[News] First national liberation, then democracy
News at freedomarchives.org
News at freedomarchives.org
Thu Feb 3 11:50:55 EST 2005
http://www.antiimperialista.com/en/
"First national liberation, then democracy"
Interview with Sammi Alaa, Iraqi Patriotic Alliance, on the results of the
WSF in porto Alegre and the need of an International Anti-imperialist Forum
Q: Why did you come to the World Social Forum in Porto Alegre?
We have been discussing with our colleagues of the Anti-imperialist Camp
and the network of Free Iraq Committees in Europe whether it was worthwhile
to attend. We eventually decided to form a common delegation "Support the
Iraqi Resistance" unifying our efforts to address the anti-imperialist
forces within the WSF's participants. We did so because we do not agree to
the official agenda of the WSF which is concentrated in the slogans "no to
war, no to violence" and "another world is possible". This does not make
any sense in the reality of the world today. Imperialism is waging an
all-out attack on the military, political, social and cultural level not
only in Iraq. Iraq and Palestine are the most clear and extreme expressions
of this tendency. We are convinced of the necessity to appeal to the
anti-imperialist forces of the Brazilian and international left to focus
their attention to the support of the Iraqi Resistance in order to defy US
imperial designs.
Q: You called for a demonstration in Porto Alegre in support of the Iraqi
Resistance? Are you content with the response?
We really appreciated the strong response to our appeal. We were even
surprised by the number of participants and endorsers. There were
international delegations from Argentina, the US, Peru, Korea to mention
only some. Already before arriving to Brazil we had heard about the strong
anti-US empire and pro-Iraqi Resistance sentiments in the population. The
wide echo the call enjoyed among the Brazilian parties confirmed this. We
believe that the Iraqi Resistance provides a viable platform to unify the
anti-imperialist forces and mobilize on this ground.
Q: The demonstration took place on the day of the election in Iraq which it
opposed. How do you evaluate their impact?
The Iraqi Patriotic Alliance considers the war of 1991, the UN embargo and
the war and occupation starting in 2003 illegitimate and illegal according
to international law, the Geneva convention and the UN charter. Therefore
the elections are illegitimate and illegal as well as all political
institutions emanating from them. The entire political process set in
motion by the occupants ranging from the "Governing Council", over the
"Transfer of Sovereignty" and the "Interim Government" to the so-called
elections is illegitimate. Therefore we called to our people to boycott the
elections. We appreciated the call of some 50 Iraqi parties to boycott the
elections and we ask all parties refusing to participate in the "political
process" to take a further step ahead: to join hands in a political front
including all forces of the Iraqi Resistance.
Q: The Western media claim a high turn-out and thus hail the elections as a
success of democracy. Isn't it a defeat for the defying forces?
It was clear that the corporate media would celebrate a victory of the US.
They did the same in Afghanistan while in reality the elections took place
only in Kabul. In a statement the Danish foreign minister, Per Stig Moller,
was more sober. He said that such kind of elections would be better than no
elections at all. It comes to us also as no surprise that the European
Union is participating in that canon willing to deal with the government
legitimized by the elections. The EU is also composed of imperialist forces
and their contradictions to the US are only temporary and secondary.
But how can one speak of a success if the influential Sunni minority nearly
completely refused to go to the ballots? In a large number of cities a
total boycott was recorded like in Diala, Baquba, Anbar, Falluja, Samarra
including entire districts of Baghdad like Adamiya, Amariya and Sadr City
with its two million inhabitants?
On the first day after the elections the Allawi administration claimed 70%,
the next day 60% and today they backtracked to 50% participation. We will
see whether he dares to admit 40 or even only 30% turn-out.
We need, however, to bear in mind that the US set up a revolver democracy.
They threatened the people in many ways to participate. People used to
receive their food ration cards by the end of the year. This time the Alawi
government postponed the issuance of the vouchers until the elections and
combined it with the casting of the vote. Ergo: no vote, no food. For many
people the UN food program is the only way to survive. But they used also
more direct and brutal methods. The exponents of the Muslim Cleric Council
which called for a boycott received death threats. Actually half a dozen of
its members were assassinated. Also many figures of the Sadr movement were
jailed to pressurize them into electoral participation.
Q: Who the elections will effect the Resistance?
I will answer by outlining the two opposing political strategies, the Iraqi
Resistance's one and the occupation's one. While the Iraqi Resistance
succeeded in the last two years in marginalising all the institutions set
up by the occupation power and polarising the politial landscape in Iraq,
the occupation completely failed to find a reliable Iraqi ally. So the
Iraqi Resistance will continue to fight for its two main goals: Firstly the
liberation of Iraq and the re-establishment of the Iraqi independence and
secondly the building of a united and democratic Iraq for all.
Q: Sheikh Jawad al-Khalisi also called for an election boycott and the
furthermore even participated in your demonstration in Porto Alegre. Why
you did not succeed to build a common front with him?
