<html>
  <head>

    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <div dir="ltr">
      <div id="gmail-toolbar" class="gmail-toolbar-container
        gmail-scrolled"> </div>
      <div class="gmail-container" dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail-header gmail-reader-header
          gmail-reader-show-element"> <a class="gmail-domain
            gmail-reader-domain"
href="https://al-shabaka.org/memos/the-palestinian-security-sector-consolidating-authoritarianism-and-repression/"
            moz-do-not-send="true">al-shabaka.org</a><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail-header gmail-reader-header
          gmail-reader-show-element"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail-header gmail-reader-header
          gmail-reader-show-element"><font size="4">The Palestinian
            Security Sector: Entrenching State Repression</font></div>
        <div class="gmail-content">
          <div class="gmail-moz-reader-content
            gmail-reader-show-element">
            <div id="gmail-readability-page-1" class="gmail-page">
              <div>
                <div>
                  <p>by <a
                      href="https://al-shabaka.org/en/author/alaat/"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">Alaa Tartir</a> on November
                    14, 2021</p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <div> <img
src="https://al-shabaka.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Tartir_PolicyMemo_Nov2021.jpeg"
                      alt="" style="margin-right: 25px;"
                      moz-do-not-send="true" width="452" height="301"> </div>
                  <p><span>In October 2021, the Palestinian Civil
                      Society Team for Enhancing Public Budget
                      Transparency revealed that the Palestinian
                      Authority’s (PA) security sector continues to
                      receive the </span><a
href="https://www.aman-palestine.org/cached_uploads/download/2021/10/11/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D9%82%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D9%86%D8%B5%D9%81-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%86%D9%88%D9%8A-%D9%84%D9%84%D9%85%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%B2%D9%86%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%85%D8%A9-2021-1633945288.pdf"
                      moz-do-not-send="true"><span>largest portion</span></a><span>
                      of the PA’s budget. During the first half of 2021,
                      more than 50 million Israeli shekels (~$16
                      million) were spent on the reform of the PA
                      security forces (PASF). The PASF also received
                      1,675 million shekels (~$538 million) - over 22%
                      of the PA’s total budget - of which 88% were
                      allocated to salaries; this was an increase of 115
                      million shekels (~$37 million) in comparison with
                      the first six months of 2020.</span></p>
                  <p><span>These figures indicate the stark divide
                      between the needs of the Palestinian people and
                      the PA’s priorities. While Palestinians seek to
                      end the</span><a
href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/palestinian-securitization-vs-liberation-with-alaa/id1537774938?i=1000529683048"
                      moz-do-not-send="true"> <span>oppressive security
                        framework</span></a><span> imposed by the Oslo
                      Accords, the PA</span><a
href="https://al-shabaka.org/briefs/palestinian-authority-security-forces-whose-security/"
                      moz-do-not-send="true"> <span>continues to invest</span></a><span>
                      politically, financially, and institutionally in
                      the status quo, entrenching the security framework
                      under the pretext of stability and state-building.</span></p>
                  <p><span>Rather than a process of democratization,
                      inclusiveness, and accountability, the PA’s
                      internationally-sponsored security reform
                      processes – which have been the lynchpin of the
                      PA’s post-2007 state-building project - have
                      resulted in repression, persecution, and the </span><a
href="https://doi.org/10.1080/19436149.2018.1516337"
                      moz-do-not-send="true"><span>professionalization
                        of Palestinian authoritarianism</span></a><span>.
                      Thus, structural authoritarianism is imbedded in
                      the Palestinian political system.</span></p>
                  <h2><span
                      id="gmail-Repression_and_Social_Deterioration"></span><b>Repression
                      and Social Deterioration</b><span></span></h2>
                  <p><span>Following the killing of activist and </span><a
href="https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/palestine-nizar-banat-killing-world-must-stop-enabling-pa-crimes"
                      moz-do-not-send="true"><span>PA critic Nizar Banat</span></a><span>
                      in June 2021, the PASF cracked down on peaceful
                      protests</span><a
href="https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/press-release/2021/07/palestinian-security-forces-escalate-brutal-campaign-of-repression/"
                      moz-do-not-send="true"> <span>with unlawful force</span></a><span>,
                      targeting journalists, civil society activists,
                      and lawyers with arbitrary arrests and torture.
