[News] 10 Things You Should Know About the Quebec Student Movement
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Wed May 23 12:02:53 EDT 2012
May 23, 2012
http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/05/23/10-things-you-should-know-about-the-quebec-student-movement/
10 Things You Should Know About the Quebec Student Movement
by ANDREW GAVIN MARSHALL
The student strikes in Quebec, which began in
February and have lasted for three months,
involving roughly 175,000 students in the mostly
French-speaking Canadian province, have been
subjected to a massive provincial and national
media propaganda campaign to demonize and dismiss
the students and their struggle. The following is
a list of ten points that everyone should know
about the student movement in Quebec to help
place their struggle in its proper global context.
* The issue is debt, not tuition
* Striking students in Quebec are setting an
example for youth across the continent
* The student strike was organized through
democratic means and with democratic aims
* This is not an exclusively Quebecois phenomenon
* Government officials and the media have
been openly calling for violence and fascist
tactics to be used against the students
* Excessive state violence has been used against the students
* The government supports organized crime and opposes organized students
* Canadas elites punish the people and oppose the students
* The student strike is being subjected to a
massive and highly successful propaganda campaign
to discredit, dismiss, and demonize the students
* The student movement is part of a much
larger emerging global movement of resistance
against austerity, neoliberalism, and corrupt power
1) The issue is debt, not tuition: In dismissing
the students, who are striking against a 75%
increase in the cost of tuition over the next
five years, the most common argument used is in
pointing out that Quebec students pay the lowest
tuition in North America, and therefore, they
should not be complaining. Even with the 75%
increase, they will still be paying substantially
lower than most other provinces. Quebec students
pay on average $2,500 per year in tuition, while
the rest of Canadas students pay on average
$5,000 per year. With the tuition increase of
$1,625 spread out over five years, the total
tuition cost for Quebec students would be roughly
$4,000. The premise here is that since the rest
of Canada has it worse, Quebec students should
shut up, sit down, and accept reality. THIS IS
FALSE. In playing the numbers game,
commentators and their parroting public repeat
the tuition costs but fail to add in the numbers
which represent the core issue: DEBT. So, Quebec
students pay half the average national tuition.
True. But they also graduate with half the
average national student debt. With the average
tuition at $5,000/year, the average student debt
for an undergraduate in Canada is $27,000, while
the average debt for an undergraduate in Quebec
is $13,000. With interest rates expected to
increase, in the midst of a hopeless job
situation for Canadian youth, Canadas youth face
a future of debt that is bankrupting a
generation of students. The notion, therefore,
that Quebec students should not struggle against
a bankrupt future is a bankrupted argument.
2) Striking students in Quebec are setting an
example for youth across the continent: Nearly
60% of Canadian students graduate with debt, on
average at $27,000 for an undergraduate degree.
Total student debt now stands at about $20
billion in Canada($15 billion from Federal
Government loans programs, and the rest from
provincial and commercial bank loans). In Quebec,
the average student debt is $15,000, whereas Nova
Scotia and Newfoundland have an average student
debt of $35,000, British Columbia at nearly
$30,000 and Ontario at nearly $27,000. Roughly
70% of new jobs in Canada require a
post-secondary education. Half of students in
their 20s live at home with their parents,
including 73 per cent of those aged 20 to 24 and
nearly a third of 25- to 29-year-olds. On
average, a four-year degree for a student living
at home in Canada costs $55,000, and those costs
are expected to increase in coming years at a
rate faster than inflation. It has been estimated
that in 18 years, a four-year degree for Canadian
students will cost $102,000. Defaults on
government student loans are at roughly 14%. The
Chairman of the Canadian Federation of Students
warned in June of 2011 that, We are on the verge
of bankrupting a generation before they even
enter the workplace. This immense student debt
affects every decision made in the lives of young
graduates. With few jobs, enormous housing costs,
the cutting of future benefits and social
security, students are entering an economy which
holds very little for them in opportunities.
Women, minorities, and other marginalized groups
are in an even more disadvantaged position.
Canadian students are increasingly moving back
home and relying more and more upon their parents
for support. An informal Globe and Mail poll in
early May of 2012 (surveying 2,200 students),
shows that students across Canada share a
similar anxiety over rising tuition fees as that
felt in Quebec. Roughly 62% of post-secondary
students said they would join a similar strike in
their own province, while 32% said they would
not, and 5.9% were undecided. In Ontario, where
tuition is the highest in Canada, 69% said they
would support a strike against increasing
tuition. A Quebec research institution released a
report in late March of 2012 indicating that
increasing the cost of tuition for students is
creating a student debt bubble akin to the
housing bubble in the United States, and with
interest rates set to increase, todays students
may well find themselves in the same situation of
not being able to pay off their student loans.
The authors of the report from the Institut de
recherche et dinformations socio-economique
explained that, Since governments underwrite
those loans, if students default it could be
catastrophic for public finances, and that, If
the bubble explodes, it could be just like the
mortgage crisis. In the United States, the
situation is even worse. In March of 2012, the
Federal Reserve reported that 27 percent of
student borrowers whose loans have gone into
repayment are now delinquent on their debt.
Student debt in the United States has reached $1
trillion, passing total credit card debt along
the way. It has become a threat to the entire
existence of the middle class in America.
