<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>

    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <div dir="ltr">
      <div id="gmail-toolbar" class="gmail-toolbar-container"> </div>
      <div class="gmail-container" dir="ltr" lang="en-US">
        <div
class="gmail-header gmail-reader-header gmail-reader-show-element"> <a
            class="gmail-domain gmail-reader-domain"
href="https://www.counterpunch.org/2024/01/16/bombing-gaza-isnt-fighting-sexual-violence/"
            moz-do-not-send="true">counterpunch.org</a>
          <h1 class="gmail-reader-title">Bombing Gaza Isn’t Fighting
            Sexual Violence</h1>
          <div class="gmail-credits gmail-reader-credits">Heidi Matthews
            – Tanya Serisier - January 16, 2024<br>
          </div>
        </div>
        <hr>
        <div class="gmail-content">
          <div
            class="gmail-moz-reader-content gmail-reader-show-element">
            <div id="gmail-readability-page-1" class="gmail-page">
              <div>
                <p><img aria-describedby="caption-attachment-310852"
                    class="size-medium wp-image-310852"
src="https://www.counterpunch.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/As_of_26_10_-_7028_killed_in_Gaza_including_2913_children_-_A_million_made_homeless_53289094234-680x453.jpg"
                    alt="" width="680" height="453"></p>
                <p>As the human catastrophe in Gaza deepens, Israel and
                  its allies are mobilizing evidence of sexual violence
                  committed by members of Hamas and other Palestinian
                  militant groups on October 7 to justify continued
                  military action. When the Security Council failed to
                  pass a resolution demanding a ceasefire on December 8,
                  Israel government spokesperson <a
href="https://twitter.com/EylonALevy/status/1733239832288059428?lang=en-GB"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">Eylon Levy tweeted</a>:
                  “Thank you to the United States of America for vetoing
                  a UN Security Council resolution designed to keep
                  Hamas’ rapist regime in power.” In the wake of its
                  case at the International Criminal Court accusing
                  Israel of genocide <a
                    href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FVsyq5CViA"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">Levy accused</a> South Africa
                  of complicity with a “rapist regime.”</p>
                <p>Israeli politicians are attempting to equate ending
                  the war with support for rape, a position that appears
                  to be supported, at least implicitly, by many liberal
                  feminists in Israel and the West. Mobilizing hashtags
                  such as <a href="https://www.metoo-unlessurajew.com/"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">#MeTooUnlessUrAJew</a> and <a
href="https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1089725989107190"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">#BelieveIsraeliWomen</a>,
                  Israel and liberal feminists have accused the
                  international community, and particularly the United
                  Nations, of silence in the face of sexual violence.
                  This accusation was formalized on December 4, when
                  Israel’s mission to the United Nations teamed up with
                  the World Zionist Organization, Sheryl Sandberg, and
                  others to host <a
                    href="https://webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1u/k1u8mfvmcm"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">an event titled “Hear Our
                    Voices”.</a> The campaign has continued, using the
                  hashtag <a
                    href="https://www.instagram.com/reel/C0joVWIOon0/"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">#UnitedAgainstRape</a>, to
                  declare that “all humans everywhere” should “agree on
                  one thing,” namely, that “rape is never ok.”</p>
                <p>Our understanding of the extent of the violence,
                  sexual and otherwise, committed on October 7 remains
                  partial and incomplete. While there have been <a
href="https://www.palestine-studies.org/en/node/1655054"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">important questions raised</a>
                  about the evidence presented by Israeli advocates, and
                  particularly by journalists from the <em><a
href="https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/28/world/middleeast/oct-7-attacks-hamas-israel-sexual-violence.html"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">New York Times</a></em>,
                  that is not a discussion we directly engage in here.
                  Instead, we intervene in the logic that equates
                  believing Israeli women and opposing sexual violence
                  with justifying and supporting Israel’s
                  disproportionate war in Gaza and increasing violence
                  in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. This logic does
                  nothing to reduce sexual violence or to provide
                  justice and accountability to victims of that
                  violence. Instead, it mobilizes sex exceptionalism and
                  selective outrage to further colonial and racist
                  political systems designed to dispossess and destroy
                  the Palestinian people.</p>
                <p><strong>‘Believe women’: Ventriloquising Victims</strong></p>
                <p>The #MeTooUnlessUrAJew campaign claims that UN Women
                  is ‘actively and knowingly working to create a false
                  and insidious narrative’ and ignoring the voices of
                  Israeli and Jewish women due to antisemitic bias.
