[News] Reality television: Al-Jazeera record of accurate reporting
News at freedomarchives.org
News at freedomarchives.org
Wed Apr 21 11:55:53 EDT 2004
Comment
Reality television
Al-Jazeera has a track record of accurate reporting - which is why its
journalists have been criminalised and its offices bombed
Arthur Neslen
Wednesday April 21, 2004
The Guardian
When US forces recently demanded that a team from the Arabic TV station
al-Jazeera leave Falluja as a condition for reaching a ceasefire with the
local resistance, it came as no surprise at the network's headquarters in
Doha. Reliable sources there say that coalition officials threatened to
close down the al-Jazeera bureau in Baghdad earlier this year and last week
sent a letter accusing the network of violating the Geneva convention and
the principles of a free press.
Since the "war on terror" began, al-Jazeera has been a thorn in the side of
the Pentagon. "My solution is to change the channel," Brigadier General
Mark Kimmitt said this month in Baghdad, "to a legitimate, authoritative,
honest news station. The stations that are showing Americans intentionally
killing women and children are not legitimate news sources."
The trouble for Kimmitt is that millions of people in the Middle East
disagree. Al-Jazeera has become the most popular TV network in the region -
with a daily audience of 35 million - precisely because it has shown the
human carnage that US military onslaughts leave in their wake. If it became
a "legitimate, authoritative, honest news station" of the kind that
routinely censors the realities of US military operations, it would lose
its audience.
The al-Jazeera reports of US snipers firing at women and children in the
streets of Falluja have now been corroborated by international observers in
the city. Perhaps it is natural that a military force should seek to
suppress evidence that could be used against it in future war crimes
trials. But it is equally natural that a free media should resist.
Democratising the Middle East may have been the neo-cons' case for the
conquest of Iraq. But on the ground, the US is acting against the flowering
of Middle East media freedom, which al-Jazeera initiated.
The station was launched in 1996, by disenchanted BBC journalists, after
Saudi investors pulled the plug on the Arabic TV division of the BBC News
service. Since then, it has spawned a plethora of competitors such as EDTV,
Abu Dhabi TV, the Lebanese Broadcasting Company and, most significantly,
al-Arabiya. Like al-Jazeera, al-Arabiya has been banned by the US-appointed
Iraqi governing council for weeks at a time for "incitement to murder",
after airing tapes of Saddam Hussein. Two of its journalists were shot dead
by US forces at a US checkpoint in March.
Last November, George Bush declared that successful societies "limit the
power of the state and the military ... and allow room for independent
newspapers and broadcast media". But three days earlier, an al-Jazeera
camera man, Salah Hassan, had been arrested in Iraq, held incommunicado in
a chicken-coup-sized cell and forced to stand hooded, bound and naked for
up to 11 hours at a time. He was beaten by US soldiers who would address
him only as "al-Jazeera" or "bitch". Finally, after a month, he was dumped
on a street just outside Baghdad, in the same vomit-stained red jumpsuit
that he had been detained in.
Twenty other al-Jazeera journalists have been arrested and jailed by US
forces in Iraq and one, Tariq Ayoub, was killed last April when a US tank
fired a shell at the al-Jazeera offices in Baghdad's Palestine hotel. It
was an accident, the Pentagon said, even though al-Jazeera had given the
Pentagon the coordinates of its Baghdad offices before the war began.
As the invasion was getting underway, aljazeera.net was taken offline by a
hacker attack mounted from California by John William Racine III. With a
maximum tariff of 25 years available, the US attorney's office agreed a
sentence of 1,000 hours community service.
Ever since al-Jazeera broadcast videotapes of Osama bin Laden in the
aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, Washington has treated it like a fifth
column. There have been allegations that intense pressure from the White
House led the network to silence some of its more outspoken journalists,
such as aljazeera.net's senior website editor, Yvonne Ridley, who was
dismissed in November 2003.
In the weeks following 9/11, Colin Powell visited Emir al-Thani, the ruler
of Qatar - and financier of al-Jazeera - to request that he rein in his
country's free press. The emir went public about Powell's mission and,
during the subsequent war in Afghanistan, al-Jazeera's offices in Kabul
were bombed - by accident, the Pentagon said.
Sami al-Haj, an al-Jazeera cameraman seized in Afghanistan, remains
detained in Guantánamo Bay to this day, and al-Jazeera's journalists in the
west have been singled out. After attending the European social forum in
Paris, I myself was detained for an hour by British special branch officers
at Waterloo station. The questioning focused on my employer. The officers
also wanted information about other al-Jazeera journalists in Paris and
London, and asked if I would speak to someone in their office on a regular
basis about my work contacts. I declined both requests.
The targeting of al-Jazeera is all the more remarkable, given that it is
the only Arab TV network to routinely offer Israeli, US and British
officials a platform to argue their case. The Israeli cabinet minister
Gideon Ezra famously told the Jerusalem Post: "I wish all Arab media were
like al-Jazeera". Kenton Keith, the former US ambassador to Qatar,
commented: "You have to be a supporter of al-Jazeera, even if you have to
hold your nose sometimes."
Al-Jazeera has a track record of honest and accurate reporting, and has
maintained a principled pluralism in the face of brutal and authoritarian
regimes within the region, and increasingly from those without. This is why
it has been vilified, criminalised and bombed. It is also why it should be
defended by those who genuinely believe that successful societies depend
upon an independent media.
· Arthur Neslen was until last week London correspondent for aljazeera.net.
He is writing a book about Israeli identity for Pluto Press
<mailto:art.neslen at ntlworld.com>art.neslen at ntlworld.com
The Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
(415) 863-9977
www.freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/news_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20040421/d18ed791/attachment.htm>
More information about the News
mailing list