[News] The Draft UN Resolution on Lebanon
Anti-Imperialist News
news at freedomarchives.org
Mon Aug 7 11:58:51 EDT 2006
http://www.counterpunch.org/makdisi08072006.html
August 7, 2006
"If Israel did not win the war and it gets all this, what would have
happened if it had won the war?"
The Draft UN Resolution on Lebanon
By KARIM MAKDISI
Beirut.
It is impossible to speak of a Hizbullah victory' when nearly a
thousand Lebanese civilians have been killed, thousands more injured,
a million people internally displaced; and Lebanon's infrastructure,
environment and economy laid to waste as the world watches.
The general consensus however is that Hizbullah's and Lebanon's
steadfastness after four weeks of merciless Israeli attacks means
that Israel has failed to achieve its objectives through military
means: crushing/disarming Hizbullah, reinstating its deterrent, and
protecting the security of northern Israel. Indeed, Hizbullah's
resistance has gained unprecedented support throughout the Arab
world, and Nasrallah has emerged as a Nasser-like figure who has
restored pride to Arabs everywhere in contrast to the uniformly
servile and unpopular Arab regimes.
The draft UN resolution proposed by the US and France on Saturday
thus seems strangely out of place, as though Israel had won this war
decisively and is in a position to dictate the terms. The draft does
not reflect either the reality of a balance of terror that clearly
exists between Hizbullah and Israel today, or the political unity
that this war has created in Lebanon and across the Arab world. As
such, it has come as a shock to many people in the region. In the
words of the influential Speaker of Parliament Nabih Berri (who is
mediating between Hizbullah and the Lebanese government), "if Israel
did not win the war and it gets all this, what would have happened if
it had won the war?"
Here are some preliminary observations on this draft resolution:
1. It clearly adopts the Israeli narrative that this war was begun by
Hizbullah"referred to dismissively as an "armed group" "on 12 July
when it "abducted" (as opposed to "captured") two Israeli soldiers,
and makes clear that to prevent the "resumption of hostilities"
Hizbullah must be banned in all areas between the Blue Line and
Litani River. Elsewhere, the text refers to the Sheba'a farms as
"disputed or uncertain" as opposed to "occupied."
2. It calls for a "cessation of hostilities" until an international
force is deployed, as opposed to the "immediate cease fire" that the
Lebanese government has repeatedly demanded. This gives Israel the
face-saving mechanism it needs to justify the heavy costs of this war
to its own public, given its pledge not to stop the war until an
international force is in place in southern Lebanon.
3. It further calls on Hizbullah to cease all "attacks" while Israel
must only cease "offensive military operations." Given that Israel
has all along stated that this war is in self-defense, this phrasing
clearly gives Israel the green light to continue to hit Hizbullah
targets whenever it interprets the need for self defense.' And since
'Hizbullah targets' apparently includes the full spectrum of civilian
installations throughout the country as well as all civilians in
Lebanon, Israel could interpret this to mean a green light for the
continuation of its onslaught.
4. It refers to the "unconditional release" of Israeli soldiers, but
only to "encouraging the efforts aimed at resolving the issue of the
Lebanese prisoners detained in Israel." It says nothing about the
exchange of prisoners, a key Lebanese demand.
5. It does not heed Lebanon's demand for an immediate lifting of the
Israeli siege of Lebanon. Rather it makes clear that airports and
ports will be reopened only for "verifiably and purely civilian
purposes." In other words, everyone and everything going in and out
of the country will be monitored, thus turning Lebanon into a new Gaza.
6. There is no mention of an international investigation into
Israel's savage attacks on civilians and civilian infrastructure as
Lebanon's Prime Minster has repeatedly demanded. There is moreover no
reference to war crimes, international humanitarian laws or the
Geneva Conventions.
7. The heart of this draft resolution calls for a permanent ceasefire
based on the disarming of "all armed groups in Lebanon" under UN
resolution 1559, and the deployment in Lebanon (as opposed to Israel,
or both countries) of an "international force" under Chapter VII of
the UN Charter to help implement a "long term solution." The Lebanese
government has insisted that the disarming of Hizbullah must be part
of Lebanon's national dialogue in the context of the Taif Accords,
and that the Lebanese army should be the main player in securing
southern Lebanon, with an expanded UNIFIL there to assist it as needed.
In short, this draft resolution is a major blow to Lebanon, its
sovereignty, and its new found political unity and consensus as
represented by the government's much-publicized seven point plan,
first unveiled in the Rome Conference of 25 July and later adopted
unanimously by the Council of Ministers (that includes Hizbullah) and
supported by the Arab League and Organization of Islamic Conferences.
The draft totally ignores major Lebanese demands, most notably
Israel's withdrawal from any territory it has seized during this war,
the placing of Sheba'a farms area under UN control until border
delineation is completed, the exchange of prisoners, and the
rejection of a Charter VII authorized "international force." Worse,
it waves all culpability of Israel in terms of its deliberate
targeting of civilians and consigns the long-established
international laws of war to the trashbin.
As expected, the Lebanese government has already rejected the draft
outright because it is clearly not a serious attempt to resolve the
crisis. Ominously, the draft's bias seems clearly designed to ensure
Lebanon rejects it, thus giving Israel yet more time to continue its
carnage in Lebanon. It also seems designed to divide Lebanon once
again politically"and potentially along sectarian lines--to isolate
Hizbullah. This is extremely dangerous, and may lead to more violent
civil conflict or even full-scale war. Much depends on the leadership
skills of Prime Minister Siniora who needs to emerge as a genuine
national leader if such civil conflict is to be avoided in the coming months.
Overall, then, we can see that this draft UN resolution represents a
second wave of US-European-Israeli attacks on Lebanon. While the
military assault against Hizbullah has apparently failed, we now
enter a diplomatic war that will be even bloodier.
It is clear that, once again, the differences between America and
Europe are not over substance but style. In blunt terms, America does
not particularly care how much damage is done to Lebanon as long as
its objectives are reached, while Europe"and France in
particular"want only for Hizbullah to be crushed without the unseemly
images produced in villages and cities throughout Lebanon, from Qana
in the South to Qaa in the North. Europe, in other words, is entirely
complicit with America and Israel in this war. As for the Arab
regimes, their support for the Israeli objectives has now been
neutralized by Hizbullah's popularity across the Arab world. The
international political will to reach a just, lasting and realistic
solution to this conflict"and the larger Palestinian question"clearly
does not exist. The violence and destruction of Lebanon will thus
continue, and Islamists will reap the long-term political rewards.
The international community as embodied by the United Nations
Security Council is, for all intents and purposes, itself waging war
on a small, vulnerable Member State; and as such it no longer carries
legitimate authority in the Arab world. In this sense Israel, America
and Europe can congratulate themselves not only on the total
destruction of a country, but on the de-legitimization of the
international legal order as we know it.
Karim Makdisi is Assistant Professor of International Relations in
the Dept of Political Studies and Public Administration at the
American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon. Email:
<mailto:km18 at aub.edu.lb>km18 at aub.edu.lb
The Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
(415) 863-9977
www.freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20060807/bad0567e/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list