[Pnews] A Florida Anarchist Will Spend Years in Prison for Online Posts Prompted by Jan. 6 Riot

Prisoner News ppnews at freedomarchives.org
Sun Oct 17 19:29:55 EDT 2021


theintercept.com
<https://theintercept.com/2021/10/16/daniel-baker-anarchist-capitol-riot/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=The%20Intercept%20Newsletter>
A
Florida Anarchist Will Spend Years in Prison for Online Posts Prompted by
Jan. 6 Riot
Natasha Lennard <https://theintercept.com/staff/natasha-lennard/> -October
16 2021
------------------------------

<https://theintercept.imgix.net/wp-uploads/sites/1/2021/10/GettyImages-1230676968-fbi-insurrection.jpg?auto=compress%2Cformat&q=90>

With the U.S. Capitol building seen in the background, a sign on a bus
shelter asks the public for information about people involved in the
Capitol insurrection, January 19, 2021.

Photo: Paul Hennessy/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

*On Tuesday,* a Florida judge sentenced
<https://www.tallahassee.com/story/news/local/fbi/2021/10/12/daniel-baker-sentenced-federal-prison-florida-capitol-threat-case/8424086002/>
Daniel Baker, an anti-fascist activist, to 44 months in federal prison for
social media posts that called for armed defense against possible far-right
attacks on the state’s Capitol in the wake of the January 6 riots. Baker, a
34-year-old yoga teacher and emergency medical technician trainee, had no
previous criminal convictions and has already been held for 10 months of
harsh pretrial detention, including seven months in solitary confinement.
He never brought a weapon near a government building; he amassed no armed
anti-fascist forces; he made no threats on a single individual.

Baker will, nonetheless, face considerably more prison time than most January
6 defendants
<https://apnews.com/article/black-lives-matter-texas-sentencing-courts-capitol-siege-675b12d0ddacb64d9030c444f8812a5c>,
including those who crossed state lines, small arsenals in tow, with the
aim of overturning a presidential election.

It goes without saying that a United States federal court is no place to
appeal to ethical grounds for militant anti-fascist resistance. Yet Baker,
while prone to hyperbolic and sometimes paranoid rhetoric, was certainly
not alone in fearing that there could be January 6-style events in
statehouses nationwide ahead of Joe Biden’s inauguration and that local
police could hardly be trusted as a bulwark. The Federal Bureau of
Investigations warned
<https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-capitol-siege-donald-trump-coronavirus-pandemic-racial-injustice-afde8d98740e057b340efa63c2d40007>
of the potential for armed protests at state capitols. Florida is home to
over 60 far-right, white supremacist, and neo-Nazi groups recognized
<https://www.splcenter.org/states/florida> by the Southern Poverty Law
Center, and there are well-reported
<https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/hidden-plain-sight-racism-white-supremacy-and-far-right-militancy-law>
links between Florida police departments and far-right militiae.

If there are moral arguments for physically confronting fascists — and I
believe there are — they would have been of scant relevance in Baker’s
case: zero such confrontations took place or appeared on the horizon, and
no far-right mobs amassed at the Florida Capitol around Biden’s
inauguration. This should have been a straightforward First Amendment case,
with Baker’s online speech, albeit bellicose, judged as constitutionally
protected. Instead, the formerly unhoused veteran has been made a victim of
government efforts to draw false equivalences between fascistic far-right
forces and the anti-fascists who would see them opposed.

“The overall message people will get from this is that online speech
calling for militant antifascist action will send you to prison for much
longer than actually taking militant action with fascists.”

“The American government has chosen to side with white supremacists, except
when their own bureaucracy forces them to prosecute the most blatant
offenders, albeit gently,” Baker told me in an email from prison. “They
criticized me for supporting Black Lives Matter, Feminist Liberation
ideologies, Global Revolutionary movements and direct democracy. … The
government has made its stance clear throughout my hearings.”

