<html>
  <head>

    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="container font-size5 content-width3">
      <div class="header reader-header reader-show-element"> <font
          size="-2"><a class="domain reader-domain"
href="https://www.delawareonline.com/story/news/2018/11/19/curious-admission-vaughn-trial-inmate-witnesses-discussing-trial-prison/1843967002/">https://www.delawareonline.com/story/news/2018/11/19/curious-admission-vaughn-trial-inmate-witnesses-discussing-trial-prison/1843967002/</a></font>
        <h1 class="reader-title">Curious admission in Vaughn trial:
          Inmate witnesses are discussing trial in prison</h1>
        <div class="credits reader-credits">Xerxes Wilson - <span
            class="asset-metabar-time asset-metabar-item nobyline">Nov.
            19, 2018</span></div>
      </div>
      <hr>
      <div class="content">
        <div class="moz-reader-content line-height4 reader-show-element">
          <div id="readability-page-1" class="page">
            <div role="main" itemprop="mainEntity articleBody">
              <div id="module-position-RWLhyoqBUH4">
                <div itemprop="video" itemscope=""
                  itemtype="http://schema.org/VideoObject">
                  <p itemprop="description"> Here's the latest in the
                    ongoing trial of the inmates accused of
                    orchestrating a siege that ultimately took the life
                    of a prison guard. <span>Delaware News Journal</span></p>
                </div>
              </div>
              <p>A jury deciding whether three men should be convicted
                of a murder tied to the uprising at James T. Vaughn
                Correctional Center last year must figure out who to
                believe: the inmates on trial or the handful of
                prisoners who testified for prosecutors. </p>
              <p>After some 60 hours of trial testimony, a New Castle
                County jury is in its second day deliberating whether
                the first three Vaughn inmates to stand trial are
                responsible for the death of Correctional Officer Steven
                Floyd, who bled to death during the 18-hour standoff. </p>
              <p>"This case is dependent on people who came in and told
                you what they saw," said Deputy Attorney General John
                Downs in his final statements to the jury.</p>
              <p>That body of testimony is laden with contradictions,
                the potential for inmate witnesses to cobble together
                narratives to fit prosecutors' arguments and questions
                about what is motivating the inmates to testify. </p>
              <p>"What happened to Sgt. Floyd is a tragedy and it
                shouldn't have happened, but so was this investigation,"
                said Ben Gifford, who is representing one of the men on
                trial. </p>
              <p>Gifford and the defendants characterized the
                investigation as "sloppy."</p>
              <p>There were no cameras in the building. Of the <a
                  data-track-label="inline|intext|n/a"
href="https://www.delawareonline.com/story/news/2018/10/24/vaughn-prison-uprising-investigation-questioned-inmates-attorneys/1743987002/"
                  target="_blank">blood-stained clothes and shanks
                  Delaware State Police decided to test</a>, there were
                no forensic matches to any particular defendant
                currently on trial. Prosecutors argued additional
                testing would likely not have yielded useful
                information. </p>
              <p>So absent other evidence, the jury must decide which
                inmates to believe, the ones on trial or the ones
                testifying against them. </p>
              <p>Jarreau Ayers and Dwayne Staats, defendants already
                serving life sentences and representing themselves in
                the trial, characterized the inmate witnesses as liars
                seeking a benefit in exchange for their testimony.</p>
              <p>They said prosecutors are willing to cut deals,
                overlook deception and ignore incriminating evidence
                against their own witnesses in order to secure murder
                convictions in one of the state's most high-profile
                trials. </p>
              <p>"I am fighting everything," Ayers said. "Every lie and
                every contradiction I am going to point out until there
                are no more inmates on the stand."</p>
              <p>Ayers' and Staats' cross examination of their former
                jail mates was at times personal. They knew each other
                and often referred to each other by nicknames, like Jay
                Bird, Poncho, Burner and Smoke.</p>
              <p>When their motives were questioned, the witnesses said
                they were victims doing the right thing.</p>
              <p>"I can't sit there and witness someone getting hit up
                and brutalized and not talk," said inmate Michael
                Rodriguez, known as Latino, addressing Staats from the
                witness stand. "It is eating me up. It is called a
                conscience.”</p>
              <p>From the stand, Ayers called it a show, saying men in C
                Building enjoyed their moment of "liberation." Staats
                said the uprising "was festive for a second." </p>
              <p>Both Ayers and Staats admitted roles in the takeover. <a
                  data-track-label="inline|intext|n/a"
href="https://www.delawareonline.com/story/news/2018/11/14/vaughn-defendant-admits-he-spurred-uprising-but-not-violence/1994062002/"
