[News] Bush's New Cuba Plan - Embargoes, Blacklists and Assassination Plots
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Wed Jul 12 18:22:35 EDT 2006
http://www.counterpunch.org/smith07112006.html
July 11, 2006
Embargoes, Blacklists and Assassination Plots
Bush's New Cuba Plan
By WAYNE S. SMITH
In May of 2004, the Bush Administration's Commission for Assistance
to a Free Cuba issued an almost 500-page report that seemed to
conclude the Castro government was virtually at the point of
collapse. Just a few more nudges--a few more Radio Marti broadcasts,
denials of a few more travel licenses, and support to a few more
dissidents--and it would all be over. The United States, the report
seemed to suggest, would then come in and show the Cubans how to
operate their schools properly, make their trains run on time, and
grow their crops more efficiently. It was envisaged as such a
U.S.-run operation that in July of 2005, a U.S. transition
coordinator was appointed. One skeptical observer noted at the time
that in the case of Iraq, the Bush Administration had at least waited
until it invaded and occupied the country before appointing a
transition coordinator. Did his appointment in this case mean the
U.S. intended to invade Cuba as well? And if not, what was the U.S.
transition coordinator supposed to do from his office in the State
Department building? Even today, that remains unclear.
Perhaps OAS Secretary General Jose Miguel Insulza's reaction to the
idea of a U.S. transition coordinator for Cuba summed it up best.
"But there is no transition," he said, "and it isn't your country."
Indeed, the transition plan put forward in 2004 had such a
"made-in-the-USA" tone to it that it backfired in Cuba. Even Cubans
who had their disagreements with the Castro government did not want
to be told by the United States how they should run their country.
Leading dissidents described the new approach as counterproductive.
Elizardo Sanchez of the Commission for Human Rights and National
Reconciliation, for example, noted that the U.S. policy announced in
2004, "has had an effect exactly the opposite of the one you should want."
Cuba's Catholic Bishops also disagreed with the U.S. approach, saying
its measures "threaten both the present and the future of our nation."
Nor did many Cubans agree with the idea that they should give up free
health care and education, and various other services provided by the
government
The New Report.
Now the Commission has issued a new report, at a ceremony on July 10
presided over by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Commerce
Secretary Gutierrez and Transition Coordinator Caleb McCarry.
Interestingly, perhaps in response to charges that the first report
was nothing but an American occupation plan, the new one stresses
that its purpose is, rather, to offer assistance to Cubans on the
island. Solutions must come from them, it insists. The United States
simply stands ready and willing to support their initiatives. But
having said that, the report then goes on with page after page of
recommended actions, from reorganizing the economy and the
educational system to the holding of multiparty elections--always
provided, of course, that Cubans on the island wish to initiate them!
And the basic premise, that the regime is on the verge of collapse,
is as pronounced and as unrealistic in the new report as in the old.
Two years have passed and rather than collapsing, the Cuban economy
has shown strong signs of reinvigoration. Even the CIA gives it a
growth rate of 8%. Cuba has new and vitally important economic
relationships with Venezuela and China and indications of an
important new oil field off the north coast, for which various
nations are bidding for drilling sites. Things are looking up, not down.
There is no indication of that in the new report, however. Rather, it
says: "Chronic malnutrition, polluted drinking water, and untreated
chronic diseases continue to affect a significant percentage of the
Cuban people." And of course adds that: "Conditions will not improve
as long as Fidel Castro remains in power."
Never mind that UN indices consistently indicate Cuba's population to
be considerably healthier than those of most neighboring states,
including the U.S. territory of Puerto Rico--one reason being that
they have free health care. It is interesting to note also that life
expectancy for Cubans is five years longer than for African-Americans!
Funds Diverted for International Meddling.
Whatever the earnings produced by the Cuban economy, the report
insists they are used not for the Cuban people, but for nefarious
purposes. "The revenue does not go to benefit the Cuban people," the
report insists, "but is diverted to maintain the regime's repressive
security apparatus and fund Castro's interventionist and
destabilizing policies in other countries of the Hemisphere. The
Castro regime's international meddling is done at the expense of the
needs of the Cuban people."
First of all, if this were so, if funds had been so massively
diverted, Cubans would no longer have free health care and education
and other social-welfare programs would have long since collapsed.
That they have not is evidence that the report's allegations are
false. Further, it provides no example of this "international
meddling" to which such a huge share of the Cuban economy is
supposedly being channeled. Cuban doctors have been sent to many
other countries, including Guatemala and Haiti, in addition to
Venezuela and Bolivia. They have been praised on every occasion for
their excellent and selfless assistance. If this is the meddling to
which the report refers, there should be more of it. If it is not,
then the report should provide examples of the interventionist
actions to which it has reference.
Prevent Succession.
When Castro passes from the scene, he will, under the Cuban
Constitution, be succeeded by the Vice President. At this point in
time, that is Raul Castro. There will be many within that new
leadership structure, and many within Cuban society, arguing for
political and economic reforms--just as there will be other voices opposed.
The principal objective of the Bush Commission's new plan, however,
is to prevent the succession altogether, calling on Cuban citizens
and the international community to reject the government that would
replace Castro under the Cuban Constitution and to insist instead on
an entirely new one. But neither the Cuban people nor the
international community are likely to take so frontal a position
against a successor regime. Change, rather, will have to come about
slowly and as the result of an internal process, not as the result of
a formula imposed from abroad--and certainly not one imposed by the
United States. As Oswaldo Paya, one of Cuba's leading dissident
leaders, stated a few weeks ago in anticipation of the publication of
this second report: "We do not accept transition programs made
outside of Cuba."
Measures to Block Succession.
