[News] How Israel is eroding life for Palestinians in the West Bank

[Anti-Imperialist News]

mondoweiss.net
<https://mondoweiss.net/2026/02/how-israel-is-eroding-life-for-palestinians-in-the-west-bank/?ml_recipient=179384222058809296&ml_link=179384150696920575&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_term=2026-02-14&utm_campaign=Daily+Headlines+RSS+Automation+-+8am>
How Israel is eroding life for Palestinians in the West Bank
Abdaljawad Omar
February 13, 2026
------------------------------
[image: image.png]

Settlers hang Israeli flags and banners in the Masoudiya neighborhood near
the town of Sebastia, north of Nablus, February 13, 2026. (Photo by
Mohammed Nasser/APA Images)
<https://mondoweiss.net/2026/01/israel-is-quietly-erasing-palestinian-refugee-camps-from-existence-in-the-west-bank/>


Today, a
<https://mondoweiss.net/2026/01/israel-is-quietly-erasing-palestinian-refugee-camps-from-existence-in-the-west-bank/>quiet
transf
<https://mondoweiss.net/2026/01/israel-is-quietly-erasing-palestinian-refugee-camps-from-existence-in-the-west-bank/>ormation
is advancing
<https://mondoweiss.net/2026/01/israel-is-quietly-erasing-palestinian-refugee-camps-from-existence-in-the-west-bank/>
in the West Bank. It isn’t the same spectacular form of violence that once
commanded the global news cycle in Gaza, but it is more methodical and
durable — and more difficult to interrupt.

It unfolds in three seemingly unrelated processes: financial warfare
against Palestinian economic life, state-backed settler terror, and the
legalization of annexation. What binds these processes together isn’t
simply their occurrence in the same territory at the same time, but their
shared architecture: they are part of a regime of compression that doesn’t
outright destroy Palestinian life, but systematically constrains it.

Each mechanism operates through a different register — one through
liquidity, one through violence, one through law — but all converge on the
same objective: to narrow the field for Palestinian life to continue.

All of this takes place under the radar, as the world appears to be moving
away from Palestine. The global movements were, after all, convoked by the
horror of daily massacres, yet everything in the West Bank appears
unchanging on the surface. The daily passage through checkpoints has
hardened into a ritual. Over 42,000 Palestinian refugees
<https://mondoweiss.net/2025/07/the-humanitarian-crisis-facing-42000-forcibly-displaced-palestinians-in-the-west-bank/>
from the camps in Jenin and Tulkarem remain displaced, inhabiting a
suspended tension that refuses resolution.

As the massacres in Gaza change form and lose their most spectacular force,
the movements protesting them falter, and solidarity reveals its dependence
on blood and catastrophe. When horror becomes less televisable, attention
disperses — a grim reflection of the state of the global attention economy.

This endless churn has done more than exhaust attention: it is laying the
groundwork for other violence to proceed in the West Bank unnoticed.

This is how the Israeli regime of compression continues to erode the
conditions for Palestinian existence.
Financial b*lockages*

The West Bank is facing a severe banking and liquidity crisis
<https://mondoweiss.net/2025/09/israel-is-trying-to-collapse-the-palestinian-authority-the-first-step-is-destroying-the-palestinian-economy/>
driven by long-standing Israeli limits on currency exchanges under the 1994
Paris Protocol. For nearly three decades, Israel has informally capped the
annual conversion of shekels from Palestinian banks at NIS 18 billion, a
figure that has not kept pace with Palestinian economic growth. The result
is that Palestinian banks have accumulated large surpluses of Israeli
shekels they are unable to convert into foreign currencies such as U.S.
dollars or Jordanian dinars. In May of 2024, the Palestinian Monetary
Authority halted banks from accepting additional shekels, leading to
widespread disruptions: individuals have struggled to deposit checks,
businesses have been unable to deposit revenues, and some residents have
been pushed into overdraft.

The shortage of convertible currency has also fueled a black market where
shekels are exchanged at rates significantly below the official rate. The
crisis has been compounded by reduced Palestinian labor access to Israel
since October 2023, which has curtailed the flow of wages that once
provided a steady source of foreign currency.

In recent months, Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has taken
additional steps that Palestinians view as attempts to further weaken
economic coordination: he has opposed increasing the shekel conversion cap
and ordered the cancellation of an Israeli government bank guarantee (an
“indemnity” letter of sorts) that protects Israeli banks when working with
Palestinian banking institutions. Although this revocation has not yet
formally taken effect, it reflects a broader shift in Israeli policy aimed
at limiting financial cooperation with the Palestinian Authority and
creating the conditions for a sustained crisis in the Palestinian banking
system.