                  target="_blank">Staats said he planned</a> it to force
                Gov. John Carney to hear inmates' protests about
                Delaware's prison conditions. Ayers said he wasn't
                involved other than helping inmates with medical
                conditions <a data-track-label="inline|intext|n/a"
href="https://www.delawareonline.com/story/news/2018/11/13/vaughn-inmate-defendant-takes-stand-says-riot-born-good-intentions/1948479002/"
                  target="_blank">out of the building during the
                  standoff</a>.</p>
              <p>Both said they had no personal hand in the violence. <a
                  data-track-label="inline|intext|n/a"
href="https://www.delawareonline.com/story/news/2018/11/15/vaughn-prison-riot-trial-goes-jury/1997636002/"
                  target="_blank">Some inmate witnesses told a different
                  story. </a>Witnesses also testified that Deric
                Forney, the other defendant on trial who was referred to
                as Twin, attacked a correctional officer in the initial
                moments of the uprising. </p>
              <p>"Twin was putting the cuffs on (Wilkinson)," Rodriguez
                testified. "As I’m walking out I can hear Wilkinson
                scream 'please don’t kill me. I have a little
                daughter.'"</p>
              <p>Inmate statements are the only evidence against Forney,
                and regardless of Ayers' and Staats' admissions about
                their roles, how the jury evaluates witnesses'
                statements about their actions during the uprising will
                decide whether they are guilty of murder, a lesser crime
                or nothing.</p>
              <h2>'If I was a gambling man'</h2>
              <p>The uprising began when three correctional officers
                were overpowered by numerous inmates using what
                prosecutors described as "coordinated violence."</p>
              <p>"People were smashing people," said inmate witness
                Richard McCane.</p>
              <p>But who attacked who, where and when during the assault
                is told differently by the handful of inmates who
                testified to seeing the melee. None that say they
                witnessed the attack could recall seeing others that
                testified that they were present. </p>
              <p>The attackers were mostly wearing makeshift masks but
                some inmates said they could identify them anyway.</p>
              <p>Abdul-Hafid As-Salafi was the only witness that said he
                saw Ayers attacking Floyd. He also was one of two who
                said he saw Forney attack another correctional officer.</p>
              <p>As-Salafi said he identified Ayers through "skin tone"
                and "mannerisms."</p>
              <p>"I’ve been incarcerated for a substantial amount of
                time and I have been around him," he told the jury. </p>
              <p>McCane said he saw Staats return to his tier with
                bloodied clothes.</p>
              <p>In prior statements, he told police he saw him using a
                mirror to look down the tier. In testimony, he said he
                saw him without a mirror. Later, he admitted to not
                seeing his face.</p>
              <p>“Is it possible you could have just profiled me?”
                Staats asked him.</p>
              <p>McCane said he made a mistake regarding the mirror and
                reiterated it was him he saw. </p>
              <p>"If I was a gambling man, I’d bet on it," McCane said.</p>
              <p>Downs, the prosecutor, said such issues are to be
                expected. </p>
              <p>"Those things happen when you recall things not only 18
                months later, but after something that was a disturbing,
                frightening experience," Downs said. </p>
              <p>Contradictions were particularly important for Ayers,
                who was accused by some witnesses of ordering a group of
                inmates lingering in the building’s yard back into the
                building minutes after the initial attack. </p>
              <p>If true, it means he played an integral role in the
                riot from near its inception and increases the
                likelihood the jury will find him guilty of murder as an
                accomplice. </p>
              <p>He called inmates to the stand refute those presented
                by prosecutors. He attacked contradictions between
                separate witnesses as well as inconsistencies between
                testimony and the inmates’ prior statements to
                detectives. </p>
              <p>For example, inmate Eugene Wiggins, told the jury he
                saw Ayers' face when he called the inmates in. Ayers
                noted that in his prior statements to police he said he
                only heard the person's voice calling the group in, and
                that “my gut is telling me it was Jarreau, but I could
                be wrong."</p>
              <p>"The (prosecutor) knows that," Ayers told the jury. "If
                I didn't tell y'all that, they wasn't going to tell
                y'all that."</p>
              <p>Inmates told the jury that their initial statements to
                police were rushed because other prisoners were timing
                how long they were pulled from their cells to speak to
                police.</p>
              <p>Ayers also noted that the state's "star witness," an
                inmate that was indicted and promised his testimony in
