[News] Pentagon's Christmas Present: Largest Military Budget Since World War II

[Anti-Imperialist News]

Pentagon's Christmas Present: Largest Military Budget Since World War II

Rick Rozoff
December 23, 2010
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Pentagon-s-Christmas-Prese-by-Rick-Rozoff-101223-140.html


On December 22 both houses of the U.S. Congress unanimously passed a 
bill authorizing $725 billion for next year's Defense Department budget.

The bill, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 
2011, was approved by all 100 senators as required and by a voice 
vote in the House.

The House had approved the bill, now sent to President Barack Obama 
to sign into law, five days earlier in a 341-48 roll call, but needed 
to vote on it again after the Senate altered it in the interim.

The proposed figure for the Pentagon's 2011 war chest includes, in 
addition to the base budget, $158.7 billion for what are now 
euphemistically referred to as overseas contingency operations: The 
military occupation of Iraq and the war in Afghanistan.

The $725 billion figure, although $17 billion more than the White 
House had requested, is not the final word on the subject, however, 
as supplements could be demanded as early as the beginning of next 
year, especially in regard to the Afghan war that will then be in its 
eleventh calendar year.

Even as it currently is, the amount is the highest in constant 
dollars (pegged at any given year's dollar and adjusted for 
inflation) since 1945, the final year of the Second World War. With 
recent U.S. census figures at 308 million, next year the Pentagon 
will spend $2,354 for every citizen of the country at the $725 
billion price tag alone.

Last year's Pentagon budget, by way of comparison, was $680 billion, 
a base budget of $533.8 billion and the remainder for operations in 
Afghanistan and Iraq. In July of this year Congress approved the 2010 
Supplemental Appropriations Act which contained an additional $37 
billion for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Next year's defense authorization of $725 billion compares to, 
according to the Center for Defense Information, a Pentagon budget of 
$444.6 billion in 1946; $460.4 billion in 1968, the highest yearly 
amount during the Vietnam War; and $443.4 billion in 1988, the 
highest during the eight years of the Ronald Reagan administration's 
massive military buildup. (Numbers in 2004 constant dollars.) [1]

The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute estimates 
American military spending for 2009 to have accounted for 43 percent 
of the world total. Carl Conetta, co-director of the Project on 
Defense Alternatives, earlier this year estimated the 2010 U.S. 
defense budget to constitute 47 percent of total worldwide military 
expenditures and to amount to 19 percent of all American federal spending.

In addition, Pentagon spending has increased by 100 percent since 
1998 and "the Obama budget plans to spend more on the Pentagon over 
eight years than any administration has since World War II." [2]

With 2.25 million full-time civilian and military personnel, 
excluding part-time National Guard and Reserve members, the Defense 
Department is the U.S.'s largest employer, outstripping Walmart with 
1.4 million employees and the U.S Post Office with 599,000. [3]

"Add in what Homeland Security, Veterans Affairs, and the Energy 
departments spend on defense and total US military spending will 
reach $861 billion in fiscal 2011, exceeding that of all other 
nations combined," according to Todd Harrison, senior fellow for 
Defense Budget Studies at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary 
Assessments. [4]

In April Robert Higgs of The Independent Institute advocated that the 
budgets - in part or in whole - of the departments of Veterans 
Affairs, Homeland Security, Energy, State and Treasury and the 
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) should be 
calculated in the real military budget, which would in 2009 would 
have increased it to $901.5 billion.

"Adding [the] interest component to the previous all-agency total, 
the grand total comes to $1,027.8 billion, which is 61.5 percent 
greater than the Pentagon's outlays alone."

His numbers are:

National Security Outlays in Fiscal Year 2009
(billions of dollars)

Department of Defense 636.5

Department of Energy (nuclear weapons and environmental cleanup) 16.7

Department of State (plus international assistance) 36.3

Department of Veterans Affairs 95.5

Department of Homeland Security 51.7

Department of the Treasury (for the Military Retirement Fund) 54.9

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (1/2 of total) 9.6

Net interest attributable to past debt-financed defense outlays 126.3

Total 1,027.5 [5]

The above-cited Carl Conetta stated at the beginning of this year 
that the 2011 Pentagon budget will mark a milestone in that "the 
inflation-adjusted rise in spending since 1998 will probably exceed 
100% in real terms by the end of the fiscal year.

"Taking the 2011 budget into account, the Defense Department has been 
given about $7.2 trillion since 1998, when the post-Cold War decline 
in defense spending ended. Approximately $2.5 trillion of this total 
is due to spending above the annual level set in 1998. This added 
amount constitutes the post-1998 spending surge."