During his sentencing hearing on Tuesday, Baker’s attorney highlighted the
case of a Georgia man who drove to
<https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/man-who-went-washington-guns-threatened-shoot-pelosi-pleads-guilty-n1278968>Washington,
D.C., with guns and ammunition and sent private texts threatening to shoot
Rep. Nancy Pelosi in the head. The Trump acolyte had missed the storming of
the Capitol by one day due to car trouble. Like Baker, he was charged with
the interstate communication of threats. Unlike Baker, he had a history of
hideous, racist online speech, and direct threats. And unlike Baker, he
could leave prison soon: He will be sentenced in December and faces between
six months to two years in prison; his eight months of pretrial detention
will count as time served. Taking into account time served, meanwhile,
Baker will spend another 34 months — almost three years — in prison.

“Dan’s case speaks volumes about how the state represses the left much
differently than it treats the far right,” Brad Thomson, civil rights
attorney at the People’s Law Office, who did not represent Baker, told me.
“Here, Dan was sentenced to three and a half years for online posts
opposing another January 6 incident. But for actual participants from
January 6, we’re seeing charges and sentences far below that.” Thomson
added that “every case is unique, but the overall message people will get
from this is that online speech calling for militant antifascist action
will send you to prison for much longer than actually taking militant
action with fascists.”

[image: IMG_4337-baker]
<https://theintercept.imgix.net/wp-uploads/sites/1/2021/10/IMG_4337-baker.jpg?auto=compress%2Cformat&q=90>

Daniel Baker in 2020.

Photo: Courtesy of Eric Champagne

*Baker was convicted* at trial earlier this year on two counts of
“transmitting a communication in interstate commerce containing a threat to
kidnap or injure another person.” The threat of kidnapping charge stemmed
from
<https://www.wctv.tv/2021/02/19/tallahassee-resident-daniel-baker-indicted-for-inciting-violence-at-florida-capitol-building/>
a feverish public Facebook post in which Baker put out a general call for
anti-racists and anti-fascists to encircle the state Capitol, should
far-right groups attack it “on or around inauguration day,” and “trap”
right-wingers inside with cops. In the very next sentence, though, he
wrote, “we will drive them out of Tallahassee with every caliber
available!” The right wing militiae were thus to be trapped in and driven
out at once, on an unspecified day, by an unnamed collaboration of
counterprotesters.

The “call to arms” posts — of which Baker posted a number — were reflective
of his genuine and rightful rage against white supremacist violence, but
were disorganized and inchoate. Other social media posts that prosecutors
pointed to as evidence at trial included memes featuring Homer Simpson,
Baby Yoda, and a picture of a kangaroo. “It was truly a surreal experience
being in a literal kangaroo court,” Baker told me. His prosecution,
conviction, and sentencing exemplify the government’s commitment to
conjuring a left-wing extremist threat
<https://theintercept.com/2020/08/24/fbi-fusion-center-environmental-wind/>
when none is there
<https://theintercept.com/2019/03/23/black-identity-extremist-fbi-domestic-terrorism/>
.

Baker, slight and sinewy at 5 foot 8, lived in Tallahassee at the time of
his arrest — just over one week after January 6. Federal agents raided his
apartment with guns drawn and a flashbang grenade. “I thought we were going
to die when the FBI broke down our door, the whole experience has been
excruciating and traumatizing,” said his best friend and roommate Eric
Champagne, an artist and former Hindu monk who had traveled with Baker to
support Black Lives Matter protests around the country last year — a fact
that was cited by the prosecution as proof of Baker’s extremist bent.

With his knowledge as an EMT trainee, Baker would, Champagne told me, run
to the aid of injured protesters. In their hometown, the friends regularly
brought food and necessities to the unhoused community, Baker having
previously experienced homelessness himself. “My heart is about helping
people who are homeless. I know how bad it can be,” he told me on a phone
call from prison.

[image: GettyImages-1294929250-insurrection]
<https://theintercept.imgix.net/wp-uploads/sites/1/2021/10/GettyImages-1294929250-insurrection.jpg?auto=compress%2Cformat&q=90>

Rioters interact with Capitol Police inside the U.S. Capitol Building on
Jan. 6, 2021.

