<html>
<body>
<font size=3><br>
</font><font face="Verdana" size=2>Original Content at
<a href="http://www.opednews.com/articles/Sami-Al-Arian--From-Exoner-by-Stephen-Lendman-080714-114.html" eudora="autourl">
http://www.opednews.com/articles/Sami-Al-Arian--From-Exoner-by-Stephen-Lendman-080714-114.html<br>
</a><hr>
<b>July 14, 2008<br><br>
</font><font face="Verdana" size=4>Sami Al-Arian: From Exoneration to
Criminal Indictment<br><br>
</b></font><font face="Verdana" size=2><i>By Stephen Lendman<br><br>
</i>Sami Al-Arian: From Exoneration to Criminal Indictment - by Stephen
Lendman <br><br>
A personal note. I've twice before written about Al-Arian and discussed
his case on my radio program with his wife and daughter. Since February
20, 2003, he's been unjustly imprisoned. The FBI hounded him for 11
years. It falsely accused him of backing organizations fronting for
Palestinian Islamic Jihad - a 1997 State Department-designated
"Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO)." It's one of 30
organizations so-designated that year. In 1999, three were removed.
Another was added in 2001 for a total of 28. Sixteen of them are
Arabic/Muslim and include Hamas, the Popular Front for the Liberation of
Palestine, Hezbollah and Al Queda. Their ideologies differ from western
standards. Washington thus calls them FTOs that "engage in terrorist
activity (and) threaten the security of US nationals or the national
security of the US." <br><br>
In August 2001, Palestinian Islamic Jihad's (PIJ) General Secretary, Dr.
Fathi Shikaki, agreed to be interviewed. He called the organization
"an independent, Islamic, and popular movement with Islam
(advocating) grassroots popular action and armed struggle (for the)
liberation of (Occupied) Palestine." In this respect, it's no
different from the Vichy French resistance. They were renown freedom
fighters. So were the Mujahideen (when they were on our side) against the
Soviets in Afghanistan and Serbia in the Balkans. <br><br>
As Michel Chossudovsky noted in a September 2001 Global Research.ca
article titled "Who is Osama Bin Laden?:" ....while the Islamic
Jihad - featured by the Bush administration as "a threat to
America" - is blamed for the (9/11 attacks), these same Islamic
organizations constitute a key instrument of US military intelligence in
the Balkans and the former Soviet Union." In other words, they're
(unwittingly) used to further US interests and at the same time justify
Washington's war on Islam (aka the "war on terrorism").
<br><br>
Shikaki denied that PIJ or the Islamic Jihad Movement (IJM) practice
"terrorism." On the contrary, "terrorism is practiced by a
state (Israel) that is fully supported by the West. (It and especially
America back) dictatorial regimes that are tyrannical, oppressive and
practice human rights abuses on massive scales....Tens of thousands of
Islamists have been arrested and....held under severe conditions."
However, "only a small segment used violence against the
state-sponsored and state-supported violence." <br><br>
How can Palestinians be called terrorists. We "scream from pain and
suffering and (are) defending (our) land against Jewish soldiers....We
are calling for peace based on justice, rights and dignity. We must be
dealt with as equals and as carriers of a great civilization. Only then
will peace prevail in our region and the whole world....Our state is
Palestine....As for the Jews, they have lived peacefully with us for
centuries....They could (always) live among us freely, but not as a
political entity....We don't espouse throwing the Jews into the sea (but)
there will be no peace unless Palestine is returned to the
Palestinians." <br><br>
Al-Arian: Falsely Targeted For Supporting "Terrorism" <br><br>
Because of his faith, ethnicity, political activism and prominence,
Al-Arian became a prime target. He was falsely vilified for supporting
terrorism. Then at the behest of Governor Jeb Bush and despite his
tenured status, the University of South Florida fired him following his
February 20, 2003 arrest. Ever since, he's been imprisoned and held in
brutalizing and dehumanizing confinement in over a dozen maximum and
other federal prison facilities. Only his spirit sustains him. <br><br>
His June 2005 trial was a travesty. It lasted six months, cost about $50
million, and in the end Al-Arian was exonerated on eight false terrorism
charges. On nine lesser ones, jurors were deadlocked 10 - 2 for
acquittal. <br><br>
Al-Arian is a Palestinian refugee, a distinguished professor and scholar,
community leader and civil activist. His crime - being an activist Muslim
at the wrong time in America. After his exoneration, prosecutors planned
to retry him but instead struck a secret plea bargain with his lawyers.
It stipulated: <br><br>
-- he neither engaged in or had any knowledge of violent acts; <br><br>
-- that he would not be required to cooperate further with prosecutors;
<br><br>
-- and that he would be released on time served and deported voluntarily
to his country of choice. <br><br>
He remained in custody pending sentencing and deportation on May 1, 2006.
