[News] An act of state terrorism

[Anti-Imperialist News]

An act of state terrorism

By <http://www.zcommunications.org/zspace/kevinovenden>Kevin Ovenden 
and Lee Sustar

http://socialistworker.org/2010/06/04/act-of-state-terrorism
Sunday, June 06, 2010


Outraged protests have spread around the world following the Israeli 
commando raid on a flotilla carrying desperately needed humanitarian 
aid to Gaza. At least nine people were killed, and many more injured 
when Israeli forces attacked the unarmed peace activists in the 
middle of the night on May 31. But the Israeli government of Prime 
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu continues to spin lies about the assault, 
with the connivance of the Israeli and American media.

Kevin Ovenden is an organizer of the Viva Palestina solidarity group 
and veteran of two convoys to Gaza. He spoke to Lee Sustar about the 
murderous Israeli assault on the peace flotilla--and he makes the 
case that the Palestinian solidarity movement must seize the moment 
to build wider support for ending the siege.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

WHEN DID it become clear that the flotilla faced violence at the 
hands of Israeli military forces?

I BECAME increasingly convinced that the Netanyahu government would 
stop at nothing to stop the flotilla, and the reason for my thinking 
was that it became clear that allowing the flotilla in--given the 
level of international support that was developing on Thursday and 
Friday of the previous week--would have signaled the end of the 
embargo on Gaza.

In fact, what's happened has also signaled the end of the siege. It's 
changed the situation utterly.

At the time, I believed that Israel's calculation was based on two 
things--one, that the force used would be brutal, but would not lead 
to such a large number of casualties--though it would lead to 
casualties. And second, that they would get away without any backlash 
in world opinion because, quite frankly, they've gotten away with far 
bigger crimes. They got away with, at least in the immediate term, 
the murder of over 1,400 Palestinians in Gaza with the assault in 
December 2008 and January 2009.

By Saturday, May 29, and certainly by Sunday, I became convinced that 
this was the calculation that had been made.

Ninety miles away from Israeli territory--which is well within 
international waters--we made the first contact with Israeli forces 
when we were parallel with the north of Israel, just coming south of 
Lebanon. When that happened, I sent out a very short but ominous 
e-mail alert to friends to circulate, anticipating that there would 
be a violent attack on the flotilla.

THE ISRAELI government and the right-wing media claim that Israel 
made an attempt at a nonviolent seizure of the ships, and their 
soldiers only fired back when they were attacked by the residents 
with pipes and other weapons. What really happened?

I WAS on the lead ship out of six--the Mavi Marmara. The initial 
contact was made at 11 p.m. on Sunday night, and people came to the 
top of the ship--there was obviously a lot of commotion. We had 
satellite broadcasting on board, and we got our message out around the world.

But for two or three hours, people were milling around, and lots of 
people went to get some rest, on the advice of the organizers. It was 
pitch black--the middle of the night.

We were 90 miles away from Israel. The internationally recognized 
sovereignty zones extend 22 miles into the sea. Obviously that 
doesn't apply for Gaza itself, but we were well away from Gaza. The 
Israelis have unilaterally extended their sea border to 68 miles. But 
we were a further 12 to 22 miles outside of even that unacceptable 
and unsupportable extension.

So people got some rest. There were lots of people on the lookout. I 
woke up at 4 a.m. along with lots of other people--it was around the 
time for the fajr morning prayer for the Muslims on the vessel. At 
about 4:25 a.m., the assault began.

It began with percussion grenades. They are an explosive, and they 
can injure people badly when they go off next to them. They were 
designed to create panic, which itself is an extremely reckless and 
violent act when you consider that this was a civilian passenger ship 
carrying over 500 people from 32 different nationalities.

The youngest participant was not yet one year old. The oldest was 88 
years old. We were carrying, among others, parliamentarians, 
including two members of the German Bundestag, and the exiled Eastern 
Catholic archbishop of Jerusalem, Archbishop Hilarion Capucci, who is 
85 years old and has the use of only one leg. This is an indication 
of the kinds of people who were aboard the ships.

To fire percussion grenades and generate panic on a boat moving at a 
speed of about 22 knots in pitch darkness in the open sea in the 
Eastern Mediterranean at night is itself a violent act.

Israeli attack dinghies, called Zodiacs, moved up very quickly on the 
side of the boat. They were carrying fully armed Special Forces--full 
commando attack units.

By fully armed, I mean something like five pieces of firepower or 
knives--rifles, sidearms, commando knives, balaclava-covered faces, 
Kevlar helmets and so on. In other words, something akin to the U.S. 
Navy Seals people see in the movies in a glamorized way.