Bankruptcy lawyers in the US are seeing the
telltale signs of a student loan debt bubble. A
recent survey from the National Association of
Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys (NACBA) indicated,
more than 80 percent of bankruptcy lawyers have
seen a substantial increase in the number of
clients seeking relief from student loans in
recent years. The head of the NACBA stated,
This could very well be the next debt bomb for
the U.S. economy. In 1993, 45% of students who
earn a bachelors degree had to go into debt;
today, it is 94%. The average student debt in the
United States in 2011 was $23,300, with 10%
owning more than $54,000 and 3% owing more than
$100,000. President Obama has addressed the
situation by simply providing more loans to
students. A recent survey of graduates revealed
that 40% of them had delayed making a major
purchase, like a home or car, because of college
debt, while slightly more than a quarter had put
off continuing their education or had moved in
with relatives to save money, and 50% of those
surveyed had full-time jobs. Between 2001 and
2011, state and local financing per student
declined by 24 percent nationally. In the same
period of time,tuition and fees at state schools
increased 72 percent. It would appear that
whether in the United States, Canada, or even
beyond, the decisions made by schools, banks, and
the government, are geared toward increasing the
financial burden on students and families, and
increasing profits for themselves. The effect
will be to plunge the student and youth
population into poverty over the coming years.
Thus, the student movement in Quebec, instead of
being portrayed as entitled brats elsewhere,
are actually setting an example for students and
youth across the continent and beyond. Since
Quebec tuition is the lowest on the continent, it
gives all the more reason that other students
should follow Quebecs example, instead of Quebec
students being told to follow the rest of the
country (and continent) into debt bondage.
3) The student strike was organized through
democratic means and with democratic aims: The
decision to strike was made through student
associations and organizations that uniquely
operate through direct-democracy. While most
student associations at schools across Canada
hold elections where students choose the members
of the associations, the democratic
accountability ends there (just like with
government). Among the Francophone schools in
Quebec, the leaders are not only elected by the
students, but decisions are made through general
assemblies, debate and discussion, and through
the votes of the actual constituents, the members
of the student associations, not just the
leaders. This means that the student associations
that voted to strike are more democratically
accountable and participatory than most other
student associations, and certainly the
government. It represents a more profound and
meaningful working definition of democracy that
is lacking across the rest of the country. The
Anglophone student associations that went on
strike from Concordia and McGill did so
because, for the first time ever, they began to
operate through direct-democracy. This of course,
has resulted in insults and derision from the
media. The national media in Canada most
especially the National Post complain that the
student tactics are anything but democratic,
and that the students arent acting in a
democratic way, but that its really mob rule.
Obviously, it is naïve to assume that the
National Post has any sort of understanding of democracy.
4) This is not an exclusively Quebecois
phenomenon: I am an Anglophone, I dont even
speak French, I have only lived in Montreal for
under two years, but the strikers are struggling
as much for me as for any other student,
Francophone or Anglophone. Typically, when others
across Canada see what is taking place here, they
frame it along the lines of, Oh those Quebecois,
always yelling about something. But Im yelling
too
in English. Many people here are yelling
in
English. It is true that the majority of the
students protesting are Francophone, and the
majority of the schools on strike are
Francophone, but it is not exclusionary. In fact,
the participation in the strike from the
Anglophone schools (while a minority within the
schools) is unprecedented in Quebec history. This
was undertaken because students began mobilizing
at the grassroots and emulating the French
student groups in how they make decisions (i.e.,
through direct-democracy). The participation of
Anglophone students in the open-ended strike is
unprecedented in Quebec history.
5) Government officials and the media have been
openly calling for violence and fascist tactics
to be used against the students: With all the
focus on student violence at protests, breaking
bank windows, throwing rocks at riot police, and
other acts of vandalism, student leaders have
never called for violence against the government
or vandalism against property, and have, in fact,
denounced it and spoken out for calm, stating:
The student movement wants to fight alongside
the populace and not against it. On the other
hand, it has been government officials and the
national media which have been openly calling for
violence to be used against students. On May 11,
Michael Den Tandt, writing for the National Post,
stated that, Its time for tough treatment of
Quebec student strikers, and recommended to
Quebec Premier Jean Charest that, He must bring
down the hammer. Tandt claimed that there was a
better way to deal with student protesters:
Dispersal with massive use of tear gas; then
arrest, public humiliation, and some pain. He
even went on to suggest that, caning is more
merciful than incarceration, or perhaps even
re-imagining the medieval punishment in which
miscreants and neer-do-wells were placed in the
stockade, in the public square, and pelted with
rotten cabbages. That might not be a bad idea,
either. This, Tandt claimed, would be the only
way to preserve peace, order, and good
government. Kelly McParland, writing the for
National Post on May 11, suggested that it was
now time for Charest to empower the police to
use the full extent of the law against those who
condone or pursue further disruption, and that
the government must make a show of strength
against the students. If this was not bad enough,
get ready for this: A member of the Quebec
Liberal Party, head of the tax office in the
Municipal Affairs Department, Bernard Guay, wrote
an article for a French-language newspaper in
Quebec in mid-April advocating a strategy to end
the student strikes. In the article, the
government official recommended using the fascist
movements of the 1920s and 1930s as an example in
how to deal with leftists in giving them their
own medicine. He suggested organizing a
political cabal to handle the wasteful and
anti-social situation, which would mobilize
students to not only cross picket lines, but to
confront and assault students who wear the little
red square (the symbol of the student strike).
