[News] Philippines: Macapagal-Arroyo: Above Human Rights
Anti-Imperialist News
News at freedomarchives.org
Mon Nov 28 14:45:13 EST 2005
<http://www.bulatlat.com/news/5-42/5-42-above.htm>This
story<http://www.bulatlat.com/news/5-42/../4-38/4-38-gloria.html>
was taken from Bulatlat, the Philippines's
alternative weekly newsmagazine
(<http://www.bulatlat.com>www.bulatlat.com,
www.bulatlat.net, <http://www.bulatlat.org>www.bulatlat.org).
Vol. V, No. 42, November 27-Dcember 3, 2005
Analysis
Macapagal-Arroyo: Above Human Rights
Macapagal-Arroyo is not literally deaf and blind
to the persistent protests and appeals here and
abroad to cease the wanton violations of human
rights. Out of lust for power, she has been
consumed by her own war on terror. Crafted to
stop the criminal activities of the ASG, used
against the NPA and now as a tool to suppress
political dissent, the anti-terrorism track is
now being harnessed simply to keep Macapagal-Arroyo in power.
By Bobby Tuazon
Bulatlat
Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo is not known for heeding
demands to whip into line the Armed Forces of the
Philippines (AFP) and other security forces for
what is reported as their brazen violations of
human rights. This is so not only because
political repression is evidently a state policy
that is at the core of the embattled presidents
war on terror but more so because maintaining
her perceived illegitimate rule has increasingly
relied on brute force and other anti-democratic forms.
Macapagal-Arroyos accountability for the
continuing spate of military atrocities against
civilians especially those identified with the
militant peoples organizations and progressive
party-list groups was underscored once more when
Army troops opened fire on a group of 47
civilians at the break of dawn Nov. 21in Barangay
(village) San Agustin, Palo, Leyte. Various
accounts tended to show that the soldiers,
wearing ski masks and armed with high-powered
rifles including grenade launchers, appeared
geared for a mayhem. There were no warning shots.
They (soldiers) just fired at us, a survivor narrates.
The shooting lasted 30 minutes. As the smoke of
gunfire settled, seven of the civilians lay dead.
Two others died in the hospital. Among the dead
were two women one of them pregnant. Eight others
were critically wounded; eight were also arrested
for being New Peoples Army (NPA) suspects.
Military officials called the incident a
legitimate encounter with the NPA and even
showed reporters firearms they said were taken
from the victims. Nothing was said however
whether the firearms were fired or why not one
soldier was hurt from the encounter.
Farmers
Preliminary investigations by church and human
rights groups and Bayan Muna (BM or people first)
- whose two organizers in Leyte were among the
casualties - revealed that those fired upon were
farmers from the San Agustin Farmer Beneficiaries
Association (SAFBA) and BM party-list. They were
in a meeting about balik-uma or occupation of
the land awarded to them by the Department of
Agrarian Reform (DAR) under the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP).
Macapagal-Arroyo extolled the soldiers but
characteristically shed no tears for the civilian
victims. The alleged perpetrators of the massacre
came from the Armys 8th Infantry Division - the
same unit that was previously commanded by Brig.
Gen. Jovito Palparan with 570 cases of violations
of human rights and international humanitarian law.
The Palo massacre happened on the heels of
similar incidents of extra-judicial killings,
disappearances, forced evacuation and other human
rights violations committed in recent days and
weeks and which add to the more than 4,300
documented cases since Macapagal-Arroyo came to
power in 2001. The cases affected 235,000
individuals, 24,500 families and 240 communities.
At least 400 persons were victims of summary
execution; 110 of forced disappearances. Twenty
of those killed were rights volunteers.
What kind of a president would possibly turn the
whole country into a killing fields of sorts?
Trademark
Macapagal-Arroyo took power in January 2001 on
the crest of a second civilian uprising and, as
president, took charge of a military institution
that is also widely considered as a surrogate
army of the U.S. Until that time, the AFP had a
30-year record of hundreds of thousands of
victims of military abuse that begun during the
Marcos dictatorship. The new president soon
courted the support of the politicized AFP to
defend her presidency against her political
opponents and so-called destabilizers. It
became her trademark that under the war on
terror which she launched to support U.S.
President George W. Bushs post-9/11 war without
borders, she began to transform the AFP into a
counter-terrorist war machine.
Even before unleashing her war on terror in
2002, however, Macapagal-Arroyo had backed the
AFPs continuing campaign against the armed Left.
It was clear to her that a few weeks after taking
over as president the AFP was already gearing for
yet another full-scale war against the NPA but
that this time the alleged legal infrastructures
of the underground Left more particularly its
alleged party-list network would have to be
reckoned with more than ever. At about this time,
although so much hype was played on the Abu
Sayyaf bandit group defense and military
officials were pointing to the armed Left as the
top national security threat. By mid-2005,
Defense Secretary Avelino Cruz would pledge to
break the backbone of the NPA in 10 years.
The real danger, of course, came from Macapagal-Arroyos own war on terror.
The war on terror not only traded the countrys
sovereignty for U.S. military aid and the return
of U.S. forces in the guise of military training
and war exercises; it also posed a graver threat
to the peoples democratic rights and civil
liberties. On the pretext of fighting
terrorism, Macapagal-Arroyo revived the
mothballed National ID system and declared as
priority the anti-terrorism bill (ATB). The ATB
has been denounced as a mechanism for curtailing
civil liberties and as Macapagal-Arroyos
political weapon against her critics particularly the Left.
