[Ppnews] The American Psychological Association Meets Dr. Mengele
Political Prisoner News
ppnews at freedomarchives.org
Wed Aug 23 13:32:42 EDT 2006
http://www.counterpunch.org/bond08232006.html
August 23, 2006
The American Psychological Association Meets Dr. Mengele
APA Confab Whitewashes Torture by Shrinks
By Dr. TRUDY BOND
Even as the unindicted war criminal Donald Rumsfeld persists in the
totally-discredited fiction that the U.S. military doesn't torture,
the American Psychological Association (APA) provides cover for its
uniformed professionals to continue to devise torture plans for
inmates at Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib and perhaps other secret prisons of
the far-flung American empire. Mimicking the Pentagon lie model, the
APA recently uttered a gratuitous self-serving pronouncement that
participation in torture by its psychologist members is forbidden,
while at the same time failing to modify its more permissive Code of
Ethics to reflect such high piety.
The APA Council passed an updated
<http://www.apa.org/convention06/notortureres.html>Resolution on
Torture at their recent annual convention. In the press release from
<http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=49459&nfid=rssfeeds>APA,
the Resolution reaffirmed
"the organization's absolute opposition to all forms of torture and
abuse, regardless of the circumstance. . . The Association
unequivocally condemns any involvement by psychologists in torture or
other forms of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
This APA policy applies to all psychologists in all settings. The
resolution, approved on August 9, 2006, further underscored the duty
of all psychologists to intervene to stop acts of torture or abuse as
well as the ethical obligation of all psychologists to report such
behavior to appropriate authorities."
"'Our intention is to empower and encourage members to do everything
they can to prevent violations of basic human rights -- at Guantanamo
Bay or anywhere else they may occur," said Gerald P. Koocher, PhD,
President of the American Psychological Association. 'It is not
enough for us to express outrage or to codify acceptable practices.
As psychologists, we must use every means at our disposal to prevent
abuse and other forms of cruel or degrading treatment.'"
Such is the basis of all the press releases coming from the
convention. A good sound byte, a sweet-smelling smoke screen, or in
military parlance, a great psyops.
Mark Benjamin had written a 2-part trailer in Salon of what was to
occur at the APA convention when psychologists across the country
rose en masse to protest the role of psychologists in the torture
process in our current military, which has been given the green light
by Rumsfeld, Bush and Gonzales to ignore the Geneva Convention.
The mutiny never occurred. We won't know whether it was due to the
fact that Lt. Gen. Kevin C. Kiley, the Army's surgeon general, was
present at the Council's meeting to discourage antitorture sentiment,
or the fact that the Resolution simply served to appease the APA
members who didn't understand the reality of what was occurring. It
is apparent, however, that the highly-touted "Resolution on Torture"
is worthless in the face of the equivocal APA Ethical Code.
In his article in the July/August 2006 volume of the
<http://www.apa.org/monitor/julaug06/interrogations.html>Monitor on
Psychology, Stephen Behnke, JD, PhD and director of APA's Ethics
Office, stated "APA derives its position from Principle A, "Do No
Harm," in the Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct
(2002), and from Principle B, which addresses psychologists'
responsibilities to society. By virtue of Principle A, psychologists
do no harm; by virtue of Principle B, psychologists use their
expertise in, and understanding of, human behavior to aid in the
prevention of harm."
Dr. Behnke also referred to the report,
"<http://www.apa.org/releases/PENSTaskForceReportFinal.pdf>REPORT OF
THE PRESIDENTIAL TASK FORCE ON PSYCHOLOGICAL ETHICS AND NATIONAL
SECURITY," which delineates the role of psychologists in the
military. The PENS report served as justification for the role of
psychologists in torture:
"Principle B of the Ethics Code, Fidelity and Responsibility, states
that psychologists 'are aware of their professional and scientific
responsibilities to society.' Psychologists have a valuable and
ethical role to assist in protecting our nation, other nations, and
innocent civilians from harm, which will at times entail gathering
information that can be used in our nation's and other nations'
defense . . . The Task Force looked to the APA Ethics Code for
fundamental principles to guide its thinking. The Task Force found
such principles in numerous aspects of the Ethics Code, such as the
Preamble, 'Psychologists respect and protect civil and human rights'
and '[The Ethics Code] has as its goals the welfare and protection of
the individuals and groups with whom psychologists work'; Principle
A, Beneficence and Nonmaleficence, 'In their professional actions,
psychologists seek to safeguard the welfare and rights of those with
whom they interact professionally and other affected persons'; . . .
The Task Force concluded that the Ethics Code is fundamentally sound
in addressing the ethical dilemmas that arise in the context of
national security-related work."
And thus the psychologists have endorsed the Orwellian groupthink
process, that by repeating the mantra that Pentagon psychologists
don't torture but are busily safeguarding the nation's defense, they
can believe that psychologists are not aiding torture. Perhaps
Orwell's survivors should sue APA for copyright infringement.
To verify the reality that the recent Resolution on Torture did not
supersede the Code of Ethics, or in other words the reality that
psychologists were fully empowered by APA to participate in any form
of torture as long as they believed it was in the realm of national
defense, I wrote to Dr. Behnke requesting a clarification. In
response to my question, "Did the new resolution passed by APA at the
convention erase Principle B as referred to in your article in the
Monitor, which addresses psychologists' responsibilities to
society?", Dr. Behnke cheerfully responded, "Hi Dr. Bond, Not at
all--this Resolution was intended to update the 1986 Resolution
Against Torture. Have you had a chance to read it? APA's press
release can be found at:
<http://www.apa.org/releases/notorture.html>http://www.apa.org/releases/notorture.html."
To rub more salt in the wounds of the tortured prisoners, on the last
morning of the conference, APA Council of Representatives voted to
suspend all rules and regulations in order to commend military
psychologists for their many significant contributions and
sacrifices, and to direct Dr. Koocher to convey thanks and support in
an individual letter to each. Apart from the tragic irony in this
action, it is quite clear that APA knows the names and locations of
those psychologists specifically involved in torture.
Perhaps a letter of commendation is not enough. I propose that APA
create the "Mengele Award" for those psychologists who have
sacrificed so much to protect their nation in the "war on terror" by
assisting in torture for prisoners of Guantanamo, Bagram and Abu
Ghraib. Even though Dr. Mengele was not a psychologist, he made
valuable contributions to the science of torture which no doubt has
been inspiration to some of our own APA members. As psychiatrists
have refused to participate in torturing others in any form including
devising torture, there won't be much competition.
Dr. Trudy Bond is a psychologist in Toledo, Ohio. She has been a
member of APA for 28 years though soon to resign in protest (if not
kicked out first). She can be reached at
<mailto:armordilo at aol.com>armordilo at aol.com
The Freedom Archives
522 Valencia Street
San Francisco, CA 94110
(415) 863-9977
www.freedomarchives.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://freedomarchives.org/pipermail/ppnews_freedomarchives.org/attachments/20060823/1e20fc96/attachment.htm>
More information about the PPnews
mailing list