[News] Bolivia: A Country That Dared to Exist
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Tue Mar 17 11:03:52 EDT 2015
March 17, 2015
*http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/03/17/bolivia-a-country-that-dared-to-exist/*
*An Interview with Félix Cárdenas Aguilar, Bolivia’s Vice Minister of
Decolonization*
Bolivia: A Country That Dared to Exist
by BENJAMIN DANGL
In 1870, Bolivian dictator Mariano Melgarejo offered an English diplomat
a glass of chicha – a corn-based beer consumed for centuries in the
Andes. The diplomat refused the drink, asking for chocolate instead. A
short-tempered Melgarejo responded by forcing the Englishman to drink a
vast quantity of chocolate, and then made him ride a mule, backwards,
through La Paz.
At least, this is how the story is related by Uruguayan author Eduardo
Galeano, who writes <http://www.progressive.org/node/982>, “When Queen
Victoria, in London, heard of the incident, she had a map brought to her
and pronounced ‘Bolivia doesn’t exist,’ crossing out the country with a
chalk ‘X.’” While the story is unlikely true, Galeano suggests it can be
read as a metaphor for Bolivia’s tortured history as a victim of
colonialism and imperialism.
In the interview below, Bolivia’s current Vice Minister of
Decolonization, Félix Cárdenas Aguilar, makes a similar point, that
“Bolivia is a failed country” because, from the time of its independence
in 1825, its modernization was based on the exploitation of indigenous
people. The challenge now, Cárdenas explains, is for Bolivia, under the
presidency of Evo Morales, to decolonize itself, to reconstruct its past
and identity, and to build a “plurinational” country where many
indigenous nations can thrive. By resisting subjugation, Bolivia is
daring to exist on its own terms.
This movement toward decolonization in the Andes is as old as
colonialism itself, but the process has taken a novel turn with the
administration of Morales, Bolivia’s first indigenous president.
Morales, a former coca farmer, union organizer, and leftist congressman,
was elected president in 2005, representing a major break from the
country’s neoliberal past.
Last October, Morales was re-elected to a third term in office with more
than 60% of the vote. His popularity is largely due
<http://upsidedownworld.org/main/bolivia-archives-31/5080-why-evo-morales-will-likely-win-upcoming-elections-in-bolivia> to
his Movement Toward Socialism (MAS) party’s success in reducing poverty,
empowering marginalized sectors of society, and using funds from
state-run industries for hospitals, schools and much-needed public works
projects across Bolivia.
Aside from socialist and anti-imperialist policies, the MAS’s time in
power has been marked by a notable discourse of decolonization. Five
hundred years after the European colonization of Latin America,
activists and politicians linked to the MAS and representing Bolivia’s
indigenous majority have deepened a process of reconstitution of
indigenous culture, identity and rights from the halls of government
power. Part of this work has been carried forward by the Vice Ministry
of Decolonization, which was created in 2009.
This Vice Ministry operates under the umbrella of the Ministry of
Culture, and coordinates with many other sectors of government to
promote, for example, indigenous language education, gender parity in
government, historical memory, indigenous forms of justice, anti-racism
initiatives, and indigenous autonomy.
Before becoming the Vice Minister of Decolonization when the office
opened, Félix Cárdenas had worked for decades as an Aymara indigenous
leader, union and campesino organizer, leftist politician and activist
fighting against dictatorships and neoliberal governments. As a result
of this work, he was jailed and tortured on numerous occasions. Cárdenas
participated the Constituent Assembly to re-write Bolivia’s
constitution, a progressive document which was passed under President
Morales’ leadership in 2009. This trajectory has contributed to
Cárdenas’ radical political analysis and dedication to what’s called the
/Proceso de Cambio/, or Process of Change, under the Morales government.
Such unprecedented work by the MAS hasn’t happened without its
shortcomings and contradictions. Violence against women in the country
is on the rise, a recent corruption scandal has weakened MAS popularity
in current local election races, and extractive industries, while
providing funds for the government’s social programs and national
development, are displacing indigenous and rural communities, and
poisoning land and rivers. Leftist and indigenous opposition to the MAS
has also faced government crackdowns, limiting the autonomy and space
for grassroots dissent in the country.
MAS allies say such pitfalls are part of the societal legacies of
colonialism and neoliberalism in the country, challenges which can’t be
reversed overnight, but which the MAS is trying to overcome. Critics say
that the MAS is worsening such problems with sexist rhetoric, a
deepening of extractivism, and silencing of critics.
Bolivia’s road toward decolonization is a rocky and contested one. But,
as Félix Cárdenas argues below, in a bleak world full of capitalist
tyrants, bloody wars and racist exploitation, Bolivia’s Process of
Change continues to shine as an alternative to the dominant global order.
***
*Benjamin Dangl: Could you please provide an overview of the kind of
work the Vice Ministry of Decolonization does?*
*Félix Cárdenas:* First of all it’s not the kind of vice ministry where
we have to say ‘we built 3,000 kilometers of highway,’ or ‘we
constructed 20 stadiums.’ It’s more than anything a political and
ideological vice ministry, and for this type of work what we have to do
first of all is establish some points of departure for the work of
decolonization. It’s not sufficient to go somewhere and say ‘I declare
you decolonized!’ and that’s it, they’re decolonized. No. It’s a
question of changing mentality, behavior, of life philosophy, and to do
this at an individual level, or at a communitarian level, a national
level, we have an obligation to first ask ‘what is Bolivia?’ If we don’t
clearly understand what Bolivia is, then we don’t know what needs to be
done.
