[News] The Palestine Papers - The al-Madhoun assassination & Erekat: "I can't stand Hamas"
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Tue Jan 25 18:39:15 EST 2011
The Palestine Papers
The al-Madhoun assassination
http://english.aljazeera.net/palestinepapers/2011/01/201112512109241314.html
Documents include handwritten notes of 2005
exchange between PA and Israel on plan to kill Palestinian fighter in Gaza.
David Poort Last Modified: 25 Jan 2011 20:08 GMT
Hassan al-Madhoun and a senior Hamas leader
were killed by Israeli missiles in 2005 [EPA]
The Palestinian Authority (PA) has shown
operational willingness to co-operate with Israel
to kill its own people, the Palestine Papers indicate.
Madhoun's family reacts
Among the documents are notes, handwritten in
Arabic,
<http://transparency.aljazeera.net/document/5240>revealing
an exchange in 2005 between the PA and Israel on
a plan to kill a Palestinian fighter named Hassan
al-Madhoun, who lived in the Gaza strip.
Al-Madhoun (born 1973) was a leading figure
within the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, a movement
aligned to Fatah, which at that stage still held
power in Gaza. Al-Madhoun had been accused by
Israel of planning deadly bombings at Israels
Ashdod port and the Qarni crossing between Gaza and Israel.
In a
<http://www.ajtransparency.com/en/document/5240>joint
committee meeting on fugitives in mid-2005 in Tel
Aviv between Shaul Mofaz, the then-Israeli
defence minister, and Nasser Youssef, the PA
minister of interior, the PA was asked to kill al-Madhoun.
Mofaz: [
] Hassan Madhoun, we know his address
and Rasheed Abu Shabak [chief of the Preventative
Security Organisation in Gaza] knows that. Why
don't you kill him? Hamas fired [Qassam rockets]
because of the elections and this is a challenge
to you and a warning to Abu Mazen [Mahmoud Abbas, the PA president].
Youssef: We gave instructions to Rasheed [Abu Shabak] and will see.
Mofaz: Since we spoke, he has been planning an
operation, and that's four weeks ago, and we know
that he wants to strike Qarni or Erez [another
border crossing between Gaza and Israel]. He is
not Hamas and you can kill him.
Youssef: We work, the country is not easy, our
capabilities are limited, and you haven't offered anything.
Mofaz: I understand that nothing has been accomplished in the [Gaza] Strip.
Less then a month after this meeting, on November
1, 2005, al-Madhoun
<http://www.breakingnews.ie/world/senior-al-aqsa-gunman-killed-in-gaza-refugee-camp-228180.html>was
killed in his car by a missile fired from an
Israeli Apache helicopter over the skies of Gaza.
The attack also killed a wanted Hamas activist and wounded three other people.
The very next day, Mofaz, who by that time was in
Washington, pledged to ease the lives of
Palestinians and to pursue peacemaking with President Abbas.
The US president should write that the US "must
withdraw from the peace process."
"We want to deal with President Abbas," Mofaz
said after meeting with Condoleezza Rice, the
then-US Secretary of State, before going to the
White House to confer with Stephen Hadley, the then-national security adviser.
"We are waiting to see how the Palestinian
Authority will deal with terrorist groups," the Israeli minister said.
The Palestine Papers appear to reveal two primary
motives for the Palestinian Authoritys
collaboration with Israel and their crackdown on dissent.
Firstly, it serves to maintain the movements
political supremacy at a time when it is being
questioned. Secondly, it is an attempt to signal
to the US that it wants to remain a trusted
partner in peace talks, regardless the costs.
Saeb Erekat, the PAs chief negotiator
acknowledged the cost of gaining US approval and
Israeli trust, in
<http://transparency.aljazeera.net/document/4827>a
meeting on September 17, 2009 with David Hale, the deputy US Middle East envoy.
Erekat: We have had to kill Palestinians to
establish one authority, one gun and the rule of
law. We continue to perform our obligations. We
have invested time and effort and killed our own
people to maintain order and the rule of law.
It is not clear as to which killings Erekat is
referring to but the discussion about the plan to
kill al-Madhoun is just one example of how, since
the death of Yasser Arafat, Fatahs policy of
resistance to Israel has become one of collaboration.
The Palestine Papers show how the Al Aqsa
Martyrs Brigade, once the spearhead of action
against the Israeli occupation, has been
transformed into a body that helps maintaining it.
During the
<http://transparency.aljazeera.net/document/2312>Annapolis
talks in 2008, Ahmed Qurei, the former
Palestinian prime minister also known as Abu Ala,
and his Israeli counterpart Tzipi Livni,
discussed collaboration between the brigade and the Israeli security forces.
Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade is part of the Fatah
movement and they agreed to be part of the
current security apparatus, even though this was
not my position when I was a prime minister. I
wanted the Brigade to remain as it was to confront Hamas, Qurei told Livni.
With the common goal of destroying Hamas, the
Palestine Papers reveal the extent to which the
PA, the US and Israel were willing to work
together, and the extent to which the PA
<http://transparency.aljazeera.net/document/2769>linked
the fate of Hamas with its own political survival.
[
] reaching an agreement is a matter of
survival for us. Its the way to defeat Hamas,
Erekat told Marc Otte, the EU negotiator, in June 2008.
Earlier that year,
<http://transparency.aljazeera.net/document/2304>on
January 22, Qurei told Livni; Well defeat Hamas
if we reach an agreement, and this will be our
response to their claim that gaining back our
land can be achieved through resistance only.
**********************************************************
http://english.aljazeera.net/palestinepapers/2011/01/201112511595595810.html
Erekat: "I can't stand Hamas"
For Fatah, the Annapolis process seems to have
been as much about crushing Hamas as about ending Israel's occupation.
