[News] Hamas Announced Postponing Prisoner Exchange: Why and Why Now?
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Tue Feb 11 13:38:06 EST 2025
palestinechronicle.com
<https://www.palestinechronicle.com/hamas-announced-postponing-prisoner-exchange-why-and-why-now-analysis/>
Hamas Announced Postponing Prisoner Exchange: Why and Why Now?- Analysis
February 11, 2025
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Al-Qassam spokesperson Abu
Obeida. (Image: Palestine Chronicle)
*By Robert Inlakesh
<https://www.palestinechronicle.com/writers/robert-inlakesh>*
Hamas is currently in a position where it must try its best to
negotiate the entry of sufficient aid into Gaza, while also
ensuring the war ends and a post-war administration is formed
so that the territory can be revived and rebuilt.
On Monday, Hamas’ Al-Qassam Brigades spokesman, Abu Obeida, issued a
statement asserting that in light of Israeli ceasefire violations, it
will be postponing the prisoner exchange planned for the coming weekend.
While this is now being framed as the potential reason for the
agreement’s collapse, it is instead a negotiating tactic at a crucial
juncture.
“The handover of the Zionist prisoners who were scheduled to be released
next Saturday…will be postponed until further notice,” announced the
military spokesperson of Hamas. This message was also accompanied by “we
affirm our commitment to the terms of the agreement as long as the
occupation commits to them”.
While Israeli politicians instantly began claiming that Hamas had
violated the ceasefire agreement, with the infamous partner in Israeli
PM Benjamin Netanyahu’s far-right coalition, Itamar Ben-Gvir, calling
for an immediate bombing campaign, nothing has materially changed on the
ground yet. However, provocative statements like Ben-Gvir’s are
predictable and also important in this equation.
Following Abu Obeida’s statement, in which he accused Israel of
violating the ceasefire terms, the Hamas movement decided to publish a
list of multiple Israeli violations of the deal, including:
* “Delaying the return of displaced persons to northern Gaza.”
* “Targeting civilians with shelling and gunfire, resulting in
numerous casualties across the Strip.”
* “Obstructing the entry of essential shelter supplies, such as tents,
prefabricated houses, fuel, and equipment needed for rubble removal
and body retrieval.”
* “Delaying the delivery of critical medical supplies and resources
necessary for restoring hospitals and the health sector.”
While Hamas stated that it had itself recorded the above-mentioned
ceasefire violations, these have been well documented by rights groups,
journalists and have been mentioned by United Nations officials. Yet,
Israel’s violations began some 15 minutes after the planned
implementation of the deal – on January 19 at 8:30 AM (local time).
Killings of civilians through airstrikes and sniper fire continued
throughout the following weeks, amongst the other ceasefire violations,
however, Hamas had chosen not to open fire; or even release threatening
statements in retaliation such as what occurred today.
*Why is Hamas Doing This Now?*
The knee jerk analyses that are being offered by most analysts in the
immediate aftermath of the Hamas statement are almost entirely centered
on a kind of he-said-she-said approach to the issue. As these disputes
rage on about who violated the ceasefire and which side seeks the
collapse of the deal, it is important to look deeper into the context.
As noted above, Hamas had chosen to not fire a single bullet or rocket,
nor threaten to postpone the release of Israeli captives, through weeks
of daily Israeli ceasefire violations. There were moments when Israeli
forces were executing children, delaying the return of displaced
Palestinians to their homes for 24 hours and restricting essential items
from reaching the Gaza Strip, all of which would have given Hamas the
moral imperative to obstruct the deal in order to end such violations of
the agreement.
If Hamas held off from retaliation for emotional, legal and moral
reasons, then it indicates that their statements from today were
strategically calculated and not simply reactionary. The timing of the
Qassam Brigades spokesman’s statement happened to coincide with the
return of the Israeli negotiating team from Doha, which also appears to
be connected.
Within the past week, Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu has changed the
composition of his negotiating team, reportedly floating the idea of an
extension to the first phase of the ceasefire agreement. These
amendments to the course of the negotiating process have been compounded
by US President Donald Trump’s threats to take over the Gaza Strip, in
addition to ethnically cleansing the territory’s population.
Israel has also now withdrawn its forces from the Netzarim Corridor that
intersects northern and central Gaza, deserting what would be a key
military position should they seek to return to the territory, while
most of the displaced refugees from the north of the territory have also
returned to their destroyed neighborhoods.
Another factor to consider is that the Israeli PM has managed to keep
his far-right coalition together so far, yet, key lawmakers from within
the Religious Zionism bloc have threatened to collapse the government
should it approve phase two of the three-phase ceasefire agreement.
Interestingly enough, Donald Trump’s rather outlandish and highly
illegal proposals have managed to persuade Netanyahu’s hardline
coalition partners that the ceasefire is a good deal, quite possibly
helping to save it.
