<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail-top-anchor"></div>
<div id="gmail-toolbar" class="gmail-toolbar-container">
<span name="selected"></span>
</div>
<div class="gmail-container" lang="en" dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail-header gmail-reader-header gmail-reader-show-element">
<a class="gmail-domain gmail-reader-domain" href="https://www.presstv.co.uk/Detail/2026/05/06/768141/project-freedom-perishes-48hours-trump-retreats-wall-iran-asymmetric-deterrence">presstv.co.uk</a>
<div class="gmail-domain-border"></div><h1 class="gmail-reader-title">'Project Freedom' perishes in 48 hours as Trump retreats under the wall of Iran's asymmetric deterrence</h1></div>
<hr>
<div class="gmail-content">
<div class="gmail-moz-reader-content gmail-reader-show-element"><div id="gmail-readability-page-1" class="gmail-page"><div>
<img src="cid:ii_mouqe0t20" alt="image.png" width="538" height="299"><br><p><br>
<strong>By Press TV Strategic Analysis Desk - May 6, 2026</strong></p>
<p><strong>In a dramatic and entirely predictable turn of events, US
President Donald Trump early on Wednesday announced the immediate
suspension of \u201cProject Freedom,\u201d the high-stakes naval offensive
launched 48 hours ago with the stated goal of forcing open the Strait of
Hormuz.</strong></p>
<p>This is not an isolated tactical pause, as he wants the world to
believe, but the third strategic retreat by the United States in less
than a month \u2013 a sequence of capitulations that reveals a profound and
irreversible shift in the balance of power in the Persian Gulf.</p>
<p>The first retreat was the ceasefire following the devastating 40-day
full-scale war against Iran, in which the US-Israeli war machine failed
to achieve even a single strategic objective.</p>
<p>The second retreat was the unilateral extension of that ceasefire
after the first round of Islamabad negotiations. The third, and most
telling, is the suspension of an operation whose very continuation would
have inevitably reignited full-scale Iranian retaliation.</p>
<p>At its core, this decision exposes a singular, undeniable truth:
Trump has belatedly realized that he holds no cards, no good options, no
viable coalition, and no appetite for the catastrophic confrontation to
challenge Iran\u2019s legal sovereignty over the strategic waterway</p>
<p>The quiet abandonment of the so-called \u201cProject Freedom\u201d is not a
strategic pivot, but a crushing defeat. It marks yet another failure for
the US war machine, following closely on the heels of the 40-day war
imposed on the Islamic Republic, and confirms that the era of unilateral
American naval intimidation in the Persian Gulf is effectively over.</p>
<p><strong>The immediate and decisive Iranian response</strong></p>
<p>The suspension of the so-called \u201cProject Freedom\u201d was not born of
American goodwill, but of raw, immediate, and overpowering Iranian
military deterrence.</p>
<p>Within hours of its commencement 48 hours ago, Iran\u2019s armed forces
delivered a response that was as calculated as it was lethal in its
messaging. Serious warning shots were directed squarely at US warships \u2013
a level of direct confrontation that Washington has historically sought
to avoid.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the targeting of a South Korean vessel that violated the
new maritime rules defined by the Islamic Republic served as an
unambiguous signal: Iran will enforce its sovereign rights with kinetic
action. Finally, a clear and serious ultimatum issued to the United Arab
Emirates shattered any illusion that the war could be contained to
international waters.</p>
<p>Iran showed that it will not cower under the shadow of American
airpower. It is fully prepared for, and in some ways inviting, a
decisive engagement. The message was unmistakable: Iran would not merely
defend the Strait of Hormuz, but it would hunt aggressors within it.</p>
<p>The speed and severity of this response forced the war hawks in the
Pentagon into a defensive crouch, demonstrating that the threshold for
Iranian retaliation is far lower \u2013 and far more dangerous \u2013 than
Washington had anticipated.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most ingenious move was the sudden, asymmetric expansion
of the war\u2019s geography. Extension of the definition of the Strait of
Hormuz to encompass the entire territory of the UAE, specifically
designating the port of Fujairah as lying within the Strait\u2019s
operational limits, is deemed a masterstroke of strategic redefinition.</p>
<p>For the US and its allies, this has come as an unexpected shock. The
port of Fujairah, located on the Gulf of Oman outside the narrow choke
point of the Strait of Hormuz, had long been considered a secure
fallback. But the dynamics have changed now.</p>
<p><strong>The impotence of American intimidation</strong></p>
<p>The 48 hours of the doomed \u201cProject Freedom\u201d laid bare a critical
