[Ppnews] Buried Alive on San Quentin's Death
Political Prisoner News
ppnews at freedomarchives.org
Tue Sep 4 11:37:13 EDT 2007
http://www.counterpunch.org/kerr09042007.html
September 4, 2007
The Continuing Saga of Steve Champion and Anthony Ross in the Wake of
Tookie Williams' Execution
Buried Alive on San Quentin's Death
By TOM KERR
When death row inmates are subjected to degrading and grossly unjust
treatment, the rest of us ought to pay close attention, whether we
subscribe to Mathew:40 or not: "Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one
of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me." Prisons
officials are public officials, acting on our behalf, presumably for
our benefit. If through our inattention or neglect we license prison
officials to mistreat prisoners-some of the most helpless, abject
souls among us-we license public officials to treat the public at
large with contempt.
In its broad outline, Steve and Anthony's story, which I first began
to tell in January 2006 (see "Why are They Rounding Up Tookie
Williams' Friends?"), is straightforward. A few days prior to
William's execution on December 13, 2005, they along with several
other inmates were rounded up and detained in the Adjustment Center,
San Quentin death row's "hole," on charges they had conspired to
retaliate against prison officials for their friend's execution. For
the past twenty months, they have been held there in stark cells on
property control and with no phone privileges. From day one, both men
have vehemently denied involvement in any kind of conspiracy. Indeed,
judging by their many and varied writings, both have long-since
transcended their violent gang pasts, explicitly repudiating, as did
their friend Tookie Williams, the sorts of values, beliefs, and
behaviors that fuel gangs and destroy communities. Both men, however,
are award-winning prison writers and outspoken critics of San Quentin
and the prison industrial complex in general. And therein lies the rub.
As I reprise their never-ending story, over a year and a half in now,
the question of credibility looms large. Why should I, much less
anyone else, believe two condemned men, two people who have nothing
to lose by lying, and, perhaps, something to gain in the form of
winning the sympathies of supporters and drawing the attention of
prison critics.
But the same kind of logic can be used to establish the credibility
of our informants. Unlike many of us living "free," they have nothing
to lose-jobs or social standing-by telling the bald truth. In a
recent letter to me, Anthony Ross notes: "We have nothing to hide,
which is more than I can say about them."
As with any institution, the more corrupt a prison, the greater its
stake in polishing its image, preserving it legitimacy, and
squelching stories that subvert the official one it tells the public
about itself. And near-absolute power, of the kind prison officials
hold over death row inmates, can too easily, through all manner of
manipulation, cripple the people who would tell subversive stories.
If you think corporate whistler blowers take risks, imagine blowing
the whistle from inside a death row prison cell.
In becoming well-read, self-reflective thinkers and accomplished
writers while in the hell of death row, these two men, like Tookie
Williams himself, have symbolically defeated the system designed to
dehumanize and, ultimately, to destroy them. Through their essays,
stories, and poems, they have vehemently insisted on their humanity
and steadfastly maintained their dignity. Such self-redemptive effort
undermines the familiar and necessary assumption that men sentenced
to death have, by their own conduct, forfeited their humanity-have
become, as is often suggested, "animals." And we can kill animals, so
the magical thinking goes, without becoming animals ourselves. If we
can kill them with impunity, all the more reason we can mistreat them
in the meantime. Who will care? Who will defend them? People for the
Ethical Treatment of Animals?
The human voices of Ross and Champion put the whole inhumane,
barbaric American killing apparatus on trial, and such a reversal cannot stand.
The darkly ironic truth revealed by Steve and Anthony's interminable
ordeal is that San Quentin officials themselves are the ones
conspiring to retaliate-against the late Tookie Williams and his
friends! For what? For liberating themselves and for expressing their
humanity in writing-while still in confinement on America's morally
bankrupt death row.
Of course, the ins and outs of the tale are complicated, involving
false charges, time-devouring grievance procedures, published
articles, various letters and documents, and lots of bone crushing
time in the hole for Anthony and Steve. The opaque complexity of
disciplinary procedures and appeals in prison is itself very often
strategic, yet another way to punish inmates and confound
transparency and accountability. Who on the outside can possibly stay
abreast of internal prison proceedings? Who can possibly bear witness?
On occasion, however, moments of clarity present themselves, and
Anthony Ross has seized upon one of these as the occasion for the
following article, which I quote below in its entirety. I received
this article and a copy of the document Ross refers to (Form #
CDC-128-B (4-74)) on August 28, 2007. Although I cannot reproduce the
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR)
document here, I can attest to its prima facie authenticity and
official form and format.
Writing Under Fire: Resisting the Regime
by Anthony Ross
"Neither hegemony nor power can determine truth."
-Prof. Molefi Kete Asante
In May 2007, my brother Steve Champion and I co-authored an articled
entitled "The Paradigm of Abuse: San Quentin's Adjustment Center
Revisited," which was published in The San Francisco Bay View
newspaper. In this article, we mention George Jackson to illustrate
the stark similarities between the hostile environment of the
Adjustment Center (AC) in 1971 and the hostile environment of the AC
in 2007. This comparison was based on factual events and personal
experience and is demonstrative of both eras. Now we have received a
CDCR 128 Report that targets us for investigation into gang activity.