Yet he's still imprisoned and his ordeal continues. In October 2006,
assistant prosecutor Gordon Kromberg violated plea bargain terms by
subpoenaing Al-Arian before a grand jury. It was to entrap him on perjury
and obstruction of justice charges through clever and manipulative
questioning. <br><br>
At the time, he said this about all Muslims that should have
automatically disqualified him: "If they can kill each other during
Ramadan, they can appear before the grand jury - all they can't do is eat
before sunset. I believe Mr. Al-Arian's request is part of the attempted
Islamization of the American Justice System. I am not going to put off
(his) grand jury appearance just to assist in what is becoming the
Islamization of America." Following these comments, Al-Arian's
attorney accused Kromberg of anti-Muslim bias and asked him to recuse
himself. He denied the request and called Al-Arian before the grand jury.
<br><br>
He refused to testify and was held in contempt. He refused again before a
newly convened grand jury, was again held in contempt, and had his
sentence extended without mitigation until April 7, 2008. On March 3,
2008 (three weeks before his scheduled release and deportation), Al-Arian
was again ordered to appear before another March 19 grand jury. He again
refused, remained imprisoned, and on June 26 was indicted on two counts
of criminal contempt. <br><br>
Al-Arian's case is crucially important. It shows the peril of being
Muslim in America. It also represents a disturbing abuse of the grand
jury system before which Al-Arian has no obligation to testify. It's at a
time our constitutional checks and balances have eroded, our civil
liberties are weakest, a president has usurped "unitary
executive" powers to claim the law is what he says it is, and when
we teeter on the edge of tyranny unless these practices are stopped.
<br><br>
Law Professor and Lead Al-Arian Counsel Jonathan Turley <br><br>
Turley calls Al-Arian's case "a classic perjury trap used repeatedly
by the government to punish those individuals who could not be convicted
before an American jury." All the more so if you're Muslim,
high-profile, and easily exploited for political advantage. <br><br>
On June 30, Al-Arian was arraigned before Judge Leonie Brinkema of the US
District Court for the Eastern District of Columbia. Turley was denied
the right to meet with him in advance and wasn't prepared to enter a
plea. The Court did it for him - "not guilty." His trial is
scheduled to begin on August 13, 2008. <br><br>
Turley requested that Al-Arian be released on bail. He's not charged with
terrorism, has no passport, and isn't a flight risk. Since charges
involve contempt, there's no reason to hold him. He's lived in the
country since 1975, has lawful alien status, his children are US
citizens, and they have deep ties here. In addition, citizens have
volunteered to be custodians, and Al-Arian is willing to be continually
monitored under home confinement. Turley calls the government's actions
"purely gratuitous and retaliatory under (these) conditions."
<br><br>
He further requested a bond hearing, and Judge Brinkema agreed. During
his Florida trial, friends offered millions in property as security. They
were denied. Prosecutors asked for a one-day trial. Turley requested
three days and told Judge Brinkema that counsel believes Al-Arian's
indictment is "invalid on its face." He didn't refuse to
cooperate. He'd already given two detailed affidavits establishing that
he had no knowledge of any crimes committed by the International
Institute of Islamic Thought (a Herndon, Virginia think tank) or its
officers. He also repeatedly asked to take a polygraph exam for
verification. He was denied. <br><br>
Turley also explained that the day before his indictment the government
expressed satisfaction with his affidavits. By indicting him, "the
government's long pattern of retaliation against Dr. Al-Arian has now
degraded further into raw thuggery." It has no interest in truth and
justice. It intends to act outside the law by whatever means it takes to
keep an innocent man imprisoned. Al-Arian is now at Alexandria, VA City
Jail awaiting his bond hearing. <br><br>
On July 10 it was held, and for the first time since his February 2003
arrest there was good news - at least so far. Over strong government
objections, Judge Brinkema agreed that Al-Arian is not a flight risk or
danger to his community and granted him bail. But it's not over yet
because DOJ is sure to fight it. One possible way according to Turley -
having ICE officials hold him for deportation and keep him imprisoned
until his trial. <br><br>
Turley cited Judge Brinkema's "significant statements in the
hearing: <br><br>
-- that she was getting "strange signals" about this case; that
"the government should not be found to have harassed efforts for
another government to accept Dr. Al-Arian under his plea agreement;
<br><br>
-- that the plea agreement still applies and the government is required
to deport him "with expedition;" <br><br>
-- should ICE resume custody, the deportation provision would be
triggered; and <br><br>
-- Judge Brinkema wants confirmation that Al-Arian already gave the
government detailed statements and repeatedly offered to take a polygraph
exam to prove his truthfulness. <br><br>
Prosecutor Kromberg twisted the truth to deny Al-Arian bail. Turley
expertly countered him. The week of July 14 he'll submit pre-trial
motions and (formally) request Al-Arian's release on bail. DOJ will
surely fight it. The case is far from resolved, and according to Turley:
"Things are likely to become stranger still as the government
continues its long campaign to hold Dr. Al-Arian by any means or method.