Above the law
Under the war on terror, political dissent,
progressive legislation and ideologically-driven
rebellion were lumped with the ASG and other
alleged terrorist networks. Macapagal-Arroyo
toed the line of Bush by placing the war against
terrorism above the law and above critical
dissent: terrorists and mere suspects have no
rights and have to face the iron fist.
The AFP, through its official newsletter Ang
Tala, sought to neutralize the Lefts alleged
front organizations particularly Bayan Muna and
other militant groups. The same time that this
came out, a top AFP official warned that
progressive party-list groups have no right to be
in Congress. More, a concerted campaign was
launched by Malacañangs national security
adviser to demonize and criminalize the militant
organizations linking many of them to the
terrorist NPA. This would be followed by the
AFPs low-intensity black propaganda and hit
lists of legal personalities and groups
including certain church-based and media
organizations. Not a few of those in the list
have fallen as victims of assassination, summary execution and abduction.
If the charges against Brig. Gen. Jovito Palparan
are true, it is quite probable that the generals
alleged bloody suppression campaign against
unarmed civilians, party-list activists, lawyers,
local executives, priests as well as rights
volunteers in Mindoro, Eastern Visayas and now in
Central Luzon is part of a carte blanche issued
by the commander-in-chief to the whole AFP for
conducting a reign of terror in the countryside.
It is not a coincidence that the number of
suspected ASG rebels killed has been surpassed
several times over by that of activists and other victims of state terrorism.
A recent report by Statewatch, the Campaign
Against Criminalizing Communities, and the Human
Rights and Social Justice Institute at the London
Metropolitan University, reveals that
"proscribing" - or labeling groups and
individuals as terrorists - in order to
"criminalize their activities or impose sanctions
against them with no right of appeal" has become
"integral" to the war on terrorism. In their
joint report, "Terrorizing the Rule of Law: The
Policy and Practice of Proscription," the three
groups also said the proscription of alleged
terrorists raises serious human rights concerns.
Wrong basis
Statewatch, which monitors civil liberties, says
terrorist lists are frequently drawn up on a
basis of secret intelligence, and that the normal
judicial process governing such serious
accusations, and their prosecution, is "discarded."
"Hundreds of groups and individuals have now been
criminalized around the world and the various
lists are expanding as states attempt to add all
groups engaged in resistance to occupation or
tyranny. Those exercising what many people around
the world see as a legitimate right to
self-defense and determination are increasingly
being treated - on a global basis - the same way
as Osama Bin Laden," the report says. There have
been serious breaches of human rights, it adds.
The Philippines, the second front of Bushs war
on terror, is no exception. Here,
counter-terrorism is just a camouflage for state terrorism.
Macapagal-Arroyo, through her generals and
anti-communist secretaries, is prosecutor, judge
and executioner at the same time. She has
replaced the judicial process which, anyway, is
biased against the poor and defenseless and is
using Congress to ram through the ATB, charter
change and other anti-democratic measures. And
now she is resorting to more repressive devices
such as the calibrated preemptive response (CPR)
and gag orders in response to the snowballing
call for her removal on charges of stealing the
presidency, culpable violation of the
constitution, betrayal of public trust and
ever-increasing human rights violations.
And yet it is not only at home that
Macapagal-Arroyo - who, as a president should be
the first to uphold the law - has been condemned
for these serious infringements. The regimes
dismal human rights record, for instance, has
been either cited or denounced at the UN Human
Rights Committee, Amnesty International, Human
Rights Watch, the Asian Human Rights Commission
and several other rights watchdogs throughout the
world. Similarly she has been held accountable
for crimes against humanity at various peoples
tribunals in Tokyo, New York and, most recently,
at the International Peoples Tribunal in the
Philippines. The impeachment charges that
Macapagal-Arroyo was able to stop in Congress
through trade-offs and alleged bribery are now
being heard before the Citizens Congress for Truth and Accountability (CCTA).
UNDP report
In a recent report, the United Nations
Development Program (UNDP) in collaboration with
two other international agencies, cited the
"militarist policy" of the Arroyo government for
worsening the insurgency in the Philippines. The
Philippine Human Development Report (PHDR, 2005)
also said the U.S.-led "global war on terror" has
only added fuel to the local war situation.
Likewise, the UNDP report refuted claims by the
Macapagal-Arroyo regime that the local communists
are terrorists by engaging in violent acts
against civilians. From its historical record of
armed struggle, policy and general practice, the
report states, the communists have not engaged
in terrorism or acts of terrorism by deliberately targeting civilians."
In its current phase, Macapagal-Arroyos war on
terror has spread its tentacles by targeting
legal activities aimed at exposing the truth
behind the 2004 elections, raising the issue of
human rights and rallying the people for her
removal. She has tagged broad coalitions of
forces seeking her removal as the handiwork of
the communist terrorists. The brutal and
anti-democratic character of the
counter-terrorism campaign is now at the heart of
the desperate efforts of the regime to cling to
power amid the increasing public clamor for her
to leave. Having lost all moral, constitutional
and political grounds to remain as president,
Macapagal-Arroyo will rely more and more on the
AFP, the police and other security forces to stay in office.
Macapagal-Arroyo is not literally deaf and blind
to the persistent protests and appeals here and
abroad to cease the wanton violations of human
rights. Out of lust for power, she has been
consumed by her own war on terror. Crafted to
stop the criminal activities of the ASG, used
against the NPA and now as a tool to suppress
political dissent, the anti-terrorism track is
now being harnessed simply to keep Macapagal-Arroyo in power. Bulatlat
© 2005 Bulatlat Alipato Publications
Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute
this article, provided its author/s and Bulatlat
are properly credited and notified.
The Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
(415) 863-9977
www.freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20051128/51fe809d/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list