[News] Palestine - ‘New generation is capable of leading a new Intifada’

[Anti-Imperialist News]

rt.com <https://www.rt.com/news/546058-west-bank-armed-uprising/> ‘New
generation is capable of leading a new Intifada’
January 19, 2022
[image: 61e1901e85f5400d700c00cd.jpg]

------------------------------

On December 28, shortly before the beginning of 2022, Palestinian Authority
(PA) President Mahmoud Abbas visited the home of Israeli Defense Minister
Benny Gantz
<https://www.timesofisrael.com/gantz-pa-president-abbas-meet-at-defense-ministers-home-in-rosh-haayin/>.
The meeting was the first between Abbas and a senior Israeli official
inside Israeli territory since 2010 and was, according to Israeli media
reports, focused on discussing the development of “security coordination”
between Israel and the PA.

Days later, PA forces raided Jenin, making a number of arrests
<https://www.timesofisrael.com/idf-planned-major-raid-on-jenin-but-called-it-off-after-pa-forces-acted-report/>,
following on from a similar Palestinian Authority operation to weaken armed
groups in the area in late November. The chief of staff for Israel’s
military, Aviv Kohavi, later praised the PA forces for their action,
claiming that Israel had been planning a similar large-scale operation in
Jenin, but had called it off when the PA began acting first.

Since last May’s Israel–Palestine crisis, after an 11-day war against Gaza
took place, tensions have been continuing to build in the occupied
territories. The subsequent torturing to death of a West Bank-based critic
of the Palestinian Authority
<https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-58400442>, Nizar Banat, by PA
security forces, sparked fear of an uprising which could potentially oust
PA leader Abbas, whose democratic presidential legitimacy expired in 2009.
[image: ‘My youngest son has seen nothing but violence’ – Palestinian
activist on life in West Bank village where Israelis killed a child]
<https://www.rt.com/op-ed/525101-violence-palestinian-killed-israeli-child/>

To get to know more about whether an uprising is brewing in the West Bank
and what connection this may have to the actions of the Palestinian
Authority, I spoke to Dr. Ramzy Baroud, a Palestinian academic and
journalist. First, I asked him what he makes of Abbas’ meeting with Benny
Gantz, and whether this was tied to recent attempts to crack down on the
Palestinian armed struggle, to which he answered the following:

*“I think that the Palestinian Authority and Israel have something in
common and that is to make sure there will be no rebellion in the West
Bank.”* He added:
* “The West Bank, as of last May, is undergoing two types of
transformations; one is the rise of the new generation that is capable of
indeed leading a new Intifada… the other change that is happening in the
West Bank is the rise of the pro-armed struggle narrative.”*

I also spoke on the issue to a Ramallah-based journalist who wished to
remain anonymous for fear of persecution. Speaking over the phone, he told
me that* “everyone is fed up with the PA, they know that they simply
collaborate with Israel and the people don’t consider them as a
representative, but instead part of the occupation.”* He went on to admit
that he* “was even surprised to see the way young people in Palestine are
behaving; they are going to other villages to resist the settlers and
soldiers, they are attending funerals of martyrs in their tens of
thousands, they are much more inspired now.”*

I asked what threat is being posed by the small, often poorly organized,
armed groups which seem to be popping up all over the West Bank in villages
and refugee camps. He answered that *“there has always been groups, which
call themselves as being associated with Al-Qassam [Hamas’ armed wing],
Saraya Al-Quds [PIJ Party armed wing], Abu Ali Mustapha [PFLP armed wing]
or Kataeb Shuhada al-Aqsa [unofficial Fatah Party armed wing], but the
problem is that, due to PA spies, groups have little chance at this time to
ever pose major threats, but maybe in the future this will change.”* He
said that the
*“biggest threat to Israel are the armed attacks by individuals who decide
to carry out an operation without telling anyone, this way there is no way
for anyone to get the word out about their intentions and, yes, now we are
seeing more of this, it’s no surprise [the Israelis] are scared and that’s
why Israeli soldiers are more trigger-happy now than in recent years.” *

To explain this point further, I asked Ramzy Baroud about the nature of the
growing Palestinian resistance in the West Bank, specifically as we have
seen manifest in areas like Jenin, to which he answered:

*“We see this happening in the Jenin area, but we see this happening beyond
the Jenin area. Jenin has particularly, in many ways, been free from the
direct oppressive influence of the PA, so it kind of served as a place in
which that phenomenon could express itself, in an open way. However, it
does exist in other parts of the West Bank and, the moment that an armed
rebellion breaks out, I think there will be much more of a popular appeal
to it in various other parts of the West Bank.”*
[image: Tied up naked and starving for 3 days in an Israeli jail –
ex-Palestinian prisoner]
<https://www.rt.com/op-ed/544538-human-rights-violations-israeli-jails/>