We remain hopeful, however, that (he'll) be vindicated and (allowed) to
leave the country" as his plea bargain stipulates. <br><br>
Yassin Aref - Another Muslim Political Prisoner <br><br>
A personal note. I've twice before written about Aref, discussed his case
with his lawyers on my radio program, and have personal contact with him
in prison. Like others of his faith, he was hunted down, rounded up, held
in detention, kept in isolation, denied bail, restricted in his right and
access to counsel, tried on secret evidence and trumped-up charges, then
convicted in a kangaroo court proceeding and given a long prison term.
<br><br>
Like Al-Arian and other Muslims, Aref was targeted for his faith and
ethnicity. He's an innocent man and another victim of police state
justice. He's now serving a 15 year sentence at the secret Terre Haute,
Indiana federal penitentiary's Communication Management Unit (CMU).
Opened in December 2006, it's for "high-security risk" Muslim
and Middle Eastern prisoners to limit or cut them off entirely from
outside contact. Doing so violates the Supreme Court's 2004 Johnson v.
California decision and Prison Bureau regulations. However, the courts
and Congress haven't intervened. <br><br>
Aref appealed on March 24, 2008 before the Second Circuit Court of
Appeals in New York. After the proceeding, one of his pro bono trial
lawyers, Stephen Downs, was hopeful but cautious. He explained that
predicting the outcome was uncertain at best and foolhardy at worst.
<br><br>
On July 2 in United States v. Aref, the (three-judge panel) Appeals Court
rendered a unanimous decision. Aref was denied, and unless a motion for
rehearing or the Supreme Court decides otherwise, he'll remain imprisoned
for 15 years. The Court issued an 11 page summary order rejecting
evidentiary challenges and other defendant claims. Appeals Court lawyers
Terrence Kindlon and Kathy Manley expressed profound disappointment with
Kindlon saying: "I feel like somebody hit me in the face with a
pie....We were feeling some optimism here. We thought there were some
significant issues that dealt not just with the law but with some of the
events that occurred throughout the course of the trial....I can honestly
say I strongly and respectfully disagree with the decision."
<br><br>
A Schenectady, NY columnist, Carl Strock, was also dismayed and
commented: "I thought the arguments (for reversal) were compelling,
but I could hardly imagine an appeals court overturning a jury verdict in
something so sensitive as Muslim terrorism, even if the terrorism
was" bogus. The ruling "means it's OK for the FBI to lure
law-abiding citizens (or legal residents) into doing something
illegal" or that government prosecutors can claim (with secret
evidence unavailable to counsel) is illegal and then arrest, charge and
convict them for it. "That's the long and short of this case."
<br><br>
It's also OK for federal judges to assure jurors that the government has
"good and valid (prosecutorial) reasons" even when there are
none. The same government claimed "valid reasons" to invade
Iraq and Afghanistan. We now know there were none. <br><br>
Kindlon said he's preparing an en banc motion for rehearing before the
full Appeals Court and a writ of certiorari petition to the Supreme Court
asking it to review the lower court ruling. Winning a reversal in either
court will be daunting given the preponderance of hard right federal
judges on the bench. It shows what all Muslims (and the rest of us) are
up against despite the important Boumedienne v. Bush Supreme Court
decision. It ruled Guantanamo detainees have habeas rights even if
they're not US citizens and are held outside the country. Despite having
them, however, getting justice in US federal courts may prove a bridge
too far. Especially for those targeted as enemies of the state with or
without evidence. <br><br>
Like Al-Arian, Aref is an innocent man. His crime is being Muslim at the
wrong time in America. He committed no crime and was victimized by an FBI
frame. I have direct contact with him in prison. We exchange letters and
occasional emails when he's allowed to send and receive them. He's a
friend and a supremely gracious and decent man. Injustice to him,
Al-Arian and others denies it to everyone. Today we're all Yassin Arefs
and Sami Al-Arians, Boumedienne v. Bush notwithstanding. <br><br>
"I Am Not Surprised" <br><br>
On the web site maintained for him (yassinaref.com), Aref responded to
the Appeals Court decision in prose and poetry. Below are extended
excerpts. <br><br>
"I am not surprised. When they arrested me....I was shocked the next
morning when they took me to court. I was surprised to see all those
police, marshals and media, and I was really confused: what was all that
about? Who am I (to be so important)? What did I do? What was going on?