According to the report, the basis for this is our use of the word
"comrade" in relation to George Jackson. According to Agent T. De La
Rosa, this constitutes gang sympathy or association, and anyone who
uses the term "comrade" (a name descriptive of George Jackson) must
be, ipso facto, a gang member.
This notion of a priori culpability, whereby one's very philosophy,
ideas, or character renders them criminal, suggests an insidious and
racist mindset within the CDCR. Yet such flights of myopic thinking
are common features of a system wherein humanity and justice have
been supplanted by degrading abuse and repressive prison policies
[see the Bay View article mentioned above].
I am reminded of the weeks and days leading up to the execution of
our brother Stanley Tookie Williams. San Quentin Spokesman Vernell
Crittenden went on a virulent smear campaign to paint Tookie as an
active gang member, offering no proof and despite the fact that
Tookie had been cleared of any gang association by the former Warden,
Jennie S. Woodford. Then, of course, in his statement justifying his
denial of clemency, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger argued that since
Tookie had mentioned Malcolm X, Assata Shukur, George Jackson, and
Geronimo Pratt in his book on prison life, Life in Prison, he could
not have redeemed himself.
This pattern of criminalizing and vilifying black leaders and
personages is an old one. And some San Quentin officials are taking
this practice a step farther by making the mere mention of a name a
gang offense. This bizarre leap of flawed logic provides them with an
erroneous catalyst for action against us. It sets in motion a
malicious process that can disrupt our mail, personal property,
visits, and trust account-indefinitely!
There is a real and present danger here. This intentional misreading
of language makes it possible to write up any prisoner who elects to
use certain appellations in his writings, such as comrade, chairman,
minister, brother, homeboy, etc.
The retaliatory targeting of prison writers has a clear objective: to
intimidate and discourage those voices willing to expose violations
of basic human rights and degrading conditions in prison. If
successful, this strategy becomes an unwritten policy for censorship
and will eventually leave only one version, one interpretation, of
life in the CDCR-that of the CDCR!
It is worth noting that our Bay View article consisted of over 1,300
words, yet only three-"comrade George Jackson"-were plucked from
their context and reinterpreted as something criminal or, worse,
seditious. Agent T. De La Rosa's semantic alchemy defies the criteria
for gang activity as defined in the CDCR rules and regulations, as
well as the standard set forth in the 1994 case Castillo v. Alameida,
Jr. [No. 94-2974], which establish specific guidelines for gang
identification. The use of the word "comrade" is not included in
either of these sources.
It is a relatively easy matter to persecute us. There is no real
redress here. The inmate appeal process is controlled by the very
people who violate policy and abuse prisoners. Now, the intent is to
silence truth.
P.S. During a unit search on July 11, 2007, all of my writing paper
was confiscated and all of Steve Champion's reference books were
taken. We were never given a reason for this. We believe it was a
blatant attempt to disrupt the writing projects we are currently
working on. Since December 2005, we have been isolated in the
Adjustment Center on the bogus allegation of conspiracy to assault
staff in the wake of Stanley Tookie Williams' execution. We are in an
on-going legal battle to fight this false charge and regain our
dignity and the very modest "privileges" afforded to death row
prisoners. To these ends, we are seeking legal assistance and/or
monetary donations [see contact information at the end of this article].
When we consider how hard it is to confront the deceptions and lies
of this country's leaders, including Bush, Cheney, Libby, Gonzales
and others, we can only imagine the daunting challenge faced by death
row prisoners confronting deceptions and lies perpetrated by their
keepers. There are no meaningful checks and balances. And with the
exception of some mainstream, highly sensationalized and largely
pro-prison, media depictions of life inside our prison industrial
complex, the system, as a whole and in its parts, remains a closed
book-a black hole in a putatively open society.
As their editor and long-time correspondent, I am convinced that
Steve Champion and Anthony Ross, with no help from San Quentin, have
in their twenty-five years on death row made themselves over. They
have evolved from young, admittedly violent gang members into mature,
thoughtful men who have reflected long and hard on their past lives
and on their present circumstances as black men on death row in
America. Although they might, like most of us, defend themselves if
attacked, both have become strong advocates of non-violent remedies
to personal and political problems. They have become writers who can
tell the stories of their transformation and defend themselves
against degrading treatment and excessively punitive prison policies,
and for this they have been buried alive on death row.
You can write either man to express your concern or offer support at
these addresses:
Anthony Ross, C-58000, San Quentin State Prison, San Quentin, CA 94964
Steve Champion, C-58001, San Quentin State Prison, San Quentin, CA 94964
Tom Kerr is Associate Professor of Writing and Rhetoric and Ithaca
College. You can email him at <mailto:tkerr at ithaca.edu>tkerr at ithaca.edu.
Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
415 863-9977
www.Freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/ppnews_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20070904/0866b416/attachment.htm>
More information about the PPnews
mailing list