[News] Apartheid in the Shadows: the USA, IBM and South Africa’s Digital Police State
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Wed May 3 10:51:17 EDT 2017
http://www.counterpunch.org/2017/05/03/apartheid-in-the-shadows-the-usa-ibm-and-south-africas-digital-police-state/
Apartheid in the Shadows: the USA, IBM and South Africa’s Digital
Police State
by Michael Kwet <http://www.counterpunch.org/author/michael-kwet/> - May
3, 2017
------------------------------------------------------------------------
“Beggars and vagrants” are not welcome
<http://www.parksec.co.za/crime-update-17-august-06-september-2015> in
Parkhurst, a mostly white suburb of about 5,000 in Johannesburg, South
Africa. Criminals of “increasing sophistication and aggression” are on
the prowl <https://archive.is/rh3qV>, residents claim. To combat local
crime, community members proposed a solution: put surveillance
everywhere. Their proposal, however, was not for “traditional”
surveillance. Thanks to the digital revolution, Parkhurst could now
integrate facial recognition, thermal sensors, infrared tracking, and
data analytics. Armed with powerful new tech, poor black “vagrants” can
be watched, flagged, policed, and intimidated into submission.
“Smart” surveillance systems are being assembled quietly inside the
country. The public has been kept uninformed. This is the first
in-depth exposé of smart policing in South Africa.
*A New “Revolution”*
Two years ago, Parkhurst became one of the first SA neighborhoods to
embark on the installation of their own smart surveillance system. This
little community made national headlines as the first suburb in South
Africa to get residential fiber Internet. Media outlets whitewashed the
surveillance component.
The Parkhurst Village Residents and Business Owners Association fought
for “Fibre to the Home” Internet. Their primary motivation was “modern”
digital surveillance only high-speed Internet could power, said the
organization’s chair <https://youtu.be/qlTZetW1Sy8?t=2162>, Cheryl
Labuschagne. That residents now have fast Internet seems to be a
secondary bonus.
A Vumatel employee, Giorgio Lovino, elaborates
<https://youtu.be/qlTZetW1Sy8?t=1942>: the fiber “connects to the CCTV
[surveillance] cameras…throughout the suburb and it transmits the video
feed from those cameras…to a control point where their cameras can then
be monitored off-site. And it allows them to do number plate
recognition, facial recognition, and all these types of surveillance
activities.” The CCTV system is being worked out so that it may be
affordable to the community.
Parkhurst plans to install infrared and heat-source cameras to track
body movements. Labuschagne says they will use “GPS technology and so
on to map where incidents occur” and determine “what movement is
considered abnormal rather than typical movements in a neighborhood of
people walking their dogs and so on.”
Labuschagne leaves unstated what constitutes “abnormal” movements.
However, iSentry <http://www.csstactical.co.za/services#page64_image3>,
the CCTV software Parkhurst seeks, makes it explicit. Their promotional
video, titled “Unusual Behavior Detection
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rol-oeBvM0c>”, depicts a young, black
“beggar”, flagged by iSentry’s artificial intelligence-based video
analytics. Within moments, he and an accomplice are brought to the
ground by a gang of cops, semi-automatic gun pointed.
The scene appears to be staged for promotional filming as a “typical
scenario” for how the system should work. That is to say, Parkhurst’s
21^st century policing system is advertised to target poor black people.
The iSentry system, deployed by CSS Tactical, has been installed
<http://sandtonchronicle.co.za/news/sandton-wiki/sandton-nonprofit-organisations/css-tactical/>
in nearby suburbs, and is spreading to others
<https://www.privateproperty.co.za/advice/news/articles/eye-on-street-cameras/3507>.
Parkview Police Station Commander, Colonel Moodley, supports
<https://archive.is/OwtBK> the “refreshing” initiative
“wholeheartedly”. Labuschagne proclaims she is “really really hopeful
that what we’ve started is a revolution” in South Africa.
*Smart Cities: Surveillance in the Shadows*
A revolution is a number of years in the making. In 2011, the City of
Johannesburg announced
<http://www.joburg.org.za/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=7216&catid=88&Itemid=266>
a draft /Growth and Development Strategy (GDS 2040)/ to convert
Johannesburg into a “smart city” in cooperation with the private
sector. Digital technology would overhaul
<https://web.archive.org/web/20160506223623/http:/joburg.org.za/gds2040/smartcity_synthesis.php>
everything from public service delivery to crime management using “smart
infrastructure” and “intelligent Video and Internet surveillance systems”.
