<div dir="ltr">
<div id="gmail-toolbar" class="gmail-toolbar-container">
</div><div class="gmail-container" dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail-header gmail-reader-header gmail-reader-show-element">
<font size="1"><a href="https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/UK-Appeal-Court-Removes-Guaidos-Access-to-Venezuelan-Gold-20201005-0002.html">https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/UK-Appeal-Court-Removes-Guaidos-Access-to-Venezuelan-Gold-20201005-0002.html</a>
</font>
<h1 class="gmail-reader-title">UK Appeal Court Removes Guaido's Access to Venezuelan Gold</h1>
October 5, 2020
</div>
<hr>
<div class="gmail-content">
<div class="gmail-moz-reader-content gmail-reader-show-element"><div id="gmail-readability-page-1" class="gmail-page"><div>
<p>The United Kingdom
Court of Appeals Monday annulled the decision that granted opposition
lawmaker Juan Guaido control of 31 tons of gold that Venezuela has
deposited in England.</p>
<p>In September, Venezuela filed an appeal against the decision of the
British High Court that prevented President Nicolas Maduro's
administration from accessing monetary reserves valued at more than US$1
billion, which are deposited in the Bank of England in London.</p>
<p>Previously, in July,
High Court Judge Nigel Teare granted self-proclaimed president Guaido
control of those monetary reserves, arguing that the United Kingdom
recognized him as the "president in charge" of Venezuela.</p>
<p>Once Judge Teare's
decision was known, the Central Bank of Venezuela (BCV), chaired by
Calixto Ortega, reported that it would immediately appeal this decision,
which it classified as "absurd and unusual."</p>
<p>On Monday, in his ruling on this case, Judge Stephen Males said that
the U.K.’s recognition “is to my mind ambiguous, or at any rate less
than unequivocal,” as reported by Bloomberg.</p>
<p>Sarosh Zaiwalla, a
lawyer for the President Maduro-appointed central bank, commented that
the previous decision of a British lower court was not correct as it
granted control of the monetary reserves to "a group of people living
outside of Venezuela, to whom the Venezuela's Constitutional Court had
already ruled that they had no legal authority."</p>
<p>"The Court of Appeal
has now... ordered that this important matter receive further
consideration," he added, referring to the decision of the judges that
an investigation be carried out to determine factually what the
diplomatic relations existing between the United Kingdom and Venezuela
are.</p>
</div></div></div>
</div>
<div>
</div>
</div>
</div>