strategic reality: America has completely lost its ability to intimidate
Iran. The torrent of threats that emanated from Washington \u2013 warnings
of \u201cunmatched force\u201d and \u201csevere consequences\u201d \u2013 landed on Tehran with
the weight of a spent cartridge.</p>
<p>For Iran\u2019s armed forces, American threats, regardless of their
hyperbolic grandeur, no longer constitute actionable intelligence and
execution. They are now understood as little more than psychological
operations and media theater.</p>
<p>With this premature suspension, the US implicitly confessed that it
still fears the risk of re-entering a war with Iran, particularly after
the harrowing experience of the 40-day war.</p>
<p>This fear is not abstract but rooted in the traumatic memory of
Iran\u2019s deadly strikes against American forces and their allies during
those 40 days, impacts whose full scale and intensity remain
deliberately under-disclosed by the Pentagon.</p>
<p>The psychological scar tissue from those engagements is so deep that
Washington has been forced to abandon all its prior claims regarding
\u201cEpic Fury.\u201d US Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed that the
operation had ended \u2013 without anything in hand.</p>
<p>That campaign is effectively over. The US has declared, through its
actions, that it will not risk a conventional military exchange with an
Iran that has proven willing to draw blood. The credibility of American
military threats has essentially evaporated.</p>
<p><strong>The Pakistani intermediary \u2013 A pretext for surrender</strong></p>
<p>Perhaps the most humiliating detail of this episode is the official
reason offered for the suspension of the 48-hour offensive. According to
Trump\u2019s own social media post, the decision to halt \u201cProject Freedom\u201d
came in response to a request from the army chief of Pakistan.</p>
<p>Let that sink in. A self-styled \u201csuperpower,\u201d possessing the largest
and most technologically advanced navy in history, abandons a
prestigious military operation \u2013 one framed as vital to global energy
security \u2013 at the behest of a foreign military commander.</p>
<p>This transparent pretext reveals two deeper truths. First, the US is
in a state of urgent, almost frantic, need for negotiations with Iran.
As became evident during Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi\u2019s recent trip
to Pakistan, the Americans are not just open to talks, but they are
counting the moments to re-engage.</p>
<p>Second, the Trump administration is willing to seize upon the
smallest request from any intermediary \u2013 even one as peripheral as a
Pakistani general \u2013 to manufacture an exit ramp from a disastrous
escalation.</p>
<p>The eagerness for a diplomatic off-ramp is directly proportional to
the fear of war. America is not stepping back out of generosity but out
of terror at the alternative.</p>
<p><strong>The lonely superpower \u2013 No coalition for war</strong></p>
<p>In essence, the failure of \u201cProject Freedom\u201d was sealed long before
the first warning shot was fired. It was sealed when America discovered
that it was entirely alone and cornered.</p>
<p>Shipping companies, the lifeblood of global trade, ignored the
American proposal. Insurance firms, the arbiters of risk, refused to
underwrite vessels sailing under the American flag in the troubled zone.
Key regional allies, fearful of Iranian retaliation on their own soil
and economic infrastructure, distanced themselves from the American
offensive.</p>
<p>The American Empire is no longer capable of forming a coalition to
open the Strait of Hormuz. Its scenario-planning has devolved into
solitary fantasizing. This isolation is not a temporary diplomatic
hiccup, but a structural reality.</p>
<p>The world\u2019s biggest navies and commercial fleets have observed Iran\u2019s
previous responses and concluded that the cost of aligning with
Washington exceeds any conceivable benefit. Trump finds himself
commanding a fleet of one.</p>
<p><strong>The triple crossroads: Trump\u2019s impossible choices</strong></p>
<p>Now, after this third and latest retreat, the most humiliating one,
Trump stands at a very dangerous triple crossroads. Each path is clogged
with thorns. He can choose to continue the war \u2013 an effectively
impossible option, given the lack of coalition support and the certainty
of Iranian asymmetric retaliation.</p>
<p>He can choose to accept Iran\u2019s principles for ending the war \u2013 an
option that would represent a total strategic surrender. Or he can
choose to continue the naval blockade and await results.</p>
<p>The blockade is a particularly ambiguous gamble for Trump. On one
hand, he urgently needs time to stabilize global energy markets before
the upcoming meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping and the November
midterm congressional elections.</p>
<p>The volatility of oil prices is a political enemy he cannot afford.