Ramzy Baroud also added that *“Mahmoud Abbas knows this,”* about the way
armed resistance seems to be growing in practice and seen as the primary
solution. He made it clear that he believes Mahmoud Abbas
* “is really not fighting for his own survival at the helm of this
so-called leadership, he is fighting for the brand that he had created. The
brand of corrupt officials and a security force, armed, trained and
sustained by American money and military intelligence, Israeli support
even, and the support of various corrupt Arab regimes in the region.”*

The Palestinian Authority, based in Ramallah, West Bank is run by the party
of Mahmoud Abbas, Fatah, but the party itself seems to be on shaky legs
after last year. Elections were called by the PA president
<https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jan/16/abbas-announces-first-palestinian-elections-in-15-years>
at the start of 2021, which caused various separate Fatah Party lists to
announce that they would run against each other. This then led to a brief
internal clash between opposing factions of Fatah. There were also several
incidents of Fatah factions launching armed attacks on one another, the
most prominent of which was in April, when gunmen in the city of Al-Khalil,
Hebron opened fire on the home of Lawyer Hatem Shaheen
<https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/gunmen-attack-home-of-palestinian-candidate-in-hebron-664903>,
who was running as a candidate on the al-Mustaqbal (‘The Future’) list
affiliated with former Fatah strongman Mohammed Dahlan.


The elections were set to be the first in over 15 years, but were
ultimately canceled by Abbas. The official PA position was that Israeli
restrictions placed on voters in East Jerusalem was the reason behind the
cancellation, but critics say that it was really down to the current
leadership's fear of losing power if a democratic vote were held. Hamas,
which won the last legislative elections, in 2006, was running a strong
campaign and, due to Fatah running so many separate lists, it looked likely
that Hamas would win. In addition to this, Marwan Barghouti
<https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2021/2/23/political-prisoner-marwan-barghouti-for-president>,
a prominent Fatah leader now held by Israel as a political prisoner, was
threatening to run for Palestinian president and, due to his popularity
amongst the Palestinian electorate, it would have been very possible that
he could’ve dethroned Abbas.

*“There is a serious concern that the moment Mahmoud Abbas disappears from
the scene, certain branches of Fatah are planning to wage an internal
rebellion for the internal definition and the soul of Fatah,”* says Ramzy
Baroud, affirming that he believes the ruling Fatah Party is itself in
crisis. Not only this, but the fear of a battle for the control of Fatah is
also part of the reason for the PA now intensifying its coordination with
Israel and its battle to prevent armed rebellion in the West Bank.

Baroud added that:
*“Israel is very keen on [a Fatah rebellion] not happening. It also cannot
afford to have the kind of rebellion that happened last May. For the first
time in its history, Israel appeared to be truly scared [during the May
rebellion], struggling to keep things together. It was a very dangerous
precedent; where there was a near state of civil war going on in Israel
itself, the West Bank was rising, East Jerusalem was on fire, Gaza was
fighting back, it was unprecedented. Israel managed to contain that, but I
don’t think Israel will be able to contain it again in the future and a
similar rebellion could lead to the disintegration of the Palestinian
Authority.”*

In addition to the growing anti-PA resentment in the West Bank, the latest
findings indicating that almost 80% of Palestinians polled say that Mahmoud
Abbas should resign
<https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/palestinians/.premium-nearly-80-percent-of-palestinians-want-abbas-to-resign-new-poll-finds-1.10228566>,
is the question of the Palestinian Authority’s economic downfall. Ramzy
Baroud says that the PA’s economic struggle is manufactured and shouldn’t
really be referred to as an “economic crisis.” This is because there is no
functioning economy in a conventional sense, in the West Bank, because it
all goes through Israel. Due to the stranglehold that the Israeli
government has on the PA’s finances, Baroud argues that, despite all his
threats to do so,* “Abbas cannot possibly operate outside of that model
that is entirely dictated by Israel,”* which is predicated on the Oslo
Accords signed between the PLO and Tel Aviv
<https://interactive.aljazeera.com/aje/palestineremix/the-price-of-oslo.html#/14>
.
[image: Palestinian refugee camps are a tinderbox for civil war]
<https://www.rt.com/op-ed/543175-palestinian-refugee-camps-lebanon/>

