[News] Tech companies block another Leila Khaled event
news at freedomarchives.org
Tue May 4 11:38:17 EDT 2021
companies block another Leila Khaled event
<https://electronicintifada.net/people/nora-barrows-friedman> - May 3, 2021
[image: A sign in front of UC Merced]
The University of California has accepted Zoom’s veto power over
Palestine-related curriculum in public institutions. (Lance Johnson
Silicon Valley tech companies have once again blocked a live-streamed event
featuring anti-apartheid activists, including Palestinian resistance icon Leila
Khaled <https://electronicintifada.net/tags/leila-khaled> and South
Africa’s former ANC military leader Ronnie Kasrils
The University of California at Merced event, “Whose Narratives? What Free
Speech for Palestine?,” was organized to discuss ongoing attacks on critics
of Israel in academia and the dangers of censorship.
It was shut down by video conferencing platformers Zoom, Facebook and
YouTube days before the 23 April panel. The event management platform
pulled the publicity page from its website.
Earlier in April, Facebook deleted the entire account page of San Francisco
State University’s (SFSU) Arab and Muslim Ethnicities and Diasporas
program, a co-sponsor of the event.
Facebook claimed that content posted to the event page violated its
The page has not been restored.
The 23 April event was due to take place exactly seven months after Zoom,
Facebook and YouTube blocked the same panelists
from speaking at San Francisco State University, part of the California
State University system which is separate from the University of
Organizers of the panel say that students and activists were looking
forward to hearing from Khaled and Kasrils, in conversation with US
activists and former political prisoners Sekou Odinga and Laura Whitehorn,
and scholar Rula Abu Dahou, director of the women’s studies institute at
Birzeit University in the occupied West Bank.
Last fall, Zoom shut down other planned events
with Khaled in the US and UK. Ironically, those censored talks intended to
discuss Zoom’s censorship of the initial September panel.
Israel lobby groups have tried to convince universities and the tech
companies that hosting Khaled, who is in her seventies and lives in Jordan,
would constitute “material support” to US-designated “terrorists” – even
though she was not being compensated for her involvement in the webinars
and has not been involved in any armed resistance activities in decades.
Palestine Legal and other law organizations warned
Zoom last October that the company’s actions “are a dangerous attack on
free speech and academic freedom, and an abuse of your contract with our
public university systems.”
Its status as an essential public service, they added, “does not give you
veto power over the content of the nation’s classrooms and public events.”
In an effort to prepare for possible interference by the streaming
platforms, UC Merced professor Sean L. Malloy had worked with
administrators and faculty colleagues to preemptively search for
alternative online venues.
“The answer I had received across the board is, we don’t have any streaming
alternatives and that we are reliant as a university for streaming on Zoom
[and] on YouTube,” he told The Electronic Intifada.
Malloy was one of the event’s moderators.
“If that is true, that the university absolutely cannot stream anything
without the cooperation of private corporations, or if they profess to
support this event but are unwilling to offer us an alternative platform,
that is troubling,” he added.
In communications with the university’s legal department, Malloy explained
that the administration had initially been supportive of the event going
forward, and had understood that it carried a low legal risk.
Michael T. Brown, the University of California’s provost and vice president
of academic affairs, had written to UC faculty in December, promising them
that Zoom was taking their concerns of potential violations of academic
Brown added that former University of California president Janet Napolitano
<https://electronicintifada.net/tags/janet-napolitano> had been appointed
to Zoom’s board of directors – ostensibly to assure faculty that Napolitano
will tell Zoom that “censorship is not consistent with the values of the
University of California.”
Napolitano, who was appointed by the Obama administration as Homeland
Security secretary and oversaw the deportations of undocumented persons in
numbers, has been “sympathetic
to anti-Palestinian lobby groups which have long tried to smear and censor
advocates for Palestinian rights on California campuses.
In his letter, the UC Provost said the administration “confirmed that Zoom
does not monitor use of its platform by participating in public or private
events, including classes, events, or protests hosted on its platform.”
Malloy said that the University of California had offered to file a
pre-enforcement action against the material support law in federal court in
order to challenge its constitutionality.
But the university chose to take a different approach before any legal move
could be made.
Instead of defending the right of the academic panel to proceed, UC
Merced’s administration publicized a counter-programming seminar
on anti-Jewish bigotry and “principles of community,” to take place around
the same time that the panel was scheduled.
“It echoed what the president of San Francisco State University did,” Rabab
Abdulhadi <https://electronicintifada.net/tags/rabab-abdulhadi>, director
of the Arab and Muslim Ethnicities and Diasporas program at SFSU, told The
Hours after the September event was canceled by Zoom, Facebook and YouTube,
SFSU President Lynn Mahoney spoke at a counter event
organized by Hillel, an explicitly Zionist organization on campus, to honor
“victims of terror.”
That event was co-sponsored
<https://jewishfed.org/news/events/vigil-victims-terror> by the Israeli
consulate and several major Israel advocacy groups, along with the
Abdulhadi told The Electronic Intifada that California State University and
SFSU had then “accepted Zoom’s control over the curriculum, and now the UC
has accepted it.”
“We hoped it would be different,” she added.
“It does not absolve the private tech companies, but our administrations
are obligated to facilitate the curriculum – not uphold the censorship of
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the News