                  However, <a
href="https://theintercept.com/2023/12/24/feminism-sexual-violence-hamas-israel/"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">it is not the case</a> that
                  the United Nations and UN Women ignored the violence
                  of October 7. UN Women first issued a <a
href="https://www.unwomen.org/en/news-stories/statement/2023/10/un-women-statement-on-the-situation-in-israel-and-the-occupied-palestinian-territory"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">statement</a> on October 13
                  condemning attacks on Israeli civilians and noting its
                  alarm at the ‘devastating impact on civilians
                  including women and girls’. United Nations bodies
                  collectively have continued to issue numerous
                  statements warning all parties to adhere to
                  international law and particularly to avoid violence
                  against civilians, including sexual violence.</p>
                <p>More significantly, while campaigners decry the
                  alleged failure of the United Nations to respond to
                  the violence, Israel is refusing to cooperate with
                  United Nations bodies established to do this. While
                  the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court <a
href="https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/icc-prosecutor-karim-khan-kc-concludes-first-visit-israel-and-state-palestine-icc-prosecutor"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">has met with the families of
                    Israeli hostages</a> held by Hamas, Israel has
                  declined to cooperate with the Court’s <a
                    href="https://www.icc-cpi.int/palestine"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">ongoing investigation</a>
                  into alleged international crimes committed by both
                  Israel and Hamas since 13 June 2014, including
                  allegations of sexual violence. It has also refused to
                  cooperate with the <a
href="https://www.ohchr.org/en/hr-bodies/hrc/co-israel/index"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">Independent International
                    Commission of Inquiry</a> mandated to investigate
                  all alleged violations of international humanitarian
                  law and abuses of international human rights law in
                  the occupied Palestinian territory and Israel ‘leading
                  up to and since 13 April 2021’. While these
                  investigations pre-date the events of October 7, they
                  provide an internationally accepted path for the
                  investigation of events on and after that date.</p>
                <p>The charge that the United Nations is failing to
                  listen to Israeli women elides the fact that, to date,
                  no women have testified publicly about experiencing
                  sexual violence. As Israeli advocates have correctly
                  insisted, this doesn’t mean sexual violence did not
                  occur. Many of the victims of violence on October 7
                  are dead and will never be able to tell their stories
                  in their own voices, and others may not speak publicly
                  for years, if ever. However, we do not honor the
                  voices of those who may have experienced sexual
                  violence by ventriloquizing them or claiming to speak
                  on their behalf. This is especially true in a context
                  where independent investigations are being
                  intentionally frustrated, and where it is not at all
                  obvious that victims of violence on Oct 7 desire a war
                  of vengeance. As Israeli hostages being held in Gaza
                  continue to die from violence there, <a
href="https://www.cbsnews.com/video/families-of-israeli-hostages-and-humanitarian-groups-call-for-cease-fire/"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">many of their families are
                    calling for a ceasefire</a>.</p>
                <p>Historically, women have not only been silenced or
                  disbelieved about sexual violence. They have also been
                  spoken for and instrumentalized, particularly in
                  conflict situations. For example, in 2011, claims that
                  Viagra had been distributed to Mohammar Gaddafi’s
                  soldiers to encourage mass rape were widely
                  circulated, including by the then-United States
                  Ambassador to the United Nations and ICC Prosecutor,
                  despite an acknowledged lack of victim testimony
                  verifying the claims. These rumours provided <a
href="https://www.uclalawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/securepdfs/2021/05/Fallah-Tzouvala-67-6.pdf"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">essential context</a> within
                  which Security Council support for military
                  intervention was generated. They were subsequently <a
href="https://www.salon.com/2016/09/16/u-k-parliament-report-details-how-natos-2011-war-in-libya-was-based-on-lies/"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">debunked</a>, with an <a
href="https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session19/A.HRC.19.68.pdf"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">International Commission of
                    Inquiry</a> finding claims of an overall policy of
                  sexual violence against civilians unsubstantiated, but
                  only after the war was complete.</p>
                <p>‘Believe Women’ does not, and cannot, mean ‘Believe
                  the IDF’, the Israeli police or security force, or
                  even those who claim to be feminist advocates. As
                  Judith Levine has suggested, the actual victims of
                  violence on October 7 ‘<a
href="https://theintercept.com/2023/12/24/feminism-sexual-violence-hamas-israel/"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">are disappearing into
                    propaganda, becoming talking points to legitimize
                    the pain of other women, children, and men in the
                    killing field on the other side of the fence</a>.’