On the other hand, it is entirely unclear \u2013 and virtually impossible \u2013
that continuing the blockade will force Iran to submit. All evidence
from the past two months suggests the opposite: the blockade is
hardening Iran\u2019s resolve, not breaking it. Trump is trapped in a cycle
where inaction hurts his domestic timetable, and action guarantees a
wider war. He has no good options because he holds no cards.</p>
<p><strong>Negotiations to end the war: Iran\u2019s non-negotiable principles</strong></p>
<p>With the back-and-forth exchange of draft principles now underway,
under the Pakistani mediation, it is essential to clarify the
fundamental and obvious conditions Iran has laid out to end the war.
These are not bargaining points but structural realities of a new
Persian Gulf order.</p>
<p><em>Iran\u2019s sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz</em>: Iran\u2019s
management of the strategic waterway, even after the war, is permanent.
This is not about temporary wartime measures. Iran must guarantee its
own security in the Persian Gulf, a right that includes obtaining
material compensation from vessel passage.</p>
<p>The recent wars have proven that the Strait has been used to equip
and strengthen Iran\u2019s enemy. Therefore, enforcing Iranian rules is a
natural act of self-defense. Furthermore, effective sovereignty over the
Strait can nullify the effects of sanctions.</p>
<p>The Strait is not a bargaining chip but an undeniable right of the
Iranian nation. As the Leader of the Islamic Revolution has clarified,
Iran\u2019s new management of this strategic waterway is permanent and
non-negotiable. There will be no return to the pre-war status quo.</p>
<p><em>Withdrawal of American forces</em>: The complete withdrawal of
American military forces from the Persian Gulf region is a definitive
requirement. As the aggressor and perpetrator of unprovoked and
devastating war against Iran, the US presence is the only remaining
obstacle to peace.</p>
<p>As long as these forces remain in the region, the shadow of war will persist.</p>
<p><em>Reparations for damages</em>: Iran\u2019s damages from the third
imposed war and before that the 12-day war represent an undeniable right
of the Iranian nation. Every single Iranian citizen has been harmed by
American aggression. Any shortfall in achieving this condition is
unacceptable.</p>
<p><em>Inclusion of the Resistance Front</em>: The terms of ending the
ongoing war must include Iran\u2019s allies on the resistance front,
especially in Lebanon. This does not negate the right to legitimate
resistance against occupation; rather, it codifies the reality that
Iran\u2019s security architecture is regional. Any peace that ignores Iran\u2019s
partners is no peace at all.</p>
<p><strong>Negotiation from the position of victory: Iran's post-war doctrine</strong></p>
<p>The collapse of the so-called "Project Freedom" effectively closes
the military chapter. What opens now is the diplomatic one \u2013 but on
Iran's terms alone. As the new doctrine makes clear, negotiation has no
intrinsic value. Only its achievable objectives matter.</p>
<p>First, negotiation is only acceptable if it prevents the repeat of a
new war of aggression, not causes it. After repeated American betrayals,
Iran will not accept talks that merely delay the next war. The bar is
absolute and clear \u2013 enduring peace or nothing.</p>
<p>Second, Iran negotiates from the position of the victorious party in
the third full-scale imposed war. The goal is not to restore the pre-war
status quo but to secure additional concessions not previously held,
which includes full sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz, expulsion of
all American forces from the region, and protection of the resistance
front.</p>
<p>Third, reparations are not a concession but a basic and inviolable
right. The aggressor must pay for the damages of the imposed war. This
is non-negotiable.</p>
<p>Fourth, any concession in any domain is forbidden. The enemy is
defeated by all accounts. To concede what the enemy failed to win on the
battlefield \u2013 whether in the 40-day war or the 12-day war before that \u2013
would be to validate its aggression.</p>
<p>Inalienable Iranian rights, including nuclear and defense capabilities, are entirely off the table.</p>
<p>Fifth, concessions guarantee future war. If the US learns it can
extract through talks what it could not take by force, it will launch
another war. Each retreat from an Iranian right is a green light for the
next catastrophe \u2013 more martyrs, more disasters like the Minab school
massacre.</p>
<p>Sixth, the current negotiation must achieve 100 percent of its
objectives. Without full realization of Iran's goals, no further
negotiation of any kind will happen. There would be no phased deals, or
interim frameworks, or endless talks without result.</p>
</div></div></div>
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div></div>
</div>
<br></div>