This, Guay suggested, would help society
overcome the tyranny of Leftist agitators, no
doubt by emulating fascist tyranny. The article
was eventually pulled and an apology was issued,
while a government superior supposedly
reprimanded Guay, though the government refused
to elaborate on what that consisted of. Just
contemplate this for a moment: A Quebec Liberal
government official recommended using
inspiration from fascist movements to attack
the striking students. Imagine if one of the
student associations had openly called for
violence, let alone for the emulation of fascism.
It would be national news, and likely lead to
arrests and charges. But since it was a
government official, barely a peep was heard.
6) Excessive state violence has been used against
the students:Throughout the three months of
protests from students in Quebec, the violence
has almost exclusively been blamed on the
students. Images of protesters throwing rocks and
breaking bank windows inundate the media and
inform the discourse, demonizing the students
as violent, vandals, and destructive. Meanwhile,
the reality of state violence being used against
the students far exceeds any of the violent
reactions from protesters, but receives far less
coverage. Riot police meet students with pepper
spray, tear gas, concussion grenades, smoke
bombs, beating them with batons, shoot them with
rubber bullets, and have even been driving police
cars and trucks into groups of students. On May
4, on the 42nd anniversary of the Kent State
massacre in which the U.S. National Guard
murdered four protesting students, Quebec almost
experienced its own Kent State, when several
students were critically injured by police, shot
with rubber bullets in the face. One student lost
an eye, and another remains in the hospital with
serious head injuries, including a skull fracture
and brain contusion. The Quebec provincial police
the SQ have not only been involved in violent
repression of student protests in Quebec, but
have also (along with the RCMP) been involved
intraining foreign police forces how to violently
repress their own populations, such as in Haiti.
Roughly 12,000 people in Quebec have signed a
petition against the police reaction to student
protests, stipulating that the police actions
have been far too violent. In late April, even
before the Quebec police almost killed a couple
students, Amnesty International asked the
government to call for a toning down of police
measures that
are unduly aggressive and might
potentially smother students right to free
expression. The Quebec government, of course,
defends police violenceagainst students and
youths. The Canadian Security Intelligence
Service (CSIS) Canadas spy agency has
recently announced its interest in gathering
intelligence on Quebec student protesters and
related groups as possible threats to national
security. Coincidentally, Prime Minister Stephen
Harper dismantled the government agency
responsible for oversight of CSIS, making the
agency essentially unaccountable. In reaction to
student protests, the City of Montreal is
considering banning masks being worn at protests
in a new bylaw which is being voted on without
public consultation. Thus, apparently it is fine
for police to wear gas masks as they shoot
chemical agents at Quebecs youth, but students
cannot attempt to even meagerly protect
themselves by covering their faces. The federal
Conservative government of Stephen Harper is
attempting to pass a law that bans masks at
protests, which includes a ten-year sentence for
rioters who wear masks. Quebec has even
established a secretive police unit called the
GAMMA squad to monitor political groups in the
province, which has already targeted and arrested
members of the leading student organization
behind the strike. The police unit is designed to
monitor anarchists and marginal political
groups. Some political groups have acknowledged
this as a declaration of war by the government
against such groups. Spokesperson for the largest
student group, Gabriel Nadeau-Dubois, stated
that, This squad is really a new kind of
political police to fight against social
movements. The situation of police repression
has become so prevalent that even the U.S. State
Department has warned Americans to stay away from
student protests in the city, as bystanders can
quickly be caught up in unforeseen violence and
in some cases, detained by the local police.
Click here to watch a video compilation of police brutality against students.
7) The government supports organized crime and
opposes organized students: The government claims
that it must increase the cost of tuition in
order to balance the budget and to increase the
competitiveness of schools. The government has
ignored, belittled, undermined, attempted to
divide, and outright oppress the student
movement. The Liberal Government of Quebec, in
short, has declared organized students to be
enemies of the state. Meanwhile, that same
government has no problem of working with and
supporting organized crime, namely, the Montreal
Mafia. In 2010, Quebec, under Premier Jean
Charest, was declared to be the most corrupt
province in Canada. A former opposition leader
in the Montreal city hall reported that, the
Italian mafia controls about 80 per cent of city
hall. The mafia is a big player in the Quebec
economy, and is deeply entrenched in city
affairs of Montreal, as more than 600
businesses pay Mafia protection money in Montreal
alone, handing organized crime leaders an
unprecedented degree of control of Quebecs
economy. The construction industry, especially,
is heavily linked to the mafia. The Montreal
Mafia is as influential as their Sicilian
counterparts, where all of the major
infrastructure work in Sicily is under Mafia
control. In 2009, a government official stated
that, Its Montreals Italian Mafia that
controls what is going on in road construction.