Laila Al-Arian Last Modified: 25 Jan 2011 19:35 GMT
The Annapolis process was meant to be a round of
peace talks aimed at reaching an agreement to
solve the decades-long Palestinian-Israeli
conflict. But instead of focusing on resolving
the core issues at hand, why did Palestinian
negotiators spend so much time during the
meetings denigrating their political rivals, Hamas?
Controlling the mosques
The Palestine Papers reveal that Fatah was
obsessed with maintaining political supremacy
over Hamas, with Israels cooperation, especially
following the 2006 electoral victory of the
Islamist movement. Documents obtained by Al
Jazeera also show the extent to which the
Palestinian Authority cracked down on Hamas
institutions to weaken the group and strengthen
its own relationship with Israel.
At the height of negotiations, on April 7, 2008,
Israeli foreign minister Tzipi Livni was
unequivocal in summing up Israels policy: Our
strategic view is to strengthen you and weaken Hamas.
Working with Israel to weaken Hamas also appeared
to be in the Palestinian Authoritys interest.
During a
<http://transparency.aljazeera.net/document/2520>May
6, 2008 security meeting between Yoav Mordechai,
the head of the Israeli army civil administration
in the West Bank, and Hazem Atallah, the head of
the Palestinian Civil Police, Hamas was a prominent subject of discussion.
Yoav Mordechai: How is your fight against
civilian Hamas: the officers, people in
municipalities, etc. This is a serious threat.
Hazem Atallah: I dont work at the political
level, but I agree we need to deal with this.
Yoav Mordechai: Hamas needs to be declared
illegal by your President. So far it is only the militants that are illegal.
Atallah: There is also the request for tear gas
canisters. You previously gave us these back in 96.
Yoav Mordechai: We gave some to you for Balata 2
weeks ago. What do you need them for?
Atallah: Riot control. We want to avoid a
situation where the security agencies may be
forced to fire on unarmed civilians.
Never mind that tear gas canisters have proven
that
<http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2011/01/20111265223661981.html>they
can be just as deadly as live bullet rounds, the
exchange also foreshadows a crackdown on Hamas
social institutions in the West Bank.
PLO chief negotiator Saeb Erekat made his
contempt for his rivals known in 2007, when he
<http://transparency.aljazeera.net/document/5177>told
the Belgian foreign minister Karel de Gucht, I
cant stand Hamas or their social programs.
"The way to defeat Hamas"
By September 17, 2009, Erekat
<http://transparency.aljazeera.net/document/4827>was
bragging to U.S. officials that the PA had
complete control over zakat committees, or
Muslim charities, in the West Bank, as well as the weekly Friday sermons.
Related
<http://english.aljazeera.net/palestinepapers/2011/01/201112512459777415.html>Qurei
to Israel: "Occupy the crossing"
Top PA negotiator offers to allow Israel to
reoccupy the Philadelphi corridor on the Gaza-Egypt border.
<http://english.aljazeera.net/palestinepapers/2011/01/2011125144345427365.html>Ali
Abunimah: Cutting off a vital connection
Palestinian officials were often more concerned
with applying pressure to Hamas than easing a humanitarian crisis.
We have invested time and effort and even killed
our own people to maintain order and the rule of
law, Erekat said. The Prime Minister is doing
everything possible to build the institutions. We
are not a country yet but we are the only ones in
the Arab world who control the Zakat and the
sermons in the mosques. We are getting our act together.
In 2007, Reuters
<http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL059215920070706>reported
that Fatah was increasing pressure on zakat
charity committees that support the network of
Islamic schools and health clinics which helped
fuel Hamas's rise to power. On one occasion, the
news service reported, 20 gunmen stormed a dairy
funded by such a zakat committee but were ultimately persuaded to leave.
At the time, Akram al-Rajoub, who headed the
Preventive Security service in Nablus said,
There is absolutely no cooperation with Israel
in our activities" but that claim is belied by
the conversations documented in The Palestine Papers.
On February 11, 2008, Atallah
<http://transparency.aljazeera.net/document/2324>presented
the Israelis with a laundry list of actions the
PA took against Hamas, and complained that
Israeli actions in the West Bank city of Nablus
the previous month were harmful. He was likely
<http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2008/01/2008525135941444137.html>referring
to the three-day incursion by the Israeli
military, in which 40 Palestinians were injured
and 20 detained. 70,000 residents of the city were placed under curfew.
We made arrests, confiscated arms, and sacked
security individuals affiliated with Hamas,
Atallah said, but you keep on deterring our
efforts, and this is whats happening in Nablus.
While security cooperation against Hamas and its
institutions dominated some meetings, often
Palestinian negotiators merely wanted to vent to
their Israeli counterparts about their
deep-seated desire to defeat their political opponents.
Hamas must not feel that it is achieving daily
victories, sometimes with Israel and sometimes
with Egypt, and Al Jazeera Channel praises these
victories, Ahmed Qurei, a senior Palestinian
negotiator, told Livni on February 4, 2008.
I hope Hamas will be defeated, not military I
mean because we didnt try this; we didnt engage
in a civil war. President Abu Mazen was wise
enough not to give orders to Fateh members to use
arms, otherwise, wed have had many casualties.
According to the Palestine Papers, for Fatah, the
Annapolis process seems to have been as much
about crushing Hamas as it was about ending
Israels occupation and establishing an independent, Palestinian state.
We continue with a genuine process, Saeb Erekat
confided to European Union Special Representative
Marc Otte
<http://transparency.aljazeera.net/document/2769>on
June 18, 2008, reaching an agreement is a matter
of survival for us. Its the way to defeat Hamas.
Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
415 863-9977
www.Freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20110125/17cf66e8/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list