[News] Iran - Got war if you want it
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Thu May 31 10:55:55 EDT 2012
Got war if you want it
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/NE31Ak03.html
By Pepe Escobar
Pentagon head Leon Panetta told ABC News that the
US is "ready" to attack Iran. It depends on US
President Barack Obama giving it a go. Will he or won't he?
Nobel Prize winner and Drone Godfather Obama has
been busy "justifying the 'just war' theories of
Christian philosophers", as Ray McGovern
graphically put it - and as attested by the New
York Times orgasmically promoting its piece
"Secret 'Kill List' Proves a Test of Obama's Principles and Will'.
Apparently there's no Iranian "kill list' so far
- apart from scientists being whacked by the
unsavory association of the Israeli Mossad and
the Iranian Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK) terrorist
outfit. And there's no evidence - yet - Obama
considers attacking Iran a "just war". On the
contrary; Obama might flaunt a nuclear deal with
Iran as a major foreign policy victory on the way
to re-election. But - just in case - the Pentagon is keeping up the pressure.
Enrich, and you're history
Panetta regurgitated the same old fallacy
perpetrated ad infinitum, since at least 2006, by
the neo-cons, the Israel lobby and US corporate
media, according to which Iran is about to build
a nuclear bomb like
tomorrow. "We will do
everything we can to prevent Iran from developing
a weapon", Panetta said. Once again, it doesn't
matter that the International Atomic Energy
Agency, the UN's nuclear watchdog, plus 17 US
intelligence agencies have stressed this is not the case.
Panetta's move must be seen as the Pentagon
preemptively bombarding the P5 + 1 talks about
the Iranian nuclear program - now scheduled for a
third round in Moscow on June 18. As Gareth
Porter has shown, there can be no deal as long as
Washington insists on absolutely ditching the
nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), to which
Iran subscribes (See
<http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/NE30Ak02.html>US
hard line in Iran talks driven by Israel, Asia
Times Online, May 29, 2012). The US position
amounts to never allowing Iran to even enrich uranium for civilian purposes.
Panetta also insists that the "international
community's been unified" about it. That's
nonsense. Not only the BRICS group of emerging
powers but also the whole Non-Aligned Movement
(NAM) has insisted Iran has a right, like any
other country that subscribes to the NPT, to
maintain a civilian nuclear program.
Now let's turn to the Iranian position. Iranian
nuclear chief Fereydoon Abbasi said, "We have no
reason to retreat from producing the 20% because
we need 20% uranium just as much to meet our
needs,'' according to Iranian state TV.
Not only that; Iran will start building two new
nuclear power plants in 2013, and its sole active
nuclear reactor is now close to full production levels.
Under the NPT, a member state with a consistent
civilian nuclear program essentially may also
acquire a nuclear weapons capability - what is
also defined as a "nuclear option". Japan, Brazil
and Argentina, for instance, all NPT member
states, have maintained their "nuclear option"
for decades. They could ditch the NPT and build a
nuclear bomb in a few months if they wanted to.
They won't. But Washington, on a mission from God, believes Iran will.
The fact is Tehran is not doing anything illegal
in its pursuit of nuclear technology. It has even
agreed to talk in Baghdad about suspending its
20% uranium enrichment. But then Iranian
negotiators found out in Baghdad that for the US,
the red line - no enrichment at all - is
definitive. At best, in exchange Iran might
receive supplies of medical isotopes.
So Tehran won't be moved from its position; it
will only consider suspending its 20% enrichment
if the ultra-harsh Western oil embargo plus the
financial war via banking sanctions is reconsidered.
By the way, Iran's Central Bank Governor Mahmoud
Bahmani said that Tehran has already activated an
alternative payment clearing system to SWIFT -
thus foiling another vector of Washington's
relentless economic war. What this means is that
Iran, BRICS members Russia, India and China, plus
Iran's trading partners in the developing world
are moving one step beyond in their flight from
the US dollar as global reserve currency.
Sanction me baby one more time
Even in the - unlikely - possibility that the
leadership in Tehran suddenly decided to stop all
uranium enrichment, and kill the whole nuclear
program on the spot, Iran would still be under US
sanctions. The sanctions have practically nothing
to do with Iran's nuclear program. It's all about regime change.
By 401-11, Congress in the US last Friday
approved a resolution that goes even beyond "crippling" sanctions.
US sanctions are bound to remain forever unless
President Obama certifies to the extremely
unpopular US Congress (14% approval rate), "Iran
has released all political prisoners and
detainees; ceased its practices of violence and
abuse of Iranian citizens engaging in peaceful
political activity; conducted a transparent
investigation into the killings and abuse of
peaceful political activists in Iran and
prosecuted those responsible; and made progress
toward establishing an independent judiciary."
There's more; Obama also has to certify, "The
government of Iran has ceased supporting acts of
international terrorism and no longer satisfies
certain requirements for designation as a state
sponsor of terrorism; and [that] Iran has ceased
the pursuit, acquisition, and development of
nuclear, biological, chemical, and ballistic weapons."
Into this mire of wishful thinking steps Chairman
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Martin Dempsey. He
told CNN on Monday, "the military option should
be considered". Oops, but that refers to that
other war in the making - in Syria. General
Dempsey said he would prefer for the
"international community" to effect regime change
in Syria, but - just in case - the Pentagon is
ready to pounce ("Of course, we always have to
provide military options.") The NATOGCC compound
is barely containing its shrieks of joy.
So what's it all about, Barack? So many wars to
choose, so little time till Re-election Day.
Pepe Escobar is the author of
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0978813820/simpleproduction/ref=nosim>Globalistan:
How the Globalized World is Dissolving into
Liquid War (Nimble Books, 2007) and
<http://www.amazon.com/Red-Zone-Blues-snapshot-Baghdad/dp/0978813898>Red
Zone Blues: a snapshot of Baghdad during the
surge. His most recent book, just out, is
<http://www.amazon.com/Obama-Does-Globalistan-Pepe-Escobar/dp/1934840831/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1233698286&sr=8-1>Obama
does Globalistan (Nimble Books, 2009).
He may be reached at pepeasia at yahoo.com
Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
415 863-9977
www.Freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20120531/82a21c81/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list