<html>
<body>
<h2><b>Court strikes down security
certificates</b></h2><font size=3>
<a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070223.wscoc0223/BNStory/National/home" eudora="autourl">
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070223.wscoc0223/BNStory/National/home<br>
<br>
</a>KIRK MAKIN AND TENILLE BONOGUORE <br><br>
Globe and Mail Update and Canadian Press<br><br>
The Supreme Court of Canada has voted unanimously to strike down a
controversial federal procedure used to deport suspected terrorists as
being a violation of life, liberty and security of the person.<br><br>
The security certificate process is hopelessly flawed and must be
redrafted by Parliament to eliminate the extreme secrecy in which
hearings to determine the reasonableness of certificates take place, the
court said on Friday.<br><br>
While carefully paying heed to fears of terrorism and the special
difficulties of protecting national security, the court said that certain
elements of fairness cannot be dispensed with -- including the right of a
detainee to know the case against them and to make full answer and
defence.<br><br>
"While there is a risk of catastrophic acts of violence, it would be
foolhardy to require a lengthy review process before a certificate should
be issued," the court said.<br><br>
However it said the various forms of review in which a designated lawyer
is empowered to act on behalf of detainees could pass constitutional
muster.<br><br>
Writing for a unanimous court, Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin suspended
the effects of the ruling for one year to give the Federal Government
time to craft a new security certificate process.<br><br>
However, foreign nationals will benefit immediately from one aspect of
the ruling which grants them a bail review within 48 hours of their first
being detained -- a far shorter period than they must currently
wait.<br><br>
In the House of Commons, Conservative House leader Peter van Loan offered
formal thanks to the court for its decision and signalled that the Tories
would get to work trying to bring the legislation into accord with the
Charter.<br><br>
"We will be reviewing that decision and seeing if there is a way to
and we are confident we can reconcile the need to protect the
security of Canadians with the directions to Parliament from the
court," Mr. van Loan said.<br><br>
The ramifications of the decision will extend far beyond Canada's border,
says Alex Neve, secretary general of Amnesty International
Canada.<br><br>
Speaking at a news conference following the judgment's release, Mr. Neve
said the ruling debunked government claims that the security certificate
system was fine.<br><br>
"It's a ringing, profoundly important endorsement of one simple
bedrock truth: Security is all about human rights," Mr. Neve
said.<br><br>
The ruling strengthens the Arar Commission's position in "conveying
an unequivocal message" that fundamental rights will not be
countenanced by the nation's senior judges, he said.<br><br>
"That will be heard outside Canada as well in courtrooms,
legislatures around the world, and it helps to reverse the global
rollback in human rights that has been such a worrying trends worldwide
since September 11th," he said.<br><br>
The court said that while federal court judges who conduct security
certificate reviews do play an unusually active role in testing secret
evidence, they are not unacceptably "co-opted" by the
process.<br><br>
It said that there may always be some evidence that cannot be disclosed
and must be heard in a secret hearing, yet that must be as minimal as
possible.<br><br>
"It may simply be so critical that it cannot be disclosed without
risking national security," Chief Justice McLachlin wrote.<br><br>
"This is a reality of our modern world. If Section 7 is to be
satisfied, either the person must be given the necessary information or a
substantial substitute for the information must be found. Neither is the
case here."<br><br>
It said that the onus on governments to move quickly in a proceeding
becomes greater with passing time.<br><br>
"Stringent release conditions . . . seriously limit individual
liberty," the court added. "However they are less severe than
incarceration."<br><br>
The court said that the security certificate provisions do not violate
the Charter right to equality or constitute cruel or unusual
punishment.<br><br>
The security certificate process -- enshrined within the Immigration and
Refugee Protection Act -- has been a target of constant, harsh
condemnation from civil libertarians.<br><br>
The provisions pre-date the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, and allow
for a non-resident to be designated as a risk to national security,
detained indefinitely, and ultimately deported.<br><br>
The detainees and their counsel are provided with only a vague summary of
the allegations against them. Evidence to back up the allegations is
given in secret to a judge, and neither the accused nor their lawyer can
attend.<br><br>
The three men behind the Supreme Court challenge – Adil Charkaoui,
Mohamed Harkat and Hassan Almrei – had all spent several years behind
bars before being released recently under tight conditions of house
arrest and their agreement not to communicate with a wide range of
individuals.<br><br>
The conditions of their detention – in a special holding unit nicknamed
Guantanamo North – led some of the detainees to resort to desperate
tactics such as hunger strikes.<br><br>
Mr. Almrei's lawyer Barbara Jackman said, without Friday's judgment, her
unmarried client would have "had a very hard time" obtaining
release from prison.<br><br>
"This decision makes it at least possible that a court may release
him without requiring that he have a wife to supervise him," Ms.
Jackman said.<br><br>
Her co-counsel John Norris said the court had risen above the
"rhetoric of national security."<br><br>
"They have recognized the fundamental importance of preserving the
security of all of us, but, at the same time, have stated in the clearest
possible terms that that must never be done at the expense of fundamental
fairness," Mr. Norris said.<br><br>
<br>
</font><x-sigsep><p></x-sigsep>
<font size=3 color="#FF0000">The Freedom Archives<br>
522 Valencia Street<br>
San Francisco, CA 94110<br>
(415) 863-9977<br>
</font><font size=3>
<a href="http://www.freedomarchives.org/" eudora="autourl">
www.freedomarchives.org</a></font></body>
</html>