[News] Planet of Slums, Age of Riots - From Tottenham to Oakland
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Fri Aug 12 11:57:55 EDT 2011
http://www.counterpunch.org/maher08122011.html
August 12 - 14, 2011
From Tottenham to Oakland
Planet of Slums, Age of Riots
By GEORGE CICCARIELLO-MAHER
Tottenham, Chile, Tunis
There are too many to count
Oakland, Brixton, Taybat al-Imam
We almost cant keep the names straight.
Clichy-sous-Bois, Caracas, Los Angeles
The phrase riot in London echoed strangely in
my ear, prompting only muted interest. I have
been present for a few riots in London and in
nearby Cambridge, marches against the war and the
perennial Mayday battle between anarchists and
the Metropolitan Police. From these to the more
recent anti-cuts marches which ended in sporadic
clashes with police, my interest has gradually
waned, and when I most recently heard this phrase
riot in London, I expected it would be followed
by yet another description of a ritualized
protest, with some marchers
<http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8000641.stm>kettled
and some anarchists fighting police. This is not
simply a criticism: I was not not excited, but I
was certainly not excited either.
Instead, the details began to emerge: the
immediate spark was the police murder of a Black
man,
<http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/gang-suspect-killed-by-police-did-not-fire-his-gun-tests-show-2335134.html>Mark
Duggan, who was shot to death by police, and the
beating of a 16-year old woman demanding answers
from police about Duggans death. The fuel for
the fire had been long accumulating, however:
institutionalized racism in the form of poverty,
police stop-and-search methods, and more recent
Conservative Party cutbacks in the name of
austerity, this years chosen catchword if
revolution doesnt eclipse it entirely.
The similarities with other serious waves of
social rebellion then began to emerge with
increasing clarity. This was both about Mark
Duggan and it was not (here we can agree with the
British Prime Minister David Cameron, albeit
toward the opposite end), just as the recent
rebellions in Oakland in 2009 were both about
more than Oscar Grant, just as 2008 Athens was
about more than Alexandros Grigoropoulos, 1992
L.A. was about more than Rodney King, the 1965
Watts Rebellion about more than Marquette Frye,
and so on. And like these previous moments, the
London rebellions are spreading with a degree of
spontaneity and a flexibility of organizational
forms that has left police utterly confounded.
There have already been more than 1,000 arrests,
and as hysterical media outlets up the rhetorical
ante
<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/8690251/London-riots-Guerrilla-warfare-erupts-as-no-one-knows-where-mob-will-strike-next.html>with
talk of guerrilla warfare, the police are gearing up for far more.
Mob Hysteria
When economic violence reaches a certain point,
social counter-violence soon follows, and yet it
is rarely the bankers or the politicians, the
purveyors of global austerity measures, who bear
the brunt. It begins with name-calling, and no
name has more political and historical resonance
than the mob, the most traditional of slurs.
From
<http://blogs.philadelphiaweekly.com/phillynow/2011/08/08/mayor-nutter-releases-flash-mob-enforcement-tactics/>Philadelphia
to London, we are told, the specter of the mob
looms, and to the image of the baying mob, that
keystone of journalistic integrity
<http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3742133/Woman-leaps-from-block-of-flats-into-the-arms-of-cops-in-third-night-of-London-rioting.html>The
Sun has also added the image of the trouble-making rabble.
Irrational, uncontrollable, impermeable to logic
and unpredictable in its movements, these
undesirables have once again ruined the party for
everyone, as they have done from Paris 1789 to
Caracas 1989. In Fanons inimitable words: the
masses, without waiting for the chairs to be
placed around the negotiating table, take matters
into their own hands and start burning
To use the word mob is a fundamentally
political gesture. It is an effort by governing
elites and conservative forces to delegitimize
and denigrate popular resistance, to empty it of
all political content by drawing a line of
rationality in the sand. To make demands is
reasonable, but since the mob is the embodiment
of unreason, it cannot possibly make demands.
Never mind the very clearly political motivations
that sparked the rebellions around London, as
well as the growing and equally political
concerns about economic inequality and racist
policing:
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/08/context-london-riots>these
have been well documented, no matter how little many Britons want to hear it.
But I want to address directly the idea that the
riots are fundamentally irrational, as the smear
of the mob would symbolically insist. Lets
listen closely, lets block out the torrent of
media denunciation and hear what the rebels are saying themselves:
Argument 1: Nothing Else Has Worked, This Might.