They control, from what we can tell, 80 per cent
of the contracts. In the fall of 2011, an
internal report written by the former Montreal
police chief for the government was leaked,
stating, We have discovered a firmly rooted,
clandestine universe on an unexpected scale,
harmful to our society on the level of safety and
economics and of justice and democracy. The
report added, Suspicions are persistent that an
evil empire is taking form in the highway
construction domain, and that, If there were to
be an intensification of influence-peddling in
the political sphere, we would no longer simply
be talking about marginal, or even parallel
criminal activities: we could suspect an
infiltration or even a takeover of certain
functions of the state. Quebec Premier Jean
Charest, for several years,rejected calls for a
public inquiry into corruption in the
construction industry, even as the head of
Quebecs anti-collusion squad called for such an
inquiry. An opposition party in Quebec stated
that Jean Charest is protecting the (Quebec)
Liberal party and in protecting the Liberal
party, Mr. Charest is protecting the Mafia,
organized crime. After the leaked report
revealed cost overruns totaling hundreds of
millions of dollars, kickbacks and illegal
donations to political parties, Charest had to
after two years of refusing open a public
inquiry into corruption. The Quebec mafia have
not only run gambling and prostitution and
imported stupefying amounts of illegal drugs into
Canada, but they have extended their influence to
elected civic and provincial governments, and to
Liberal and Conservative federal governments
through bribery and other illustrious
relations. The Federal Conservative Party of
Canada, with Prime Minister Stephen Harper as its
leader, received dozens of donations from
Mafia-connected construction and engineering firm
employees. The Mafia-industry has also donated to
the Federal Liberal Party, but less so than the
Conservatives, who hold power. In Quebec,
government officials have helped the Mafia charge
far more for public-works contracts than they
were worth. These Mafia companies would then use
a lot of that extra money to fund political
parties, most notably, the Liberals, who have
been in power for nine years. A former Montreal
police officer who worked in the intelligence
unit with access to the polices confidential
list of informants was suspected of selling
information to the mafia. In January of 2012, he
was found dead, reportedly of a suicide. In April
of 2012, fifteen arrests were made in Montreal by
the police in relation to corruption charges
linked to the Mafia. Among them were one of the
biggest names in the construction industry, with
14 individual facing conspiracy charges
involving municipal contracts associated with
the Mascouche water-treatment plants [that] are
connected to big construction, engineering and
law firms that have been involved in municipal
contracts and politics across the Montreal region
for decades. And the individuals have been around
the municipal world for years. One Quebec mayor
has even been charged. The Montreal police force
has not been very interested, and it should be,
in helping the anti-corruption investigation. Two
of those who were arrested included Quebec
Liberal Party fundraisers, one of whom Charest
personally delivered an award to in 2010 for his
years of service as an organizer. All three of
Quebecs main political parties were connected to
individuals arrested in the raids. Canadas
federal police force,the RCMP, have refused to
cooperate with the Mafia-corruption inquiry in
handing over their massive amounts of information
to the judge leading the inquiry. Quebec
Education Minister Line Beauchamp, who has been
leading the government assault against the
students, attended a political fundraiser for
herself which was attended by a notorious Mafia
figure who personally donated generously to the
ministers Liberal riding association. As these
revelations emerged, Beauchamp stated, I dont
know the individual in question and even today I
wouldnt be able to recognize him. At the time,
Beauchamp was the Environment Minister, and was
responsible for granting the Mafia figures
company a favourable certificate to expand its
business. Beauchamp claimed she did not know
about the deal, but as head of the Ministry which
handled it, either she is utterly incompetent or
a liar. Either way, she is clearly not fit for
public service if it amounts to nothing more
than service to the Mafia. The fact that she is
now responsible for increasing tuition and
leading the attack on students speaks
volumes. Line Beauchamp, when questioned about
taking political contributions from the Mafia,
stated, Now that the information is public and
the links well established, I would not put
myself in that position again. Well isnt that
reassuring? Now that its public, she wouldnt do
it again. Thats sort of like saying, I wouldnt
have committed the crime if I knew I was going to
be caught. The notion that Beauchamp didnt know
whom this Mafia figure was who was giving her
money is absurd. Its even more absurd when you
note that one of Beauchamps political attaches
was a 30-year veteran of the Montreal police
force. As one Quebec political figure commented
about the Liberal Governments Mafia links: They
refuse to sit down with a student leader but they
have breakfast with a mafioso
where is the
logic in that? Indeed. Its clear that the
Quebec government has no problem working with,
handing out contracts to, and taking money from
the Mafia and organized crime. In fact, they are
so integrated that the government itself is a
form of organized crime. But for that government,
and for the media boot-lickers who follow the
government line, organized students are the true
threat to Quebec. National newspapers declare
Quebec students following mob rule when its
actually the government that is closely connected
to mob rule. The students are challenging and
being repressed by a Mafioso-government alliance
of industrialists, politicians, financiers and
police
yet it is the students who are blamed for
everything. The government gives the Mafia public
contracts double or triple their actual value,
wasting hundreds of millions of dollars (if not
more), while students are being asked to pay
nearly double their current tuition. Theres
money for the mob, but scraps for the students.