Shortly thereafter, Johannesburg began implementing “smart policing”
based on new surveillance cameras and centralized police data
analytics. Last year, then Mayor Parks Tau (ANC) attributed
<http://www.itweb.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=152258>
smart policing to a 22% crime reduction for 2014/15 in the wealthy
central business district of Johannesburg – a whites-only area under
apartheid. Tau boasted
<http://ewn.co.za/2016/06/26/City-of-JHB-installs-smart-cameras-around-city>
his crime-fighting tools have “face recognition technologies, number
plate recognition technologies and are able to detect or anticipate when
a group of people are planning a smash and grab.” The City of Cape Town
is similarly
<http://www.itweb.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=153751>
following suit
<https://mybroadband.co.za/news/security/195448-cape-town-fights-crime-with-drones-acoustic-technology-and-smartphones.html>.
High-speed Internet is critical to smart video surveillance because it
enables the transmission of high definition feeds. Computers need
richly detailed images to identify words, faces, and other attributes.
Blurry images will not do. Thus where there is high-speed Internet,
there can also be smart surveillance.
At the helm of South Africa’s high-speed Internet roll-out is Siyabonga
Cwele
<http://www.brainstormmag.co.za/cover-story/36-cover-story/9332-martin-czernowalow>,
the former Minister of Intelligence (2008-09) and State Security
(2009-14). As SA’s former spy boss, Cwele supported the controversial
Protection of State Information Bill which bolsters the protection of
state secrets.
Cwele lists no formal credentials, industry experience or training in
technology. Nevertheless, President Jacob Zuma, himself a former
intelligence chief, appointed Cwele as Minister of the Department of
Telecommunications and Postal Services (DTPS). This puts a former spy
minister in charge of South Africa’s Internet.
Speaking in the Western Cape, Cwele told South Africans
<http://www.gov.za/speeches/minister-siyabonga-cwele-2016-southern-african-telecommunications-networks-and-applications>
they “must adapt” to a “change [in] our notions of privacy”. The
“fourth industrial revolution” – a term coined by World Economic Forum
founder Klaus Schwab – is coming to South Africa.
*Smart Policing: United States, South Africa*
Across the Atlantic, smart policing is well under way. In 2016, a study
<https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing>
published by /ProPublica/ found that software commonly used in the
United States to predict “future criminals” is “biased against blacks”.
Even though there were no racial categories programmed into the
software, blacks were incorrectly ranked as “future criminals” at almost
twice the rate of white defendants. The racist ranking could not be
explained by prior crimes or the type of crimes committed, the study found.
In US public spaces, aerial surveillance drones and smart sensors are
being used for urban population control. In 2015, the FBI disclosed
<http://bigstory.ap.org/article/f1a797c9b286412ca72eb85b3cc35a4b/comey-fbi-used-aerial-surveillance-above-ferguson>
it flew surveillance drones over Ferguson and Baltimore during
BlackLivesMatter protests prompted by police murders of Michael Brown
and Freddie Gray. Published documents
<https://www.aclu.org/blog/free-future/fbi-documents-reveal-new-information-baltimore-surveillance-flights>
reveal the FBI was utilizing infrared and night-vision cameras and
keeping recordings of aerial drone surveillance footage.
Cell phones are also targeted by cops. In 2015, Baltimore residents
discovered
<http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2015/08/23/baltimore-police-stingray-cell-surveillance/31994181/>
their city police department is systematically abusing
<https://www.wired.com/2016/04/spy-tool-ruling-inches-stingray-debate-closer-supreme-court/>
“stingray” devices that trick cell phone owners into revealing their
location. Evidence shows
<http://fusion.net/story/337107/baltimore-police-department-stingrays-black-neighborhoods/>
the stingray devices are overwhelmingly concentrated in poor black
neighborhoods, with disproportionate impact on people of color. Half of
all US adults
<http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/10/the-perpetual-lineup-half-of-us-adults-in-a-face-recognition-database/>
are now in a law enforcement facial-recognition database. One-fourth of
the nation’s police departments have access to face-recognition databases.
Smart policing is a controversial new component of the digital era.
