[Ppnews] Life in Solitary Confinement: 12,775 Days Alone
Political Prisoner News
ppnews at freedomarchives.org
Tue Apr 17 08:40:20 EDT 2007
Life in Solitary Confinement: 12,775 Days Alone
By Brooke Shelby Biggs, AlterNet
Posted on April 17, 2007, Printed on April 17, 2007
http://www.alternet.org/story/50663/
Around midday today, Central Time, two men in
Angola Prison in Louisiana will quietly mark the
moment, 35 years ago exactly, when the bars of
solitary confinement cells closed behind them.
They will likely spend the moment in their 6 by 9
concrete cells reading, or writing letters to
their hundreds of supporters around the world.
And most of America and the rest of the world
will still have never heard of them, or that in
the United States of America, it is still
possible to spend a life sentence in solitary
confinement without interruption and without any
real means of appeal. Americans shamefully
imagine such things happen offshore in places
like Guantanamo, or in totalitarian countries
half a world away. Not here, though. Certainly not here.
Herman Wallace and Albert Woodfox are those men,
who along with Robert King, are known as the
Angola Three. (King established his innocence and
was released in 2001 after almost 30 years in
solitary.) Collectively, the three of them have
spent 100 years in solitary confinement. Wallace
asked this week, "Where is the justice?"
It was also on this day in 1972, that Brent
Miller, a young, white, newlywed prison guard,
was discovered in a pool of his own blood,
stabbed 32 times. Brent Miller was a popular,
athletic, handsome local boy who dreamed of
leaving Angola with his young wife as soon as he
could get a job in the nearby paper mill or up in
Oklahoma. He never got a chance.
And based on long-lost evidence uncovered by a
new team of attorneys and investigators over the
past year and a half, it is clear Miller hasn't
received justice, either. Woodfox and Wallace
were placed in solitary and under suspicion of
the murder the day it happened, and were later
convicted of Miller's murder following trials
highlighted by key testimony by inmate witnesses
who were promised items such as cigarettes and
the warden's recommendation of a pardon for their
testimony. One of the state's inmate eyewitness
was a legally blind certified sociopath. Another
inmate repeatedly confessed to the murder to his
fellow inmates and assured them that the prison
administration knew he was guilty, but wanted to
make examples of Woodfox and Wallace, known activists and Black Panthers.
But this anniversary, unlike the 34 preceding it,
has a tinge of hope to it. Wallace and Woodfox,
convicted separately of Miller's murder by
all-white juries, have finally begun to attract some measurable attention.
Two very important legal cases are wending their
way through the courts on this anniversary. The
criminal case addresses the now publicly
documented payoffs of the state's key witness in
the murder trials. The other tackles a legal
issue that could reverberate across the country
-- is indefinite solitary confinement a violation
of the constitutional guarantee against cruel and unusual punishment?
By what few and murky laws exist, prisoners
assigned to solitary should receive access to due
process by which they can appeal their placement
in solitary. For the Angola Three, the biweekly
"hearings," during which they may use their clean
records of good behavior to argue for their
release back into the general population, long
ago devolved into farce. Wallace reports that for
decades now, he has been led into the room for
his hearings, has not not permitted to present
his arguments, and has been simply handed a piece
of paper, already filled out, stating that the
prison administration has denied his appeal and
that he will stay in solitary because of the
"nature of the original offense." The appeals
boards do not pretend anymore that there is
anything meaningful in the charade. The same
fiction plays out for Woodfox and did for King
during his years on the solitary block.
At least once, according to Wallace, current
warden Burl Cain offered to release Woodfox and
Wallace back into the general population if they
renounced their political views and accepted
Jesus Christ as their savior. (The megalomaniacal
Cain is to media attention what a lobotomized
moth is to an incandescent bulb; he wrote a book
and has done hundreds of interviews about his
"reformist" approach to penology, which involves
converting prisoners to Christianity and holding
the hands of those being executed so that his
face would be the last they'd see before Christ's.)