                  The dangers of propaganda are particularly pressing in
                  a conflict that has already seen eyewitness testimony
                  of atrocities, such as the beheading of over forty
                  babies, being withdrawn only after being widely
                  circulated and <a
href="https://theintercept.com/2023/12/14/israel-biden-beheaded-babies-false/"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">even repeated by United
                    States President Joe Biden</a>.</p>
                <p>In contrast to calls for swift condemnation and
                  authoritative statements of what happened, proper
                  investigations that allow victims time and space to
                  speak with adequate material support and protections
                  take time and are almost impossible in conditions of
                  active conflict. In the former Yugoslavia, for
                  instance, the investigation conducted by a Commission
                  of Experts <a
                    href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/2204144"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">took years and could only
                    begin once peace was established</a>. By refusing to
                  cease hostilities and allow an independent
                  investigation conducted in accordance with
                  international standards of fairness, Israel is
                  prioritising shielding itself from accountability for
                  its own actions in Gaza. As a result, Israel is
                  deferring and potentially denying its opportunity for
                  justice and accountability as well as the opportunity
                  for victims’ voices to be heard on the international
                  stage.</p>
                <p><strong>‘Rape is Rape’: Colonial Logics of Outrage</strong></p>
                <p>In contrast to the work of investigation, <a
href="https://time.com/6342428/israel-hamas-sheryl-sandberg-oct-7/"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">advocates such as Hillary
                    Clinton and Sheryl Sandberg</a> infer that there are
                  only two alternatives: denial or outrage. The modern
                  history of Western responses to rape in conflict
                  suggests otherwise. Denials and indifference have
                  co-existed with selective outrage and moral panic,
                  where allegations of rape have been used to justify
                  military aggression. During World War II, Nazi
                  propaganda stoked fear of rape by Soviet forces
                  through racist rhetoric that portrayed Soviet soldiers
                  as ‘<a
href="https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9781137283399_15"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">barbaric hordes of Asiatics
                    and their officers Jewish-Bolshevik rapists</a>.’</p>
                <p>In colonial contexts, sexual violence is a frequent
                  trope in ‘atrocity stories’ which justify the
                  consolidation of colonial power by mobilizing
                  oppositions between civilized Europeans and barbaric
                  racialized others. For example, British media covering
                  the 1857 anti-colonial rebellion in India repeatedly
                  reported false, exaggerated, and sensationalized
                  accounts of sexual violence against English women.
                  These stories were used to justify widespread
                  retributive violence against the Indian population
                  generally. As Jenny Sharpe has explained, ‘<a
href="https://www.upress.umn.edu/book-division/books/allegories-of-empire"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">[w]hen articulated through
                    images of violence against women, a resistance to
                    British rule does not look like the struggle for
                    emancipation but rather an uncivilized eruption that
                    must be contained</a>.’</p>
                <p>Similar narratives have appeared in Western
                  representations of conflict in Africa. As in India,
                  these representations frequently rely on spectacular
                  narratives of extreme violence including sexual
                  mutilation. Critical feminist scholars have critiqued
                  this process, for example, in relation to dominant
                  representations of the conflict in the Democratic
                  Republic of the Congo, as overly reliant on tropes of
                  ‘<a
href="https://acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/1594"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">barbarity, sexual mutilation
                    and cannibalism</a>.’</p>
                <p>Israeli officials have repeatedly cast themselves <a
                    href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v64TVMo2vKw"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">as defending Western
                    civilisation from barbaric Palestinians</a>, <a
href="https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/192/192-20231228-app-01-00-en.pdf"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">as documented in South
                    Africa’s genocide case</a>. Addressing the Knesset,
                  Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu described the war as
                  “a struggle between the children of light and the
                  children of darkness, between humanity and the law of
                  the jungle.” As in the above examples, these
                  depictions are buttressed through the repetition of
