<html>
<body>
<h1><font size=4><b>Atenco’s Political Prisoners: The Persistence of
Resistance<br>
</b></font></h1><h2><font size=3><b>Thirty-One Year Sentences for Protest
(or Being Near It) in
Mexico</b></font></h2><font size=3>
<a href="http://www.narconews.com/Issue54/article3192.html" eudora="autourl">
http://www.narconews.com/Issue54/article3192.html<br><br>
</a></font><h3><b>By Alejandro Reyes<br>
Radio Zapatista</b></h3><font size=3>September 22, 2008<br><br>
When the parents of Oscar Hernández Pacheco were told that their son
would be free in late August or Early September, they were overwhelmed
with happiness. At the prison of Molino de Flores, don Paco and other
relatives of political prisoners who since the violent repression in
<a href="http://www.narconews.com/Issue41/article1831.html">San Salvador
Atenco</a> on May 3 and 4, 2006, had faced uncertainty, fear, and
indignation celebrated the news. “You see, don Paco,” said the father
of another young prisoner from the town of Texcoco, “the kids will soon
be free, we just need to stick it out a little longer.” “We’ll celebrate
back in our town,” answered don Paco.<br><br>
But some days later, on August 21 this year, they heard the terrible
news: their son, like all other political prisoners held at Molino de
Flores, were sentenced to 31 years and 10 months in prison, accused of
kidnapping, while
<a href="http://www.narconews.com/Issue45/article2651.html">Ignacio del
Valle</a> was given an additional 45 years, on top of the 67 which he had
already been sentenced to.<br><br>
When doña Francisca learned of the decision, she fell ill. At 63 years of
age, both she and her husband suffer from diabetes, an illness, which has
worsened in these two years of anguish. “My children didn’t want me to go
to the prison because they were afraid for my health, but I went anyway.
I was a bit calmer, but when I got there I felt like I was no longer
myself. I felt very ill. The next day I went to the hospital and the
doctor told me I had to calm down, or I would have to be hospitalized.
But how? He’s 30 years old. In another 30, he will be 60. How can they do
that to him? And with such young children… the girl is eight years old,
the boy is about three.”<br><br>
As most of the prisoners sentenced, their son did not participate in the
confrontations on May 3 and was not even a member of the Peoples’ Front
in the Defense of the Land (FPDT), the organization that in 2006
<a href="http://www.narconews.com/Issue41/article1761.html">was defending
the flower vendors of Texcoco</a> from being evicted from their place of
work.<br><br>
</font>
<dl>
<dd>“The day they captured him he was going to see a relative that was
very sick. They stopped him on the highway. They beat him; they injured
his head, his face. We have a picture where the police are beating him,
and one officer has a piece of concrete block with which he’s hitting him
on the head. I didn’t know anything because that day he’d been at home.
We were having breakfast, eating pozole</i>, which is his favorite dish,
and he told me that he would pick up the girl and he would come back to
eat some. When the troops started coming into the town, we locked
ourselves up. At around 3 pm my sons knew they had arrested him, but they
didn’t tell me because they were afraid for my health. But then I saw him
in the news, and that’s how I found out.”<br><br>
</dl>Something similar happened with Julio César Espinoza Ramos, son of
Maribel Ramos Rojas. At the time Julio was 18 and he hadn’t even heard
about the FDPT. He liked to play soccer, worked in sales at the town of
San Pablito Chiconcuac, and helped his grandmother take care of the
cattle. On May 3, 2006, Julio César was riding his scooter on the highway
that goes by San Salvador Atenco. Near the gas station of Tocuila he was
detained at a police blockade. There he was brutally beaten, and then
taken to the police station, before being transferred to the
high-security prison of Santiaguito, in Almoloya, in the state of
Toluca.<br><br>
Julio César doesn’t understand why all of this is happening to him. Why
was he sentenced to so many years in prison, if he didn’t do anything?
And why such a heavy sentence, while the true kidnappers, those who maim
people, those who murder and rape, are free? “He had so many dreams,”
says his mother, “and now those dreams are truncated, locked up behind
those prison walls.”<br><br>
Juan de Dios Hernández, the FDPT lawyer who defends Atenco’s political
prisoners, argues that the sentence was made without convincing proof,
through legal proceedings full of irregularities and contradictions. One
of the relatives even claims that, when he questioned the judge about the
harshness of the sentences, he answered that he didn’t have full control
over it and that the decision had come from above.<br><br>
The political motives behind the sentences are evident in the fact that
they were announced the same day that a highly publicized meeting of the
National Council on Public Security was being held at the National
Palace. In this meeting one of the topics that most concerns Mexican
society was discussed: the insecurity that is currently lived in the
country. There, a National Security Agreement was drafted, through which
police and judicial institutions will be strengthened, with a focus on
fighting kidnapping, money laundering, and organized crime. Among other
legal reforms is a proposal for a general law on kidnapping. The
sentences against Atenco’s political prisoners, precisely for kidnapping,
should be read by Mexican society as a sign of alarm, since they
criminalize dissidence and the defense of basic rights, equating
political activism to organized crime. “We’re indignant,” says Trinidad
Ramírez Velázquez, wife of Ignacio del Valle. “How dare they compare
someone who defends the land and his rights to someone who kidnaps,
murders, mutilates, rapes, and so on.” One of President Felipe Calderon’s
proposals is to apply life in prison to convicted kidnappers. The
sentence of 112 years to Ignacio del Valle is nothing less than life in
prison.<br><br>
It’s important to note that, regarding insecurity, the wave of
kidnappings that are increasingly the topic of front-page headlines, and
the drug-related violence that plagues the country, state corruption and
impunity are two of the main contributors. Practically all known
