<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail-top-anchor"></div>
<div id="gmail-toolbar" class="gmail-toolbar-container">
</div><div class="gmail-container" lang="en-EN" dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail-header gmail-reader-header gmail-reader-show-element">
<a class="gmail-domain gmail-reader-domain" href="https://english.almayadeen.net/articles/analysis/manufactured-reach--real-resistance--gaza-s-attrition-and-th">english.almayadeen.net</a>
<div class="gmail-domain-border"></div>
<h1 class="gmail-reader-title">Manufactured Reach, Real Resistance: Gaza\u2019s Attrition and the Fall of a Myth</h1>
<div class="gmail-credits gmail-reader-credits">Amro Allan</div>
<div class="gmail-meta-data">
<div class="gmail-reader-estimated-time">September 19, 2025</div>
</div>
</div>
<hr>
<div class="gmail-content">
<div class="gmail-moz-reader-content gmail-reader-show-element"><div id="gmail-readability-page-1" class="gmail-page"><p>The Israeli aggression on Gaza ended without resolution, shattering its military myth and deepening the roots of the resistance.</p><div><ul id="gmail-content-slick-0"><div aria-hidden="false"><li>
<a href="https://alpha-en-media.almayadeen.net/media/image/2025/9/19/f4a0067b-70c9-4901-ab11-0040ed65cb70.png?v=4&width=1000" tabindex="0"><img src="https://alpha-en-media.almayadeen.net/media/image/2025/9/19/f4a0067b-70c9-4901-ab11-0040ed65cb70.png?v=4&width=1000&preset=w650" alt="Manufactured Reach, Real Resistance: Gaza\u2019s Attrition and the Fall of a Myth" class="gmail-moz-reader-block-img"></a>
\u201cIsrael\u2019s\u201d overwhelming firepower in Gaza has yielded only
devastation, dependence on the US, and reputational collapse, exposing
brutality without control and myths shattered by resistance (Illustrated
by Ali al-Hadi Chmeis to Al Mayadeen English)
</li></div></ul>
<p>\u201cIsrael\u2019s\u201d campaign since October 2023 has fused overwhelming
firepower with expansive ambitions, yet the strategic ledger reads very
differently from the public claims. Inside Gaza, a grinding ground war
has failed to deliver decision even as devastation has been driven to
genocidal scales; across the region, spectacular long-range operations
have leaned on American scaffolding that exposes dependence rather than
sovereign reach. The consequence is a widening gap between military
exertion and political effect: tactical shocks without strategic
settlement, destruction without control, and a reputational collapse
accelerated by the humanitarian catastrophe.</p>
<h2>Overwhelming firepower but absent control</h2>
<p>By mid-2025 \u201cIsrael\u201d had taken more than two-thirds of the Strip and
massed within roughly a kilometre and a half of old Gaza City,
telegraphing an intent to push out roughly three-quarters of a million
inhabitants. Yet a war designed to crush resistance instead entrenched
it. Months of bombardment, razed districts, and shattered infrastructure
have not produced so-called \u201csecurity,\u201d freed captive Israeli soldiers,
or dismantled the Palestinian resistance\u2019s governing capacity
underground. The Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) which long cultivated
an aura of invincibility, have struggled to secure and hold dense urban
terrain measured in single-digit kilometres.</p>
<p>The attrition has been severe and asymmetrical. About a quarter of a
million Palestinians have been killed or wounded; whole neighbourhoods,
hospitals, schools, and power systems have been levelled. In a single
recent week, more than 500 buildings were destroyed; around 600 tents
sheltering displaced families were burned; at least 20 centres housing
refugees were hit, leaving more than 50,000 people homeless overnight.