All of it was unbelievable. I (told) the marshals that there is a law in
this country and I did nothing wrong, so the judge will free me and let
me go back to my family." <br><br>
He didn't and refused me bail, "claiming I was a flight risk and
danger to the community, even" though I have no "travel
documents and there was 50 cents in my wallet, plus I am stateless and
have no country to go to. Above all, I did nothing wrong (and) have
(nothing) to hide. <br><br>
Then while....in jail....I understood what was going on....it's not me,
it's politics and discrimination....if I was not a Muslim and
Imam....never would I have been targeted (or) indicted" or tried
without evidence. Even if they" tried me, no "jury (would) find
me guilty," and if they did no judge would accept it. Even if the
judge did, no "appeal court" would go along. "But all of
this happened....because I was a foreigner, a Muslim who had a little
beard. <br><br>
All the government did was misrepresent their evidence to confuse the
court and prevent justice from taking place." Everyone in the drama
played a role. "But still I am happy because I did nothing wrong and
harmed no one....what they did to me is wrong and not fair, and I believe
the truth will never die and people will find it sooner or later."
<br><br>
The government "dishonored justice and humiliated the Constitution,
not me. Anyone who knows me....knows I am innocent." Knows I'm not
"a dangerous wild animal who must be locked down in an isolated
unit. I am just a scapegoat for the (government's wrong policies and a
victim (of) their nonsensical ongoing war." Millions of others are
suffering like me. <br><br>
"The government....know(s) very well I had nothing to do with
terrorists or (have any) anti-American (beliefs) or (approve of)
violence, and that never in my life did I participate in any fighting
or....support any terrorists....I am just a Muslim and a stateless
Kurd....Let the government celebrate their victory for destroying my
family and for putting an innocent man in prison. Let the media" and
appeals court support what they did. It changes nothing. "I am
innocent and did nothing wrong. <br><br>
I am grateful for everyone who has supported me, wished and prayed for
the best for me and felt sorry for my family....They cannot put hate in
my heart and revenge in my thoughts. I know it's not over, and I hope you
believe the same and stay firm until justice takes place and the truth
comes out. Please do not forget my family." <br><br>
We never will Yassin or stop supporting your struggle for justice. Or
other innocent victims like yourself. <br><br>
For Muslims in America, Their Ordeal Continues <br><br>
Rumors are circulating about new police state tactics later this summer -
so the DOJ may open new investigations without evidence of wrongdoing.
Merely on the basis of an undisclosed "terrorist profile" or
"pattern of behavior" suggesting suspects should be watched and
interrogated about their Muslim or Arab-connected activities. Other
grounds as well - where they travel as well as their occupation, race or
ethnicity. It means millions of Americans will be targeted at a time no
one's civil liberties are protected. Bogus charges will be brought
against innocent people, and if they're Muslims and called
"terrorists" imagine what little justice they'll get. <br><br>
Congress won't help either. It gutted the Fourth Amendment further after
both Houses passed and George Bush signed (on July 10) the FISA
Amendments Act of 2008. It's FISA on steroids and more by granting
telecom companies retroactive immunity to conduct warrantless spying
post-9/11. Obama and McCain supported it. So did most others in Congress.
Everyone has reason to fear it. Muslims most of all. They've suffered
hugely since 9/11. No letup is in sight. This is how a police state
works. Congress, the courts, and executive are on board. So is his
successor. Expect little change in 2009 and no open public debate. The
law of the land is now lawlessness. No one is safe, and there's no place
to hide. <br><br>
Stephen Lendman is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on
Globalization. He lives in Chicago and can be reached at
lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. <br><br>
Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to The
Global Research News Hour on RepublicBroadcasting.org Mondays from 11AM -
1PM US Central time for cutting-edge discussions with distinguished
guests. All programs are archived for easy listening. <br><br>
<a href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9569">
click here</a><br><br>
<br><br>
Authors Bio: I am a 72 year old, retired, progressive small businessman
concerned about all the major national and world issues, committed to
speak out and write about them. <br><br>
<br><br>
</font><x-sigsep><p></x-sigsep>
<font size=3 color="#FF0000">Freedom Archives<br>
522 Valencia Street<br>
San Francisco, CA 94110<br><br>
</font><font size=3 color="#008000">415 863-9977<br><br>
</font><font size=3 color="#0000FF">
<a href="http://www.freedomarchives.org/" eudora="autourl">
www.Freedomarchives.org</a></font><font size=3> </font></body>
</html>