[News] Ben-Gvir’s words expose Zionism’s real nature

[Anti-Imperialist News]

middleeastmonitor.com
<https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20230829-ben-gvirs-words-expose-zionisms-real-nature/>
Ben-Gvir’s words expose Zionism’s real nature
by Amjad Alqasis - August 29, 2023
------------------------------

Itamar Ben-Gvir’s claim
<https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/israel-ben-gvir-says-rights-outweigh-palestinians>
that “his rights outweigh those of Palestinians” comes as no surprise. The
Zionist movement and its racist state Israel have been brutal from the
beginning with the aim of taking as much Palestinian land as possible with
the fewest number of indigenous Palestinians on it. Zionists have always
known that the only way to accomplish that goal is through forced
population transfer. This is a crime so severe that it is deemed a war crime
<https://www.casematrixnetwork.org/cmn-knowledge-hub/elements-digest/art-7/7-1-d/>
and a crime against humanity
<https://www.casematrixnetwork.org/cmn-knowledge-hub/elements-digest/art-7/7-1-d/>
by the Rome Statute. As far as Zionism is concerned, though, it is its
proud ideological foundation.

The establishment of a Jewish state on land with a predominantly non-Jewish
population has been carried out by forcibly displacing the majority
indigenous people. Today, nearly 70 per cent of the Palestinians worldwide
have been forcibly displaced by the Israeli regime, or are their direct
descendants. The idea of “transfer” in Zionist thought has been traced
rigorously by Nur Masalha in his seminal text *Expulsion of the
Palestinians: The Concept of “Transfer” in Zionist Political Thought,
1882–1948*, and is encapsulated in the words of Israel Zangwill, one of the
early Zionist thinkers who, in 1905, stated, “If we wish to give a country
<https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/7572869/mod_resource/content/1/Nur%20Masalha%20-%20Expulsion%20of%20the%20Palestinians%20-%20The%20Concept%20of%20Transfer%20in%20Zionist%20Political%20Thought%2C%201882-1948.pdf>
to a people without a country, it is utter foolishness to allow it to be
the country of two peoples.”

Yosef Weitz, the former director of the Jewish National Fund’s Land
Department, was even more explicit when, in 1940, he wrote: “…it must be
clear
<https://www.palestineremembered.com/Acre/Famous-Zionist-Quotes/Story644.html>
that there is no room in the country for both peoples… the only solution is
a Land of Israel, at least a western Land of Israel without Arabs. There is
no room here for compromise… There is no way but to transfer the Arabs from
here to the neighbouring countries… Not one village must be left, not one
[Bedouin] tribe.”

Rights and ethics were not to stand in the way, or as David Ben-Gurion
argued in 1948: “The war will give us the land
<https://www.progressiveisrael.org/ben-gurions-notorious-quotes-their-polemical-uses-abuses/>.
The concepts of ‘ours’ and ‘not ours’ are peace concepts, only, and in war
they lose their meaning.”

The essence of political Zionism, therefore, is summarised aptly as the
creation and fortification of a specific Jewish national identity, the
takeover of the maximum amount of Palestinian land, and the assurance that
the minimum number of non-Jews remain on that land while the maximum number
of Jews are implanted upon it. In other words, political Zionism from its
inception has necessitated population transfer, notwithstanding its brutal
requisites and consequences.

However, the Zionist movement and Israel have tried to mask that reality by
seeking to appear modern, democratic and enlightened, rather than
murderous, supremacist and authoritarian. In his novel *The* *Old New Land*,
Theodor Herzl portrayed the Jewish state as a beacon of light in which the
indigenous Arabs are similar to Man Friday in Defoe’s *Robinson Crusoe*,
and are given an identity and purpose through making them helpful servants
who, if properly instructed, are able to stay as minors in the
newly-created Utopia.

In reality, the goal of the Zionist movement was always to create a country
exclusively for Jews. To this end various tactics leading to ethnic
cleansing were applied ranging from mass deportations in 1948 and 1967 to a
subtler strategy which is known in Zionist terminology as “silent
transfer”. This is “silent” in the sense that Israel tries to avoid
international attention by displacing small numbers of people on a weekly
basis. The strategy has been applied predominantly in the past few decades
by creating untenable living conditions that basically push the
Palestinians to leave their homes.

Silent transfer is embodied in the State of Israel’s laws, policies and
practices. The most significant of these cover governance and enforcement
of residency rights; land rights; the regulation of natural resources; the
application of justice; law enforcement; and the status of Zionist
para-state actors. Israel uses its power in such areas to discriminate,
expropriate and ultimately to forcibly displace the indigenous non-Jewish
population from the land of historic Palestine.

The Israeli land-planning and zoning system, for example, has left 93,000
Palestinians in East-Jerusalem
<https://www.badil.org/cached_uploads/view/2021/04/19/wp17-zoninig-plannig-en-1618823771.pdf>
with little option but to build without proper permits from the state
because 87 per cent of the land is off-limits to Palestinians for their own
use, and most of the remaining 13 per cent is already built up. The
Palestinian population of Jerusalem is growing steadily, and has had to
expand into areas not zoned for Palestinian residence by the state of
Israel. All those homes are now under the constant threat of being
demolished by the Israeli army or police, which will leave their
inhabitants homeless and displaced.

