[News] Subduing al-Quds: Israel’s High-stake Game in al-Aqsa and Why Netanyahu May Prevail
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Wed Sep 23 11:50:33 EDT 2015
September 23, 2015
Subduing al-Quds: Israel’s High-stake Game in al-Aqsa and Why
Netanyahu May Prevail
<http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/09/23/subduing-al-quds-israels-high-stake-game-in-al-aqsa-and-why-netanyahu-may-prevail/>
by Ramzy Baroud <http://www.counterpunch.org/author/ramzy-baroud/>
*http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/09/23/subduing-al-quds-israels-high-stake-game-in-al-aqsa-and-why-netanyahu-may-prevail/*
The State of Israel was established on the ruins of Palestine, based on
a series of objectives that were initialed by letters from the Hebrew
alphabet, the consequences of which continue to guide Israeli strategies
to this day. The current violence against Palestinian worshippers at
al-Aqsa Mosque in Occupied East Jerusalem is a logical extension of the
same Zionist ambition.
Plan A (February, 1945), Plan B (May, 1947) and Plan C (November, 1947)
all strove to achieve the same end: the ethnic cleansing of Palestine of
its original inhabitants. It was not until March 1948 that Plan Dalet
(Hebrew for Plan D) brought together all of the preparatory stages for
final implementation.
Championed by the Haganah Jewish militias, ‘Plan Dalet’ saw the
destruction of hundreds of villages, the depopulation of entire cities
and the defense of the new country’s borders, ensuring Palestinian
refugees are never allowed back. For Palestinians, that phase of their
history is known as the “Nakba”, or the “Catastrophe”.
‘Dalet’ was an astounding success from the Zionists’ viewpoint. However,
the borders were never truly defined – in order to allow for territorial
expansion, at the opportune time. That moment came when Israel launched
its war of 1967 (known to Palestinians as ‘Naksa’ or the ‘Setback’),
seizing East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza, thus sealing the fate of
entire historic Palestine.
Occupied Jerusalem was not open for negotiations: it is Israel’s
historic, eternal and undivided capital, they claimed, citing or
misinterpreting biblical references as they saw fit. Almost immediately,
the Israeli Government annexed Jerusalem by extending the West Jerusalem
municipal borders to include newly conquered East Jerusalem.
It was not until 1980 when Israel passed a law that explicitly annexed
the illegally occupied city to become part of the so-called Israel
proper. Since then, Jerusalem has been a major point of strife,
political conflict and controversy. Understandably, the Jerusalem
political discourse is conflated with discussion about religion, but it
is far more encompassing than a conflict over access to holy sites.
The fate of Jerusalem and its holy sites cannot be understood separately
from the fate of Palestine. And the daily struggle of Palestinian
Muslims and Christians in that City is a representation of the struggle
of Palestinians everywhere.
As West Jerusalem was conquered under ‘Plan Dalet’, East Jerusalem, like
the rest of the Occupied Territories was, along with other Palestinian
regions, the target of another plan: The ‘Allon Plan’.
It was named after Yigal Allon, a former general and minister in the
Israeli Government, who took on the task of drawing an Israeli vision
for the newly conquered Palestinian Territories. While the Israeli
Government moved to immediately change the status quo governing East
Jerusalem, the ‘Allon Plan’ sought to annex more than 30 percent of the
West Bank and all of Gaza for ‘security purposes’.
It stipulated the establishment of a “security corridor” along the River
Jordan, as well outside the “Green Line”, a one-sided Israeli
demarcation of its borders with the West Bank. The plan envisioned the
incorporation of all of the Gaza Strip into Israel, and was meant to
return parts of the West Bank to Jordan as a first step toward
implementing the “Jordanian option” for Palestinian refugees, i.e.,
ethnic cleansing, coupled with the creation of an ‘alternative homeland’
for Palestinians.
While the plan did not fully actualize, the seizure, ethnic cleansing
and annexation of occupied land was a resounding success. Moreover, the
‘Allon Plan’ provided an unmistakable signal that the Labor Government,
which ruled Israel at the time, had every intention of retaining large
parts of the West Bank and all of Gaza, with no intention of honoring
United Nations Security Council Resolution 242, which challenged
Israel’s military takeover of Palestinian territories.
To ensure seizure of new land would be irreversible, the Labor
Government needed to move some of its citizens (in violation of the
Geneva Conventions) to the newly-occupied territories. Doing so required
reaching out to the most reactionary, religious elements of Israeli
society, the religious- ultra-nationalists camps, who were on the
margins of mainstream politics.