The Bush administration's objective, as stated in the new Commission
report, is to see to it that "the Castro regime's succession strategy
does not succeed," but the measures put forward to achieve that goal
are as inadequate as were those put forward two years ago to bring an
end to the Castro government.
Expanded Broadcasting.
The new report, for example, calls for increased Radio and TV Marti
broadcasting and an expansion of third-country broadcasting. But the
broadcasting already conducted over the past two years, of the one
kind or the other, hasn't had any appreciable effect on public
opinion. More of it isn't likely to have any more.
Support for Dissidents and Civil Society.
The report two years ago called for support to dissidents and
representatives of "civil society" as a means of confronting the
government. The new report calls for more of the same, and even for
the establishment of an $80 million fund to increase that support.
But as in an earlier report we quoted one dissident on the island
summing up the effect of that support: "The good news is that most of
that money remains in Miami; the bad news is it makes our position
more difficult even so."
What he meant is that much of the money is given to organizations in
Miami, some of it, supposedly, to pass on to groups in Cuba, but that
little in fact gets through; it stays with those in Miami. Further,
when the U.S. says its objective is to bring down the Cuban
government, and then says that one of its means of accomplishing that
is by providing funds to Cuban dissidents, it in effect places them
in the position of being the paid agents of a foreign power seeking
to overthrow their own. Inevitably, that puts them in an even more
difficult position and severely limits their effectiveness.
That will be no less true now than in the past. The new fund, in
short, is not likely to have any greater impact than did the old one,
especially as, as noted above, many of the dissidents themselves do
not agree with the U.S. action plan. It should be noted, for example,
that one of Cuba's leading dissidents, Oswaldo Paya, on July 1 of
this year, published an opinion piece in The Washington Post
emphasizing that Cubans wanted to preserve the right to free health
care and education--something at odds with the recommendations in the
original Commission report. Paya has also said he wants the U.S.
embargo to end and for Americans to be allowed to travel to Cuba, a
position that has enraged hard-line exiles in Miami.
Curtail Travel. Measures were introduced two years ago to sharply
reduce the travel of Americans and especially Cuban-Americans, and to
curtail remittances and parcel deliveries. Claiming that these
measures have had great success, the new report calls for their
strengthened implementation. But while the new restrictions on the
travel of Americans and Cuban-Americans to the island have of course
reduced revenues from that source, overall revenues from tourism have
not fallen, since Canadians, Europeans and Latin Americans
(especially Venezuelans) have continued to travel in even greater numbers.
Moreover, this is a problem with several dimensions. It had long been
an article of faith, for example, that the best way to get the
message of American democracy abroad was through the travel of
American citizens. Does reducing their travel to Cuba, then, not work
at cross purposes with the broader objective of encouraging change in
Cuba? And whether the pain caused to divided Cuban-American families
is worth the few millions denied to the Cuban government is an open question.
No Assistance to the Cuban Council of Churches.
New measures are called for even against Cuban churches, through a
tightening of regulations for the export of humanitarian items to
ensure that exports are not consigned to entities that are "regime
administered or controlled organizations, such as the Cuban Council
of Churches." This follows on denial of visas to various members of
the Cuban Council of Churches, which the Bush administration insists
is controlled by the Cuban government. As an American religious
leader countered heatedly: "In that they have to play by the rules
laid down by the Cuban government, they are of course 'controlled.'
But to suggest that the Cuban Council of Churches is simply an
instrument of the government is absurd. They are legitimate religious
leaders whose cooperation we highly value."
Be that as it may, American churches will no longer be able to send
the Cuban Council of Churches humanitarian assistance, a prohibition
the U.S.-based Church World Service is already vigorously protesting.
Effort to Monitor Nickel Exports.
Given that nickel exports are now such an important source of
revenues for the Cuban government, the Commission report calls for
the creation an inter-agency Cuban Nickel Targeting Task Force to
strengthen measures to control imports of nickel-bearing substances
or products (i.e., "we won't buy your steel if there's any chance it
contains Cuban nickel!"), and for several other measures to
discourage other countries from buying Cuban nickel. Such tactics
have been tried in years past with very little success. They are not
likely to have any greater success now. Indeed, they are more likely
to cause a strong negative reaction in the international community.
Reaction of the Cuban People to Efforts to Undermine Their Economy.
One must wonder also how the Bush administration expects the Cuban
people to react to its call for measures which can only have the
purpose of making their own lives more difficult? Are they supposed
to be grateful to the United States should its policies result in new
shortages and thus be ready to support its campaign against their own
government? Not likely. On the contrary, fostering a siege mentality
in Cuba can only work against any popular support for U.S. policy.
The Secret Annex.
The measures to block the succession process that are discussed in
this report--or, at least those that are openly discussed--aren't
likely to work. However, the report carries an annex which it is said
must remain secret for "reasons of national security" and to maximize
its chances of success. We can only guess what is in the annex. Given
the history of U.S.-Cuban relations, however, there will inevitably
be speculation that it contains new assassination plots against
Castro (although this time against Raul) and new plans for exile
raids if not direct U.S. military action. There is already virtually
no support in the international community for U.S. policy toward
Cuba. The uncertainty and suspicion resulting from this secret annex
are likely to reduce it even further.
Wayne S. Smith is now a Senior Fellow at the
<http://www.ciponline.org/>Center for International Policy and
perhaps the most veteran U.S. observer of U.S.-Cuban relations,
having been a Cuba analyst in the State Department's Bureau of
Intelligence and Research (1957-58), Third Secretary of Political
Affairs in the American Embassy in Havana (1958-61), Cuban Desk
Officer (1964-66), Director of Cuban Affairs in the Department of
State (1977-79), and Chief of the U.S. Interests Section Havana, 1979-82
The Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
(415) 863-9977
www.freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20060712/1a939d25/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list