<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail-top-anchor"></div>
<div id="gmail-toolbar" class="gmail-toolbar-container">
</div><div class="gmail-container" lang="undefined" dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail-header gmail-reader-header gmail-reader-show-element">
<a class="gmail-domain gmail-reader-domain" href="https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20231017-no-peace-without-justice-gaza-has-just-vanquished-a-20-year-old-israeli-plan/">middleeastmonitor.com</a>
<div class="gmail-domain-border"></div>
<h1 class="gmail-reader-title">No peace without justice: Gaza has just vanquished a 20-year-old Israeli plan</h1>
by
<a href="https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/6-author/178473/">Dr Ramzy Baroud</a>- October 17, 2023<br></div>
<hr>
<div class="gmail-content">
<div class="gmail-moz-reader-content gmail-reader-show-element"><div id="gmail-readability-page-1" class="gmail-page"><div>
<p>Israel had the perfect plan for Gaza – in fact, for all Palestinians, when it decided to <a href="https://embassies.gov.il/MFA/AboutIsrael/Maps/Pages/Israels%20Disengagement%20Plan-%202005.aspx">redeploy</a> its forces around the Occupied Gaza Strip in 2005.</p>
<p>Despite statements made, back then, by Israeli officials that the
‘disengagement’ plan aimed at severing Israel’s legal and other
responsibilities from its role as an Occupier, the actual story was
different.</p>
<p>Dov Weisglass, a top adviser to the late Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, <a href="https://www.haaretz.com/2004-10-06/ty-article/top-pm-aide-gaza-plan-aims-to-freeze-the-peace-process/0000017f-e56c-dea7-adff-f5ff1fc40000">conveyed</a> the real reasons behind the redeployment.</p>
<p>Weisglass knew exactly what he was saying; after all, he was one of the architects of the plan.</p>
<p>But how much of the Israeli plan, as described by Weisglass, was, in
fact, implemented? And did the current war in the Strip change those
outcomes, as pronounced nearly two decades ago?</p>
<p><b>READ: </b><a href="https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20231016-history-wont-forgive-our-leaders-for-supporting-war-crimes-in-gaza/"><b>History won’t forgive our leaders for supporting war crimes in Gaza</b></a></p>
<p>“The significance of the disengagement plan is the freezing of the peace process,” Weisglass <a href="https://www.haaretz.com/2004-10-06/ty-article/top-pm-aide-gaza-plan-aims-to-freeze-the-peace-process/0000017f-e56c-dea7-adff-f5ff1fc40000">told</a> <i>Haaretz</i> in 2004.</p>
<p>That part has, indeed, been achieved in full. Not only was the
so-called peace process frozen, but Israel has, since then, carried out
numerous steps to make sure that there is nothing worth negotiating
over.</p>
<p>The exponential <a href="https://press.un.org/en/2023/sc15424.doc.htm">growth</a> of illegal Jewish settlements, the <a href="https://www.palestinechronicle.com/these-are-the-palestinian-children-killed-by-the-israeli-army-in-2023-updated/">killing</a> of Palestinians, the <a href="https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/israeli-settler-incursions-into-jerusalem-s-al-aqsa-violation-of-international-law-jordan/2999942">desecration</a>
of holy sites and the annexation plans made it unrealistic to even
suggest that a two state solution is still practically possible.</p>
<p>But why was Israel keen on freezing a ‘process’ that was futile to begin with?</p>
<p>It was not the peace process that mattered to Israel, but the fact
that, so long as such political conversations were still taking place,
the Palestinian political agenda remained relevant.</p>
<p>This logic, long argued by Palestinians, was supported by Weisglass himself, when he <a href="https://www.haaretz.com/2004-10-06/ty-article/top-pm-aide-gaza-plan-aims-to-freeze-the-peace-process/0000017f-e56c-dea7-adff-f5ff1fc40000">said</a>
that “When you freeze that process, you prevent the establishment of a
Palestinian State, and you prevent a discussion on the refugees, the
borders and Jerusalem.”</p>
<p>“Effectively,” he added, “this whole package called the Palestinian
State, with all that it entails, has been removed indefinitely from our
agenda. And all this with authority and permission. All with a (US)
presidential blessing and the ratification of both houses of Congress.”</p>
<p>This explains much of what has happened since the senior Israeli officials made those revelations and predictions.</p>
<p>First, is that all Israeli governments, regardless of their
ideological or political orientations, remained faithful to the plan,
and never engaged in any genuine political conversations on the future
of a Palestinian State, the rights of the Palestinians, let alone a just
peace.</p>
<p>This indicates that Israel’s intentions were not open for debate
within the country’s political establishment. For Tel Aviv, it was the
end of peace efforts, and the start of a new phase, that of entrenching
the Occupation.</p>
<p>Second, every US administration since then has either invested in the
overall Israeli agenda or disowned the very ‘peace process’ that the
Americans had, themselves, invented and sustained.</p>