8)
Canadas elites punish the people and oppose
the students: Its not simply the government of
Quebec which has set itself against the students,
sought to increase their tuition and repress
their resistance, often with violent means, but a
wide sector of elite society in Quebec and Canada
propose tuition increases and blind faith to the
state in managing its repression of a growing
social movement. As such, the student movement
should recognize that not simply are Jean Charest
and his Liberal-Mafia government the antagonists
of social justice, but the whole elite society
itself. As early as 2007, TD Bank, one of
Canadas big five banks, outlined a plan for
prosperity for the province of Quebec, and
directly recommended Quebec to raise tuition
costs for students. Naturally, the Quebec
government is more likely to listen to a bank
than the youth of the province. Banks of course,
have an interest in increasing tuition costs for
students, as they provide student loans and lines
of credit which they charge interest on and make
profits. The Royal Bank of Canada acknowledged
that student lines of credit are very popular
products. Elites of all sorts support the
tuition increases. In February of 2010, a group
of prominent (i.e., elitist) Quebecers signed a
letter proposing to increase Quebecs tuition
costs. Among the signatories were the former
Premier of Quebec for the Parti Quebecois, Lucien
Bouchard. In early May, a letter was published
in the Montreal Gazette which stated that
students need to pay more for their education in
Quebec, signed by the same elitists who proposed
the tuition increase back in February of 2010.
Initially, this group of elitists had proposed an
increase of $1,000 every year for three years.
The letter then calls for the application of
state power to be employed against the student
movement: It is time that we react. We must
reinstate order; the students have to return to
class
This is a situation when, regardless of
political allegiances, the population must
support the state, which is ultimately
responsible for public order, the safety of
individuals and the integrity of our
institutions. The integrity of institutions
which cooperate with the Mafia, I might add. What
incredible integrity! The letter was signed by
Lucien Bouchard, former Premier of Quebec; Michel
Audet, an economist and former Finance Minister
in the first Charest government in Quebec;
Françoise Bertrand, the President and chief
executive officer of the Fédération des chambres
de commerce du Québec (The Quebec Federation of
Chambers of Commerce), where she sits alongside
the presidents and executives of major Canadian
corporations, banks, and business interests. She
also sits on the board of directors of Quebecor
Inc., a major media conglomerate, with former
Prime Minister Brian Mulroney on its board.
Another signatory was Yves-Thomas Dorval,
President of the Quebec Employers Council, who
formerly worked for British American Tobacco
Group, former Vice President at Edelman Canada,
an international public relations firm, was a
director at a pharmaceutical corporation, head of
strategic planning at an insurance company, and
previously worked for the Government of Quebec
and Hydro-Quebec. Joseph Facal, another signatory
to the letter demanding higher tuition and state
repression of students, is former president of
the Quebec Treasury Board, and was a cabinet
minister in the Quebec government of Lucien
Bouchard. Other signatories include Pierre
Fortin, a professor emeritus at the Université du
Québec à Montréal; Michel Gervais, the former
rector of Université Laval; Monique
Jérôme-Forget, former finance minister of Quebec
and former president of the Quebec Treasury
Board, member of the Quebec Liberal Party between
1998 and 2009, was responsible for introducing
public-private partnerships in Quebecs
infrastructure development (which saw enormous
cooperation with the Mafia), and is on the board
of directors of Astral Media. Robert Lacroix,
another co-signer, was former rector of the
Université de Montréal is also a fellow at
CIRANO, a Montreal-based think tank which is
governed by a collection of university heads,
business executives, and bankers, including
representatives from Power Corporation (owned by
the Desmarais family). Another signatory is
Michel Leblanc, president and CEO of the Board of
Trade of Metropolitan Montreal, a prominent
business organization in Montreal, of which the
board of directors includes a number of corporate
executives, mining company representatives,
university board members, bankers and Hélène
Desmarais, who married into the Desmarais family.
Another signatory is Claude Montmarquette,
professor emeritus at the Université de Montréal,
who is also a member of the elitist CIRANO think
tank, which as a research institution (for
elites) has recommended increasing Quebecs
tuition costs for several years. Another
signatory was Marcel Boyer, a Bell Canada
Professor of industrial economics at the
Université de Montréal, Vice-president and chief
economist at the Montreal Economic Institute, is
the C.D. Howe Scholar in Economic Policy at the
C.D. Howe Institute, Member of the Board of the
Agency for Public-Private Partnerships of Québec,
and Visiting Senior Research Advisor for
industrial economics at Industry Canada. At the
Montreal Economic Institute, Boyer sits alongside
notable elitists, bankers, and corporate
executives, including Hélène Desmarais, who
married into the Desmarais family (the most
powerful family in Canada). At the C.D. Howe
Institute, Boyer works for even more elitists, as
the board of directors is made up of some of
Canadas top bankers, corporate executives, and
again includes Hélène Desmarais. The Desmarais
family, who own Power Corporation and its many
subsidiaries, as well as a number of foreign
corporations in Europe and China, are Canadas
most powerful family. The patriarch, Paul
Desmarais Sr., has had extremely close business
and even family ties to every Canadian Prime
Minister since Pierre Trudeau, and all Quebec
premiers (save two) in the past several decades.
The Desmarais have strong links to the Parti
Quebecois, the Liberals, Conservatives, and even
the NDP, and socialize with presidents and prime
ministers around the world, as well as the
Rothschilds, Rockefellers, and even Spanish
royalty. Paul Desmarais Sr. has a
disproportionate influence on politics and the
economy in Quebec and Canada, and he especially
has a lot of influence on Premier Jean Charest.