A helicopter moved in over the ship, and people began to file down. 
There was, of course, massive commotion aboard the ship. In that 
commotion, some people responded quite instinctively and with good 
cause--and with all legal and moral authority on their side. They 
pushed back, fought back with their hands and with whatever was to 
hand on the top of the ship where the first soldiers landed. Two 
soldiers were pushed from the top of the ship onto the next deck down.

They had already opened fire with what I thought to be rubberized 
bullets. These are not bullets that are made of rubber. They have a 
steel core, but are surrounded by rubber, and can themselves can be 
lethal. But almost immediately, we heard the different noise of live 
rounds being fired--but not indiscriminately or wildly. Rather, it 
was carefully targeted from both sides of the ship--which was 
surrounded--from the helicopter, and from those Israeli attack forces 
who were landing on the ship itself.

I can give you some examples of what happened--one from another 
colleague who was also on the Viva Palestina delegation aboard the 
ship, Nicci Enchmarch. She was next to one of the very first people 
to be killed. He was a Turkish man who was holding a camera--that's 
all he had in his hands. He was shot directly through the center of 
the forehead. The exit wounds through the back of the head took away 
the back third of the skull. He fell to the ground and experienced 
his last few seconds of life. This is the nature of the attack from 
the Israelis.

After they commandeered the whole ship and brutally rounded people 
up, they gathered together whatever they could find on the ship to 
pile up and show what we had used as weapons. We could see that they 
took knives from the kitchen, where of course there were knives. They 
were kitchen knives, not commando knives or anything like that--and 
they piled those up as if they were used as weapons.

They most certainly were not used as weapons. The evidence for that 
is the two Israeli soldiers, who were disarmed for the safety of 
everybody on the ship. They were very quickly disarmed and taken down 
to the area we'd set up as an improvised emergency room. They were 
looked after--guarded--so that there would be no reprisals from 
anybody who was feeling outraged.

The injuries that they sustained were injuries from being manhandled, 
perhaps hit with sticks. They were walking wounded. They were given 
back to their units as soon as possible, after the murderous attacks stopped.

This is why the Israeli lie machine is stumbling to a halt on this 
question. Whatever they claim, whatever selective footage they try to 
put forward, the brutal fact is that nine people--at least--were 
murdered, with gunshot wounds, and some Israeli soldiers ended up 
getting roughed up. That's the balance of the use of force--on the 
one hand, the use of force by some people to defend themselves; on 
the other, a truly murderous attack, a massacre.

CAN YOU help answer the question about the confusion, about the numbers dead?

YES. PEOPLE were killed in various parts of the outside of the ship, 
on the decks. The attack lasted for about 28 minutes. The captain was 
then able to broadcast by loudspeaker that the ship had been taken. 
He told everybody who had been on the outside of the ship to desist 
from demonstrating against the Israelis. Many of us, simply by our 
physical presence, were hoping to delay the attack and protect the 
lives of other people.

No one knew, when the live firing started, what would happen if the 
Israelis got inside the ship, and perhaps started firing wildly where 
there were even more people. So we then went inside to the large 
sleeping areas, and the Israelis poured onto the walkways and onto 
the very top of the ship--into the bridge and the engine room and so on.

Then, for more than an hour and a half, we appealed via the 
loudspeaker system, and via an Israeli Knesset [parliament] member, 
an Arab who speaks fluent Hebrew. She went forward to the windows 
with a sign explaining who she was, and that we had many, many injured.

We had managed to get as many as we could to the makeshift emergency 
room--some of which became a makeshift mortuary. But many of the 
people who were killed or seriously injured were still on the roof 
and the top decks of the boat. It was chaos--we didn't know how many 
there were. She was told to go back or she'd be shot, as would 
anybody who attempted to make contact with the Israelis.

For more than an hour and a quarter, we were appealing for help in a 
situation where quite literally we had people who were bleeding to 
death. According to the medics, at least one of those people who died 
may well have had their life saved if more sophisticated medical 
assistance of the kind that's onboard an Israeli vessel had been to hand.

But we were not allowed to evacuate any wounded over to the Israelis 
for more than an hour and a quarter, during which time one person 
died. So you can imagine the situation. There are seriously wounded 
people, and bodies lying in various parts of the ship. And then we 
were treated with a mixture of contempt, humiliation and attempts to 
degrade us throughout the rest of the horrific, horrific ordeal. 
There was scant regard for the wounded.

We tried to get out one wounded person at a time to the Israelis. The 
Israelis were not at all sensitive in handling them. We had them on 
stretchers, but they were rudely bundled up upstairs. These are 
people with abdominal and serious leg wounds. We sent experienced 
medics, one with each of the wounded. The medics were taken, 
thoroughly body-searched, handcuffed and not allowed to be with the wounded.