<p>This, too, did not happen by chance. Israel had invested much
lobbying efforts and diplomacy in dissuading the Americans from
continuing to pursue their own agenda.</p>
<p><b>READ: </b><a href="https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20231016-the-most-dangerous-man-in-the-world-is-enabled-by-hypocrites-in-the-west/"><b>The most dangerous man in the world is enabled by hypocrites in the West</b></a></p>
<p>Not only did the Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, get what he wanted, he even managed to <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/06/world/middleeast/trump-jerusalem-israel-capital.html">convince</a>
the Trump Administration in 2017 to follow Israel’s own agenda on
Jerusalem, on the refugees, on settlements and even on annexation.</p>
<p>The Biden administration did not alter that new grim political
reality established by President Donald Trump, even if some of its
language appeared to suggest otherwise.</p>
<p>Third, although unwittingly, Weisglass indicated that Israel does not
see Palestinians and their struggle as fragments, but as a unified
whole. By blocking one aspect of that struggle, the political process,
all others are meant to fall apart like pieces of dominos.</p>
<p>The division of Palestinians, along with the ability of Mahmoud Abbas
to sustain his Palestinian Authority for all these years despite its <a href="https://www.inss.org.il/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/systemfiles/SystemFiles/adkan19-1ENG_3_Michael-Guzansky.pdf">failure</a> to achieve anything of substance, allowed Israel to advance its original plan unhindered.</p>
<p>Frustrated by the insistence of many countries, including the US,
that Israel must engage in a political process, Israel, instead, decided
to ‘disengage’ from Gaza.</p>
<p>“The disengagement is actually formaldehyde,” Weisglass said. “It
supplies the amount of formaldehyde that is necessary so there will not
be a political process with the Palestinians.”</p>
<p>The Israeli plan, however, was not a complete success. Palestinians continued to lead a massive campaign of <a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/4324473">resistance</a>, involving all aspects of society in Gaza, the West Bank and Jerusalem.</p>
<p>And, as was always the case, Israel responded with a massive show of
force whenever Palestinians seemed ready to challenge their Israeli
jailors.</p>
<p>From the frequent <a href="https://www.aa.com.tr/en/world/israeli-army-raids-west-bank-city-of-jenin/3016523">raids</a>
on Jenin, Nablus, Jericho to the massive and deadly wars on Gaza,
Israel has done everything in its power, not only to crush Palestinians
but also to send them a message: no resistance of any kind will be
tolerated, and no form of resistance will ever be enough to place
Palestine back on Israel’s political agenda, or those of its allies.</p>
<p>A feeling of ‘we won, and you lost’ has pervaded official Israeli
institutions and society. Israeli election campaigns seemed entirely
disinterested in even discussing the settlements, a Palestinian State,
the status of Jerusalem and so on.</p>
<p>Palestinians were still useful, however. The PA served as a line of
defence for the ever-growing settlements. And every Palestinian attack
against Israeli targets was utilised as further proof that Israel has no
peace partner, thus solidifying the anti-peace position of every
Israeli government.</p>
<p>The discussion in the media following the Hamas <a href="https://abcnews.go.com/International/timeline-surprise-rocket-attack-hamas-israel/story?id=103816006">attack</a>
on southern Israel on 7 October focused on the attack itself, on Hamas
as a group and, later, although selectively, on the bloodbath created by
Israel in Gaza.</p>
<p>But that date was not the start of the war; it is a horrific episode
of a war that has already started and is sustained by a very violent
Israeli military Occupation and apartheid.</p>
<p>Equally important, regardless of Israeli propaganda and distorted
western media coverage, there is no question that Israel has failed.</p>
<p>That failure was initiated by Sharon’s wishful thinking in 2005, and
maintained through the illusions and arrogance of every Israeli
government ever since.</p>
<p>The truth is that Netanyahu is only a cog in a massive Israeli
political machine which aims at dismissing the Palestinian cause,
forever.</p>
<p>Even those who insist on supporting Israel at any cost cannot now
genuinely pretend that Palestine is not back on the agenda as the Middle
East’s most vital issue. Without a free Palestine, there can never be
true peace, security or stability.</p>
<p><b>READ</b><a href="https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20231015-not-hamas-israeli-conflict-the-palestinian-cause-belongs-to-the-world/"><b>: Not Hamas-Israeli conflict: The Palestinian cause belongs to the world</b></a></p>
<p>The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not
necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Monitor.</p>
</div></div></div>
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div></div>
</div>
</div></div>