Using smart surveillance, computers and sensors automatically detect and
interpret video feeds and other data in real-time to facilitate
ubiquitous policing. As the cost of technology drops, corporate and
state actors are littering cities with an array of sensors – microphones
to detect gun-shots, hi-res video for face recognition, infrared and
heat to evaluate bodily movements – and networking them with high-speed
Internet to radically expand police power.
Utilizing advanced data analytics, those with access to the surveillance
– corporations, police departments, private security firms, government
spy agencies – sift through massive troves of data to hone in on groups
and persons of interest. Computer software is determining where to
concentrate cops on patrol to prevent “future crime”, with potentially
disastrous
<http://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2016/08/31/civil-rights-and-tech-advocates-sound-alarm-racial-bias-predictive-policing>
effects on civil rights.
The South African state is mirroring the US. The government has
“grabber” devices
<http://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2016-09-01-meet-the-grabber-how-government-and-criminals-can-spy-on-you-and-how-to-protect-yourself/>
that pretend to be cell phone towers in order to “track [a] phone’s
movements, pinpoint its location, intercept its calls, or eavesdrop on
conversations” – without the cell phone owner ever knowing it.
Protesters, when gathered in large groups, are highly vulnerable to
grabbers.
Drone surveillance has also begun. The City of Cape Town is
experimenting with aerial drones to watch over citizens. Their website
even calls the program
<http://www.groundup.org.za/article/city-cape-town-plan-acquire-drones_2226/>
“Big Brother”. A Pretoria-based company, Desert Wolf, developed a drone
that can spray tear gas and fire rubber bullets at protesters. An
unnamed mining company ordered 25 units.
As I reported at Counterpunch
<http://www.counterpunch.org/2017/01/27/cmore-south-africas-new-smart-policing-surveillance-engine/>
in January, South Africa-based R&D organization, the Council for
Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), has quietly developed Cmore
<http://cmore.co.za/site/>. A new “Jason Bourne” type surveillance
system, Cmore aggregates and analyzes data from drone footage, CCTVs,
cell phone data, and other inputs for maritime, park, and border
policing. The CSIR considered Cmore “for police” and subsequently
partnered with the South African Police Service (SAPS). Experiments
include “crowd-control concept demonstrations”.
Meanwhile, Johannesburg’s Intelligence Operations Centre (IOC) is now
outfitted with
<http://www.joburg.org.za/images/stories/2016/june/pdf/End%20of%20Term%20Report.pdf>
“100 existing high impact cameras” enabled for software-based
“Intelligent Video Analytics as an input into Intelligent Law
Enforcement”. The new anti-immigrant mayor
<http://www.timeslive.co.za/politics/2016/12/13/Mashaba-sticks-to-his-guns-about-illegal-immigrants>
of Johannesburg, Herman Mashaba (DA), endorsed
<http://www.timeslive.co.za/sundaytimes/opinion/2016/04/10/Herman-Mashaba-my-vision-for-smartening-up-SAs-biggest-city>
predictive policing in April 2016, months before his election victory.
Five years prior, IBM, the major computer and surveillance partner
<https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/02/eff-files-amicus-brief-case-seeks-hold-ibm-responsible-facilitating-apartheid>
to the apartheid state, partnered
<https://smartercitieschallenge.org/assets/cities/johannesburg-south-africa/documents/johannesburg-south-africa-summary-2011.pdf>
with the City of Johannesburg to define a roadmap which includes crime
prevention and investigative analytics.
*IBM Corporation: Apartheid Past and Present*
In 2002, South Africans brought a law suit against US corporations
alleging direct support for human rights violations committed by the
apartheid regime. IBM, SA plaintiffs claimed, provided technology used
to implement the apartheid-era racial classification system.
The USA continuously provides
<https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/02/time-act-companies-selling-mass-spy-gear-authoritarian-regimes>
technology to oppressive foreign regimes. In years past, multiple US
corporations played a treacherous role assisting
<http://allafrica.com/stories/200805130448.html> South African
apartheid. IBM has been among the worst offenders.
Beginning in the 1930s, IBM New York, under the direction of its
president, Thomas Watson, Sr., supplied
<https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/02/eff-files-amicus-brief-case-seeks-hold-ibm-responsible-facilitating-apartheid>
Hollerith punch card systems to their IBM Germany subsidiary for use by
the Third Reich. IBM machines were customized for the Nazis to
efficiently track and sort groups targeted for persecution and genocide.