According to Sam Spital, one of the attorneys
from Hollland & Knight, which represents the
Angola Three in the civil suit, the lawsuit also
challenges that there is "no legitimate
penological reason for keeping our clients in
CCR, and (2) there is persuasive evidence that,
in light of the duration of their confinement and
their advancing age, our clients are at risk of
and/or have already suffered serious physical and
psychological harm -- it is cruel and unusual
punishment to keep our clients in CCR, which
violates the Eighth Amendment." Should the suit
go to trial as expected within the next few
months and should a verdict be rendered in the
three men's favor, the face of (and regulations
surrounding) solitary confinement in America
could change drastically for good. The case could
serve as a precedent, forcing accountability by
prison administrators to reserve solitary as a
last-ditch and temporary measure with sharply
defined restrictions. In an age of Supermax
prisons where huge populations of prisoners
spends months and years in solitary, the ramifications could be enormous.
For the Angola Three, it could mean monetary
damages, and release from solitary into the general population at Angola.
George Kendall, lead attorney on the case says,
"We are moving to trial and we are quite hopeful to win."
Among the evidence are reports made by leading
psychologists noting the terrible toll of
solitary over long periods. King has spent the
six years since his release campaigning for the
release of his friends, and helping expose the
abuses inside Angola Prison. Of his 29 years he
said, "Being in solitary was terrible. It was a
nightmare. My soul still cries from all that I
witnessed and endured. It does more than cry --
it mourns, continuously. I saw men so desperate
that they ripped prison doors apart, starved and
mutilated themselves. It takes every scrap of
humanity to stay focused and sane in this
environment. The pain and suffering are
everywhere, constantly with you. But, it's was
also so much more than that. I had dreams and
they were beautiful dreams. I used to look
forward to the nights when I could sleep and
dream. There's no describing the day-to-day
assault on your body and your mind and the
feelings of hopelessness and despair. By any
logical and apparent reasons, I should be
anything but what I am today, but sometimes the
spirit is stronger than the circumstances." King
now runs a small candy business making pralines,
which he calls "Freelines," from a recipe he had
used to make the candy in a tin can in his solitary cell.
In 2003, when the ACLU was handling the civil
case, a Louisiana magistrate was shocked by the
filings she read: "The present matter, of course,
involves confinements of 28 to nearly 33 years,
durations so far beyond the pale that this court
has not found anything even remotely comparable
in the annals of American jurisprudence."
Late last year, the criminal case for Herman
Wallace took a great step forward when evidence
was presented at a hearing held inside Angola's
prison walls, proving that a prison snitch who
served as the state's main witness was paid for
his testimony against Wallace with a carton of
cigarettes a week for life, living quarters in a
house on a hill with his own room and a TV, no
work duty, and privileges unheard of by other
inmates. It was further shown that the
administration and many of the guards lobbied on
behalf of the inmate for a pardon, which he eventually got.
The commissioner who presided over the hearing
recommended that Wallace's conviction immediately
be overturned. The judge in that case granted two
extensions to the state to prepare a response,
and both parties now await a decision on when and
if Herman Wallace may see his day in court again.
Ever hopeful and almost never bitter, Wallace
said from his cell this week, "Albert and I have
been in solitary confinement for 12,775 days.
We're two men who are innocent of a crime we
never committed. The state just won't let go."
Meanwhile, Woodfox, who was tried separately
albeit on essentially the same evidence and
testimony, has filed his last-ditch habeas corpus
appeal in the hope that new evidence and
developments in the other cases might provide him one last shot at freedom.
Said Scott Fleming, one of the criminal defense
attorneys representing the Woodfox and Wallace,
"I've been representing Albert and Herman for
nearly a decade. Even so, they were placed in
solitary confinement before I was born. Their
cases are getting more serious consideration from
the courts than they ever have, and we are all
hoping this nightmare is nearing an end."
© 2007 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
View this story online at: http://www.alternet.org/story/50663/
The Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
(415) 863-9977
www.freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/ppnews_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20070417/c00ae56b/attachment.htm>
More information about the PPnews
mailing list