When former French President Nicolas Sarkozy gave
Desmarais the French Legion of Honour, Desmarais
brought Jean Charest with him. Quebec author
Robin Philpot commented that Desmarais took him
along like a poodle, referring to Charest. The
Desmarais family has extensive ties to Canadian
and especially Quebec politicians, have extensive
interests in Canadian and international
corporations and banks, are closely tied to major
national and international think tanks (including
the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral
Commission, and the Bilderberg Group), and even
host an annual international think tank
conference in Montreal, the Conference of
Montreal. The Desmarais family have had very
close ties to Prime Ministers Pierre Trudeau,
Brian Mulroney, Jean Chretien, Paul Martin, and
even Stephen Harper, and to Quebec premiers,
including Lucien Bouchard, who co-authored the
article in the Gazette advocating increased
tuition. The Desmarais empire also includes
ownership of seven of the ten French newspapers
in Quebec, including La Presse. The Desmarais
family stand atop a parasitic Canadian oligarchy,
which has bankers and corporate executives
controlling the entire economy, political
parties, the media, think tanks which set policy,
and even our educational institutions, with the
chancellors of both Concordia and McGill
universities serving on the boards of the Bank of
Montreal and the Royal Bank of Canada,
respectively, as well as both schools having
extensive leadership ties to Power Corporation
and the Desmarais family. It is this very
oligarchy which demands the people pay more, go
further into debt, suffer and descend into
poverty, while they make record profits. In March
of 2012, Power Corporation reported fourth
quarter profits of $314 million, with yearly
earnings at over $1.1 billion. Canadas banks
last yearmade record profits, and then decided to
increase bank fees. At the end of April, it was
reported that Canadas banks had received a
secret bailout back in 2008/09, from both the
Bank of Canada and the U.S. Federal Reserve,
amounting to roughly $114 billion, or $3,400 for
every Canadian man, woman, and child (more than
the cost of yearly tuition in Quebec). And yet
Quebec youth are told we suffer from
entitlement. And now banks are expected to be
making even more profits, as reported in early
May. As banks make more record profits, Canadians
are going deeper into debt. The big Canadian
banks, along with the federal government, have
colluded to create a massive housing bubble in
Canada, most especially in Toronto and Vancouver,
and with average Canadian household debt at
$103,000, most of which is held in mortgages, and
with the Bank of Canada announcing its intent to
raise interest rates, Canada is set for a housing
crisis like that seen in the United States in
2008, forcing the people to suffer while the
banks make a profit. The head of the Bank of
Canada (a former Goldman Sachs executive) said
that Canadian household debt is the biggest
threat to the Canadian economy, but dont worry,
Canadas Finance Minister said he is working in
close cooperation with the big banks to intervene
in the housing market if necessary, which would
likely mean another bailout for the big banks,
and of course, hand the check to you! So, Canada
has its priorities: every single Canadian man,
woman, and child owes $3,400 for a secret bank
bailout to banks that are now making record
profits and increasing their fees, while
simultaneously explaining that there is no money
for education, so we will have to pay more for
that, too, which is something those same banks
demand our governments do to us. When the
students stand up, they are said to be brats
and whining about entitlements. But then, what
does that make the banks? This is why I argue
that Canadas elites are parasitic in their very
nature, slowly draining the host (thats us!) of
its life until there is nothing left the extract.
9) The student strike is being subjected to a
massive and highly successful propaganda campaign
to discredit, dismiss, and demonize the students:
In the vast majority of coverage on the student
strike and protests in Quebec, the media and its
many talking heads have undertaken a major
propaganda campaign against the students. The
students have been consistently ignored,
dismissed, derided, insulted and attacked. One
Canadian newspaper said it was hard to feel
sorry for Quebec students, who were whining and
crying and kicking up a fuss, treating
Canadas young generation like ungrateful
children throwing a collective tantrum. In almost
every article about the student strike, the main
point brought up to dismiss the students is that
Quebec has the lowest tuition costs in North
America. The National Post published a column
written by a third-year political science student
at McGill University in Montreal stating that,
Quebec students must pay their share, and
advised people to ignore the overheated rhetoric
from student strikers, and that, Jean Charest
must go full steam ahead. The student author,
Brendan Steven, is co-founder of McGills
Moderate Political Action Committee (ModPAC),
which is an organizing mobilizing McGill students
inopposition to the strike. Stevens organization
attacked striking student associations as
illegitimate, unconstitutional shams and
attacked the democratic functioning of other
student associations holding general assemblies.
Steven complained that the democratic general
assemblies are being invented on a whim.
Brendan Steven not only gets to write columns for
the National Post, but getsinterviewed on CBC.
Stevens anti-strike group sent a letter to the
McGill administration complaining about
pro-strike students on the campus, writing, This
group violates our democratic right to access an
education without fear of harm, and added: We
are demanding the McGill administration take
action against this minority group before the
current conflicts escalate into disasters. They
have proven they will not remain peaceful. As a
lap-dog boot-licking power worshipper, Brendan
Steven has a future for himself in politics,
thats for sure! Back in January, Steven wrote an
article for the Huffington Post in which he
explained that the reason why CEOs get paid so
much is because theyre worth it. He referred
to Milton Friedman the father of neoliberalism
as a great economic thinker. Back in November
of 2011, Steven wrote an article for the McGill
Daily entitled, Do not demonize authorities,
and then went on to justify police violence
against protesting students engaged in an
occupation of a school building, which he
characterized as an inherently hostile act.