Photo: Win McNamee/Getty Images

*There can be* little doubt that Baker’s online posts were reckless at a
time when federal law enforcement had made clear its desire to demonize
radical left-wing politics — to conjure extremist forces equal, if not
greater, to those very real and deadly threats from the far right.
Following Baker’s arrest on January 15, U.S. Attorney Larry Keefe, who led
the prosecution, pronounced, “Extremists intent on violence from either end
of the political and social spectrums must be stopped, and they will be
stopped.”

It would be naive and ahistorical to hope that the U.S. government would
draw a moral distinction between militant acts carried out in the service
of genocidal white supremacy on the one hand and militant resistance to
such acts on the other. Even a week after January 6, when it seemed that
racist Trumpians had made undeniable their singular role as an extremist
threat to this country’s already diminished democracy, the government once
again doubled down on its baseless two-sidesism.

This came as no real surprise. The far right has for two decades been
responsible for the vast majority
<https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/24/us/domestic-terrorist-groups.html> of
deadly extremist attacks, while both Republicans and Democrats have
endorsed the targeting of leftists on the flimsiest of grounds — all the
more so when righteous, Black-led uprisings swept the nation last summer.
It was among the defining qualities of Donald Trump’s presidency, to
condone neo-Nazis and condemn with theatrical fervor the dangerousness of
anarchists and antifa. The Biden administration, while making greater
overtures to the dangers of the far right, has been no less keen to make
fallacious “both sides” claims about the threat of far-left extremism.

After January 6, national security experts and liberals urged
<https://eu.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/11/16/biden-lead-fight-against-white-supremacist-terror-threat-column/6263293002/>
Biden
to take on right-wing extremism through a strategy of counterterrorist law
enforcement. I noted
<https://theintercept.com/2021/01/05/trump-rally-far-right-violence/> at
the time that it would be misguided
<https://theintercept.com/2020/08/28/kyle-rittenhouse-violent-pro-trump-militias-police/>
to treat the state’s law enforcement apparatus as an ally in the struggle
against white supremacist violence.

Cases like this exemplify how the invocation of domestic counterterrorism
efforts against the right will inevitably harm the left, given the state’s
reactionary ideological tendencies.

As Branko Marcetic argued
<https://www.jacobinmag.com/2021/01/daniel-baker-florida-case-fbi-capitol>
in Jacobin after Baker’s arrest, cases like this exemplify how the
invocation of domestic counterterrorism efforts against the right will
inevitably harm the left, given the state’s reactionary ideological
tendencies. The government made much of Baker’s “dangerousness,” citing his
ownership of two firearms and the fact that he had placed an order for one
more — hardly proof of a planned attack: Gun sales jumped
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2021/02/03/gun-sales-january-background-checks/>
80 percent nationwide in January following the Capitol riot.

The prosecution focused, too, on Baker’s brief military training. He had
joined the U.S. military in his late teens but refused to be deployed
overseas. “His conscience prevented him from deploying with people he
didn’t trust to uphold human rights in a far off corner of the world,” his
friend, Champagne, told me. Baker then received an “other than honorable”
discharge, receiving no benefits.

Baker would later choose to use his military and medical training for a
cause he believed in. Like dozens of other anarchists, communists, and
socialists from around the world, Baker spent his savings to fly to Syria
to join the feminist-led, environmentalist, and directly democratic
political project in Rojava. There, he fought with the Kurdish People’s
Protection Units against ISIS. From his Kurdish comrades, he told me he
learned the concept of “welatparazi,” which, he said, “denotes a
sentimental feeling of loyalty and obligation of service towards one’s
community which shelters and nourishes us.”

The internationalist involvement in Rojava has been compared
<https://www.cartercenter.org/resources/pdfs/peace/conflict_resolution/syria-conflict/foreign-volunteers-for-syrian-kurdish-forces-2017.02.23.pdf>
to the communist International Brigades who fought against Francisco
Franco’s forces in the Spanish Civil War. Despite the fact that the U.S.
had backed the very same Kurdish units in their fight against ISIS, Baker’s
participation was consistently cited by the government as proof
<https://twitter.com/MonicaCaseyNews/status/1448003991561023490> that he
poses a terror threat.