What the manufactured banking crisis reveals is not an aberration but a
governing logic: blockage as method. The threatened withdrawal of
correspondent banking safeguards was not simply a financial maneuver; it
exposed the structural chokehold embedded in the Palestinian economy.
Because Palestinian banks rely on Israeli counterparts to clear shekels and
process cross-border transactions, the entire monetary system remains
externally mediated. The refusal to absorb surplus shekels, the freezing or
delay of clearance mechanisms, and the periodic threat to sever indemnified
banking ties together form a regime of controlled interruption. Like
physical checkpoints, this system establishes financial ones.

Blockage operates by constricting the circulation of currency, liquidity,
and credit, until economic life slows to the edge of asphyxiation. This is
not a collapse in the dramatic sense, but something more calculated.
Financial systems depend on confidence: the expectation that deposits are
secure, that liquidity will be available, that correspondent channels will
remain open. By repeatedly threatening to terminate safeguards and disrupt
clearance processes, Israel injects uncertainty into the bloodstream of
Palestinian finance. Banks continue operating, but under permanent duress.
Depositors remain, but with mounting anxiety. The Palestinian Monetary
Authority reassures, yet reassurance itself becomes part of the crisis
management cycle.

Blockage thus produces chronic precarity rather than immediate implosion.
It hollows institutions from within, eroding trust while maintaining the
façade of normalcy. As a settler-colonial strategy, blockage precedes
demolition. It prepares the ground. The Palestinian banking sector — once
portrayed as a pillar of relative stability — becomes the site where
sovereignty’s absence is felt most acutely.

The capacity to restrict circulation transforms economic dependency into
political leverage. Blockage is the first movement in a sequence aimed at
dismantling the Palestinian world: not by spectacular destruction alone,
but by quietly closing the channels through which that world sustains
itself. It pushes Palestinians — traders, merchants, businesses, and
laborers alike — toward the brink, where economic life narrows into mere
survival and the edge becomes not an exception, but a condition.
*Settler terror *

What began as the solitary steps of a settler descending from the Nahal
Adasha farm into Khirbet al-Halawa unfolded into a coordinated spectacle of
domination across Masafer Yatta in the southern West Bank. After an
altercation with residents, the settler summoned reinforcements; dozens
arrived, some armed, soon joined by Israeli soldiers. For hours, according
to Palestinian eyewitnesses, settlers beat residents, stole dozens of
sheep, torched property and firewood reserves, shattered windows and
sprayed homes with pepper spray. Men were detained and forced to sit on the
ground, women and children assaulted, and ambulances obstructed.

In nearby Khirbet al-Fakhit, a 48-year-old man was left hospitalized with a
fractured skull and cerebral hemorrhage as his elderly mother was injured
beside him. Sheep were driven toward outposts and settlements as night
fell, the violence stretching from one hamlet to the next in what residents
described as a pre-planned raid.

Throughout much of the six-hour episode, Israeli forces were present.
Villagers recount soldiers standing by as livestock were taken and, at
points, restricting the movement of medics attempting to reach the wounded.
Two Palestinian women were arrested and later released without charge. What
Palestinians experienced was not merely mob violence, but a choreography of
impunity in which the architecture of occupation — civilian outposts, armed
settlers and uniformed soldiers — converged to produce dispossession in
real time.

This scene is not new. It is the grammar of life in Area C, the 60 percent
of the West Bank under full Israeli control. In these marginal expanses,
Palestinian construction is reduced to the minimum, and permanence is
treated as provocation. Life follows seasonal rhythms: the olive harvest,
the tending of flocks, the slow movement across open land. These are not
empty spaces. They are lived geographies, sustained by grazing routes,
footpaths, and inherited care. Yet their openness makes them vulnerable.
They are exposed to encroachment and choreographed intimidation
<https://mondoweiss.net/2025/06/meet-the-palestinian-bedouin-community-that-no-longer-exists/>,
to a regime that reads mobility itself as a claim.