Numbers tattooed on Auschwitz inmates began as IBM punch card system
identification numbers.
During apartheid, with Thomas Watson, Jr. now president, IBM New York
leased its IBM South Africa subsidiary with specialized technology
tailored for the apartheid state. In 1952, the apartheid regime ordered
its first electronic tabulator to IBM South Africa. There is ample
evidence
<https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2724563/United-States-Ford-SADF-Collaboration-Complaint.pdf>
their technology was used to categorize, segregate and denationalize blacks.
In 1965, IBM lost a bid
<http://www.historicalpapers.wits.ac.za/inventories/inv_pdfo/AG1977/AG1977-A11-8-3-001-jpeg.pdf>
to produce passbooks targeting the black population. However, they won
the contract to build the eerie “Book of Life
<http://wiser.wits.ac.za/sites/default/files/Breckenridge%20-%202014%20-%20The%20Book%20of%20Life%20The%20South%20African%20Population%20Reg_0.pdf>”
issued after 1970 – a surveillance project covering additional races
(e.g., coloureds, Indians, and whites).
Computer automation of the population register helped streamline
<https://www.docdroid.net/GjdLcbl/narmic-american-friends-service-committee-1992-automating-apartheid.pdf.html>
the infamous “reference book” system. The reference books (scorned as
“dompas” or “dumb pass”) were designed to monitor and control blacks
from a centralized location, the Central Reference Bureau in Pretoria.
As Keith Breckenridge’s /Biometric State/ (2014) details, police desired
the ability to swiftly identify and locate “Natives” by their national
ID or fingerprints contained in the passbooks. It was “a single,
cost-effective tool that would allow the police to track elusive African
suspects.”
But this form of centralized surveillance had weaknesses – people would
lose or burn their dompas or rip out or forge pages. An unwieldy
registration backlog quickly ballooned out of control. The dystopian
dream of panoptic population control by an all-seeing state failed, but
the consequences were brutal. Apartheid cops used the passbook system to
perpetrate mass violence and incarceration against blacks.
IBM New York, the central headquarters which provided technology and
expertise to its SA subsidiary, has denied liability. Last June, they
successfully fought off
<http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-apartheid-idUSKCN0Z61KA>
the law suit brought to US courts by black South African plaintiffs
representing victims of apartheid. Plaintiffs included relatives of
those tortured, raped, and murdered, in many instances in connection
with passbook violations.
In 2011, the City of Johannesburg announced
<https://web.archive.org/web/20170501222229/https:/www.smartercitieschallenge.org/cities/johannesburg-south-africa>
a partnership with IBM to conduct a “five-year public safety strategy in
line with the city’s 2040 vision of a smart city”. Unlike the “dumb”
passbook system, IBM’s latest system is “smart”: it uses “integrated
intelligence” for “crime prevention and investigation – including
increased police presence and visibility, better coordination amongst
agencies, and a data center with predictive analytics” as well as
“intelligence sharing”.
IBM bases its innovations on its new “Watson
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watson_%28computer%29>” supercomputer
system famous for surpassing humans in the quiz show Jeopardy. Their
Smart Vision Suite
<https://web.archive.org/web/20170501222405/http:/researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view_group.php?id=1394>
includes “moving object detection, tracking, object classification,
color classification, and face tracking” as well as “large scale
learning of vehicles and pedestrians”. They have a ten-year partnership
<http://www.fin24.com/Tech/Companies/IBM-to-launch-Joburg-inner-city-research-lab-20150206>
with South Africa’s Department of Science and Technology.
*SA in the 21^st Century: A Digital Police State*
South Africa’s smart policing movement has escaped public conversation.
Media coverage has been mostly taken up by tech outlets that focus on
individual technologies, and apparently see nothing wrong
<http://www.itweb.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=155209>
or even endorse
<http://www.itweb.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=158962>
this turn of events.
In March, hard-hitting investigative journalists at amaBhungane reported
<http://amabhungane.co.za/article/2017-03-07-jobs-for-pals-in-the-free-state-ace-magashules-playground>
that the Free State issued and awarded a “One Stop ICT Fusion Centre”
tender in violation of proper procurement procedures. The fusion centre
will apparently provide “an integrated ICT system for the entire
provincial government”, including “security camera surveillance and
traffic management” in a centralized control room. Indian corporation
Tech Mahindra is “the solutions partner”.