kidnapper gangs have members who are agents or former agents of precisely
the same police forces which are in theory in charge of combating
them.<br><br>
At the same time, while political prisoners are given these absurd
sentences, those responsible for the blatant human rights violations
committed in San Salvador Atenco enjoy complete impunity. The events of
May 3 and 4, 2006, represent one of the darkest moments of state
repression and violence in the history of modern Mexico: murders, mass
<a href="http://www.narconews.com/Issue41/article1827.html">sexual
aggressions</a> against women and men, breaking and entering without a
warrant, destruction of property, beatings, torture, humiliations. The
savagery committed in Atenco were not just the uncontrolled actions of
unprepared police forces, but rather
<a href="http://www.narconews.com/Issue42/article1938.html">a
premeditated act of state violence</a> designed to provoke terror in the
population and to set a precedent that serves as an example to other
social movements. The sentences of August 21 are just one more ingredient
of these politics of terror.<br><br>
It is hard to describe the pain of the families. “I’m a single mother,”
says Maribel Rojas. “My son is all I have, and I’m all he has. This has
affected me a lot at work because I’ve had to miss work many times and
I’m afraid to lose my job, but I can’t leave him alone. It’s also
affected by my health because I have diabetes and I’ve been hospitalized
numerous times. And of course, it’s been very hard economically. I have
to take him food, there are many expenses, and if I don’t work, how am I
going to get the money, especially being alone? It hurts me a lot seeing
him there. The day he called after the sentence, he seemed strong because
he didn’t want to hurt me. But when I went to see him, he seemed like an
entirely different person, he was completely broken.”<br><br>
Doña Francisca can’t hold back her tears when she speaks of her son. “I
feel very bad when I can’t go see him, but it hurts me a lot when I go to
the prison. Since he was in Toluca, I used to go see him. But I feel
terrible when I see my son like that. That’s why he tells me, ‘Don’t
come, mother, because I get very sad when I see you cry.’ And we both cry
together. But God willing I’ll be able to go see him and I’ll be calm and
I won’t cry.”<br><br>
For don Paco, his son’s imprisonment has also been devastating. He is a
farmer, he plants corn in Atenco. “These two years have been very
difficult. There are times I can’t go see him, because I have to work.
There’s no money. We have to take money and food to him, and we make
every effort to do it. And we spend 500 or 600 pesos in just one day.
Imagine that, and we have no money. So we go crazy trying to find a
solution, because I can’t work like I should.” Doña Francisca explains:
don Paco is also diabetic and he often falls ill for one or two weeks at
a time.<br><br>
For Trinidad Ramírez, these past two years have been a veritable ordeal.
Her son César was in jail for almost two years. Her daughter América is
in hiding. And her husband Ignacio faces a sentence of 112 years in
prison. Nonetheless, she seems strong, firm, decided. “I think about
them,” she explains. “I think of Ignacio in jail, always so optimistic.
I’m afraid of falling into a depression and not being able to get up to
continue fighting. But love can do so many things.” She says that,
despite the sentence, Ignacio holds his head up. “He is very secure in
his beliefs, in his ideals, in his cause. That’s why when I say that
Ignacio is doing well, it’s not because he is well being there, because
the conditions in prison are very tough, but because he believes in his
ideals.”<br><br>
But the repression and especially the sentences, which were intended to
provoke fear and to silence people, had another effect. Maribel Ramos
knew nothing about the FPDT, she had never participated in any struggle,
and she had never expressed indignation against the injustices she
saw.<br><br>
“My vision has changed a lot,” she says, “because we used to be very shy
about expressing what’s happening in our country, the repression we
suffer. Because what the government is doing is repression. They want to
use us as an example and tell people: if you rebel, this is what can
happen to you, you can have the same fate as these people. But instead of
intimidating me, this has made me stronger, and I think it’s really
important for me to express my indignation as a mother, to defend my son,
because he’s completely innocent, and to denounce all this injustice
we’re living. It’s time to raise our voices. If they said, ‘You better be
quiet,’ well, I don’t think so. We have to face them and denounce
everything that’s happening.”<br><br>
Doña Francisca and don Paco, like other relatives of political prisoners
who had never participated in any struggle, have also approached the
FPDT, joining forces to struggle together for their son’s
freedom.<br><br>
For Trinidad Ramírez, “all bad things have a good side.” The sentences
reawakened indignation and gave a new impulse to the struggle, in Mexico
and around the world. This September 15, the FPDT organized an
Independence Day event in the main plaza of San Salvador Atenco, and on
September 23 a march is planned from the Angel to Los Pinos in Mexico
City. At the same time, the Zapatista Army of National Liberation (EZLN)
announced that the encampment in front of the Molino de Flores prison
would be reinforced and that it would be transformed into a space of
encounter for the Other Campaign. The EZLN also called for a renewal of
the national and international campaign for the freedom of political
prisoners.<br><br>
For many people, demanding the release of Atenco’s political prisoners is
an urgent necessity, because what is at stake, besides the lives of
innocent people, is the right to resistance and the defense of basic
rights. It is, in sum, a struggle for justice, democracy, and freedom in
Mexico<br><br>
<br><br>
<x-sigsep><p></x-sigsep>
<font size=3 color="#FF0000">Freedom Archives<br>
522 Valencia Street<br>
San Francisco, CA 94110<br><br>
</font><font size=3 color="#008000">415 863-9977<br><br>
</font><font size=3 color="#0000FF">
<a href="http://www.freedomarchives.org/" eudora="autourl">
www.Freedomarchives.org</a></font><font size=3> </font></body>
</html>