[Pnews] Secret case keeps Gary Freeman from coming home - accused of membership in the BPP

Prisoner News ppnews at freedomarchives.org
Wed Oct 16 12:42:07 EDT 2013


Supporters are urged to attend the court hearing reviewing the decision 
to deny Mr. Freeman reunification with his family. It takes place on 
Thursday, October 17 at 9:30 am at the Federal Court in Toronto, 180 
Queen Street West (just west of University Avenue).
http://rabble.ca/columnists/2013/09/secret-case-keeps-freeman-coming-home


  Secret case keeps Freeman from coming home

By Matthew Behrens
September 24, 2013

Anytime a government wants to hide its errors and illegality, it pulls 
down the shades of national security confidentiality and refuses to 
disclose any information. Time and again, the Canadian government's own 
cries for secrecy have been found to be without substance. Federal court 
decisions, judicial inquiries into complicity in torture, and various 
freedom of access to information requests have revealed the extent to 
which secrecy becomes the convenient way out from having to explain and 
be held accountable for lousy policy, inhumane actions and sheer 
incompetence.

Yet the secrecy train rolls on, whether through security certificates (a 
challenge to which will be heard at the Supreme Court of Canada on 
October 10) or in regular immigration proceedings. In the long-running 
case of Gary Freeman, the federal government has now invoked national 
security secrecy on what appears to be a foundation so slim that the 
slightest breeze will blow it away. Based on unsubstantiated newspaper 
articles and a secret file neither he nor his lawyer is allowed to see, 
the Canadian government alleges Freeman should not be allowed to live 
with his Mississauga family based on "reasonable grounds to believe" 
that it's possible that he may have been, could be, or will be a member 
of an organization that may have in the past, could at present, or may 
in future engage in terrorism.

The organization in question, which Freeman has repeatedly denied 
belonging to, is the now defunct U.S. Black Panther Party (BPP), a 
self-defence organization that worked towards empowerment of the 
African-American community and which was subject to vicious and violent 
attacks by U.S. government forces under the COINTELPRO program of 
disruption, deception and, in many cases, assassination. The Black 
Panther Party is not listed anywhere in the world as a terrorist entity, 
either by the U.S., Canada or the United Nations, and former 
high-profile members and associates of the group continue to travel 
freely to Canada for speaking engagements. Former members of the BPP can 
be found in the U.S. Congress and in tenured university positions.

Nonetheless, Canada is now using this allegation to prevent Freeman from 
reuniting with his family. Freeman is a 64-year-old married father of 
four, a mild-mannered library worker, poet and photographer who narrowly 
avoided becoming a statistic in the deadly summer of 1969, when so many 
young African-American men were being gunned down by police that Chicago 
residents formed a Committee to End the Murder of Black People.

*Life changed forever*

One March 1969 morning changed Freeman's life forever, a classic example 
of police racial profiling as standard operating procedure, and the 
targeted harassment of black men that continues to warp communities 
across North America. Freeman, then 19, was stopped by a white 
21-year-old officer who, angered that Freeman refused to be frisked 
because he had been stopped without probable cause, proceeded to grab 
Freeman, throw him onto the police car, and scream, "I'm gonna blow your 
head off, nigger."

As Freeman recalled in an interview last year with the U.S.-based 
/Truthout/, "I was waiting to be killed. I turned my head around and 
closed my eyes. And then I heard a voice. We were in front of a school. 
Some of the black kids were hanging out at the window asking, 'Hey 
brother, what's wrong, what's happening?' That paused him [Officer Knox] 
for just a second. Things were very fast, but in slow motion. So, I drew 
my own, I swung around and he started firing and I started firing and I 
happened to be more accurate. My purpose was to disarm him."

The officer in question was wounded in the arm, and Freeman was 
arrested. Fearing he would not receive a fair trial and that his life 
was in danger -- especially following a number of threats and an 
incident where someone shot at him while he was out on bail -- he 
eventually came to Canada, where he began a new life and for 30 years 
lived a normal, peaceable life as a well-loved community member.

According to /The Boston Review/, "In the late 1960s, Chicago police led 
the nation in the slaying of private citizens, who were euphemistically 
characterized as "fleeing felons" to mask the routine use of excessive 
force by police against racial minorities. The police also exploited 
seemingly benign offence categories, such as disorderly conduct, 
vagrancy, and loitering to bully minority youths and adults who had the 
audacity to challenge police authority." The revelations of police 
torture over the past four decades in Chicago, among other U.S. cities, 
certainly provide additional context for why Freeman would head north. 
Indeed, Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel issued a public apology two weeks ago 
for what he called a "dark chapter" in his city's history that saw 
hundreds of African-American detainees subjected to torture to elicit 
false confessions.

Court documents proved that Mr. Freeman's presence and location in 
Canada was known to authorities since 1974, yet U.S. authorities waited 
30 years to seek his return. The officer who was wounded in 1969 had 
remained obsessed with Freeman (born Joseph Pannell), and in 2004, as a 
result of the officer's relentless lobbying of the Chicago cold case 
squad, Mr. Freeman was arrested in an armed takedown outside of his 
downtown Toronto workplace. After three years and seven months of 
pre-extradition custody in Canada, Freeman voluntarily returned to 
Chicago in February 2008, where he accepted a prosecution proffered plea 
bargain agreement of a guilty plea to a single count of aggravated 
battery for a sentence of 30 days in the Cook County Jail, two years of 
probation, and a major contribution to a Chicago police charity. It was 
a plea that was satisfactory to the officer, who told /The National 
Post/, "If he [Freeman] were to have served 15 years in prison he'd be 
75 when he got out: he wouldn't survive that. I couldn't tolerate that. 
I'm not out for blood."