                  spectacular stories, such as the unsubstantiated
                  account of one eyewitness that a militant cut off a
                  woman’s breast while raping her, and other militants
                  played with it. Were this allegation to be proved to
                  the criminal standard, it would undoubtedly constitute
                  a war crime. But as United Nations experts <a
href="https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2024/01/un-experts-demand-accountability-victims-sexual-torture-and-unlawful"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">have recently pointed out</a>,
                  more investigation is needed to determine whether the
                  contextual requirements for crimes against humanity
                  were present on October 7. Rather than functioning as
                  clear evidence of systemic violence, these stories
                  both work within and reinforce the trope of
                  civilization versus barbarism.</p>
                <p>This civilizational discourse proceeds from a long
                  history of Orientalist Western imaginings of Arab men
                  as sexually perverted and rapacious, and contemporary
                  tropes of <a
href="https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/dangerous-brown-men-9781842778791/"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">Arabs and Muslims as sexually
                    violent ‘terrorists’ preoccupied with white or
                    Western women</a>. <a
href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01419870.2015.1103877"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">Yohai Hakak describes</a> how
                  these stereotypes fuel an ongoing moral panic within
                  Israel about sexual contact between Palestinian,
                  especially Muslim, men and Jewish women. The far-right
                  anti-miscegenation group, Lehava, has organized highly
                  publicized semi-military rescue operations designed to
                  extract Jewish women living in occupied Palestinian
                  territory, and has successfully lobbied the National
                  Service Administration to institute a policy
                  forbidding Jewish women from volunteering during
                  hospital night shifts, lest they develop relationships
                  with Arab doctors.</p>
                <p>The latest step in this campaign came in July 2023,
                  following a high-profile case in which a Jewish
                  Israeli woman was raped by a Palestinian man. In
                  response, the Knesset passed a new law creating a
                  special category of sexual violence: sexual assault
                  and sexual harassment committed with ‘nationalistic
                  motivations’. These crimes are now considered ‘<a
href="https://jewishcurrents.org/israels-anti-miscegenation-law"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">sexual terrorism</a>’,
                  prosecutable under the 2016 terrorism law, making the
                  maximum sentence life imprisonment. These racially
                  targeted laws were introduced despite vocal opposition
                  from the <a
href="https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2023-03-19/ty-article-opinion/.premium/im-the-jewish-woman-sexually-attacked-by-an-arab-dont-use-me-to-feed-your-racism/00000186-f9e3-df62-adfe-fbf333960000"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">survivor herself</a> and from
                  feminist groups who declared that the Parliament was
                  in effect stating that Israeli survivors of rape by
                  Jewish Israeli men were less deserving of justice and
                  sympathy. As Dana Frank <a
href="https://www.haaretz.co.il/magazine/the-edge/2023-12-06/ty-article/.highlight/0000018c-3ee0-d826-ab9e-bfffb7260000"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">has argued in <em>Haaretz</em></a>,
                  the current mobilization of sexual violence
                  allegations in Israel co-opts feminist language to
                  advance the Israeli state’s militarist and racist
                  agendas.</p>
                <p><strong>‘Just One Thing’: Sex Exceptionalism and
                    Israeli Exceptionalism</strong></p>
                <p><a
href="https://www.instagram.com/sherylsandberg/reel/C0jk3I_O_bB/"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">Sheryl Sandberg</a> has
                  declared in relation to this conflict: ‘No matter what
                  you believe should happen in the Middle East, what
                  marches you’re attending, or what flag you’re flying,
                  there’s one thing we can all agree on: rape should
                  never be used as an act of war’. In making these
                  statements, she is mobilizing an increasingly
                  common-sense position: that concerns about sexual
                  violence in war should trump concerns about the wider
                  politics or justice of conflict.</p>
                <p>This is a militarized version of sex exceptionalism –
                  ‘<a
href="https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA496344217&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=15334686&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7Ed6d2e3b8&aty=open-web-entry"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">the idea that sex and
                    sexualities are inherently different from all other
                    human activities and topics of study’</a>. It is why
                  we treat sexual offences as different and worse than
                  other crimes, justifying intensely punitive responses.
