[Ppnews] Palestinian children 'abused' in Israeli jail
Political Prisoner News
ppnews at freedomarchives.org
Tue Aug 14 15:47:47 EDT 2012
*Palestinian children 'abused' in Israeli jail *
Recent studies allege a system of abuse targeting children detained by
Israel's military court system.
Dalia Hatuqa <http://www.aljazeera.com/profile/dalia-hatuqa.html> Last
Modified: 14 Aug 2012 16:38
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2012/08/20128910267627456.html
*
Ramallah, occupied Palestinian territories -* A dirty mattress fills up
a space barely two metres long and one metre wide. A suffocating stench
emanating from the toilet hovers over the windowless room, and a light
turned on 24/7 means sleep is a distant dream. This is the infamous Cell
36 in Al Jalameh Prison in Israel. It's one of the cells that many
Palestinian children have either heard of or, worse, been inside when
placed in solitary confinement.
The children imprisoned here are most often taken from their homes
between midnight and 5am. Most don't even see it coming. In one case, in
Beit Ummar near Bethlehem, Israeli soldiers detained a Palestinian boy
after reportedly taking some of the house's doors off their hinges. Most
of the children detained live close to "friction points", areas close to
Israeli settlements, roads used by settlers or near the separation wall.
And their offence is almost always throwing stones at settlers or troops.
These vivid details emerged recently in a report based on the
testimonies of more than 300 Palestinian children, which were collected
over four years. The study by Defence for Children International,
/Bound, Blindfolded and Convicted: Children Held in Military Detention/
<http://www.dci-palestine.org/sites/default/files/report_0.pdf>
highlights a pattern of abuse towards children detained under the
Israeli military court system. In the past 11 years, DCI estimates that
around 7,500 children, some as young as 12, have been detained,
interrogated and imprisoned within this system. This is about 500-700
children per year, or nearly two children every day.
Mohammad S, from the northern West Bank town of Tulkarem, was 16 when he
was arrested, according to the report. It was 2:30am when Israeli
soldiers dragged him out of bed. He was blindfolded and verbally abused
and taken to an unknown destination, where he says he was forced to lay
down in the cold for an hour. He was later taken to an interrogation
centre near Nablus at around 11am, and only then was he allowed to drink
some water and use the bathroom, after he underwent a strip search. Tied
and blindfolded still, he was then taken to Al Jalameh, near Haifa in
Israel. There he was taken to Cell 36, where he was forced to spend his
first night sleeping on the floor because there was no mattress or blanket.
Mohammad says he spent 17 days in solitary confinement in Cell 36 and
Cell 37, interrupted only by interrogations. Mohammad was reportedly
interrogated for two to three hours every day, while sitting on a low
seat with his hands tied to the chair.
*The most crucial hours*
"The first 48 hours after a child is taken are the most important
because that's when the most abuse happens," DCI's lawyer Gerard Horton
said. Children taken from their homes in the night are blindfolded and
bound and made to lie face down or up on the floors of military
vehicles, according to the centre's report.
Very rarely are parents told where their child is being taken, and,
unlike Israeli children from within either Israel or the settlements in
the occupied West Bank, Palestinian minors are reportedly not allowed to
have a parent present before or during initial interrogation, and
generally do not see a lawyer until after their interrogation is over.
Specifically, Israeli children have access to a lawyer within 48 hours
and those under the age of 14 cannot be imprisoned. Palestinian
children, however, can be jailed even if they are as young as 12 and,
like adults, can be held in jail without having formal charges against
them for up to 188 days.
"The key issue is one of equality. If two children, a Palestinian and an
Israeli, are caught throwing stones at each other, then one will be
processed in a juvenile justice system and one in a military court,"
Horton said.
"They have completely different rights. It's hard to justify this after
45 years of occupation. It's not a question of whether offences are
committed. What we are saying is children should not be treated
completely differently."
As soon as children are taken from their homes, and placed inside an
Israeli military vehicle, they are often kicked or slapped, according to
testimonies obtained by DCI. Some said they were laughed at and others
said they heard cameras clicking.
*Nightmares*
Because children are often taken late at night, they are driven to the
nearest settlement to wait until Israeli police interrogators open up
shop in the morning. This means children are sometimes placed out in the
cold or rain for many hours. Requests for water or using the bathroom
are most often denied, and children are taken straight to interrogation
after a night of little sleep.
That's what Ahmad F said happened to him. A 15-year-old from 'Iraq Burin
village, just outside Nablus, he was arrested in July 2011. He was taken
to the nearby Huwwara interrogation centre, where he was left outside
from 5am until 3pm. At one point, soldiers brought a dog. "They brought
the dog's food and put it on my head," Ahmad told DCI. "Then they put
another piece of bread on my trousers near my genitals, so I tried to
move away but [the dog] started barking. I was terrified."
During interrogation, many children reported being facing with slurs and
threatened with physical violence. In a small number of cases,
interrogators have reportedly threatened minors with rape.
In 29 per cent of cases studied by DCI, Arabic-speaking children were
either shown or given documentation written in Hebrew to sign. An
Israeli spokesperson denied this to Al Jazeera, saying "the norm is that
interrogations in Arabic should be either recorded or written in
Arabic". Israeli officials did say, however, they had identified 13
cases from the report where children had signed a confession written in
Hebrew. Yet the spokesperson maintained that video recordings of those
interrogations had been available, should the lawyers acting for the
children doubt the accuracy of the written Hebrew statements.