The recent crackdowns inside the West Bank, by PA forces, have primarily
seemed to target Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), which has
coincided with a rise in what would seem to be support for Hamas since last
May. Similar crackdowns have occurred in the past, most notably following
the 2006 Palestinian legislative elections
<https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/jan/26/israel1>, which Hamas won in
a landslide. This resulted in Fatah, the United States and Israel’s
rejection of the elections’ outcome and a planned coup against the Gaza
based government, democratically elected in what former US President Jimmy
Carter called a *“free and fair”* election. Despite the ‘Mecca agreement,’
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatah%E2%80%93Hamas_Mecca_Agreement>
facilitated by Saudi Arabia to form a unity government between Fatah and
Hamas, Fatah’s PA went on to receive financial backing from the United
States to persecute Hamas. Hamas pre-empted the planned coup – coordinated
between the US Bush administration and PA Preventative Security Head
Mohammed Dahlan – and defeated Fatah, taking complete control of Gaza.

Due to this history, a factional analysis is now being made, presenting the
issue as again a Hamas-against-Fatah struggle in the occupied territories,
but Ramzy Baroud argues that this is a misinterpretation of Palestine’s
current predicament.

*“I think that we have to be clear here, I don’t think that the issue here
is about popularity for Hamas at the expense of Fatah… What I think we are
talking about here is a different political model,”* he proposed, stating
that the *“factional narrative of Hamas vs. Fatah or the Socialists, or
Islamic Jihad”* is no longer what we are dealing with. Instead he believes
that there is a unified model under which Palestinians have tossed away
belief in negotiating for a two-state model and believe only in resistance
as a solution, stating that the distinction between armed and popular
non-violent struggle is not one really made by Palestinians, but instead
this is a Western way of looking at it.

*“The support of the resistance is not necessarily support of Hamas as a
political party, but it’s rather the support of anybody that is willing to
resist and it just happens that Hamas is the major party that operates in
Gaza,”* he pointed out, adding that the support is also allocated to *“the
socialist groups, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad [PIJ] and even al-Aqsa
Martyrs brigades [Fatah’s armed wing, not officially connected to the
Party] and other Fatah affiliates in the West Bank.”*

An example of the support for any resistance figures, Ramzy Baroud argued,
came when six Palestinian political prisoners escaped from Israel’s Gilboa
Jail
<https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/israel-gilboa-prison-break-escapees-survived-run-how>last
September. He noted that the primary hero for Palestinians of all political
leanings and parties was Zakaria Zubeidi, who is a Fatah member and once
led the Al-Aqsa Martyrs brigades (a Fatah armed group), calling the unified
position on Zubeidi across Party lines *“unprecedented.”*

Israel repeatedly called for foreign powers to boost their aid to the
Palestinian Authority
<https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-will-push-states-to-boost-aid-to-palestinians-at-donor-conference-minister/>
late last year. The Israeli government also seems to be eying the prospect
of boosting their own aid to the PA
<https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2021/11/israel-calls-increase-financial-aid-palestinian-authority>,
but notably there are no high-ranking Israeli government officials who dare
call for dialogue to discuss a two-state solution, as was the case in the
past, when the Palestinian Authority’s leaders had formed such strong bonds
with their counterparts in the Israeli government. Both Israeli Prime
Minister Naftali Bennett
<https://www.jpost.com/international/bennett-to-americans-we-want-stability-but-not-two-states-677709>
and his power-sharing partner, Yair Lapid
<https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/israel-palestine-yair-lapid-two-state-solution-unfeasible>,
oppose the idea that a Palestinian State should come from a thorough
dialogue with the PA; this adds the additional layer of pressure, pitting
them directly against the international consensus for ending the conflict.
Unlike the situation under the former US administration of Donald Trump,
the Israelis are not being given a direct say on what Washington’s policy
will be when it comes to the Palestinians. President Joe Biden, although
staunchly pro-Israel, has reverted back to the traditional US position of
supporting the international consensus and this is potentially bad news for
Israel.
[image: 61e7dc3685f54025a2450e75.jpg]

The strategy to simply strengthen the Palestinian Authority economically
and with additional weapons in the West Bank may not be enough to prevent
its downfall, as the closer Israel gets with Mahmoud Abbas, the further
isolated the Palestinian public feels. Elements of the Israeli government,
including its current Prime Minister, also seem to be opposed to the US
plan to strengthen the PA’s standing with moves such as opening a consulate
to deal with the PA in East Jerusalem
<https://english.alaraby.co.uk/news/israel-pm-refuses-reopening-us-palestinian-consulate>.
If Israel’s government cannot decide on a unified position on how to
support the PA, this could also make its plan to prop up the leadership of
Mahmoud Abbas’s Palestinian Authority a more arduous task.