There is another story here, aside from the tender: what is Tech
Mahindra up to? According to a Tech Mahindra brochure
<http://www.techmahindra.com/sites/ResourceCenter/Brochures/new_gen_services/digital_enterprise_solution/Smart-Security-Surveillance.pdf>,
as a part of their “Smart City Solutions”, they provide “Smart Security
Surveillance”, which includes license plate and facial recognition,
behavior analysis, video analytics, and real-time monitoring.
Mahindra Defence Systems and US-based Cisco Systems have teamed up
<http://tech.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/technology/lucknow-police-smart-surveillance/46915693>
in Lucknow, India, to deploy 10,000 cameras. In April 2015, the Uttar
Pradesh government’s “state police demonstrated drones that can be used
to shower pepper powder on an unruly mob”. Five of these “crowd
control” drones were to be launched that month; they have a range of up
to 600 meters. The surveillance “will be very useful in managing
traffic violations” as well.
Mahindra is based in India. However 21^st century models and
technologies of repression are distinctly Western.
This is the current path for South Africa, already begun.
Perhaps it is worth recalling a bit of history. In 2016, a former
(now-deceased) CIA operative, Donald Rickard, happily admitted
<http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/nelson-mandela-cia-arrest-south-africa-a7030751.html>
he provided intelligence which led to Nelson Mandela’s 1962 arrest.
Years later, Steve Biko was placed under a banning order by the state,
which silenced his speech and restricted his movement. Police detained
and tortured him, leading to his tragic death. Apartheid cops murdered
untold numbers
<http://www.csvr.org.za/index.php/publications/1483-the-policing-of-public-gatherings-and-demonstrations-in-south-africa-1960-1994.html>
through riot control, the “prevention of unrest”, and the policing of
“public disorder”.
SA universities are spending millions on surveillance to quell
#FeesMustFall protests. In 2016, CCTVs at Rhodes University mushroomed
to provide what seems like blanket coverage, even extending inside
buildings. Management refuses
<http://www.ru.ac.za/latestnews/safetyandsecurityoncampus.html> to
disclose details. Earlier this year, Wits University added new CCTVs
and announced
<https://mg.co.za/article/2017-03-03-00-favour-rigorous-debate-not-security>
considerations for drone surveillance and biometrics on campus. And in
March, eNCA’s Checkpoint reported
<https://www.enca.com/media/video/big-brother-on-campus?playlist=75588>
that the University of Johannesburg appointed a private security
company, Bold Heart Group, that spies on students.
Outside of student spaces, service delivery protests abound. From
Vuwani to Cape Town, people are active in the streets. In response to
Zuma’s latest cabinet re-shuffle, tens, if not hundreds of thousands of
people amassed in public to exercise their constitutionally protected
right to protest.
On April 20, amaBhungane launched a challenge
<http://amabhungane.co.za/article/2017-04-20-surveillance-silent-killer-of-journalism-and-democracy>
to the constitutionality of the Regulation of Interception of
Communications and Provision of Communication-Related Information Act
(Rica). The challenge focuses on bulk communications interceptions.
There could be no better time to also challenge the legality and ethics
of smart policing.
It is essential to note that both major political parties – the ANC and
the DA – are assembling the smart surveillance state. It remains to be
seen what smaller parties like the EFF and UDM have to say – and what
the public will say itself.
Two decades after apartheid, half the population
<https://africacheck.org/reports/mail-onlines-claim-of-400000-poor-whites-in-south-africa-incorrect>
lives on $2 (R26) or less per day, while the majority are getting poorer
<http://www.fin24.com/Economy/we-will-be-poorer-in-2017-20161216>.
Serious plans for large scale wealth redistribution remain off the
table. In the shadows, the state – and some wealthy citizens – are
teaming up with corporations to unleash Western policing
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Zt7bl5Z_oA> for population control.
/Michael Kwet is a doctoral candidate in Sociology at the University
Currently Known as Rhodes (UCKAR). He studies the digital revolution in
South Africa, with a focus on basic education./
--
Freedom Archives 522 Valencia Street San Francisco, CA 94110 415
863.9977 www.freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20170503/a077ca32/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list