So, as a part of this process, one has to explain that Bolivia is a
failed country. This is a point of departure. Bolivia failed as a
proposed country. This country, that was founded in 1825, that claimed
to be modern, that claimed to be civilized, that wanted to look like
Europe, that wanted to be Europe while denying itself – this type of
country failed. It failed because this type of country, that was born in
1825, wanted to be modern, wanted to be civilized based on the
destruction of the indigenous people, based on the destruction of their
languages, their culture, their identity. /
/
Therefore, it’s from this perspective that we understand that Bolivia is
not what they tell us – that Bolivia is one nation, one language, one
religion. We are 36 [indigenous] nations, 36 cultures, 36 ways of seeing
the world, and therefore, 36 ways of providing solutions for the world.
We call this diversity of cultures ‘plurinational,’ and we want to build
a plurinational state.
So, seen in this way, if our future work is to decolonize and create a
plurinational society, we have to work in education, we have to work in
all areas, in justice, for example, to reinstate indigenous justice. The
constitution tells us that indigenous justice and standard justice have
the same hierarchy. So there is a need to work in indigenous justice,
reinstate indigenous justice in the face of the crisis of standard
justice, which is foreign as well as corrupt.
The constitution speaks of a secular state. Before, the catholic
religion was the official religion. Not today. Today no one is obligated
to get married in front of a priest. No one is obligated to be baptized
in front of a priest. Religion was the strongest aspect of colonialism.
Religion was always power. Today, no. Today religion is outside of
power, outside of the government palace. It’s fine if religion dedicates
itself to saving souls, but never again will it define the politics of
the state as it used to.
When many people talk about decolonization they think it’s just an
indigenous people’s problem. But decolonization is not an indigenous
peoples’ problem, decolonization is everyone’s problem. For example, our
bourgeoisie, our private business class, thinks that they are condemned
to always live off of the scraps thrown to them by transnational
companies. This is colonialism, and they don’t dare invest in the
development of their own country. And so, decolonization is everyone’s work.
*BD: A process of decolonization has to be global, right? What do
countries in the north, the most capitalist countries, have to do as a
part of this process?*
FC: For the first time, the countries of the north have to look at
themselves in the mirror and realize that they are in crisis. If they
don’t accept that they are in crisis, they will never find ways to solve
their crisis. But they also need to accept that they’re in crisis and
they themselves don’t have the solutions. They have to look to us, to
the indigenous people. Not to Bolivia, but to the indigenous people that
are all over the world, and who have a philosophy of life that is
qualitatively superior to philosophies constructed in the form of
civilizing modernity.
From Bolivia, we salute the [Syriza] triumph in Greece. We salute the
future triumph in Spain, which has more or less the same
characteristics. These revolutions in Spain and in Greece are being
built while looking to Bolivia. So, for us, this is a kind of
complication; to recognize that 500 years ago they [Europeans] arrived,
taught us a way of life, a type of religion, a type of modernity that
failed. And so today, after 500 years, we, the indigenous people, have
the obligation to go to Europe and speak to them, to convert them, to
tell them that there is another way to live, and that their crisis is
bringing planet earth to a global crisis.
*BD: The economy of Bolivia is very much based in mining, gas –
extractivism. How do you see this process? How can Bolivia overcome its
dependency on mining and gas? On the one hand, the president speaks of
respecting mother earth, but on the other hand, mining and gas
industries are very crucial here. How do you see these contradictions?*
*FC:* This isn’t something that this government invented. Bolivia has
always lived off of mining, we have always lived off of extractivism.
Now, what we hope to do is that this sacrifice, this fruit that mother
earth is providing us with, is not in vain. And that it doesn’t just
leave [the country] as raw material, but that there’s a need to
industrialize, and as we industrialize we can reach the point where we
can lower the level of extractivism.
/*Benjamin Dangl* has worked as a journalist throughout Latin America,
covering social movements and politics in the region for over a decade.
He is the author of the books //Dancing with Dynamite: Social Movements
and States in Latin America/
<http://www.amazon.com/Dancing-Dynamite-Social-Movements-America/dp/1849350159>/,
and //The Price of Fire: Resource Wars and Social Movements in Bolivia/
<http://www.amazon.com/Price-Fire-Resource-Movements-Bolivia/dp/190485933X/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1422481340&sr=1-1&keywords=price+of+fire&pebp=1422481360338&peasin=190485933X>/.
Dangl is currently a doctoral candidate in Latin American History at
McGill University, and edits UpsideDownWorld.org, a website on activism
and politics in Latin America, and TowardFreedom.com, a progressive
perspective on world events. Twitter:
//https://twitter.com/bendangl// Email: BenDangl(at)gmail(dot)com/
--
Freedom Archives 522 Valencia Street San Francisco, CA 94110 415
863.9977 www.freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20150317/e514b347/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list