                  In the context of war, sexual violence allegations are
                  used to bolster public support for hostility. Karen
                  Engle notes that since the 1990s, ‘<a
                    href="https://www.sup.org/books/title/?id=30534"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">rape has come to be one of
                    the most commonly invoked reasons for use of force</a>’.</p>
                <p>Sex exceptionalism facilitates Israeli
                  exceptionalism, justifying Israel’s right to violently
                  avenge attacks on Israeli women and girls without
                  being limited by international law. Each reiteration
                  that sexual violence by Hamas was ‘<a
href="https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/israel-hamas-oct-7-murder-sexual-violence-torture-45aab439"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">unprecedented in its cruelty</a>’
                  encourages the world to accept the scenes of
                  devastation in Gaza. Sex exceptionalism insists that
                  we agree on ‘just one thing’ while we agree to
                  disagree on collective punishment, starvation, and the
                  annihilation of the inhabitants of Gaza, the West
                  Bank, and East Jerusalem.</p>
                <p>Ironically, far from working to reduce sexual
                  violence, this logic supports the production of more
                  violence which disproportionately affects women and
                  girls. As Janet Halley has warned, <a
href="https://law.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/1683183/Halley.pdf"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">‘the intensive and specific
                    prohibition of rape can weaponise it… its special
                    legality could power up another rape-driven,
                    rape-repeating war</a>.” The fact that Israel’s
                  siege on Gaza increases the already-heightened
                  vulnerability of Palestinian women and girls to sexual
                  violence was a key feature of the UN Women reports
                  that Israeli advocates found so objectionable.</p>
                <p>The focus on spectacular sexual violence also
                  backgrounds the widespread sexual violence committed
                  by Israeli forces against Palestinians in the everyday
                  functioning of the occupation. Rather than occurring
                  in battle, this violence takes place in “<a
href="https://www.berghahnjournals.com/view/journals/conflict-and-society/9/1/arcs090105.xml"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">less visible spaces, such as
                    prisons, courtrooms, and investigation rooms”</a> making
                  it easier to ignore and erase. <a
href="https://www.timesofisrael.com/ending-censorship-idf-admits-officer-jailed-in-2017-raped-a-palestinian-woman/"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">The case</a> of an IDF Civil
                  Administration officer convicted of repeatedly
                  exploiting his position of power to rape and coerce
                  sexual acts from Palestinians, made public in 2021, is
                  only one example among many.</p>
                <p>Even when these stories reach mainstream media, they
                  almost never become the subject of international
                  outrage. On December 4, Josh Paul, a US State
                  Department employee who resigned over US arms sales to
                  Israel spoke to CNN’s <a
href="https://edition.cnn.com/videos/tv/2023/12/04/amanpour-state-epartment-official-resignation-josh-paul.cnn"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">Christiane Amanpour</a>. He
                  revealed that the State Department had received
                  credible evidence from a Palestinian charity of the
                  rape of a 13-year-old Palestinian boy in Israeli
                  detention. According to Paul, when the State
                  Department reported the allegation to Israel, the IDF
                  declared the charity a terrorist organization, raided
                  its offices, and seized its computers. Even in an
                  environment of intense media attention on
                  Israel/Palestine and the question of sexual violence,
                  Paul’s account has not generated condemnation, or even
                  much attention.</p>
                <p>The failure to condemn or even register sexual
                  violence against Palestinians persists despite
                  extensive evidence, <a
href="https://www.berghahnjournals.com/view/journals/conflict-and-society/9/1/arcs090105.xml"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">including numerous
                    first-person testimonies of sexual violence in
                    Israeli detention</a>. <a
href="https://www.un.org/unispal/document/flash-report-on-the-human-rights-situation-in-the-west-bank-including-east-jerusalem-7-october-20-november-2023-un-human-rights-office-ohchr/"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">The Office of the United
                    Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights reports
                    that</a> between October 7 and December 27, 2023 the
                  Internal Security Force carried out mass arrests
                  involving sexual and gender-based violence such as
                  genital beatings, forced nudity captured on video,
                  sexual slurs, and threats of rape. <a
href="https://www.972mag.com/israel-torture-camp-gaza-detainees/"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">Reports such as this are now
                    accompanied</a> by an extensive photo and video
                  archive circulated by Israeli forces of Palestinian
                  men and boys tied up, blindfolded, and semi-naked. In
                  some cases, the IDF has confirmed that the majority of
                  these men are civilians.</p>
                <p>As Israel stands formally accused of genocide at the
                  International Court of Justice, we cannot allow select
                  and spectacular allegations of wartime rape to be the
                  ‘only thing’ we all agree on. Any feminism worth its
                  name must refuse to accept the bombing of civilians,
                  forcible transfer and denial of food, water and
                  medicine to be justified as avenging sexual violence.
                  Even more, we must seek to prevent further violence,
                  sexual and otherwise, and this must mean reckoning
                  with the everyday violence of occupation that preceded
                  October 7.</p>
              </div>
              <p> <em>Heidi Matthews is an Assistant Professor at
                  Osgoode Hall Law School at York University in Toronto.
                  She researches and teaches in the areas of
                  international law, criminal law, and law and
                  sexuality. She is currently leading an
                  interdisciplinary research project studying colonial
                  genocide. </em>
                <em>Tanya Serisier is a Reader in Feminist Theory at the
                  School of Social Sciences, Birkbeck College,
                  University of London. She writes and publishes on the
                  cultural politics of sexuality and sexual violence.
                  She is the author of <a
href="https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-98669-2"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">Speaking Out: Feminism, Rape
                    and Narrative Politics</a>.</em> </p>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div> </div>
      </div>
    </div>
  </body>
</html>