                      The level of repression observed during the summer
                      of 2021 was unprecedented, and its complexity was
                      apparent: it indicated the steady convergence of
                      the legal, political, security, and economic
                      institutions of the PA. Converging to repress more
                      effectively is a concerning development, and
                      unless it is countered with people-driven
                      accountability mechanisms, authoritarian
                      aggression will intensify and democratic
                      transition will be denied. </span></p>
                  <p><span>Consolidating power in the security sector
                      continues to be a key objective of the PA.</span>
                    <span>The goal of the </span><a
                      href="https://doi.org/10.1525/jps.2017.46.2.7"
                      moz-do-not-send="true"><span>2007 PASF campaigns</span></a><span>
                      was to “cleanse” the West Bank of non-PA weapons,
                      conduct a disarmament process, arrest those who
                      challenged the PA’s authority, and send a clear
                      message to Palestinians that the PA was the sole
                      governing structure and power. Hence, the PA
                      adopted a “blanket approach” to confiscate arms,
                      and intentionally blurred the lines between
                      “weapons of anarchy” and those of “armed
                      resistance.” This meant that criminals and
                      resistance fighters were conflated and similarly
                      targeted. As a resident of Balata refugee camp</span><a
                      href="https://doi.org/10.1525/jps.2017.46.2.7"
                      moz-do-not-send="true"> <span>derisively asked</span></a><span>:
                      “How can a thief be held in the same jail cell as
                      a </span><i><span>muqawim</span></i><span>
                      (freedom fighter)?”</span></p>
                  <p><span>The ramifications of security sector reform
                      (SSR) processes take time to manifest socially,
                      and in Palestine, they are now becoming clear. The
                      2007 security campaigns, ironically dubbed as “</span><a
href="https://al-shabaka.org/briefs/after-gaza-what-price-palestines-security-sector/"
                      moz-do-not-send="true"><span>Smile and Hope</span></a><span>,”
                      and the ongoing reform process that ensued created
                      profound structural problems and deficiencies that
                      only entrenched a culture of fear, tamed and
                      criminalized resistance, and deepened the distrust
                      Palestinians feel towards their leadership.</span></p>
                  <p><span>Indeed, the torture and killing of political
                      opponents, arbitrary arrest of critics in inhumane
                      conditions, increased levels of surveillance, and
                      decreased levels of tolerance and plurality, are
                      key ingredients for deterioration in Palestinian
                      society. Further securitization of social spaces
                      will disempower the Palestinian people, entrench
                      their fragmentation, and weaken their ability to
                      effectively resist colonial and oppressive
                      structures.</span></p>
                  <h2><span
                      id="gmail-Rethinking_Security_Sector_Governance"></span><b>Rethinking
                      Security Sector Governance</b><span></span></h2>
                  <p><span>Rethinking Palestinian security sector
                      governance whereby the Palestinian people are
                      prioritized must be part of any serious and
                      comprehensive national dialogue. The consolidation
                      of power, as opposed to inclusivity and
                      accountability, has meant that the PASF are more
                      accountable to donors and the Israeli regime than
                      to the Palestinian people. Reversing this is a
                      critical entry point to SSR. In order to do so:  </span></p>
                  <ul>
                    <li><span>Palestinian civil society and leadership
                        must commit to engage in an inclusive, genuine,
                        and comprehensive national dialogue. Revisiting
                        the Palestinian national program from a security
                        sector governance lens could serve multiple
                        purposes, as it necessitates debating resistance
                        strategies, the nature of the governance
                        structures, and accountability mechanisms. </span></li>
                    <li><span>Palestinian political factions and civil
                        society must demand that the PA redistribute its
                        budget equitably, including in productive
                        economic sectors, to bring an end to the
                        inflated budget of the PA security
                        establishment.</span></li>
                    <li><span>Palestinian civil society must pressure
                        the PA to implement the Palestine Liberation
                        Organization’s decision to stop security
                        coordination with Israel, which it has </span><a
href="https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/israel-palestinian-authority-security-coordination-what-gain"
                        moz-do-not-send="true"><span>failed to do</span></a><span>
                        despite its claims.</span></li>
                    <li><span>Palestinian civil society and leadership
                        must adopt a united resistance strategy,
                        including with regards to armed resistance, to
                        avoid the instrumentalization of arms and
                        weapons in internal fighting by political
                        factions, especially in times of power
                        transitions and leadership vacuums.</span></li>
                  </ul>
                </div>
              </div>
              <div><br>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div> </div>
      </div>
    </div>
  </body>
</html>