After children sign a "confession", they are brought before an Israeli
military court. Since 2009, an Israeli spokesperson said, children have
faced juvenile military courts. Most often, that's the first time the
minor will see their lawyer. The confession is generally the primary
evidence against the child, say DCI officials. Other evidence will often
consist of a statement by an interrogator, and sometimes a soldier.
Because so few are granted bail, children face a legal dilemma: they can
ask the lawyer to challenge the system - and by doing so potentially
wait, locked up, for four to six months - or plead guilty and get a two
or three month prison sentence for a "first offence".
*Pleading guilty*
"So, very rarely does anyone challenge the system," said DCI's Horton,
as the quickest way to be released is to plead guilty. This goes some
way to explain why, according to the military courts, the conviction
rate for adults and children in 2010 was 99.74 per cent
<http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/nearly-100-of-all-military-court-cases-in-west-bank-end-in-conviction-haaretz-learns-1.398369>.
According to DCI, some fifty to sixty per cent of the time, children are
taken to prisons inside Israel, making it difficult for parents to
visit. "Some parents are denied permits on unspecified 'security
grounds'. For the others, the bureaucracy can take up to two months to
get a permit, which means if their children are sentenced to less time,
they will not receive a visit," Horton said. "However, some permits are
processed in less than two months, and those children sentenced to more
time will also generally receive visits."
The allegations of what seems to be a deliberate system of abuse appear
to be corroborated by another report
<http://www.childreninmilitarycustody.org/>published by a group of
British jurists. The UK government-backed delegation of nine lawyers,
with human rights, crime and child welfare backgrounds, concluded that
Israel's soldiers regularly breach
<http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/crc.htm>the UN Convention on the
Rights of the Child <http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/crc.htm> (UNCRC)
and the Fourth Geneva Convention <http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/full/380>,
of which Israel is a signatory.
Their report, /Children in Military Custody/
<http://www.childreninmilitarycustody.org/>, attributed much of Israel's
reluctance to treat Palestinian children in accordance with
international norms to "a belief, which was advanced to us by a military
prosecutor, that every Palestinian child is a 'potential terrorist'".
The lawyers said this seemed to be "the starting point of a spiral of
injustice, and one which only Israel, as the Occupying Power in the West
Bank, can reverse".
Israel's practice of holding children "for substantial periods in
solitary confinement would, if it occurred, be capable of amounting to
torture", the report concluded. Of all the children represented by DCI,
12 per cent reported being held in solitary confinement for an average
of 11 days.
*Denial*
The Israel Security Agency (ISA), also known as Shin Bet, denied that
children were mistreated under the military court system, calling claims
to the contrary "utterly baseless". The ISA also said that claims
regarding the prevention of legal counsel were also completely groundless.
"No one questioned, including minors being questioned, is kept alone in
a cell as a punitive measure or in order to obtain a confession," said
the ISA in a statement when the /Guardian/ first released a special
report
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jun/26/israel-palestinian-children-injustice>about
the status of child detainees in Israel.
The ISA also said that it provides minors special protection because of
their age and adheres to "international treaties of which the State of
Israel is a signatory, and according to Israeli law, including the right
to legal counsel and visits by the Red Cross".
Speaking to Al Jazeera, an Israeli spokesperson accused the DCI report
of bias, and refuted the group's finding that the majority of children
prosecuted were charged with throwing stones: "This was the basis for
only 40 per cent of the indictments filed against minors in the West
Bank ... the young age of offenders is not relevant to the gravity of
the act: it has been proven beyond doubt that a stone thrown by a
15-year-old child can be no less fatal than a stone thrown by an adult."
Stone-throwing can prove deadly, stressed the spokesperson, citing a
case from September 2011, when an Israeli settler and his one-year-old
son were killed after their car overturned as a result of stones hurled
at them. "Two Palestinians from Halhul confessed to throwing the stone
which caused the deaths of Asher and Yonatan. The stone was hurled from
a driving car," the spokesperson said. The official said that children
were also involved in grenade throwing, the use of explosives, shooting
and assault
The spokesperson also denied that the ISA used isolation as an
interrogation technique or as punishment to exert confessions out of
minors. "There are certain cases in which an interrogee will be held
alone for a few days at the most, in order to prevent information in
his/her possession from leaking to other terrorist activists in the same
detention facility, which could compromise the interrogation of the
suspect. Note that even in these cases, the interrogee is not held in
absolute confinement, but is entitled to meet with Red Cross
representatives, medical staff etc."
Furthermore, the spokesperson rejected the idea that pleading guilty was
the quickest way out of the system for a defendant, deeming the
accusation "misleading, distorted, and premised upon incorrect information".
"Should a minor defendant choose to plead 'not guilty' and challenge the
prosecutorial evidence by proceeding to a full trial and mounting a
good-faith defence, military courts will, in the vast majority of the
cases, conduct the hearings very efficiently, sometimes even in a few
weeks."
Yet, since the DCI and UK reports came out, "there's no substantive
change on the ground", Horton said. "The response by the military
authorities has been to start talking about making some changes and
amending the military orders. But when you look at the details, the
changes are of little substance."
"In reality, what we are seeing is a /de facto/ annexation of most of
the West Bank; it's not a temporary military occupation," he concluded.
"The military courts are an integral part of this process used to
control the population."
/Follow Dalia Hatuqa on Twitter: @DaliaHatuqa
<https://twitter.com/DaliaHatuqa>/
--
Freedom Archives 522 Valencia Street San Francisco, CA 94110 415
863.9977 www.freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/ppnews_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20120814/6fb4b20c/attachment.htm>
More information about the PPnews
mailing list