Steven later got an opportunity to appear on
CBCs The Current. Margaret Wente, writing for
the Globe and Mail, wrote that, Its a little
hard for the rest of us to muster sympathy for
Quebecs downtrodden students, who pay the lowest
tuition fees in all of North America. She then
referred to the striking students as the
baristas of tomorrow and they dont even know
it. Wente then attempted to explain the Quebec
students by writing: Now I get it: The kids are
on another planet. Interesting how she used the
word kids to just add a little extra
condescension. But it seems clear that Wente
gets very little. In an August 2011 column,
Wente tried to explain why poor black communities
in Britain and America were experiencing riots
and gang activity, placing blame on
single-mothers and family breakdown, and
explained that, Rootless, unmoored young men
with no stake in society are a major threat to
social order. Explaining this demographic in
economic terms, Wente wrote: They are, quite
simply, surplus to requirements. In another
column, Wente argued that helping deliver
much-needed humanitarian supplies to Gaza would
enable terrorists. Wente also wrote an article
entitled, The poor are doing better than you
think, suggesting that its not so bad for poor
people because they have air conditioning, DVD
players, and cable TV. Wente has been
consistently critical of the Occupy movement, and
suggested in another article that, the biggest
economic challenge we face today is not income
inequality, greedy corporations, Wall Street
corruption or the concentration of wealth among
the top 1 per cent. Its the increasing failure
of young men with high-school degrees or less to
latch on to the world of work. Of course, in
Wentes world, the inability of young men to get
a job has nothing to do with income inequality,
greedy corporations, Wall Street corruption or
the concentration of wealth. In another article
criticizing the Occupy movement, Wente managed to
argue that it was not Wall Street and bankers
that have destroyed the economy and left people
without jobs, but rather what she refers to as
the virtueocracy, blaming unions, single
mothers who gets masters degrees in social
sciences, and people who want to work at NGOs and
non-profits, doing transformational,
world-saving work. So its Wentes insightful
voice which is informing Canadians about the
student movement in Quebec. Other Canadian
publications writing about the Quebec student
strike have headlines like, Reality check for
the entitled, repeating the idiotic argument
that because Quebec students pay less than the
rest of Canada, they shouldnt be complaining
about the hikes. Andrew Coyne wrote a syndicated
column in which he claimed that, Quebec students
know violence works, framing the protest at
which police almost killed two students as an
action of general rage the students had
promised. With no mention of the student who
lost an eye, or the other student who ended up in
the hospital with critical head injuries, Coyne
talked about a cop who was beaten savagely and
lay helpless on the ground. No mention, of
course, of the police truck that drove into a
group of students moments later, or the fact that
the cop who was beaten savagely got away with
minor injuries, unlike the students who were shot
in the face with rubber bullets. By simply
omitting police brutality and violence, Coyne
presented the student movement as itself
inherently violent, instead of at times erupting
in violent reactions to state violence, which is
far more extreme in every case. The Toronto Sun
even had an article which claimed that the
students have employed tactics of thuggery and
violent criminal behaviour. Publications
regularly ask their readers if Quebec students
have legitimate grievances, if they are
fighting for social justice, or if they are
just spoiled brats. A syndicated column from
theVancouver Sun by Licia Corbella was titled,
How rioting students help make me grateful. She
discussed her latest visit to church where the
pastor advised: Parents, do not provoke your
children to anger by the way you treat them, and
mentioned how parents anger their children by
belittling them, underestimating them and not
treating them as individuals. Corbella then took
particular note of how parents provoke and enrage
children when we give them a sense of
entitlement. With the word entitlement,
Corbella naturally then began thinking about
Quebec students, as according to Corbellas
pastor, entitlement leads to rage. Corbella
wrote that rioting is, in essence, what a
spoiled two-year-old would do if they had the
ability. She further wrote: In Quebec, these
entitled youth, who believe the rest of society
MUST provide them with an almost free education
or else, have blocked other students from
accessing the educations they paid for, burned
vehicles, smashed shop windows, looted property
and severely beaten up a police officer who got
separated from the rest of his colleagues.
Again, no mention of the two students who were
almost killed by police at the same event.
Corbella quoted someone interviewed on TV,
endorsing the claim that the student protests are
starting to resemble terrorism, though she took
issue with the word starting. This is the
result of creating, according to Corbell, an
entitlement society. Apparently, the pastors
lesson about not belittling the young did not
sink in with Corbella. An article in the
Chronicle Heraldasked, What planet are these
kids on? The author then wrote that, the irony
is that these students now want the system to
accommodate their desires and for someone else to
pay the bill, and that, students should stop
making foolish demands. Other articles claim
that students need a lesson in economics. After
all, the fact that the majority of economists,
fully armed with lessons in economics, were
unable to predict the massive global economic
crisis in 2008, should obviously not lead to any
questioning of the ideology of modern economic
theory. No, it would be better for students to
learn about the ocean from those who couldnt see
a tsunami as it approached the beach. Another
article, written by a former speechwriter to the
Prime Minister of Canada, wrote that the student
arguments were vacuous and that the youth were in
a state of complete denial. Rex Murphy, a
commentator with the National Post and CBC,
referred to the student strike as short-sighted
and that student actions were crude attempts at
precipitating a crisis. Student actions, he
claimed, were the actions of a mob and were
simply wrong, and thus, should be condemned.