When ITV asked one young rebel what, if anything,
rioting would achieve, his response was as matter-of-fact as it was profound:
You wouldnt be talking to me now if we didnt
riot, would you?... Two months ago we marched to
Scotland Yard, more than 2,000 of us, all blacks,
and it was peaceful and calm and you know what?
Not a word in the press. Last night a bit of
rioting and looting and look around you.
As
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zmo8DG1gno4>another
put it: you cant do nothing thats normal for
it to happen right. In other words, legitimate
discontent has not been heard through official
channels, and so those suffering turn to
unofficial ones. If someone has an effective
counter-argument to this, Im all ears. This is
not to suggest that the rebellions have a
singular logic shared by every participant, but
that there is logic to be found nonetheless.
This isnt the only time riots have worked,
either:
<http://www.counterpunch.org/maher01092009.html>in
2009 Oakland, it was riots and only riots that
led to the arrest, prosecution, and conviction of
BART police officer Johannes Mehserle for the
death of Oscar Grant. And this effectiveness
extends to the tactical, while the left marches
and is surrounded by police, these street rebels
have proven far less susceptible to tactics like
kettling: as The Guardian put it,
roaming groups of youths cannot be effectively
kettled. And unlike activists they will often
return to the site of trouble, seeking direct
confrontation with police.The looters appear to
have been more savvy. Large groups targeting
shops have been melting into a nearby estate in
seconds at the first sound of sirens arriving.
Argument 2: The Rich Can Do It, Why Cant We?
Poor people arent stupid enough not to have
noticed whats been going on in the world around
them. As capitalist crisis has set in a massive
redistribution of wealth has taken place, with
banks and investors bailed out at the expense of
the population, effectively rewarding them for
predatory behavior and leveraging national debt
into economic growth. The rich line their profits
as essential services and benefits are slashed,
and faced with such obvious looting, we are somehow expected not to notice.
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zmo8DG1gno4>One
onlooker to the London riots puts it precisely:
This is about youth not having a future
a lot of
these people are unemployed, a lot of these
people have their youth center closed down for
years, and theyre basically seeing the normal
things: the bankers getting away with what
theyre getting away with
this is the youth
actually saying to themselves, guess what? These
people can get away with that, then how come we cant tell people what we feel?
As one
<http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3742133/Woman-leaps-from-block-of-flats-into-the-arms-of-cops-in-third-night-of-London-rioting.html>young
female looter told
<http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3742133/Woman-leaps-from-block-of-flats-into-the-arms-of-cops-in-third-night-of-London-rioting.html>The
Sun, Were getting our taxes back, and
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/10/riots-reflect-society-run-greed-looting>as
another told
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/10/riots-reflect-society-run-greed-looting>The
Guardian, The politicians say that we loot and
rob, they are the original gangsters.
Argument 3: Locating the Riots.
Essential to the imagery of the irrational mob is
the insistence that the bulk of the destruction
is centered on working-class communities, and
here the logic is fundamentally colonial. The
poor and the Blacks cant be trusted: look what
they do to their own. Incapable of governing
themselves, they must be taught civilization, by
blows if necessary. Here again Oakland resonates,
as after the riots there a solitary African braid
shop, one of many whose windows were smashed,
<http://articles.sfgate.com/2009-01-08/news/17195522_1_bart-police-police-officer-demonstrators>became
the media symbol of the irrationality of
rioters hell-bent on destruction and nothing
more. It is worth noting that the poor rarely
own anything at all, even in their own communities.
To break this narrative, we must read the actions
of the rebels as well as listening to their
words. While working-class communities have
indeed suffered damage (we should note that
working-class communities always bear the brunt
of upheaval), there has been less talk of more
overtly political targeting: police stations
burned to the ground,
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/aug/07/tottenham-riots-peaceful-protest>criminal
courts windows smashed by those who had passed
through them, and the tacitly political nature of
youth streaming into neighboring areas to target
luxury and chain stores. On just the first night,
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/aug/07/tottenham-riots-peaceful-protest>rioters
in Tottenham Hale targeted Boots, JD Sports, O2,
Currys, Argos, Orange, PC World and Comet,
whereas some in nearby Wood Green ransacking the
hulking HMV and H&M before bartering leisurely
with their newly acquired possessions.
This tendency was seemingly
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/interactive/2011/aug/10/poverty-riots-mapped?CMP=twt_fd>lost
on analysts at
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/interactive/2011/aug/10/poverty-riots-mapped?CMP=twt_fd>The
Guardian, who were left scratching their heads
when the riot locations did not correspond
directly to the areas with the highest poverty.