The violence is multi-directional. The settler both mimics the Palestinian
and burns the land; he imitates the grazing even as he slaughters the
flock; he sets fire to the olive trees and tears up the very soil from
which they draw their stubborn life. The attack on Masafer Yatta was not an
isolated eruption. Similar incidents have been documented across the West
Bank with increasing frequency since October 2023: in al-Tuwani
<https://mondoweiss.net/2022/09/israeli-settlers-attacked-a-palestinian-man-breaking-both-his-arms-then-the-army-arrested-him/>,
where settlers blocked farmers from accessing their land during the olive
harvest; in Susiya, where outpost expansion has pushed families off grazing
areas they’ve used for generations; in Jinba, where military “firing zone”
designations have been weaponized to facilitate displacement. The pattern
is consistent: violence creates facts on the ground that administrative
measures then consolidate.

But more than anything, settler terror is meant to confine, to demolish,
and to render life unlivable
<https://mondoweiss.net/2025/07/how-israeli-colonization-disrupts-the-palestinian-social-fabric-in-the-west-bank/>
— to compress existence into ever-narrower enclosures where departure
begins to appear as the only remaining horizon. What distinguishes the
current moment is not the invention of these tactics but their
intensification and coordination.

Settler terror has always been a feature of the occupation, but it now
operates with a brazenness that also means official sanction. Israeli
ministers openly celebrate attacks. Police investigations are perfunctory
or nonexistent. The message is clear: Palestinian presence is provisional,
subject to revocation through a combination of legal restriction and
physical intimidation.
*Annexation and legalization*

What has unfolded is not a dramatic proclamation of sovereignty, but
something far more insidious: a quiet tightening of the grip. In recent
months, the Israeli government has advanced a series of measures
<https://mondoweiss.net/2026/02/israel-just-started-legalizing-its-annexation-of-the-west-bank-heres-what-that-means/>
that function as instruments of territorial absorption. In January, the
Knesset passed legislation effectively legalizing dozens of settlement
outposts built on private Palestinian land, retroactively granting them
official status. The law allows settlers to claim ownership of land they
have occupied, often for years, by asserting that their presence was
authorized, even when no such authorization existed. Palestinian landowners
are entitled to compensation in theory, but the mechanism for securing it
is cumbersome, requires navigating Israeli courts, and offers no guarantee
of success.

Simultaneously, the government has moved to ease restrictions on settlement
expansion. Planning committees that once required coordination with the
Civil Administration — the Israeli military body that governs Area C — can
now approve construction more rapidly. Environmental review processes have
been streamlined. Archaeological assessments, which previously delayed some
projects, are now fast-tracked or waived. The cumulative effect is to
remove bureaucratic friction that had, at times, slowed settlement growth.
What was once incremental becomes accelerated.

These measures are presented as administrative adjustments, yet they
function as instruments of territorial absorption. Annexation here is not
declared; it is sedimented — layer by layer, permit by permit, registry by
registry.

By opening land records and stripping away safeguards, the state transforms
the landscape into a marketplace in which power, capital, and coercion
converge. The violence is bureaucratic, its language technical, but its
effect unmistakably political: the steady erasure of Palestinian spatial
presence in favor of a sovereign claim that advances without ever naming
itself.

These measures also hollow out what remains of Palestinian administrative
autonomy. The Oslo framework — already fractured and unequal — rested on
the fiction of delegated authority in designated areas of the West Bank,
what are called Areas A and B. Now, even that fiction is being methodically
dismantled.

By extending Israeli enforcement powers into spheres once managed by
Palestinian institutions — planning, environmental regulation, heritage —
the architecture of limited self-rule collapses inward. The Palestinian
Authority is not confronted in open rupture, but bypassed, rendered
irrelevant, and quietly displaced by a regime of direct oversight. What
appears to be governance reform is, in fact, the reconfiguration of
sovereignty on the ground.

The seriousness of these steps lies not only in their immediate impact but
in their temporal ambition. This is not policy as reaction, but policy as
permanence. It seeks to foreclose the future by reshaping the present —
embedding Israeli control so deeply into the territory’s legal and
administrative fabric that reversal becomes unimaginable.

The Western backers of Israel may issue condemnations, but the machinery of
consolidation proceeds with procedural calm. Each regulatory adjustment,
each planning approval, each land registration incrementally transforms the
status quo into something international law no longer has the vocabulary to
challenge.
*The logic of compression *

Blockage constricts economic circulation. Terror renders physical space
dangerous and uncertain. Law forecloses legal recourse and administrative
autonomy. The banking crisis means that even those with capital cannot
reliably access it. Settler violence means that even those with land cannot
safely work it. Legal annexation means that even those with title cannot
defend it.