\u201cEvacuation\u201d leaflets and last-minute calls function as coercive
displacement mechanisms rather than credible civilian-protection
measures in a territory where \u201cnowhere safe\u201d is an operational reality
engineered by design.</p>
<p>The resistance\u2019s tunnel networks have proved far more resilient than
IOF threat assessments suggested, and urban fighting has repeatedly
channelled armoured formations into ambush geometries where aerial
dominance confers diminishing returns. Recovery attempts for captive IOF
soldiers have consistently failed; the core objectives of freeing
Israeli prisoners and imposing full control remain unmet despite the
scale of force and technical sophistication. In short, Gaza is the
textbook case of imperial firepower colliding with a politically
anchored popular resistance that knows its ground.</p>
<h2>ISR saturation meets denial, deception, and adaptation</h2>
<p>\u201cIsrael\u2019s\u201d second push into Gaza City, marketed as \u201cOperation
Gideon\u2019s Chariots 2\u201d, was underwritten by a saturated intelligence,
surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) picture: persistent drone orbits,
offshore reconnaissance aircraft from U.S. forces and other IOF
partners, space-based imagery and electronic collection, cyber
intrusions, and informant networks. In doctrine, fusion cells knit
SIGINT, IMINT, and HUMINT into actionable intelligence; in practice, the
system was publicly humiliated when Hamas moved a live captive IOF
soldier through recognisable cityscapes in daylight and published the
footage. This was not a mere propaganda flourish; it exposed the
vulnerabilities of overreliance on technical collection in cluttered
urban terrain, persistent HUMINT gaps, and fusion shortfalls. It
underscored how ISR saturation can manufacture a false sense of control
that agile adversaries exploit. Gaza\u2019s defenders turned density,
electromagnetic noise, and population movement into living camouflage
that blunted overmatch. Cognitively, a short, audacious video achieved
more effect than a hundred airstrikes. It eroded the aura of omniscience
that sustains coercive credibility.</p>
<h2>The collapse of a manufactured myth</h2>
<p>Amid criticism, the Israeli government replaced Herzi Halevi with
Yael Zamir as IOF Chief of Staff, a handover wrapped in the promise that
Gaza could be delivered \u201con a plate.\u201d What followed instead was the
protraction of \u201cGideon\u2019s Chariots,\u201d officer-level admissions that
negotiation would ultimately be unavoidable, and a strategic
conversation haunted by reputational loss. If an army operating with
minimal legal or political restraint cannot subdue a besieged enclave,
the 1967-vintage myth of invincibility is analytically useless. The
Lebanon stalemates, in 2006 and again in 2024, had already weakened that
myth; Gaza has fractured it. The inability to prevent missile and drone
penetrations deep into Palestinian land occupied in 1948 from Yemen and
Iran compounded the psychological damage and further punctured
deterrence theatre.</p>
<p>Politically, the military has become a foil. Once central to \u201cstate\u201d
identity, settler hard-liners now publicly denigrate senior commanders.
The old image, \u201can army with a government\u201d, has inverted; the IOF is
scapegoated to preserve an unwinnable course. That inversion corrodes
settler-military cohesion precisely when adaptive learning and
cross-institutional trust are most required.</p>
<h2>\u201cLong Arm\u201d revealed as scaffolded reach</h2>
<p>The strike on a Hamas leadership meeting in Doha marked a geographic
escalation with messaging far beyond Gaza. Tactically, it failed to
assassinate key figures; strategically, it collapsed a live mediation
channel, signalled that no capital is sanctuary, and, most tellingly,
exposed how Israeli long-arm operations ride American infrastructure.
Open sources tracked US and UK aerial tankers (USAF KC-46A Pegasus; RAF
Voyager/KC3) orbiting east of Qatar in the strike window; integrated
CENTCOM radar coverage would have tracked launch platforms, deconflicted
airspace, and ensured corridor access. Whether munitions were released
from outside Qatari airspace with precision stand-off weapons, or
whether identification friend-or-foe codes rendered tracks \u201cfriendly,\u201d
the decisive enabler was the US-managed architecture that makes such
missions feasible.</p>
<p>The weapon signature points to method: small-calibre, delay-fused
precision bombs optimised for roof penetration and selected-floor
detonation in dense urban settings, consistent with the 250-lb GBU-39/B
Small Diameter Bomb (SDB I), a GPS/INS-guided glide munition with
roughly 70\u2013110 km stand-off range depending on release parameters. That
profile permits stand-off delivery while preserving deniability for
overflight claims, but it does not conceal the obvious: without US
tankers, shared radar pictures, permissive corridors, and regional
command-and-control, the sortie geometry makes little sense. The
projection of Israeli power, in this instance, is an extension of
American supremacy, not a demonstration of unconstrained sovereign
reach.</p>
<p>The theatre around foreknowledge, conflicting timelines between
Washington\u2019s statements and Doha\u2019s account, mattered less than the
physics of the strike. Everyone operating in Gulf skies understands that
nothing of that profile happens untracked. Hosting US bases offers
\u201cIsrael\u201d a shield and a springboard; it offers Arab hosts neither
immunity nor leverage when Israeli aims and American enabling coincide.</p>
<h2>\u201cGreater Israel\u201d</h2>
<p>Having failed to translate battlefield brutality into decisive
outcomes, the Israeli governing coalition has traded in land and
symbolism. Expansionist projects in and around Jerusalem, most notably
the E1 scheme, are pushed by key ministers to pre-empt any Palestinian
statehood by fracturing contiguity. Settlement growth functions as
political currency to keep the far right aligned while the army bleeds.
