daily activities of the
three "presidenciales" sometimes shows AMLO in
herky-jerky frames just to underscore his
purportedly erratic and unstable persona.
Both Calderon and the PRI's Madrazo (who trails
badly in the polls) will get another chance to
beat up on Lopez Obrador in upcoming debates set
for April and June â*" AMLO will only show up for the second.
Meanwhile, on the left flank of the Lopez Obrador
bandwagon, the rebel Zapatista Army of National
Liberation's "Other Campaign", a fiercely
anti-electoral initiative featuring "Delegate
Zero" (Subcomandante Marcos) that has been
barnstorming from state to state talking bad
about all the candidates with particular emphasis
on Lopez Obrador, suffered a bitter slap when
Rosario Ibarra, the Gran Dame of Mexico's human
rights movement and Marcos's surrogate mother,
accepted a sure-shot senate seat on the AMLO ticket.
Nevertheless, whether due to the Other Campaign's
efforts or voter disgust at the antics of the
candidates, a quarter of the electorate tell
pollsters that they will not go to the polls July 2nd.
Question: How is Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador like
Ronald Reagan? Answer: both are (were) coated
with Teflon. No matter what crimes they are
(were) accused of ("like eating babies for
breakfast" cracks former AMLO City Hall sidekick
Jose Agustin Ortiz Pincheti), the salvos
strengthened their statures. Indeed, every
ill-intentioned ploy to unseat him or bar him
from the ballot or cast him as an unstable
subversive has only helped Lopez Obrador to firm
up his advantage. March monthly ratings by
Mitofsky pollsters contracted by Televisa, not a
fountain of support for AMLO, have the
frontrunner solid at 38, Calderon (probably due
to the anti-Chavez barrage) up a point and a half
at 31.5 and Madrazo shrinking to 28. The sampling
may have as much validity as the predictions of
the famous Witches of Catamaco Veracruz who
recently cleansed AMLO by passing an egg over his
person and subsequently divined him the big winner July 2nd.
But despite the witches' "limpia", being the
frontrunner could be extremely dangerous for
Lopez Obrador's health. Exasperated as Calderon
and Madrazo must be at the failure of character
assassination to deflate AMLO's lead, the corporeal kind could come next.
John Ross has covered four previous Mexican
presidential election. He is the author of
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1560255781/counterpunchmaga>Murdered
By Capitalism.
The Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
(415) 863-9977
www.freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20060406/353e2e01/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list