[News] The Blood-Stained Monster Enters Gaza
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Mon Jan 12 11:21:49 EST 2009
http://www.counterpunch.org/
January 12, 2009
How Many Divisions?
The Blood-Stained Monster Enters Gaza
By URI AVNERY
Nearly seventy ago, in the course of World War
II, a heinous crime was committed in the city of
Leningrad. For more than a thousand days, a gang
of extremists called the Red Army held the
millions of the towns inhabitants hostage and
provoked retaliation from the German Wehrmacht
from inside the population centers. The Germans
had no alternative but to bomb and shell the
population and to impose a total blockade, which
caused the death of hundreds of thousands.
Some time before that, a similar crime was
committed in England. The Churchill gang hid
among the population of London, misusing the
millions of citizens as a human shield. The
Germans were compelled to send their Luftwaffe
and reluctantly reduce the city to ruins. They called it the Blitz.
This is the description that would now appear in
the history books if the Germans had won the war.
Absurd? No more than the daily descriptions in
our media, which are being repeated ad nauseam:
the Hamas terrorists use the inhabitants of Gaza
as hostages and exploit the women and children
as human shields, they leave us no alternative
but to carry out massive bombardments, in which,
to our deep sorrow, thousands of women, children
and unarmed men are killed and injured.
* * *
IN THIS WAR, as in any modern war, propaganda
plays a major role. The disparity between the
forces, between the Israeli army - with its
airplanes, gunships, drones, warships, artillery
and tanks - and the few thousand lightly armed
Hamas fighters, is one to a thousand, perhaps one
to a million. In the political arena the gap
between them is even wider. But in the propaganda
war, the gap is almost infinite.
Almost all the Western media initially repeated
the official Israeli propaganda line. They almost
entirely ignored the Palestinian side of the
story, not to mention the daily demonstrations of
the Israeli peace camp. The rationale of the
Israeli government (The state must defend its
citizens against the Qassam rockets) has been
accepted as the whole truth. The view from the
other side, that the Qassams are a retaliation
for the siege that starves the one and a half
million inhabitants of the Gaza Strip, was not mentioned at all.
Only when the horrible scenes from Gaza started
to appear on Western TV screens, did world public
opinion gradually begin to change.
True, Western and Israeli TV channels showed only
a tiny fraction of the dreadful events that
appear 24 hours every day on Aljazeeras Arabic
channel, but one picture of a dead baby in the
arms of its terrified father is more powerful
than a thousand elegantly constructed sentences
from the Israeli army spokesman. And that is what is decisive, in the end.
War every war is the realm of lies. Whether
called propaganda or psychological warfare,
everybody accepts that it is right to lie for
ones country. Anyone who speaks the truth runs
the risk of being branded a traitor.
The trouble is that propaganda is most convincing
for the propagandist himself. And after you
convince yourself that a lie is the truth and
falsification reality, you can no longer make rational decisions.
An example of this process surrounds the most
shocking atrocity of this war so far: the
shelling of the UN Fakhura school in Jabaliya refugee camp.
Immediately after the incident became known
throughout the world, the army revealed that
Hamas fighters had been firing mortars from near
the school entrance. As proof they released an
aerial photo which indeed showed the school and
the mortar. But within a short time the official
army liar had to admit that the photo was more
than a year old. In brief: a falsification.
Later the official liar claimed that
our soldiers were shot at from inside the
school. Barely a day passed before the army had
to admit to UN personnel that that was a lie,
too. Nobody had shot from inside the school, no
Hamas fighters were inside the school, which was full of terrified refugees.
But the admission made hardly any difference
anymore. By that time, the Israeli public was
completely convinced that they shot from inside
the school, and TV announcers stated this as a simple fact.
So it went with the other atrocities. Every baby
metamorphosed, in the act of dying, into a Hamas
terrorist. Every bombed mosque instantly became a
Hamas base, every apartment building an arms
cache, every school a terror command post, every
civilian government building a symbol of Hamas
rule. Thus the Israeli army retained its purity
as the most moral army in the world.
* * *
THE TRUTH is that the atrocities are a direct
result of the war plan. This reflects the
personality of Ehud Barak a man whose way of
thinking and actions are clear evidence of what
is called moral insanity, a sociopathic disorder.
The real aim (apart from gaining seats in the
coming elections) is to terminate the rule of
Hamas in the Gaza Strip. In the imagination of
the planners, Hamas is an invader which has
gained control of a foreign country. The reality
is, of course, entirely different.
The Hamas movement won the majority of the votes
in the eminently democratic elections that took
place in the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the
Gaza Strip. It won because the Palestinians had
come to the conclusion that Fatahs peaceful
approach had gained precisely nothing from Israel
- neither a freeze of the settlements, nor
release of the prisoners, nor any significant
steps toward ending the occupation and creating
the Palestinian state. Hamas is deeply rooted in
the population not only as a resistance
movement fighting the foreign occupier, like the
Irgun and the Stern Group in the past but also
as a political and religious body that provides
social, educational and medical services.
From the point of view of the population, the
Hamas fighters are not a foreign body, but the
sons of every family in the Strip and the other
Palestinian regions. They do not hide behind the
population, the population views them as their only defenders.