We weren't allowed to go upstairs, which was where most of the bodies 
were. So it's taken some time to piece things together. There are 
still two critically ill people in Israel, and there are six in the 
military hospital in Ankara, who are very seriously ill, but appear 
to be recovering. So I'm afraid to say that the figure of nine 
deaths, which took us 48 hours to establish, could go even higher.

WHAT WAS the treatment you were given when you were finally taken to 
the Israeli port of Ashdod?

THEY STOPPED the ship to begin removing bodies--this was still while 
we were at sea. They will, of course, have taken pictures. People 
have to ask themselves why, if the Israelis are so keen to explain 
what's taken place, have they have not been prepared to release those 
pictures to the world? We know why. I found out from Turkish 
officials that one of the people killed was shot at close range 
through the back of the head--which is an execution.

As the ship was stopped, and after the seriously wounded had been 
evacuated, we were led out onto the deck one by one, thoroughly 
searched, with all our belongings and everything taken. Some people 
had their passports taken at that stage.

We were cable-tied with those plastic cuffs--and most of the men with 
their hands tightly behind their backs. Most of the women were in 
front. Some people--journalists and members of parliament--were not 
cable-tied. But we were placed on the decks of the boats, with many 
people in stress positions, on their knees, heads down, arms 
cable-tied behind their backs.

We weren't allowed to talk. People who asked questions were pushed 
down. Anybody who tried to stand up was pushed down, so that they 
fell down, with guns pointed in their face. It was all the tactics 
that people may have seen meted out against the Palestinians and 
meted out by occupation forces in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere in 
the world--paramilitary terrorizing tactics.

I saw one British citizen on his knees, arms cable-tied behind his 
back, slapped three times across the face. Three people who I took to 
be Palestinian were also blindfolded and then kicked to the ground, 
arms tied behind their backs. Sheikh Raed Salahm--a leader of the 
Islamic Movement in Israel who was with us who is from Jerusalem--was 
taken off and severely intimidated, although he maintained his 
composure throughout.

There was a menacing atmosphere, one in which you could legitimately 
fear that someone could be shot even though they were handcuffed.

When we got to Ashdod, people were taken off one by one. As we were 
processed, Israeli intelligence and all manner of different state 
agencies were there. There were attempts to bully, humiliate, 
belittle and frighten people.

We were told as we got there not to worry--that we were simply going 
to be deported, and that we would be reunited with our belongings 
after we had been processed. After we were processed, we were put 
into prison vans, which are cells on wheels, and nobody was taken 
immediately to the airport as had been promised. That was all a mind 
game. Everybody was taken to a new prison facility in the Negev 
Desert. I arrived on the night of Monday the 31st and was eventually 
released on the morning of Wednesday the 2nd.

WHY DID you end up in Turkey?

WE IN the Viva Palestina delegation--and, I think, many others--had 
already decided that in this event, we would ask to go to Istanbul, 
because this is the area where most of the convoy had headed off 
from, and where we could rendezvous with friends from around the world.

In fact, all the Arabs were sent to Jordan, I think by land, and 
everybody else to Turkey. The Turkish civil organizations--and by 
that stage, the Turkish government--moved with incredible speed and 
determination to get absolutely everybody out and to safety. The 
Turkish airline sent three planes; the Turkish Red Crescent, or civil 
organization, sent two ambulance planes; and the Turkish military 
sent a third ambulance plane to Tel Aviv to get people out.

We now know that the Turkish prime minister said to the Israelis that 
if they were not going to release all of the prisoners, then Turkey 
was prepared for an escalating military confrontation.

WHEN DID you begin to perceive what a political storm the assault had caused?

I DIDN'T fully know that until Wednesday the 2nd. We were held 
incommunicado, of course, but I did have a visit from a man from the 
British consulate.

I should say that the treatment was not acceptable at all. We had 
nothing you could really describe as food on the first night, and the 
first thing we had resembling a meal was on the Tuesday afternoon, 
when consulate officials were visiting--which, as they said, was 
hardly a coincidence.

The consulate officials were treated contemptuously. I'll give you 
one example: the British consulate official from Jerusalem tried to 
have a private conversation through a prison cell door--we weren't 
allowed to meet face to face--with two British citizens. The junior 
prison guard refused to move. When he was asked to move, he brought 
two other prison guards. When the diplomat explained that under all 
international treaties, protocol and the law, he's entitled to speak 
to his nationals privately, the junior guard said, "Go to your 
international tribunals, go to your law, we don't care."