And its not just the lefty news outlets that let
such details slip:
<http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/fac0b38e-c1d1-11e0-bc71-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1UZKq74AI>Danny
Kruger, ex-adviser to David Cameron observed
that: The districts that took the brunt of the
rioting on Monday night were not sink estates.
Enfield, Ealing, Croydon, Clapham... these places
have Tory MPs, for goodness sake. A mob attacked
the Ledbury, the best restaurant in Notting Hill.
While refusing to denounce the rebellions,
socialist thinker
<http://www.facebook.com/pages/Socialist-Workers-Party/132633832928#%21/notes/alex-callinicos/a-few-thoughts-about-the-riots/10150254079385887>Alex
Callinicos nevertheless suggests that such
looting is a form of do-it-yourself consumerism
reflecting the intensive commodification of
desires in the neoliberal era. This view misses
the far more complex role of the commodity during
a riot, which was as evident in
<http://www.counterpunch.org/maher06292010.html>Oakland
as in
<http://www.counterpunch.org/maher03032007.html>Venezuela:
not only is the looting of luxury consumer items
far more complex than Callinicos suggests, but
the argument of looting as consumerism would have
a hard time explaining both the destruction of
luxuries and appropriation of necessities that often ensues
Despite the ideological deployment of the specter
of mob hysteria, in the words of one observer,
there is
<http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/opinion/2011/08/201189165143946889.html>nothing
mindless about the London rebellions.
An Insurrection of the Masses
British media has by now largely closed ranks
against the rebellion, providing a seamless
tapestry of denunciation that oscillates between
the violently reactionary and the comically
hysterical. But this was not without first making
a serious mistake, an error in judgment that
pried open but the tiniest crack into which
stepped a man who has since become a focal point
for resistance to the media hype. Darcus Howe,
nephew of the Trinidadian Marxist C.L.R. James,
seems to have inherited his uncles acute
capacity for seeing through the racist hype about
mobs and discerning the political kernel of
seemingly apolitical daily acts of resistance, of
recognizing the new even amid the crumbling shell of the old.
When asked in a live BBC interview to
characterize the recent outbursts, How spoke the following words:
I dont call it rioting, I call it an
insurrection of the masses of the people. It is
happening in Syria, it is happening in Clapham,
its happening in Liverpool, its happening in
Port of Spain, Trinidad, and that is the nature of the historical moment
When Howe refused to follow the self-generating
script, one so well-known that no orders for its
reading usually need be given, the flailing BBC
correspondent turned first to bad logic and then
to ad hominem attack. If Howe was attempting to
explain the context of the rebellions he must
also be condoning their effects, and wasnt he,
by the way, himself a rioter as a youth? He
wasnt, as a matter of fact, but he was certainly
accused of being one: Howe was tried for affray
and riot at the Old Bailey in 1971 only to be
acquitted. After Howes later release on charges
of assaulting a police officer,
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eT602aV8zbI>Linton
Kwesi Johnson penned a tribute, Man Free, which featured the following words
Him stand up in the court like a mighty lion, him
stand up in the court like a man of iron, Darcus out of jail, Shabba!
(A
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=biJgILxGK0o&feature=player_embedded>video
of the interview recorded from a living room has
spread like wildfire, with more than 2.3 million
hits as I write, and the
<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/8693842/London-riots-BBC-apologises-for-accusing-Darcus-Howe.html>Beeb
has since been forced to apologize, blaming unspecified technical issues).
The Nature of the Historical Moment
Darcus Howe is right: there is something peculiar
about the nature of the historical moment.
Maybe it began in 1989 in the South, when
Venezuelans rose up against neoliberalism in
<http://www.counterpunch.org/maher03032007.html>the
Caracazo rebellions only to be crushed in blood
and fire with up to 3,000 dead. Who was the
subject of that near-insurrection, that
world-historical detonator which forever
transformed Venezuela and unleashed all that has
come since? The poor dwellers of the barrios
surrounding Caracas and other Venezuelan cities,
the product of decades of systematic
underdevelopment and the nascent neoliberalism
that had accelerated its effects. These were the
residents of the slums of which our planet was
soon composed, in Mike Daviss haunting words,
and without access to political power or a
workplace to strike in, they had discovered the
location of their political action in practice: the streets.