The rhetorical invocation of a Torah-rooted polity from Egypt\u2019s river to
the Euphrates serves not just as a policy blueprint but as an
ideological cover for present-day objectives as well: annexation by
increments and a narrative that reframes failure in Gaza as destiny
elsewhere.</p>
<p>The same logic explains continued Israeli aggression against Syria
and Lebanon. Since the September 2024 war against Lebanon, a handful of
newly occupied hill positions along the frontier in South Lebanon has
grown to eight, quietly widening a de facto buffer. A formal ceasefire
with Hezbollah would undercut the coalition\u2019s ideological project and
its claim to strategic depth; confrontation sustains encroachment and
preserves domestic cohesion.</p>
<p>American policy has reinforced this posture. Formal US recognition of
Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Hights (2019) and an explicit
preference for Israeli so-called security prerogatives over inherited
borders have emboldened expansionist instincts. <strong>When
Washington\u2019s envoy, Thomas Barrack, declares that \u2018for Israel\u2019s safety
the Sykes\u2013Picot borders are meaningless, they will go where they want,
when they want, and do what they want\u2019, thereby reducing those lines to
dispensable abstractions, the message is that borders are treated as
matters of convenience rather than as legal constraints.</strong><strong> </strong>In that frame, expansion is not an aberration but a licence.</p>
<h2>Negotiation as a target set</h2>
<p>Regionally, the Doha strike did more than miss its human targets; it
struck at the negotiating architecture itself. By hitting a venue
associated with mediation, under the shadow of the region\u2019s largest US
air base, the operation signalled that diplomacy is dispensable whenever
it threatens to impose limits on the war\u2019s internal logic. In practical
terms, it condemned Israeli captives to continued limbo and further
weaponised their fate within domestic politics; strategically, it told
Arab states that American security umbrellas do not extend to the
protection of their sovereignty when Israeli operational aims are
engaged. The message to intermediaries was chilling: your capital can be
made into a battlespace, and your utility as mediator is contingent on
alignment, not neutrality.</p>
<h2>International cracks</h2>
<p>Western governments have provided weaponry, intelligence, and
protection at the UN; popular outrage, however, has pushed European
debates toward recognition of Palestinian statehood, not from newfound
sentiment, but from the impossibility of defending the facts on the
ground. Arab capitals that flirted with normalisation now face domestic
opinion radicalised by images of mass civilian harm; neighbours
responsible for refugees balance quiet security coordination with public
alarm. Even in Washington, the apparatus is not monolithic. Pentagon
and State professionals can calculate strategic risk even when political
leadership shields impunity. The net effect is isolation layered atop
impunity, a volatile combination in which immediate costs are deferred
but long-term damage compounds.</p>
<h2>The humanitarian ledger</h2>
<p>Whatever the IOF\u2019s talking points, the humanitarian record is
measurable. Hundreds of thousands of Palestinian civilians dead or
injured; hospitals, schools, and refugee shelters systematically
targeted; power and water grids broken; urban cores pulverised; mass
displacement and famine engineered by tempo and design rather than
incidental effect, a genocide televised in daylight. When a single
week\u2019s strikes in Gaza City can erase hundreds of structures and reduce
tens of thousands to homelessness overnight, the intent is territorial
transformation by explosive force. That is not a pathway to governance
or security; it is the manufacture of future wars and the hardening of a
people\u2019s will to resist.</p>
<h2>Where this ends</h2>
<p>Israeli coercion has reached diminishing returns in Gaza. ISR
dominance, armour, and precision munitions have not produced a decision.
Palestinian resistance has adapted faster than doctrine has adjusted;
the political centre of gravity, captive release, and \u201ccredible
security\u201d, remains unmet, and persisting on the same course promises
only more destruction and further erosion of deterrent mystique.</p>
<p>The Doha strike has confirmed an old truth. \u201cIsrael\u2019s\u201d theatre-level
reach is rarely autonomous. It is scaffolded, riding American command
networks, tankers, radars, and permissive corridors. The spectacle of
boundless reach is, in fact, a mirror held by another\u2019s hand.</p>
<p>An occupation entity once defined by \u201crapid conventional victories\u201d
now finds itself exposed by the kind of war it preferred to avoid: long,
urban, attritional, and political. The war on Gaza demonstrates that
superiority in sensors and munitions is different from control; the Doha
strike shows that \u201cstrategic depth\u201d is often rented, not owned.
Meanwhile, the humanitarian catastrophe begets new hostilities into the
future.</p>
<p>Despite the grimness of the present and the vast Palestinian
sacrifices on the path to liberation, the result of this Israeli
doctrine will not be pacification but serial repetition of more blows
traded across borders, more capitals pulled into the battlespace, more
illusions dispelled, and a myth finally, irrevocably, replaced by a
reckoning.</p></div></div></div>
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div></div>
</div>
<br></div>