Another example can be seen in the decision of the Israeli Supreme Court in
2012 <https://www.adalah.org/en/content/view/7185> to prohibit Palestinian
citizens of Israel from marrying Palestinians from elsewhere and living
together in the self-styled Jewish state. The effect of this ruling has
been that Palestinians with different residency statuses — such as Israeli
citizen, Jerusalem ID, West Bank ID or Gaza ID, all issued by Israel —
cannot live together legally on either side of the Green (1949 Armistice)
Line separating Israel from the occupied West Bank and Jerusalem. They are
thus faced with a choice of living abroad, living apart from one another,
or taking the risk of living together illegally. Such a system is used as a
further means of displacing Palestinians and thereby changing the
demography of Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory in favour of
Jews.

Another example is the Prawer Plan from 2013
<https://imeu.org/article/the-prawer-plan-ethnic-cleansing-in-the-negev>
and 2017 <https://www.adalah.org/en/content/view/9049>, which called for
the forcible displacement of tens of thousands of Palestinian citizens of
Israel due to a land allocation policy which imposes “unrecognised” status
on at least thirty-five Palestinian villages in the Naqab (Negev) Desert.
Israel deems the inhabitants of those villages to be illegal trespassers
and squatters, and they face the imminent threat of displacement, despite
the fact that in many cases, their communities predate the state of Israel
itself.

However, we can see that this policy has been abandoned gradually by Israel
to make room for a more aggressive version. Today, Israeli ministers openly
discuss
<https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/jerusalem-itamar-ben-gvir-israel-al-aqsa>
the takeover of Muslim and Christian holy places. The aforementioned
far-right National Security Minister Ben-Gvir has declared that the Noble
Sanctuary of Al-Aqsa Mosque in occupied Jerusalem is under Israeli control.
Another extreme far-right official, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has
called for the erasure of whole villages
<https://edition.cnn.com/2023/03/03/middleeast/inside-palestinian-town-minister-wants-erased-mime-intl/index.html>,
not least the Palestinian village of Huwara. Moreover, the deportation of
large parts of the non-Jewish population was discussed by several state
officials planning to “move” Palestinians to Sinai
<https://www.aa.com.tr/en/analysis/analysis-deal-of-century-and-the-plan-to-relocate-palestinians/1716084>
from 2014 onwards. It seems as if Israeli Zionist leaders, more than 75
years after the creation of the Zionist state, are trying to demonstrate to
their own constituencies and to the world that, like it or not, they will
complete the Zionist vision in their lifetime.

In the past couple of years, Israel has adopted laws to further curtail
public freedoms
<https://hrdf.org.il/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/By-all-means_web.pdf>;
to demonise
all forms of legitimate Palestinian resistance
<https://mondoweiss.net/2021/08/israeli-efforts-to-repress-human-rights-work-must-fail/>
as “terrorism”; and to denounce all international supporters
<https://www.badil.org/publications/al-majdal/issues/items/3476.html> of
Palestinian rights as “anti-Semites”. Examples such as the Nation-State Law
can be seen as an effort to lead the Israeli political system openly into a
majoritarian and authoritarian direction. This law is, in effect, simply
the codification of existing Israeli practices, in particular the section
proclaiming that the right to “exercise national self-determination
<https://www.adalah.org/uploads/uploads/Final_2_pager_on_the_JNSL_27.11.2018%20.pdf>
in the State of Israel” is solely for Jews. In doing so, it exposed to the
world the hypocrisy that Israel claims to be both a democratic and
exclusively Jewish state. The law basically declares that if there is a
clash between the Jewish and democratic character of the state, the former
takes precedence over the latter. So much for the mantra that Israel is the
“only democracy” in the Middle East.

Although in practice the law did not change the actual fabric of the state
or the inferior status of Palestinians, it was important for Israeli
leaders to prove their commitment to the Zionist cause. Consider, for
example, the recently-passed amendment
<https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/israel-palestine-admissions-committees-law-expanded>
of one of Israel’s central apartheid
<https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2022/02/israels-apartheid-against-palestinians-a-cruel-system-of-domination-and-a-crime-against-humanity/>
laws —the Village Committees Law of 2010 — that allows neighbourhoods and
villages up to 700 households to reject non-Jews moving in, so that the
fabric of the Jewish community is preserved. This leads naturally to
communities made up exclusively of Jews. What’s more, in five years from
now, it will grant Jewish-controlled admission committees power beyond the
current limit of 700 households in all Israeli-controlled areas and cities
throughout historic Palestine. The Zionist state, it seems, is no longer
concerned about exposing its ugly apartheid face.

To further illustrate the current changing climate, in 2012 the former
president of the Israeli Supreme Court, Asher Grunis, declared that “human
rights are not a prescription for national suicide
<https://merip.org/2012/02/the-myth-of-israels-liberal-supreme-court-exposed/>,”
referring to Palestinian rights and needs. At the time, this was seen
clearly as an extreme right-wing view, but in today’s unmasked apartheid
reality Grunis would be regarded as a liberal for linking human rights to
Palestinians in the first place.

While Zionist institutions, including the Israeli Supreme Court as well as
all governments in Israel, have advanced the Zionist goal of colonising all
of Palestine, a shift from a hidden and subtle colonial system to a more
overtly aggressive apartheid is clearly happening.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20230829/c21728ed/attachment.htm>