Of course, in a sense, the prison guard was right--he was simply 
reflecting the experience of all Israeli officials over the course of 
many, many decades, which is that whatever words are uttered at the 
international level, there's nothing to make those words reality.

But I heard from the British consulate official something of the 
scale of what had taken place. Even the new British foreign 
secretary--who at that point had not yet made a speech in the House 
of Commons--was condemning the attack and calling for an inquiry.

We'd managed to piece together among ourselves that there were, we 
thought, upwards of four dead. We knew that this would be a major 
story. As we were leaving the prison, with no real further 
information and being taken to the airport in coaches and prison 
vans, we could see Israeli police, military and civilians through the windows.

I could see the looks on their faces. I had prepared myself for a 
journey where we would be jeered at and laughed at from beginning to 
end, from Be'er Shiva to Ben-Gurion Airport. In fact, there were 
looks of hatred and aggressive gestures. It struck me very quickly 
that the only explanation for this was that in the international 
arena--although Israel had killed many people--it had wounded itself 
enormously in its standing and its strategic goals.

One thing's for sure. This was an attempt to instill fear--to use 
terror to achieve a political objective. This is the dictionary 
definition of terrorism. Real terrorism--state terrorism, by Israel.

WHAT'S NEXT for the movement to break the siege of Gaza?

THESE DISCUSSIONS are taking place right now among the leading 
components of the movement, so I don't want to say anything that 
preempts that. But I think that the following is common ground for everybody.

Firstly, there has never been such an event in the history of the 
solidarity movement with Palestine. This is the Sharpeville and the 
Soweto of the Palestine solidarity movement. Not of course, the 
Sharpeville and the Soweto for Palestinians themselves. They've 
experienced many such massacres--from Deir Yassin in 1948 all the way 
through to the attacks on Gaza in December-January of 2008 and 2009.

But for the Palestinian solidarity movement, this is the Sharpeville 
and Soweto, and it must be turned into such. Both of those events 
marked international turning points in the struggle against apartheid 
and the isolation of the apartheid regime in South Africa, and this 
strategically is what we need to work toward now. The momentum, which 
has come at an incredible, almost unbearable price, cost, is 
nevertheless against the Israelis. It's with the Palestinians and 
with all those who stand with them.

This development has several strands. First, various international 
bodies and governments have taken strong--and in some cases, 
unprecedentedly strong--positions, not just over the massacre and the 
call for an independent, international tribunal, but also saying 
clearly that the siege on Gaza has to come to an end.

This has absolutely been the position of the British government--a 
right-wing government has come out with a position that is stronger 
than the position of the Labour government 18 months ago during the 
time of the Gaza atrocities. That's not a product of government 
thinking--it's a product of the groundswell in Britain, and many, 
many other countries.

Former British MP George Galloway, my close friend and colleague, was 
on a speaking tour in the U.S. designed to maximize support for the 
flotilla and for Palestine. He spoke in one city on Monday night as 
news was beginning to break in Houston, and there were 300 or 400 
people there. By Tuesday night, he spoke in Dallas, and there were 
1,200 people there. He describes it as the most electrifying meeting 
he'd ever been at, and this is someone who's been at many meetings 
and many momentous events, particularly around this question.

So the tide is definitely turning. First, we have to turn all our 
energies into pushing every government and international body to come 
out with the strongest possible position, which has to include ending 
the siege on Gaza as an immediate step toward a wider advance for the 
Palestinian position.

Second, we have to appeal to the core of people who have already been 
active on one level or another around the Palestinian question, or 
those who are already convinced, to re-galvanize the movement, and go 
out and convince yet wider layers of people. We must argue the 
Palestinian case, and also push the case more generally to very wide 
layers of people.

In Britain, we're saying: How great is the price to be for blanket 
support for Israel, and for whatever its governments choose to do? 
The price has now become a murderous attack on nationals from 32 
difference countries, the murder of nine people, attacks and 
humiliation and mistreatment of British citizens in the Eastern 
Mediterranean in an act of piracy on the high seas--an attack on a 
Turkish ship with Turkish crew. People talk of alliances, and Turkey 
is a NATO ally.

Is this the price they have to pay--that people who are supposed to 
be allies are to be murdered so that Israel is supported in anything 
it does? That's a price which people in Britain are not prepared to pay.

Through this argument, we can move people progressively to a deeper 
understanding of what's taking place. I genuinely believe that this 
is a major turning point--not just over the siege of Gaza, but over 
Palestine and the wider politics of the region. Everything we do 
needs to be carefully calibrated and strategically thought out to 
drive that home in the coming months.

Transcription by Sarah Levy.




Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110

415 863-9977

www.Freedomarchives.org  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20100606/9c562db7/attachment.htm>