                return for a plea deal, said he didn't know why Ayers
                was being charged. </p>
              <p>That witness told the jury someone else called the
                inmates in from the yard, but is also the only person to
                testify that Ayers was involved in planning the
                uprising.</p>
              <p>Downs implored the jury to "use your common sense."</p>
              <p>"This is what happens when people are involved in any
                event, especially one that is disturbing and scary,"
                Downs said. "Sometimes the little details lose their
                way."</p>
              <h2>'Hope springs eternal'</h2>
              <p>Ayers told the jury the case was built "on men
                desperate to go home," arguing the inmates testifying
                against him will benefit from their cooperation with
                prosecutors. </p>
              <p>Gifford and the defendants representing
                themselves pointed out that some inmates were eager to
                help police in return for getting transferred out of
                Delaware or getting a break on their sentences. </p>
              <p>Gifford quoted one witness'
                explicative-filled statement to police that "them N
                words" did the riot and "if I can capitalize off of it
                and go ... home, that is what ... I'm going to do."</p>
              <p>In court, each inmate testified said they received "no
                promises" from prosecutors. </p>
              <p>"What deals?" Deputy Attorney General Brian Robertson
                asked the jury. "We are now four weeks out, what were
                the deals that people got for their testimony?"</p>
              <p>For most inmates, Gifford quizzed them about their
                sentence and the potential for the state to help them.
                At least one said they were under the impression that
                they could receive some benefit all the way up until two
                weeks before trial. </p>
              <p>"It doesn’t matter if they are actually getting or have
                gotten benefits from the state," Gifford said. "Hope
                springs eternal."</p>
              <p>He said that benefit doesn't have to be a promise from
                a prosecutor. He told the jury the Department of
                Correction lords over the lives of the inmates: "who
                they get to see, who they get to talk to, how long they
                get to come out of their six-by-six cell."</p>
              <p>"(DOC) lost a brother," Gifford told the jury. "Do you
                think it possible that inmates who testify and the DOC
                perceives to have helped the prosecution, that DOC
                helped them out a little bit?" </p>
              <p>Robertson said such benefits are not in evidence. </p>
              <h2>'I read the paper'</h2>
              <p>The defendants and Gifford accused the inmates of
                colluding to craft testimonies that fit the prosecutors'
                ends.</p>
              <p>They said the witnesses could do that because they have
                time to talk and prosecutors' theories were set out in
                the pages of The News Journal. </p>
              <p>Gifford asked the jury if they really believed that
                anytime during the 18-hour standoff that those
                responsible didn't talk about how they could get away
                with the crime and who to pin it on. </p>
              <p>Trial testimony established that some two dozens of the
                state's witnesses are being housed together, in a single
                tier at Howard R. Young Correctional Institution. </p>
              <p>Inmate witnesses said they were free to spend time
                talking to the other witnesses and that no detective or
                prosecutor warned them against speaking to each other.
                They denied speaking to each other about their
                testimonies but said they are talking about the case. </p>
              <p>"Who is not talking about this case?" Rodiguez said. </p>
              <p>Rodriguez said inmates have easy access to The News
                Journal and pass it around. Gifford asked him if he had
                read the newspaper in the days prior to taking the
                stand. </p>
              <p>"Of course, who doesn’t?" Rodriguez said.</p>
              <p>In addressing the jury, Ayers recalled testimony he
                said contradicted an inmate's previous statements. </p>
              <p>"That was in February. He comes back in
                November: 'everybody y'all got in the paper, that is who
                it was,'" Ayers said. </p>
              <p>Once the jury returns its verdict in this trial, 14
                more C Building inmates are set to be tried for murder
                tied to the uprising in multiple trials over the coming
                months. </p>
              <p id="article-body-p-last"><em>Contact Xerxes Wilson
                  at (302) 324-2787 or <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:xwilson@delawareonline.com">xwilson@delawareonline.com</a>.
                  Follow @Ber_Xerxes on Twitter.</em></p>
              <p><br>
              </p>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div> </div>
    </div>
    <div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
      Freedom Archives
      522 Valencia Street
      San Francisco, CA 94110
      415 863.9977
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://freedomarchives.org/">https://freedomarchives.org/</a>
    </div>
  </body>
</html>