To capitalize on the Government’s alluring settlement policies in the
West Bank, a group of religious Jews rented a hotel in the Palestinian
town of al-Khalil (Hebron) to spend Passover at the ‘Cave of the
Patriarchs’, and simply refused to leave, sparking the biblical passion
of religious Orthodox Israelis across the country, who referred to the
West Bank by the Biblical name, Judea and Samaria.
The move ignited the ire of Palestinians, who watched in complete dismay
as their land was conquered, renamed and, later, settled by outsiders.
In 1970, to ‘diffuse’ the situation, the Israeli Government constructed
the ‘Kiryat Arba’ Settlement on the outskirts of the Arab city, which
invited even more orthodox Jews to al-Khalil.
The ‘Allon Plan’ may have been intended for strategic purposes; but out
of necessity, what began as political objectives intermingled with what
became religious and spiritual.
Over the years, the strategic settlement growth was complemented by the
religiously motivated expansion, championed by a vibrant movement,
exemplified in the founding of “Gush Emunim” (Bloc of the Faithful) in
1974. Its mission was to settle legions of fundamentalists on the West Bank.
Little has changed since, save the fact that the current Israeli
Government is a government of settlers, who are not engaged in a
symbiotic relationship with the Government but who dominate a political
establishment that is teeming with zealots and fanatics, relentless on
changing the status quo in Jerusalem, starting with Haram al-Sharif, or
the ‘Noble Sanctuary’.
Haram al-Sharif is one of the holiest Islamic sites, but this is not
just about religion. Israeli politicians have been ‘debating’ the status
of Haram al-Sharif for many months, as right-wing, religious and
ultra-nationalists elements are advocating the complete appropriation of
the al-Aqsa Mosque (situated in Haram al-Sharif), currently under the
management of the Islamic Trust (known as ‘Waqf’.)
Israel’s new Minister of Internal Security, Gilad Erdan, is repressing
any Palestinian in Jerusalem who dares challenge new Israeli rules
regarding Muslim access to al-Aqsa. Scores of Palestinians have been
shot, beaten and many more arrested in recent days as they have
attempted to confront Israeli police who escort Jewish extremists on
their provocative ‘tours’ of the Muslim holy site.
The current conflict suggests a repeat of what took place on February
25, 1994, when a US-born Jewish fanatic, Baruch Goldstein, stormed into
the Ibrahimi Mosque in the Palestinian city of al-Khalil and opened
fire. Over 50 Palestinians were killed while kneeling for prayer on that
day. In the name of ‘keeping the peace’, the Israeli army took over the
Mosque and began regulating Muslim access to it, allowing Jewish
worshippers to the Palestinian holy site.
Goldstein and his most ardent supporters hailed from the notorious
“Kiryat Arba” illegal Jewish settlement.
Israeli politicians now want to see the al-Aqsa Mosque status changed as
well. The Government wants to ensure its complete dominance over
Palestinians, while the extremists wanted to demolish the Mosque,
seeking ancient Jewish temples presumably destroyed in 586 BC and AD 70.
But to change the status of Haram al-Sharif, which has been an exclusive
Muslim site for the last 1,300 years, much blood would have to be
spilled. That, too, is being managed by Israel’s Prime Minister,
Benjamin Netanyahu, who has successfully pursued the country’s Attorney
General to permit the use of sniper fire against protesting Palestinian
youth.
With such right-wing and extremist politicians at his side, Netanyahu’s
designs in Jerusalem are consistent with the political mood in Israel
today, and also consistent with plans enacted by his predecessors many
years ago.
The fact that plans to conquer even the remaining symbols of Palestinian
nationhood and spirituality have finally reached al-Aqsa is particularly
alarming. Considering the turmoil throughout the Middle East region and
the ineffectual Palestinian leadership of Mahmoud Abbas, Netanyahu is
likely to push forward with his plan, no matter the price or the
consequences.
/*Dr. Ramzy Baroud* has been writing about the Middle East for over 20
years. He is an internationally-syndicated columnist, a media
consultant, an author of several books and the founder of
PalestineChronicle.com. His latest book is My Father Was a Freedom
Fighter: Gaza’s Untold Story (Pluto Press, London). His website is:
ramzybaroud.net/
--
Freedom Archives 522 Valencia Street San Francisco, CA 94110 415
863.9977 www.freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20150923/910c0357/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list