[News] Agent Orange in Vietnam
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Fri Oct 16 15:11:37 EDT 2009
http://www.counterpunch.org/lindorff10162009.html
October 16-19, 2009
Agent Orange in Vietnam
Ignoring the Crimes Before Our Eyes
By DAVE LINDORFF
On Oct. 13, the New York Times ran a news story
headlined Door Opens to Health Claims Tied to
Agent Orange, which was sure to be good news to
many American veterans of the Indochina War. It
reported that 38 years after the Pentagon ceased
spreading the deadly dioxin-laced
herbicide/defoliant over much of South Vietnam,
it was acknowledging what veterans have long
claimed: in addition to 13 ailments already
traced to exposure to the chemical, it was also
responsible for three more dread
diseasesParkinsons, ischemic heart disease and hairy-cell leukemia.
Under a new policy adopted by the Dept. of
Veterans Affairs, the VA will now start providing
free care to any of the 2.1 million Vietnam-era
veterans who can show that they might have been
hurt by exposure to Agent Orange.
This is another belated step forward in the
decades-long struggle by Vietnam War veterans to
get the Defense Department and the VA to
acknowledge the American governments
responsibility for poisoning them and causing
permanent damage to them and often to their
children and grandchildren. Dioxin, one of the
most poisonous substances known to man, is known
to cause many serious systemic diseases,
autoimmune illnesses, cancers and birth defects.
(It is also a warning about the general Pentagon
and government approach to other hazards caused
by its battlefield use of toxinsmost
significantly the increasingly common use of
depleted uranium projectiles in bombs, shells and
bulletsan approach which features lack of
concern about health effects on troops and
civilians, denial of information to troops, and
denial of care to eventual victims.)
Missing from the Times article, written by
military affairs reporter James Dao, which did
include mention of the obstructionist role the
government has played through this whole sorry
saga, was a single mention of the far larger
number of victims of Agent Orange in Vietnamthe
people on whose heads and lands the toxic
chemical was actually dropped, or of the adamant
refusal by the US government to accept any
responsibility for what it did to them.
According to the article, the VA estimates that
there may be as many as 200,000 US veterans who
are suffering from Agent Orange-related
illnesses. But according to a court case brought
on behalf of Vietnamese victims, which was
dismissed by a US Federal District Judge who
ruled that there was no basis for the claims,
there are at least three million Vietnamese, and
possibly as many as 4.8 million, who are
suffering the same Agent Orange-related illnesses
as American veterans and their children. It is
estimated that as many as 800,000 Vietnamese in
the countrys south currently suffer from chronic
health problems due to Agent Orange exposure,
either to themselves, or to a parent or
grandparent. Most of these victims, some of whom
are retarded, and others of whom cannot walk or
have no use of their arms, need constant care.
Veterans for Peace, an organization whose
membership includes a large number of Vietnam War
veterans, has issued a call for the US to provide
funds for health care, education, vocational
education, chronic care, home care and equipment
to clean up hotspots of dioxin in Vietnama call
which Congress and the White House have
consistently ignored. Tests have found dioxin
levels around the sites of the three main former
US bases in what was South Vietnam to be 300-400
times recognized safe levels. The US dumped huge
amounts of Agent Orange for miles around those
bases to kill off jungle cover that Vietnamese
fighters could use to approach the bases, but it
was never cleaned up when the US pulled out.
One organization that includes a number of
American veterans of the way, including former
military doctors or soldiers who later became
physicians, is the Vietnam Friendship Village
Project USA Inc., which raises funds to help
establish communities in Vietnam to care for the victims of Agent Orange.
It may seem a pathetic stab at principle given
Americas use of two nuclear weapons against
civilian targets in Japan a few years later, but
back in World War II, in the midst of the most
brutal island-to-island fighting during the
Pacific War, a US Judge Advocate General in the
Pentagon ruled that a military request for
permission to use herbicides against the Japanese
on Pacific islands would be illegal under the
Hague Convention (forerunner of what are now
called the Geneva Conventions). He ruled that
trying to destroy the crops of civilians on those
islands to deny food to the Japanese troops would
be a war crime. The US went ahead and used the
herbicides anyway, arguing that even though it
was illegal, the US was free to go ahead, since
the Japanese had already broken the laws of war
by using strychnine to kill military guard dogs
in Siberia. Under the rules of war, if one side
breaks a rule, the other side is no longer bound by it.
But the Viet Cong and North Vietnamese never used
toxic materials against US forces or against
South Vietnamese forces. And the Pentagon in the
Vietnam War never even considered whether
spraying a highly toxic herbicide over 1.4
million hectares12% of the total land area of
Vietnam and almost 25% of the southern half of
the countrymight be a war crime.
Moreover, the Pentagon knew, before it began its
massive defoliation campaign, about studies
showing that Agent Orange was heavily laced with
deadly dioxin, but covered up those studies, some
by the chemicals makers, Dow Chemical and
Monsanto, and never even warned the troops who
handled the material daily, or who were sent out
to fight in areas that had been heavily sprayed.
The ongoing medical disaster in Vietnam caused by
Americas criminal use of Agent Orange to
defoliate a nation would be a good place for
President Obama to start earning his just-awarded
Nobel Peace Prize. He could kick off his peace
campaign by finally honoring President Richard
Nixons immediately broken promise to provide
several billion dollars in reconstruction aid to
Vietnam at the conclusion of peace talks at the
end of the war. Not a dollar of such aid was ever given.
Dao says he didn't mention significance for
Vietnamese dioxin victims of the VA's decision to
recognize three new diseases as being Agent
Orange-linked, because "my beat is veterans," and
because he only had 800 words in which to cover
his story. That may be true (though surely the
Vietnamese at least deserved a one-sentence
mention). But back on July 25, when the Times ran
a story (by Janie Lorber, not by Dao) about the
finding by an expert panel of the National
Institute of Medicine linking Parkinsons,
ischemic heart disease and leukemia to Agent
Orange, upon which the latest VA decision was
based, it also failed to mention the Vietnamese
victims. In that case, the lapse was simply
journalistically inexcuseable, since it was about
a new medical finding, not a policy decision
regarding the treatment of veterans.
At this point, the only way the New York Times
can salvage a bit of its journalistic reputation
on this topic would be by having Dao, Lorber or
some other reporter write a piece about the
impact of Americas Agent Orange use on the
people of Vietnam. They could start by calling a
veteran at Veterans for Peace or the Vietnam Friendship Village Project USA.
Dave Lindorff is a Philadelphia-based journalist
and columnist. His latest book is
<http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/031237254X/counterpunchmaga>The
Case for Impeachment (St. Martins Press, 2006
and now available in paperback). He can be
reached at <mailto:dlindorff at mindspring.com>dlindorff at mindspring.com
Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
415 863-9977
www.Freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20091016/9ed2b801/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list