If the Palestinian Authority, lead by Mahmoud Abbas’s Fatah Party, fails to
consolidate power and hold on to its current position in the West Bank, it
is very possible that a new phase in the Palestine-Israel conflict will be
reached. The Oslo Process, beginning from 1993
<https://peacemaker.un.org/israelopt-osloaccord93>, ended the large-scale
Palestinian rebellion (the Intifada) that had broken out in 1987 inside the
occupied territories, and ushered in an era of failed dialogue. The
Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) had officially recognised Israel as
a state and, by accepting UN resolution 242, accepted that the West Bank,
Gaza and East Jerusalem were the only areas in which Palestine could be a
future state. Out of Oslo, the Palestinian Authority was born and was
tasked with managing small areas of the West Bank and Gaza. Although this
model of partial PA control was supposed to lead to their expanded control
over the territories, Israel refused to withdraw incrementally, as was
stipulated in Oslo II, and instead, through settlement expansion, the
Israeli presence — called 'occupation' by its opponents — became even more
deeply entrenched.
[image: Israel is picking so many fights on multiple fronts that several
wars could break out at any time. Meanwhile, the US stays silent]
<https://www.rt.com/op-ed/538126-israel-war-us-silent/>

The Second Intifada
<https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2020/9/28/palestinian-intifada-20-years-later-israeli-occupation-continues>,
in 2000, erupted out of the failure of the Peace Process to produce
tangible results and, following the death of former PA President Yasser
Arafat in 2004 after he was besieged by the Israeli military, the new PA
model began under Arafat’s successor Mahmoud Abbas. The model set forward
was a ‘status quo’ model, which has essentially led to the building
discontent seen inside the occupied territories today. There is no longer
any hope for the revival of the ‘Peace Process’ between the PA and Israel,
in large part due to this being seen as unacceptable by most Israelis and,
therefore, not worthy of support by its politicians.

On November 2, a new Palestinian organisation was founded, the ‘Masar
Badil,’
<https://www.mintpressnews.com/masar-badil-new-palestinian-movement-israel-pa-edge/279051/>
calling itself the alternative to the Oslo Process and the Palestinian
Authority in the West Bank. It has so far garnered open support from
political parties inside Palestine, such as the Palestinian Islamic Jihad
(PIJ) movement, and seeks to support* “all the resistance forces inside
Palestine”* in order to achieve total liberation of Palestine. I spoke to
some of Masar Badil’s founding members, asking for a comment on the rise of
an armed rebellion in the West Bank, and got the answer that the
organisation believes the young generation have reached the point where
they’re on the verge of a new uprising.

Khaled Barakat, a founding member of Masar Badil, views the armed struggle
element as one that has to be understood in its context, sharing with me
that this only comes as a last resort historically, and pointing back to
the absence of a unified armed struggle during periods of dialogue with
either Britain or Israel during the past 100 years of struggle towards
statehood. Gollowing a lack of positive results attained by an often
corrupt elitist leadership class, from there, then, comes an uprising which
seeks to make strides towards liberation using armed force as an
alternative to empty platitudes and meaningless dialogue, he stressed.

The Israeli government and its allies seem to be trying to keep the status
quo and may be considering the likes of former Fatah strongman Mohammed
Dahlan – who currently works as Abu Dhabi Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Zayid’s
right-hand man
<https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/10/30/mohammed-dahlan-uae-palestinians-israel/>
– as a valid replacement in the absence of Mahmoud Abbas. But it seems that
one miscalculation and, without a consensus reached within the Israeli
government on exactly how to maintain the PA and the status quo, everything
could quickly get out of hand and, in the event that a new Intifada breaks
out, Israel may be forced to make compromises in order to quell that
uprising. If the majority of Palestinians now really support armed
uprising, then all attempts to strengthen the PA at this time may be futile
or, at the very least, may prove unsustainable.

*Robert Inlakesh* is a political analyst, journalist and documentary
filmmaker currently based in London, UK. He has reported from and lived in
the occupied Palestinian territories and currently works with Quds News and
Press TV.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely
those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20220119/063005a1/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 61e7dc3685f54025a2450e75.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 317888 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20220119/063005a1/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 61e1901e85f5400d700c00cd.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 90223 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20220119/063005a1/attachment-0001.jpg>