The CBC has been particularly terrible in their
coverage of the student movement. With few
exceptions, the Canadian media have established a
consensus in opposition to the student protests,
and use techniques of omission, distortion, or
outright condemnation in order to promote a distinctly anti-student stance.
10) The student movement is part of a much larger
emerging global movement of resistance against
austerity, neoliberalism, and corrupt power: In
the coverage and discourse about the student
movement, very little context is given in placing
this student movement in a wider global context.
The British newspaper, The Guardian, acknowledged
this context, commenting on the red squares worn
by striking students (a symbol of going squarely
into the red, into debt), explaining that they
have become a symbol of the most powerful
challenge to neoliberalism on the continent. The
article also adopted the term promoted by the
student movement itself to describe the wider
social context of the protests, calling it the
Maple Spring. The author placed the fight
against tuition increases in the context of a
struggle against austerity measures worldwide,
writing: Forcing students to pay more for
education is part of a transfer of wealth from
the poor and middle-class to the rich as with
privatization and the states withdrawal from
service-provision, tax breaks for corporations
and deep cuts to social programs. The article
noted how the student movement has linked up with
civic groups against a Quebec government plan to
subsidize mining companies in exploiting the
natural resources of Northern Quebec (Plan Nord),
taking land from indigenous peoples to give to
multibillion dollar corporations. As one of the
student leaders stated, the protest was about
more than tuition and was aimed at the elite
class itself, Those people are a single elite, a
greedy elite, a corrupt elite, a vulgar elite, an
elite that only sees education as an investment
in human capital, that only sees a tree as a
piece of paper and only sees a child as a future
employee. The student strike has thus become a
social movement. The protests aim at economic
disruption through civil disobedience, and have
garnered the support of thousands of protesters,
and 200,000 protesters on March 22, and close to
300,000 on April 22. Protests have blocked
entrances to banks, disrupted a conference for
the Plan Nord exploitation, linking the movement
with indigenous and environmental groups. It was
only when the movement began to align with other
social movements and issues that the government
even accepted the possibility of speaking to
students. Unions have also increasingly been
supporting the student strike, including with
large financial contributions. Though, the large
union support for the student movement was also
involved in attempted co-optation and undermining
of the students. At the negotiations between the
government and the students, the union leaders
convinced the student leaders to accept the deal,
which met none of the student demands and kept
the tuition increases intact. There was a risk
that the major unions were essentially aiming to
undermine the student movement. But the student
groups, which had to submit the agreement to
democratic votes, rejected the horrible
government offer. Thus the Maple Spring
continues. Quebec is not the only location with
student protests taking place. In Chile, a
massive student movement has emerged and
developed over the past year, changing the
politics of the country and challenging the
elites and the society they have built for their
own benefit. One of the leaders of the Chilean
student movement is a 23-year old young woman,
Camila Vallejo, who has attained celebrity
status. In Quebecs student movement, the most
visible and vocal leader is 21-year old Gabriel
Nadeau-Dubois, who has also achieved something of
celebrity status within the province. Just as in
Quebec, student protests in Chile are met with
state violence, though in the Latin American
country, the apparatus of state violence is the
remnants of a U.S.-supported military
dictatorship. Still, this does not stop tens of
thousands of students going out into the streets
in Santiago, as recently as late April. Protests
by students have also been emerging elsewhere,
often in cooperation and solidarity with the
Occupy movement and other anti-austerity
protests. Silent protests are emerging at
American universities where students are
protesting their massive debts. California
students have been increasingly protesting
increased tuition costs. Student protests at UC
Berkeley ended with 12 citations for trespassing.
Some students in California have even begun a
hunger strike against tuition increases. In
Brooklyn, New York, students protesting against
tuition increases, many of them wearing the
Quebec red square symbol, were assaulted by
police officers. Even high school students in New
York have been protesting. Israeli social
activists are back on the streets protesting
against austerity measures. An Occupy group has
resumed protests in London. The Spanish indignado
movement, which began in May of 2011, saw a
resurgence on the one year anniversary, with
another round of anti-austerity protests in
Spain, bringing tens of thousands of protesters,
mostly youths, out into the streets of Madrid,
and more than 100,000 across the country. Their
protest was met with police repression.
Increasingly, students, the Occupy movement, and
other social groups are uniting in protests
against the costs of higher education and the
debts of students. This is indeed the context in
which the Maple Spring the Quebec student
movement should be placed, as part of a much
broader global anti-austerity movement.
So march on, students. Show Quebec, Canada, and
the world what it takes to oppose parasitic
elites, mafia-connected politicians, billionaire
bankers, and seek to change a social, political,
and economic system that benefits the few at the expense of the many.
Solidarity, brothers and sisters!
For a comprehensive analysis of the Quebec
student strike, see: The Québec Student Strike:
From Maple Spring to Summer Rebellion?
For up to date news and information of student
movements around the world, join this Facebook
page: We Are the Youth Revolution.
Andrew Gavin Marshall is an independent
researcher and writer based in Montreal, Canada,
writing on a number of social, political,
economic, and historical issues. He is also
Project Manager of The Peoples Book Project. He
also hosts a weekly podcast show, Empire, Power,
and People, on BoilingFrogsPost.com.
Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
415 863-9977
www.Freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20120523/d478967e/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list