Emboldened by the American President’s hardline rhetoric, Netanyahu has
since gone on a number of tirades in which he has not only endorsed the
idea of ethnically cleansing the people of Gaza to neighboring nations,
but has even said that Saudi Arabia should carve out part of its
territory to make a Palestinian State.
These extreme threats have now managed to ironically unite West Asia,
not with Israel but against it. Contrary to the claims of Netanyahu and
Trump, about Riyadh abandoning its position on requiring a viable path
to a Palestinian State in exchange for a normalisation agreement with
Tel Aviv, it has only doubled down. In fact, the condemnatory rhetoric
of Israel, coming from Saudi Arabia, is the strongest in decades.
Hamas has been center stage in this sudden, seemingly overnight regional
shift, which has certainly factored into their decision to begin
applying pressure on the Israeli negotiating team.
The Hashemite ruler of Jordan, King Abdullah II, has been publicly
starkly opposed to the US-Israeli proposal to transfer hundreds of
thousands, if not close to a million Palestinians, out of Gaza and into
his territory. While the Egyptian military has reportedly been
mobilizing to deal with any major destabilizing development. Both Cairo
and Amman fear the potential repercussions for the survival of their
leadership should a mass displacement from Gaza occur.
Saudi Arabia, meanwhile, has also been placed in a difficult position.
Like Jordan and Egypt, it is friendly to not only the US, but also
Israel. Yet, taking into consideration the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s
government in Syria, in addition to the popular moods of the Saudi
people in support of the Palestinian cause, normalizing with Israel
right now and enabling a major regionally destabilizing event that could
even cause the collapse of the Jordanian Monarchy, is a risk they are
not willing to currently take.
Another major factor here is both the warming of relations between
Riyadh and Tehran, combined with the recent weakening of the Iranian-led
Axis of Resistance. This essentially means that there is little to gain
from joining an anti-Iran alliance, likely re-igniting its frozen
conflict in Yemen, with little role for it to actually play. In such a
scenario, Saudi Arabia would be fully subordinate to the US, which
limits future opportunities in the emerging multipolar world. Saying
this, the threat of destabilization inside Saudi Arabia goes both ways,
if they go too far in opposition to the Americans and Israelis, they
could also incur their wrath.
Hamas decided to release its statement, doing so with a region that is
now united against the Israeli-US invasion/ethnic cleansing plan. The
Arab and Islamic nations will soon likely adopt a joint platform and
help in putting forth urgent proposals to see the Gaza ceasefire’s
implementation through the second and third phases. This includes
throwing their weight behind the success of a post-war administration in
the Gaza Strip.
Israel on the other hand has little leverage in this situation, other
than to implement plans that will inflict mass regional destabilisation
and return to carrying out its catastrophic genocide in Gaza. This is
why, so far, the Israeli threats against Gaza have been centered around
what their response will be if there is a failure to exchange prisoners
on Saturday, which is five days away.
If Israel carries out airstrikes in the coming days, it has two options,
to completely collapse the ceasefire or to just carry out random raids
that will kill civilians, but not in a way that would lead to the
ceasefire’s dissolution. However, there is also a trap in the Israelis
deciding to carry out any significant raids on Gaza, because this will
then give Hamas – and perhaps its ally Ansarallah – the excuse to
respond in kind.
If Hamas fires volleys of rockets toward Israeli settlements, possibly
even Tel Aviv, it will serve as a great embarrassment to Israeli Premier
Benjamin Netanyahu and could even encourage his extremist allies to
threaten the collapse of his coalition. In the minds of Netanyahu’s
partners like Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir, they believe that
Hamas must be crushed and the entirety of the Palestinian population be
driven out. Therefore, Hamas’ rocket fire could trigger emotional
reactions from them that put Netanyahu in a difficult political position.
Meanwhile, the families of Israeli captives who are still held in Gaza
have already taken it upon themselves to blockade main roads in Tel
Aviv, demanding the implementation of the ceasefire agreement.
Hamas is currently in a position where it must try its best to negotiate
the entry of sufficient aid into Gaza, while also ensuring the war ends
and a post-war administration is formed so that the territory can be
revived and rebuilt. Although it may be a dangerous gamble on their
behalf, it appears to be an attempt to use the current climate to
pressure the Israelis to allow the passage of sufficient aid, while also
paving the way to the success of the next phases of the ceasefire deal.
The wildcard here is a potential US-Israeli plot to use insane levels of
violence that will sink the entire region into chaos.
/– Robert Inlakesh is a journalist, writer, and documentary filmmaker.
He focuses on the Middle East, specializing in Palestine. He contributed
this article to The Palestine Chronicle. /
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20250211/f2de9c8e/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list