At his sentencing hearing, U.S. District Judge Allen Winsor, a Trump
nominee whose appointment was vehemently opposed
<https://civilrights.org/resource/oppose-confirmation-allen-winsor-u-s-district-court-northern-district-florida/>
by a coalition of over 200 civil and human rights groups, said that Baker
had intended to commit acts of violence, “like he went to Rojava to do.”

“The government’s case relied heavily on the fact that Dan is anarchist,”
Thomson, the civil rights attorney, noted. “There is a long history in this
country of police, prosecutors, and courts targeting anarchists for trumped
up charges and excessive sentences. This legacy goes back to Haymarket
<https://theintercept.com/2021/05/07/deconstructed-may-day-labor-pro-act/>
and continues to today, with Dan’s case being the most recent example.”

*Baker described his* first months held at the Federal Correctional
Institution in Tallahassee as harrowing. “I was placed in a cell covered in
feces and rotated to other tainted cells every three weeks,” he wrote via
email. Another man held next to him in the Special Housing Unit — solitary
confinement — was severely mentally ill, traumatized, and autistic. “He was
soiling himself and throwing his waste all over the cells and out under the
door several times a day,” Baker told me, noting that the “crueler guards”
would consistently taunt and abuse the man. “I eventually contacted his
family with the help of a sympathetic guard,” Baker said.

The quotidian cruelties of prison life abounded. Baker had to plead for
weeks to get vegan meals; as a Hare Krishna, he does not eat meat as a
point of respect for human and nonhuman life and is lactose intolerant. “It
took nine months to get them to stop sending me dairy products,” he said.
He’s had equal trouble accessing prayer beads and says his legal mail was
opened by prison staff, which is illegal. He has filed a civil suit
<https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21085731-baker-v-strong-complaint>
against the prison and a number of named guards in relation to the alleged
violations. The Bureau of Prisons declined to comment on Baker’s lawsuit or
the conditions of his confinement.

“When you remove one person from that sort of support network, it creates a
great burden on the people who are left.”

Baker’s friends in Tallahassee are concerned for his emotional and
psychological well-being. Music teacher Desiree Gattis described herself as
playing “sisterly/motherly role” to Baker. She met him while he was
unhoused and helped him get back on his feet. Gattis, who has helped
organize Baker’s legal and financial support, is less interested in his
lionization as a political prisoner and would rather he be primarily
recognized as a vulnerable person, who has suffered serious trauma from
seven months in solitary confinement. She called the government’s treatment
of her friend “cruel and absurd.” “This is not a threatening person,” she
said.

Gattis said that prior to his imprisonment, Baker helped her “a great deal”
with her regular work with the city’s unhoused community. ”When you remove
one person from that sort of support network, it creates a great burden on
the people who are left,” she said. In a separate conversation, Champagne
echoed the same message: “For each person in jail, a community suffers.”

Baker worries that, because of his felony conviction, he “won’t be able to
find work or continue to rescue injured people” and that he will face
far-right violence after his release and possibly while in prison too. He
will be appealing his conviction, but the likely venue — the conservative
<https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/trump-pick-confirmed-boosting-11th-circuits-conservative-lean>
11th Circuit Court of Appeals — will not be a welcoming one. In the
meantime, he told me that he plans to read and learn more about liberation
movements and abolitionist histories.

At the end of our phone call on the day following his sentencing, he
hurriedly read off a quote from the philosopher Bertrand Russell, which he
had recently come across. “‘Three passions, simple but overwhelmingly
strong, have governed my life: the longing for love, the search for
knowledge, and unbearable pity for the suffering of mankind,’” he said.
“That’s how I feel.”


*Correction: Oct. 16, 2021, 3:05 p.m. ET **A previous version of this
article misspelled Brad Thomson’s last name. *
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/ppnews_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20211017/9dbb0efb/attachment.htm>


More information about the PPnews mailing list