Together, they produce a condition in which protection recedes, and
exposure becomes ordinary.

The aim here is not to eliminate the Palestinian population yet—such a
project would invite international condemnation and organized
resistance—but to manage it at the threshold of viability. Palestinians
remain, but their capacity for autonomous social, economic, and political
reproduction continues to contract. Businesses operate, but under
conditions that prevent expansion. Farmers cultivate, but on ever-smaller
parcels. Institutions function, but without the resources or authority to
serve their populations effectively. Life continues, but in narrowed
corridors.

What makes this regime particularly effective is its diffusion of
responsibility. No single actor bears sole accountability. The
correspondent bank cites regulatory compliance. The settler claims
self-defense or biblical entitlement. The planning committee invokes zoning
regulations. The soldier follows orders. Each decision is defensible within
its own domain, justified by precedent or necessity or external pressure.
Yet the pattern, invisible at the level of individual actions, becomes
legible in aggregate. What appears as administrative friction, security
imperative, or market risk reveals itself, over time, as organized
constriction.

The experiential reality for those subjected to this regime is one of
chronic adjustment. The merchant in Ramallah who once planned five years
ahead now calculates in quarters, uncertain whether his bank will honor
withdrawals or whether new restrictions will sever his supply chain. The
shepherd in Masafer Yatta who once grazed across hillsides his family has
worked for generations now confines his flock to valleys within sight of
the village, his children learning caution before they learn confidence.
The municipal planner in Bethlehem who once designed expansions now spends
his time navigating permit rejections and negotiating demolition orders,
his professional training reduced to crisis management. Time becomes
reactive rather than projective. Planning extends only as far as the next
permit.

This logic is not unique to the West Bank. Across disparate geographies, we
encounter similar patterns: the scaling down of rights, the shrinking of
public goods, the contraction of political possibility, the normalization
of emergency as structure. In Gaza, the blockade has operated for nearly
two decades as a laboratory of controlled diminishment, maintaining a
population above the threshold of humanitarian catastrophe while preventing
economic development or political autonomy.  And with the destruction of
Gaza, life is diminished into narrower space and managed calorie intakes.

Shock politics
<https://mondoweiss.net/2026/01/how-israel-and-the-u-s-are-using-the-shock-doctrine-to-impose-a-new-administration-in-gaza/>
and bureaucratic attrition are not opposites; they are complementary tempos
within a single order. Spectacle destabilizes perception, announcing
transformation and rupture, while administrative measures quietly
recalibrate what is livable. The Trump administration’s executive
blitz—orders issued in rapid succession, policies reversed and reinstated,
norms violated and defended in the same breath—generates disorientation.
Attention scatters. What seemed outrageous yesterday becomes backdrop
today. Meanwhile, the less visible work proceeds: regulations rewritten,
courts reshaped, enforcement discretion expanded. The spectacular and the
procedural collaborate, one exhausting the capacity for outrage, the other
embedding constraint into institutional architecture.

What is being constructed, then, is not a temporary crisis but a durable
condition. The banking blockage in the West Bank is not designed to be
resolved, but managed. Settler violence is not an aberration to be
corrected, but calibrated. Legal annexation is not a deviation from
international norms, but part of it is the new normal.

The question is not whether these processes will intensify—they already are
intensifying—but whether those subjected to them will recognize the pattern
in time to interrupt it, whether global attention can be sustained in the
absence of spectacular violence, whether solidarity can attach itself to
the slow grind of compression as fiercely as it once responded to the
sudden shock of massacre.

For now, the logic of compression proceeds with the confidence of a project
that has calculated the limits of resistance. It bets that populations kept
below the threshold of rupture will adapt rather than revolt, will exhaust
themselves in navigation rather than organize for transformation.

Whether this wager holds depends not on the ingenuity of the mechanisms —
those are already operational — but on the capacity of those subjected to
it to refuse the terms, to find in the very condition of compression the
grounds for collective refusal.
------------------------------

*Abdaljawad Omar*
Abdaljawad Omar is a writer and Assistant Professor at Birzeit University,
Palestine. Follow him on X @HHamayel2
<https://x.com/hhamayel2?s=21&t=kWr9Cxh8rnTkK4lRyrYujw>.
------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20260214/26386732/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1138240 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20260214/26386732/attachment-0001.png>