We highly appreciate this boycott call and his participation in our
mobilization in support of the Iraqi Resistance. With all the respect to
the Muslim Cleric Council's support to the Iraqi Resistance we believe that
is not enough. Our differences touch two issues. First the Muslim Cleric
Council is looking for a international political solution to end the
occupion inspite of the presence of an Iraqi solution represented by the
Iraqi Resistance. The second issue is an internal one. After two years of
occupation we urgently need a political front of the Iraqi Resistance. That
means to gather all the political forces, which remain outside the
"political process" initiated by he occupation, into one single Political
Resistance Front. While the armed resistance is huge and consolidated, the
political front is still lacking. Khalisi and the other members of the
Council are still hesitating to really work on this front, because they
object to the participation of the Baath Party. But we think that it is not
the right time to cultivate mutual conflicts between the Resistance forces.
They cannot speak of the unconditional support to the Resistance and at the
same time deny this very support to the Baath Party, which is the major
patriotic force and the strongest military and political component of the
Iraqi Resistance. We really hope that after the elections the Council,
which we consider to consist of convinced Iraqi patriots, will swiftly and
honestly reconsider their position and start to work with us to establish
the required Political Resistance Front. We need an historical and
political reflection of the past 35 years in form of a commission for truth
and natioanl reconciliation. But we think that it is not the right time
because of the presence of occupation powers in Iraq. We must remove all
political obstacles to the unification of our struggle to end the occupation.
Q: In a workshop of the WSF you strongly attacked your compatriots Amir
al-Rekaby and Ibrahim al-Saqban. Why?
It was necessary for me to reply to their analysis on the situation in Iraq
which I belive is fundamentally flawed. We should not forget the subject of
the debate which was how to end the occupation of Iraq. Rekaby came up with
a well-worded theoretical discourse to find a new definition of occupation
according to which a new political project with a new notion of patriotism
is necessary. Saqban, the representative of the Iraqi Communist Party
(Central Command), on his turn, advocated that to end the occupation we
have to wait until all the religious and sectarian groups of the country
are unified. Similarly, Rekaby wants to first install democracy and then
achieve liberation from occupation. Both never voiced a clear-cut support
to the Iraqi Resistance. On the contrary they demonise the Resistance by
claimed that they would kill civilians and would consist of foreign
fighters. Under these circumstances Khalisi felt himself forces to take the
microphone and to underline that the Iraqi Resistance is a broad and
popular one which must be supported. Rekaby and Co follow a hidden agenda
which is a UN-brokered solution with the support of the so-called
international community. That means to give legitimacy to the aggression
and also to imperialist troops remaining in Iraq. Where ever this circle
participates (WSF, ESF etc.) their advocate this perspective. They do
neither speak of aggression nor of imperialism. And we can not see any
serious effort by them to unify the resisting forces in Iraq. They still
focus on Saddam Hussein and the Baath party while most of their leading
cadres are in jail and the US has been occupying our country for more than
two years.
For the IPA the Iraqi Resistance is the only legitimate representative of
the Iraqi people. Any political solution which is not based on this
fundamental fact is doomed to fail, therefore is no solution. The last two
years have clearly taught this. Half a dozen regional and international
conferences claiming to bring about a political solution but in reality
intending to split and defeat the Iraqi Resistance miserably failed.
Q: In its final resolution he WSF calls for an international day of action
on March 19/20 to protest war and occupation. Doesn't that show that the
Forum is a viable instrument of struggle?
Nowhere the WSF states its support for the Iraqi Resistance. But this is
today the fundamental question. We saw in many debates that among the
Brazilian and also the international participants there is the readiness to
lend support to the Iraqi Resistance. But the leadership of the WSF decides
independently, without involving the mass base. Thus it does not express
their standpoint having come forth also in the arena Porto Alegre. They are
increasingly afraid of the widening gap between the popular interests and
the leading group. Therefore they could not do other than to call for the
international day of action. Only doing so they can avoid a clear message
against imperialist occupation in support of the Iraqi Resistance. There
are two fronts in the ongoing war in Iraq and one must choose and take side.
Q: The WSF could only take place because of the massive support by the Lula
government. What are your suggestions to the Brazilian anti-imperialists in
regard to this contradiction?
The Workers' Party (PT) and its Social Democratic brother parties in he
West are part of the capitalist establishment. Lula's government is
implementing the IMF and WB program in Brazil which only serves the rich
classes. Therefore there is no hope to find a solution for the interests of
the por classes inside the establishment. We appeal to our comrades in
Brazil to unify in an anti-imperialist front which can be part of an
international anti-imperialist front. The WSF cannot give any satisfying
answer to for the anti-war and anti-imperialist forces in the world. We
need to work seriously to establish and International Anti-imperialist
Forum as an alternative to the WSF challenging the imperialist agenda. His
is the urgent necessity of today.
Interview conducted by Willi Langthaler
Porto Alegre, Brazil
February 1, 2005
The Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
(415) 863-9977
www.freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20050203/0878b086/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list