Based on constant 2010 dollars, Conetta further details that the 
Ronald Reagan administration spent $4.1 trillion on the Defense 
Department, the Georgia W. Bush administration spent $4.65 trillion 
and "Barack Obama plans to spend more than $5 trillion."

He also compares the two previous largest post-World War Two surges 
in U.S. military spending to the current one:

 From 1958-1968: 43 percent

From: 1975-1985 57 percent

In regards to which he said, "the 1998-2011 surge is as large as 
these two predecessors combined."

His calculations also include a growth in Pentagon contract employees 
of 40 percent since 1989, thereby freeing up uniformed service 
members for more direct combat roles.

The U.S. share of global military spending grew from 28 percent 
during the Cold War to 41 percent by 2006 and that of NATO member 
states, including the U.S., from 49 percent to 70 percent in the same period.

Contrariwise, the "group of potential adversary and competitor states 
has gone from claiming a 42 % share to just 16 % in 2006.

"Had Ronald Reagan -" who is generally regarded a hawkish president 
-" wanted to achieve in the 1980s the ratio between US and adversary 
spending that existed in 2006, he would have had to quadruple his 
defense budgets.

"And, of course, since 2006, the US defense budget has not receded, 
but instead grown by another 20% in real terms.

"By 2011, the United States will probably account for more than half 
of all global military spending calculated in terms of 'purchasing 
power parity' (which corrects for differences between national economies)." [6]

The defense authorization bill passed on December 22, despite its 
monumental and unprecedented size, has been routinely described in 
the American press as stripped-down, scaled-down and pared-down 
because an arms manufacturer or two, their lobbyists and obedient 
congresspersons didn't get every new defense contract and weapons 
project they desired three days before Christmas.

The December 22 vote in the House was, as Associated Press accurately 
described it, conducted without debate or discussion - and "without 
major restrictions on the conduct of operations" - particularly in 
regards to the $158.7 billion for the military operations in 
Afghanistan and Iraq, $75 million to train and equip the armed forces 
of Yemen for the counterinsurgency campaign in that country and $205 
million more to fund Israel's Iron Dome missile shield.

Regarding the first vote on December 17: "This year's bill is mostly 
noteworthy for its broad bipartisan support during wartime....Unlike 
during the height of the Iraq War when anti-war Democrats tried to 
use the legislation to force troops home, the House passed the 
defense bill Friday with almost no debate on Afghanistan." [7]

Aside from voting for the repeal of the "don't ask, don't tell" 
policy as a stand-alone measure, excising an amendment to allow 
abortions to be performed on military bases, and refusing reparations 
to victims of the World War Two Japanese occupation of the U.S. 
Pacific territory of Guam (apparently $100 million for the purpose 
was considered excessive in the $725 billion authorization), there 
was no meaningful dissent in either house of Congress.

Increasing the U.S. war budget to the highest level it's been since 
the largest and deadliest war in history while no nation or group of 
nations poses a serious threat to the country, and to a degree where 
it effectively exceeds the defense spending of the rest of the world 
combined, is all in the proper order of things for the world's sole 
military superpower.


1) Center for Defense Information
    <http://www.cdi.org/news/mrp/us-military-spending.pdf>http://www.cdi.org/news/mrp/us-military-spending.pdf
2) Christian Science Monitor, March 29, 2010
    <http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/David-R.-Francis/2010/0329/Defense-budget-After-Afghanistan-and-Iraq-withdrawal-a-peace-dividend>http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/David-R.-Francis/2010/0329/Defense-budget-After-Afghanistan-and-Iraq-withdrawal-a-peace-dividend
3) Christian Science Monitor, June 28, 2010
    <http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/David-R.-Francis/2010/0628/Cuts-to-US-defense-budget-look-inevitable>http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/David-R.-Francis/2010/0628/Cuts-to-US-defense-budget-look-inevitable
4) Ibid
5) Robert Higgs, Defense Spending Is Much Greater than You Think
    The Independent Institute, April 17, 2010
    <http://www.independent.org/blog/index.php?p=5827>http://www.independent.org/blog/index.php?p=5827
6) Carl Conetta, Trillions to Burn? A Quick Guide to the Surge in Pentagon
    Spending
    Project on Defense Alternatives, February 5 2010
    <http://www.comw.org/pda/1002BudgetSurge.html>http://www.comw.org/pda/1002BudgetSurge.html
7) Associated Press, December 17, 2010




Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110

415 863-9977

www.Freedomarchives.org  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20101223/e4b17cfa/attachment.htm>