Therefore, the whole operation is based on
erroneous assumptions. Turning life into living
hell does not cause the population to rise up
against Hamas, but on the contrary, it unites
behind Hamas and reinforces its determination not
to surrender. The population of Leningrad did not
rise up against Stalin, any more than the Londoners rose up against Churchill.
He who gives the order for such a war with such
methods in a densely populated area knows that it
will cause dreadful slaughter of civilians.
Apparently that did not touch him. Or he believed
that they will change their ways and it will
sear their consciousness, so that in future they
will not dare to resist Israel.
A top priority for the planners was the need to
minimize casualties among the soldiers, knowing
that the mood of a large part of the pro-war
public would change if reports of such casualties
came in. That is what happened in Lebanon Wars I and II.
This consideration played an especially important
role because the entire war is a part of the
election campaign. Ehud Barak, who gained in the
polls in the first days of the war, knew that his
ratings would collapse if pictures of dead soldiers filled the TV screens.
Therefore, a new doctrine was applied: to avoid
losses among our soldiers by the total
destruction of everything in their path. The
planners were not only ready to kill 80
Palestinians to save one Israeli soldier, as has
happened, but also 800. The avoidance of
casualties on our side is the overriding
commandment, which is causing record numbers of
civilian casualties on the other side.
That means the conscious choice of an especially
cruel kind of warfare and that has been its Achilles heel.
A person without imagination, like Barak (his
election slogan: Not a Nice Guy, but a Leader)
cannot imagine how decent people around the world
react to actions like the killing of whole
extended families, the destruction of houses over
the heads of their inhabitants, the rows of boys
and girls in white shrouds ready for burial, the
reports about people bleeding to death over days
because ambulances are not allowed to reach them,
the killing of doctors and medics on their way to
save lives, the killing of UN drivers bringing in
food. The pictures of the hospitals, with the
dead, the dying and the injured lying together on
the floor for lack of space, have shocked the
world. No argument has any force next to an image
of a wounded little girl lying on the floor,
twisting with pain and crying out: Mama! Mama!
The planners thought that they could stop the
world from seeing these images by forcibly
preventing press coverage. The Israeli
journalists, to their shame, agreed to be
satisfied with the reports and photos provided by
the Army Spokesman, as if they were authentic
news, while they themselves remained miles away
from the events. Foreign journalists were not
allowed in either, until they protested and were
taken for quick tours in selected and supervised
groups. But in a modern war, such a sterile
manufactured view cannot completely exclude all
others the cameras are inside the strip, in the
middle of the hell, and cannot be controlled.
Aljazeera broadcasts the pictures around the clock and reaches every home.
* * *
THE BATTLE for the TV screen is one of the decisive battles of the war.
Hundreds of millions of Arabs from Mauritania to
Iraq, more than a billion Muslims from Nigeria to
Indonesia see the pictures and are horrified.
This has a strong impact on the war. Many of the
viewers see the rulers of Egypt, Jordan and the
Palestinian Authority as collaborators with
Israel in carrying out these atrocities against their Palestinian brothers.
The security services of the Arab regimes are
registering a dangerous ferment among the
peoples. Hosny Mubarak, the most exposed Arab
leader because of his closing of the Rafah
crossing in the face of terrified refugees,
started to pressure the decision-makers in
Washington, who until that time had blocked all
calls for a cease-fire. These began to understand
the menace to vital American interests in the
Arab world and suddenly changed their attitude
causing consternation among the complacent Israeli diplomats.
People with moral insanity cannot really
understand the motives of normal people and must
guess their reactions. How many divisions has
the Pope? Stalin sneered. How many divisions
have people of conscience? Ehud Barak may well be asking.
As it turns out, they do have some. Not numerous.
Not very quick to react. Not very strong and
organized. But at a certain moment, when the
atrocities overflow and masses of protesters come
together, that can decide a war.
THE FAILURE to grasp the nature of Hamas has
caused a failure to grasp the predictable
results. Not only is Israel unable to win the war, Hamas cannot lose it.
Even if the Israeli army were to succeed in
killing every Hamas fighter to the last man, even
then Hamas would win. The Hamas fighters would be
seen as the paragons of the Arab nation, the
heroes of the Palestinian people, models for
emulation by every youngster in the Arab world.
The West Bank would fall into the hands of Hamas
like a ripe fruit, Fatah would drown in a sea of
contempt, the Arab regimes would be threatened with collapse.
If the war ends with Hamas still standing,
bloodied but unvanquished, in face of the mighty
Israeli military machine, it will look like a
fantastic victory, a victory of mind over matter.
What will be seared into the consciousness of the
world will be the image of Israel as a
blood-stained monster, ready at any moment to
commit war crimes and not prepared to abide by
any moral restraints. This will have severe
consequences for our long-term future, our
standing in the world, our chance of achieving peace and quiet.
In the end, this war is a crime against ourselves
too, a crime against the State of Israel.
Uri Avnery is an Israeli writer and peace
activist with Gush Shalom. He is a contributor to
CounterPunch's book
<http://www.easycartsecure.com/CounterPunch/CounterPunch_Books.html>The
Politics of Anti-Semitism.
Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
415 863-9977
www.Freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20090112/016da4c8/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list