[Pnews] Governor denies restoring voting rights to parolee Jalil Muntaqim
ppnews at freedomarchives.org
Wed Nov 25 19:45:49 EST 2020
denies restoring voting rights to parolee Jalil Muntaqim
David Andreatta - November 25, 2020
Jalil Abdul Muntaqim, a parolee living in Brighton facing felony charges
for attempting to register to vote, has been denied a pardon from the
governor restoring his right to cast a ballot that is granted to most
parolees, according to the Governor's Office and the state Department of
Corrections and Community Supervision.
Parolees are not allowed to vote in New York upon release from prison
without the pardon.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo has issued such pardons as a matter of course on a
monthly basis since 2018, when he signed an executive order directing the
corrections commissioner to submit to him each month a list of every felon
newly eligible for parole, with each name to be “given consideration for a
conditional pardon that will restore voting rights.”
Anyone on the list is eligible for a pardon as long as they are not flagged
by law enforcement for any specific concerns. Most parolees receive their
pardon, which does not expunge their record, within four to six weeks of
A spokesperson for the Governor’s Office said Muntaqim was denied a voting
pardon last week.
In a notable twist, however, the Department of Corrections listed Muntaqim
on its website as having received the pardon. The spokesperson called the
listing "a clerical error."
The error could be found as recently as Monday on the department’s “Parolee
Lookup” page, which provides information on parolees to the public,
including their date of birth, parole status, and whether their voting
rights have been restored.
On the page assigned to Muntaqim, the word “Yes” was shown next to a line
that indicates whether a voting pardon has been issued. The agency modified
that to “No” late Monday after CITY inquired about Muntaqim’s voting
Muntaqim, 69, was released from prison on parole on Oct. 7, after serving
nearly 50 years on a pair of first-degree murder convictions in the 1971
shooting deaths of two New York City police officers. He was convicted and
served under his given name, Anthony Bottom.
About two weeks after his release, the Monroe County District Attorney’s
Office charged Muntaqim
tampering with public records and offering a false instrument for filing,
both felonies, and a misdemeanor for filing a completed voter registration
form with the county Board of Elections.
Muntaqim filled out the form the day after his release, before being
notified whether he had received the governor’s pardon. He filled out the
form using his given name, which he never formally changed after assuming
his new name in prison decades ago.
The Board of Elections subsequently rejected his registration.
A conditional pardon restoring Muntaqim's voting rights would have put a
wrinkle into his prosecution, which has gotten the attention of national
organizations that advocate for expanded ballot access for formerly
Muntaqim has been arraigned in Brighton Town Court and is scheduled to
appear next on Dec. 14.
Should he be convicted on the felonies, he would likely be returned to
prison. One of the felonies carries a maximum penalty of seven years in
prison. The other carries a maximum of four years.
"This case is just another reminder of the extreme outcome for the
underlying act that is being called into question and the extreme level of
punitiveness that characterizes American criminal jurisprudence," said
Nicole Porter, the director of advocacy at the Sentencing Project, an
advocacy group for criminal justice reform.
"It is incredibly frustrating that prosecutors are willing to make an
example of this man and take away someone's liberty for something like
this," Porter said. "I don't know how these prosecutors sleep at night."
The United States has a long history of disenfranchising felons, even after
they’ve served their time, although a national movement to restore their
voting rights is gaining traction. This month, California and Florida
overwhelmingly approved measures to re-enfranchise voting rights to
"The point of parole is to encourage people to reintegrate themselves into
the community in a healthy way," said Sean Morales-Doyle, deputy director
of the Brennan Center's Voting Rights and Elections Program at New York
University. "We should all want people who are being released from prison
and returned to their communities to play a productive role in their
communities. That shouldn't be a controversial proposition."
District Attorney Sandra Doorley said in an interview that Muntaqim's case
was presented to her as an instance of potential voter fraud and that the
facts were straightforward.
Reached at home, Muntaqim declined to comment. His lawyer, a public
defender, also declined to comment.
His mother, Billie Bottom Brown, has called his filing of a voter
registration form “a mistake.”
said the form was within a packet of paperwork provided to her son to help
him assimilate back into society.
Friends of Muntaqim’s said the paperwork was provided by the county’s
Department of Human Services, which helps newly released prisoners
acclimate. Those packets include everything a former inmate might need —
information on Medicaid, food stamps, child care, becoming an organ donor,
and a voter registration form.
“I don’t think he was trying to game the system” by signing the form, said
James Schuler, 52, a youth advocate in Wayne County who has known Muntaqim
since they met as inmates at Auburn Correctional Facility in 2000 and
considers him a mentor.
“One thing he wanted to be more than anything was be a productive member of
society,” Schuler said. “They gave him paperwork to do that and he signed.”
*David Andreatta is CITY’s editor. He can be reached
at dandreatta at rochester-citynews.com <dandreatta at rochester-citynews.com>.*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the PPnews