[News] Robert Fisk: The Reality of this barbaric bombing

News at freedomarchives.org News at freedomarchives.org
Mon Jul 11 12:02:18 EDT 2005


The reality of this barbaric bombing
If we are fighting insurgency in Iraq, what makes us think insurgency won't 
come to us?
Britain had been warned says Robert Fisk
"If you bomb our cities," Osama bin Laden said in one of his recent video 
tapes, "we will bomb yours."

By Robert Fisk

07/08/05 "The Independent" - - "If you bomb our cities," Osama bin Laden 
said in one of his recent video tapes, "we will bomb yours." There you go, 
as they say. It was crystal clear Britain would be a target ever since Tony 
Blair decided to join George Bush's "war on terror" and his invasion of 
Iraq. We had, as they say, been warned. The G8 summit was obviously chosen, 
well in advance, as Attack Day.

And it's no use Mr Blair telling us yesterday that "they will never succeed 
in destroying what we hold dear". "They" are not trying to destroy "what we 
hold dear". They are trying to get public opinion to force Blair to 
withdraw from Iraq, from his alliance with the United States, and from his 
adherence to Bush's policies in the Middle East. The Spanish paid the price 
for their support for Bush - and Spain's subsequent retreat from Iraq 
proved that the Madrid bombings achieved their objectives - while the 
Australians were made to suffer in Bali.

It is easy for Tony Blair to call yesterdays bombings "barbaric" - of 
course they were - but what were the civilian deaths of the Anglo-American 
invasion of Iraq in 2003, the children torn apart by cluster bombs, the 
countless innocent Iraqis gunned down at American military checkpoints? 
When they die, it is "collateral damage"; when "we" die, it is "barbaric 
terrorism".

If we are fighting insurgency in Iraq, what makes us believe insurgency 
won't come to us? One thing is certain: if Tony Blair really believes that 
by "fighting terrorism" in Iraq we could more efficiently protect Britain - 
fight them there rather than let them come here, as Bush constantly says - 
this argument is no longer valid.

To time these bombs with the G8 summit, when the world was concentrating on 
Britain, was not a stroke of genius. You don't need a PhD to choose another 
Bush-Blair handshake to close down a capital city with explosives and 
massacre more than 30 of its citizens. The G8 summit was announced so far 
in advance as to give the bombers all the time they needed to prepare.

A co-ordinated system of attacks of the kind we saw yesterday would have 
taken months to plan - to choose safe houses, prepare explosives, identify 
targets, ensure security, choose the bombers, the hour, the minute, to plan 
the communications (mobile phones are giveaways). Co-ordination and 
sophisticated planning - and the usual utter ruthlessness with regard to 
the lives of the innocent - are characteristic of al-Qa'ida. And let us not 
use - as our television colleagues did yesterday - "hallmarks", a word 
identified with quality silver rather than base metal.

And now let us reflect on the fact that yesterday, the opening of the G8, 
so critical a day, so bloody a day, represented a total failure of our 
security services - the same intelligence "experts" who claim there were 
weapons of mass destruction in Iraq when there were none, but who utterly 
failed to uncover a months-long plot to kill Londoners.

Trains, planes, buses, cars, metros. Transportation appears to be the 
science of al-Qa'ida's dark arts. No one can search three million London 
commuters every day. No one can stop every tourist. Some thought the 
Eurostar might have been an al-Qa'ida target - be sure they have studied it 
- but why go for prestige when your common or garden bus and Tube train are 
there for the taking.

And then come the Muslims of Britain, who have long been awaiting this 
nightmare. Now every one of our Muslims becomes the "usual suspect", the 
man or woman with brown eyes, the man with the beard, the woman in the 
scarf, the boy with the worry beads, the girl who says she's been racially 
abused.

I remember, crossing the Atlantic on 11 September 2001 - my plane turned 
round off Ireland when the US closed its airspace - how the aircraft purser 
and I toured the cabins to see if we could identify any suspicious 
passengers. I found about a dozen, of course, totally innocent men who had 
brown eyes or long beards or who looked at me with "hostility". And sure 
enough, in just a few seconds, Osama bin Laden turned nice, liberal, 
friendly Robert into an anti-Arab racist.

And this is part of the point of yesterday's bombings: to divide British 
Muslims from British non-Muslims (let us not mention the name Christians), 
to encourage the very kind of racism that Tony Blair claims to resent.

But here's the problem. To go on pretending that Britain's enemies want to 
destroy "what we hold dear" encourages racism; what we are confronting here 
is a specific, direct, centralised attack on London as a result of a "war 
on terror" which Lord Blair of Kut al-Amara has locked us into. Just before 
the US presidential elections, Bin Laden asked: "Why do we not attack Sweden?"

Lucky Sweden. No Osama bin Laden there. And no Tony Blair.

The Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
(415) 863-9977
www.freedomarchives.org 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20050711/5e9a60c5/attachment.html>


More information about the News mailing list