*An **inhumane approach*

While the officer obsessed with Freeman said he was not out for blood, 
the Canadian government's approach has been quite different. Freeman was 
released from custody in March 2008 and began the process of applying to 
return to Canada while on probation, during which his family was struck 
by the death of his father-in-law in Montreal on Oct. 31, 2009. Freeman 
sought and received permission from U.S. authorities to attend the 
funeral but the Canadian government refused him entry for reasons of 
"serious criminality." At this time, Freeman was also told he was 
inadmissible on national security grounds as well.

Interestingly, immigration documents indicate that Canadian government 
officials knew that the allegations about BPP membership were flimsy. As 
Mr. Freeman's legal submissions indicate, Canadian consular officials on 
November 4, 2009 not only recognized strong humanitarian and 
compassionate grounds for allowing Mr. Freeman to be with his family in 
Canada, they also acknowledged there was insufficient evidence to make 
the link with the BPP. Yet an about-face occurred the following day 
when, without explaining why, Mr. Freeman was deemed inadmissible to 
Canada based on an unexplained belief that he was connected to the BPP.

Court documents verify Freeman's assertion that he was not a BPP member, 
and former Conservative Minister of Justice Vic Toews wrote in 2006 that 
the U.S. would have to prove the BPP allegation, conceding that the 
government of Canada had no proof. The issue was not brought up during 
the Chicago hearing that sentenced Freeman to 30 days in Cook County 
Jail, and former Party members, including an historian of the party, 
have repeatedly maintained over the past decade that Freeman was never a 
member. (Freeman, like many others, disputes the Canadian government 
position that the BPP was a terrorist organization. He has said he was 
sympathetic to the party's social programs, such as free breakfast and 
education for ghetto youth, but so were millions of Americans who were 
not members either. Canadians such as actor and activist Shirley 
Douglas, who founded Friends of the Black Panthers, and American actor 
Jane Fonda, a vocal supporter of the Black Panthers who frequently 
visits Canada, do not appear to face the same conundrum as Mr. Freeman.)

Before Superior Court of Ontario Justice Ian Nordheimer in 2004, 
Canadian government prosecutors essentially conceded that Freeman was 
NOT a threat to society. Freeman holds a U.S. passport and his name does 
not appear on the no-fly list, this in a country that has no qualms 
about labelling someone a terrorist or national security threat.

*Predetermined decision to keep Freeman out*

It has been five years since Mr. Freeman began his efforts to return 
home to his family in Mississauga, and it appears that at every step of 
the way, a predetermined decision to keep him out of Canada by any means 
necessary has been the government's response. He has faced everything 
from extensive delays to cruel decisions that have refused even 
short-term permits to attend his father-in-law's funeral or to celebrate 
the birth of his Canadian grandchildren. Elsewhere in his case file, 
immigration authorities acknowledge that his "sole grounds for 
inadmissibility are his conviction" but that "there are considerable 
humanitarian and compassionate considerations in this case." If the 
conviction were the only ground keeping him out of Canada, Freeman would 
still be allowed to take his case to the Immigration Appeal Division. 
However, that avenue suddenly becomes barred to him because of the 
national security finding.

Freeman's case received national attention in the House of Commons when 
convicted criminal Conrad Black was allowed to return to Canada, a 
decision made while the former press baron was still behind bars. While 
Freeman did not begrudge Black's return to his family, he did wonder if 
there were perhaps a double standard at play. At that time, Freeman was 
publicly slandered by Immigration Minister Jason Kenney, who falsely 
called him a "cop killer."

A week after the Supreme Court of Canada hears the challenge to secret 
trials, Mr. Freeman's lawyer, Barb Jackman, will be in Federal Court in 
Ottawa arguing that the government of Canada has acted in bad faith and 
made a "perverse and unreasonable decision" in denying Mr. Freeman a 
temporary resident permit that would allow him to live with his family 
in Mississauga while awaiting the outcome of his wife's sponsorship of 
him. Part of the case being reviewed by the Court will be heard in 
secret, absent Mr. Freeman, his lawyer, the press and the public.

Jackman notes in her written argument that Mr. Freeman has not been 
treated fairly, as Canadian officials "had made up their minds that Mr. 
Freeman was a terrorist, and that he should not be permitted to return 
to Canada. Rather than just use the admitted ground of inadmissibility 
[i.e., Mr. Freeman's conviction] they searched for evidence to ensure 
that he was refused admission on a far more serious ground and when they 
realized they did not have evidence to that effect, they refused his 
landing application on the security ground anyways. This is bad faith. 
Officials failed to keep an open mind and acted perversely and 
arbitrarily against Mr. Freeman."

When Freeman's case comes before the Federal Court on October 17, it is 
hoped that the judge will similarly find the Canadian government's 
position is sloppy, biased and prejudicial against Mr. Freeman, and take 
the necessary steps to reunite his long-suffering family.

/Matthew Behrens is a freelance writer and social justice advocate who 
co-ordinates the Homes not Bombs non-violent direct action network. He 
has worked closely with the targets of Canadian and U.S. 'national 
security' profiling for many years./


-- 
Freedom Archives 522 Valencia Street San Francisco, CA 94110 415 
863.9977 www.freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/ppnews_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20131016/781a2cf3/attachment.html>


More information about the PPnews mailing list