[News] Netanyahu’s Victory is an Even Bigger Victory for Palestinian Solidarity Movement

Anti-Imperialist News news at freedomarchives.org
Thu Mar 26 14:08:07 EDT 2015


March 26, 2015
*http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/03/26/netanyahus-victory-is-an-even-bigger-victory-for-palestinian-solidarity-movement/*


<http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/03/26/netanyahus-victory-is-an-even-bigger-victory-for-palestinian-solidarity-movement/#><http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/03/26/netanyahus-victory-is-an-even-bigger-victory-for-palestinian-solidarity-movement/#><http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/03/26/netanyahus-victory-is-an-even-bigger-victory-for-palestinian-solidarity-movement/#><http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/03/26/netanyahus-victory-is-an-even-bigger-victory-for-palestinian-solidarity-movement/#><http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/03/26/netanyahus-victory-is-an-even-bigger-victory-for-palestinian-solidarity-movement/#> 

A New Opportunity


  Netanyahu’s Victory is an Even Bigger Victory for Palestinian
  Solidarity Movement

by AJAMU BARAKA

The cover of respectability that obscured the brutal and immoral reality 
of the Israeli colonial project may have been permanently ripped away by 
Benjamin Netanyahu’s angry declaration that if re-elected, there would 
never be a Palestinian state and his racist rant on election day against 
his own citizens who happen to be Palestinians.

Many people in the U.S. and Western Europe were shocked by Netanyahu’s 
comments. However, for those of us who are aware of the platform of 
Netanyahu’s Likud Party, the only thing that was surprising was his 
candor. The rejection of a viable Palestinian state has always been 
Likud’s position, a position well known in Israel and the basis of 
Likud’s appeal, but rarely acknowledged and never discussed in the U.S. 
corporate media.

But it is not just the Likud Party – there has never been a serious 
commitment to a two-state solution from any of the mainstream Israeli 
parties, including the newly-constructed Zionist Union.

The two-state solution was always an illusion. From the beginning, it 
was a right-wing political diversion meant to confuse and fragment the 
international community and undermine the legitimacy of the Palestinian 
struggle for one, democratic, secular state for all of the people who 
live in the territory. Even after the Palestinian leadership adopted the 
two-state position in 1988 that then served as a framework for the Oslo 
Accords in 1993, Israeli leaders never seriously moved to finalize the 
process.

According to Ali Abunimah, 
<http://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/why-im-relieved-netanyahu-won> 
the co-founder of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions Movement, what 
distinguishes the Netanyahu victory from the scenario that would have 
likely unfolded if the liberal Zionists from the ZU had won, is that 
Netanyahu’s win strips away the opportunities for the so-called 
‘international community’ to “hide its complicity with Israel’s ugly 
crimes behind a charade of a “peace process.”

Abunimah’s analysis reflects the position that for most Palestinians the 
cultural and psychological assault, checkpoints, curfews, home 
demolitions, torture, targeted killings, assaults from armed settlers 
who kill with impunity – the daily reality of life under occupation – 
would have continued, no matter what party formation dominated the 
Israeli Knesset.

That is precisely why the two-state solution was such a valuable 
subterfuge and why liberal Zionists in Israel and the U.S. were so 
devastated with the results of the election.

They understood that even though the plight of Palestinians and a 
resolution of the conflict was not even a serious topic in the 
elections, Netanyahu’s last minute declaration and racist rant — and the 
“positive” response it generated among many Israelis — made the 
two-state issue and Israeli racism the embarrassing centerpieces of the 
election in the minds of the international community.

Even though Netanyahu’s comments only confirmed what everyone knew to be 
the real position of all the major parties in Israel, liberal Zionists, 
who have always attempted to have the best of both worlds — to enjoy the 
privileges of stolen land while simultaneously opposing the more crude 
elements of the colonial theft — understood that without the political 
cover provided by the endless “negotiations” toward a two-state 
solution, Israel could potentially face serious international isolation.

*The Congressional Black Caucus and Black Participation in the BDS movement*

Africans in South Africa make-up the most consistently militant section 
of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement targeting
KillingTrayvons1 
<http://store.counterpunch.org/product/killing-trayvons/>Israel. This is 
not surprising, given that Israeli support for the racist South African 
regime was only eclipsed by the support that came from the U.S.

Archbishop Desmond Tutu, one of the moral voices that opposed apartheid 
in South Africa, upset the leaders of the Israeli state when he 
characterized Israel as an apartheid state. He has also expressed how 
deeply impacted he was personally by witnessing the degradation of 
Palestinian men, women and children by Israeli military forces. 
According to Bishop Tutu 
<http://www.jpost.com/Diplomacy-and-Politics/Desmond-Tutu-Israel-guilty-of-apartheid-in-treatment-of-Palestinians-344874>, 
the scenes of Palestinian humiliation that he witnessed in Israel would 
be “familiar to all black South Africans who were corralled and harassed 
and insulted and assaulted by the security forces of the apartheid 
government.”

The principled opposition to Israeli apartheid on the part of South 
Africans is in sharp contrast to the immoral support the Congressional 
Black Caucus (CBC) gives to Israel.

Until now, members of the CBC were able to avoid criticism of their 
slavish support for Israel by arguing that they in fact supported 
Palestinian liberation by supporting the peaceful resolution of the 
conflict in the form of a Palestinian state.

However, with Netanyahu’s rejection of the two-state solution, coupled 
with what many African Americans see as Netanyahu’s “disrespect” for 
Obama with his speech to Congress, the CBC and other liberal black 
formations like the National Association for the Advancement of Colored 
People (NAACP), the National Urban League, as well as some members of 
the black clergy, are now beginning to face serious questions about 
their support for Israel.

This development, along with the new generation of young African 
American activists leading the anti-police violence struggle who have 
established solidarity links with Palestinian activists, are creating 
the political conditions to challenge and reverse the influence of the 
pro-Israel forces in the black community that emerged over the last two 
decades and to also generate black support for the Boycott, Divestment 
and Sanctions (BDS) movement, especially among black students.

Netanyahu and the Israeli voters that voted for him gave the Palestinian 
solidarity and BDS movement a strategic opening. The election may have 
finally stripped the veil of nationalist legitimacy from the racialized 
Ashkenazi Zionist project and exposed the genocidal violence, greed and 
generalized moral rot that is at the core of this project and at the 
center of all European invasions and colonialism since 1492.

For 67 years, Palestinian human beings have been displaced, degraded and 
dehumanized. Today the Palestinian solidarity movement has a new 
opportunity to intensify the efforts to expose and isolate the Israeli 
project as the most morally obscene capitulation to injustice on the 
part of the international community since 1945. Let’s thank Netanyahu 
for his honesty and take up the challenge we’ve been given.

/*Ajamu Baraka* is a human rights activist, organizer and geo-political 
analyst. Baraka is an Associate Fellow at the Institute for Policy 
Studies (IPS) in Washington, D.C. and editor and contributing columnist 
for the Black Agenda Report. He is a contributor to “Killing Trayvons: 
An Anthology of American Violence 
<http://store.counterpunch.org/product/killing-trayvons/>” (Counterpunch 
Books, 2014). He can be reached at info.abaraka at gmail.com 
<mailto:info.abaraka at gmail.com> and www.AjamuBaraka.com 
<http://www.AjamuBaraka.com>/

-- 
Freedom Archives 522 Valencia Street San Francisco, CA 94110 415 
863.9977 www.freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20150326/20c5b1b4/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: KillingTrayvons1.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 28392 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20150326/20c5b1b4/attachment.jpg>


More information about the News mailing list