But as jobs have moved South, crisis has come
North. Or rather, it has been here all along, in
the South of the North and the North of the
South, but austerity measures have begun to shift
the effects of the contemporary crisis to reach a
far broader demographic. In this context,
<http://libcom.org/news/north-london-solfeds-response-london-riots-09082011>critiquing
the effects of riots in our historical moment is
about as effective as bemoaning the existence of
gravity. Those taking to the streets of London
and elsewhere are the social product of
capitalist restructuring in the long term and
austerity measures in the short term. But a
historical subject does not gain its status
merely from being a product: first it must act.
Darcus Howes uncle, the late C.L.R. James, was
straightforward in insisting that it is in such
action that the new world emerges from the shell
of the old, and here I only hope to note some
hopeful indications of this. First and foremost
is the unprecedented spirit of unity that has
emerged in the streets of London and elsewhere.
As
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/aug/09/london-riots-who-took-part?INTCMP=SRCH>The
Guardian reports:
the rioting has been unifying a cross-section of
deprived young men who identify with each other
Kast gave the example of how territorial markers
which would usually delineate young people's
residential areas known as endz, bits and
gates appear to have melted away. On a
normal day it wouldnt be allowed going in to
someone elses area
Now they can go wherever
they want. Theyre recognising themselves from
the people they see on the TV [rioting]. This is bringing them together.
This sense of unity is not merely among different
sets from different areas, but also extends to
the unprecedented multi-ethnic demographic that
has participated: poor whites, Black British,
African and Afro-Caribbean immigrants, South
Asians, Muslims, and Jews have all played a role.
While some in the Jewish community
<http://www.jpost.com/International/Article.aspx?id=233113>have
complained of being singled out for the
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/aug/07/tottenham-riots-peaceful-protest>participation
of Hasidic Jews in the first nights rioting in
Tottenham, this should instead be read against
assumptions that the crowd was only Black or only
Muslim. All ages have participated as well, with
entire families spotted either looting or warning
looters of approaching police. The youth, and
especially young men, have nevertheless
constituted the functional spearhead of the
rebellions, with
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zmo8DG1gno4>one
observer insisting that this is a movement of
the youth, of the young people saying, guess what
mister, Ive got no voice, no future, no leadership.
But if C.L.R. James saw the potential for unity
amid such rebellions, cracks in the shell of the
old often produce dangerous shards, and so he was
also keenly aware of the equal potential for the
opposite: racist backlash among even poor whites.
Thus while the more the more liberal wing of
white supremacy has appeared in the form of
<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2024446/UK-riots-2011-Broom-armies-reclaim-London-Birmingham-Manchester-streets.html>broom
armies cleaning up the aftermath of the
rebellions (wearing t-shirts emblazoned with such
heartwarming slogans as rioters are scum),
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6p4itkdLi8>mobs
of white racists like the Enfield Army have
also emerged, offering their services to the
police against the rioters (this alongside the
more organized white supremacy of
<http://worldblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/08/10/7332221-far-right-group-calls-for-safe-and-sober-vigilantism?fb_comment_id=fbc_10150289286512521_17970725_10150289341312521#f717362809c4da>the
English Defence League).
The Left Must Respond
In a short web comment,
<http://www.counterpunch.org/harvey08122011.html>Daniel
Harvey expressed the sentiment of many on the
radical left seeking to walk the fine line
between uncritically embracing the English
rebellions and falling into the right-wing media strategy of denunciation:
We have to remain loyal to this crisis. We have
to support the eruption of the unheard and the
unspoken in our obscene society
the problem is
not the excesses of this or that action, it is
that the rioters are simply not radical
enough. We have to radicalise them further
We
have to support the anger, but make the anger
political, and thereby turn it into something
genuinely powerful and dangerous a revolutionary moment rather than a riot.
This is certainly true in one sense, but it runs
the risk of neglecting the fact that the left
is far behind the rebels in the streets. In some
key ways, these riots are far more radical and
more effective than the left has proven itself to
be, and the rebels have certainly surpassed the
left in tactical savvy as in sheer bravado. Who is really more radical?
Certainly,
<http://www.redpepper.org.uk/riots-the-left-must-respond/>the
left must respond as one op-ed puts it, if only
to fight the messaging of the right, but only if
we recognize that there is much we can learn from
those rushing through the London streets. As
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zmo8DG1gno4>one
observer puts it, these youth got nothing to
lose, to which we might be tempted to add, but their chains
George Ciccariello-Maher is Assistant Professor
of Political Science at Drexel University. He is
completing a peoples history of the Bolivarian
Revolution in Venezuela and beginning a history
of rabbles, mobs, and gangs. He can be reached at gjcm(at)drexel.edu.
Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
415 863-9977
www.Freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20110812/1467cb01/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list