<html>
  <head>

    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="container content-width3" style="--font-size:20px;"><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.mintpressnews.com/human-rights-watch-right-wing-massacre-bolivia/262887/">https://www.mintpressnews.com/human-rights-watch-right-wing-massacre-bolivia/262887/</a><br>
      <h1> <a
href="https://www.mintpressnews.com/human-rights-watch-right-wing-massacre-bolivia/262887/">
          <u><font color="#330033">How Human Rights Watch Whitewashed a
              Right-Wing Massacre in Bolivia</font></u> </a> </h1>
      <h2>
        <p><font size="-1">While some may be surprised by its response
            to the Bolivia crisis, Human Rights Watch’s support for a
            U.S.-backed right-wing coup is no aberration. </font></p>
      </h2>
      <div class="content">
        <div class="moz-reader-content line-height4 reader-show-element">
          <div id="readability-page-1" class="page">
            <div>
              <h3>By Alan MacLeod / <a
href="https://www.mintpressnews.com/human-rights-watch-right-wing-massacre-bolivia/262887/">MintPress
                  News - November 20, 2019<br>
                </a></h3>
              <p>Bolivia is in turmoil after President Evo Morales was
                deposed in a<a
href="https://www.mintpressnews.com/bolivia-latest-successful-us-backed-coup-latin-america/262773/">
                  U.S.-supported coup d’état on November 10</a>.</p>
              <p>The new coup government forced Morales into exile,
                arrested left-wing politicians and journalists, and then
                <a
href="https://www.mintpressnews.com/media-silent-bolivia-massacre-indigenous-protesters/262858/">pre-exonerated
                  security services</a> of all crimes committed during
                the “re-establishment of order,” effectively giving
                soldiers a license to kill all resistance to the
                military junta’s rule.</p>
              <p>Dozens have been killed. Indigenous protesters were
                massacred in the city of Cochabamba and the small town
                of Senkata.</p>
              <blockquote data-width="550" data-dnt="true">
                <p dir="ltr" lang="en">Horrifying massacre today in
                  post-coup Bolivia: The military junta just killed at
                  least 8 protesters in the community of Senkata</p>
                <p>The area is surrounded by military and police<a
                    href="https://t.co/j35bGwAN5c">pic.twitter.com/j35bGwAN5c</a></p>
                <p>— Ben Norton (@BenjaminNorton) <a
href="https://twitter.com/BenjaminNorton/status/1196945935403814912?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November
                    20, 2019</a></p>
              </blockquote>
              <p>In confusing and alarming situations such as these,
                millions of people around the world look to
                international human rights organizations for leadership
                and guidance.</p>
              <p>However, far from standing up for the oppressed, <a
                  href="https://thegrayzone.com/tag/human-rights-watch/">Human
                  Rights Watch</a> (HRW) has effectively endorsed the
                events. In its <a
href="https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/11/12/bolivia-prioritize-rights-wake-morales-resignation"
                  target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">official
                  communiqué</a>, HRW refrained from using the word
                coup, insisting Morales “resigned.”</p>
              <p>HRW Americas director José Miguel Vivanco claimed
                President Morales stepped down “after weeks of civil
                unrest and violent clashes,” and did not even mention <a
href="https://www.salon.com/2019/11/19/who-is-behind-the-right-wing-bolivian-botnet/"
                  target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">opposition
                  violence against his party</a> or the role of the
                military in demanding, at gunpoint, that he resign.</p>
              <p>Therefore, Morales mysteriously “traveled to Mexico,”
                in the organization’s words, rather than fleeing there
                to escape arrest. HRW tacitly endorsed the coup
                government, advising it to “prioritize rights.”</p>
              <p>Human Rights Watch executive director Kenneth Roth went
                further, presenting the elected head of state fleeing
                the country at gunpoint as a refreshing step forward for
                democracy.</p>
              <p>Roth <a
                  href="https://twitter.com/KenRoth/status/1196318814599884801"
                  target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">wrote that</a>
                Morales was “the casualty of a counter-revolution aimed
                at defending democracy… against electoral fraud and his
                own illegal candidacy,” claiming that Morales had
                ordered the army to shoot protesters.</p>
              <blockquote data-width="550" data-dnt="true">
                <p dir="ltr" lang="en">Bolivia's Evo Morales was "the
                  casualty of a counter-revolution aimed at defending
                  democracy..against electoral fraud & his own
                  illegal candidacy. The army w/drew its support because
                  it was not prepared to fire on people in order to
                  sustain him in power." <a
                    href="https://t.co/jeVnGta0Kk">https://t.co/jeVnGta0Kk</a></p>
                <p>— Kenneth Roth (@KenRoth) <a
href="https://twitter.com/KenRoth/status/1196318814599884801?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November
                    18, 2019</a></p>
              </blockquote>
              <p>Roth also described the coup approvingly as an “<a
                  href="https://twitter.com/KenRoth/status/1196133917247655939"
                  target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">uprising</a>”
                and a “<a
                  href="https://twitter.com/KenRoth/status/1194415776205352961"
                  target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">transitional
                  moment</a>” for Bolivia, while presenting President
                Morales as an out-of-touch “<a
                  href="https://twitter.com/KenRoth/status/1196133917247655939"
                  target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">strongman</a>.”</p>
              <blockquote data-width="550" data-dnt="true">
                <p dir="ltr" lang="en">The most important thing now in
                  this transitional moment for Bolivia is ensuring that
                  authorities reestablish the rule of law and protect
                  fundamental rights, including to protest peacefully
                  and to vote in transparent, competitive, and fair
                  elections. <a href="https://t.co/ayWcCKdedS">https://t.co/ayWcCKdedS</a>
                  <a href="https://t.co/WdxFmxEuhw">pic.twitter.com/WdxFmxEuhw</a></p>
                <p>— Kenneth Roth (@KenRoth) <a
href="https://twitter.com/KenRoth/status/1194415776205352961?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November
                    13, 2019</a></p>
              </blockquote>
              <p>New self-declared President Jeanine Añez, whose party
                received just 4 percent of the vote share in the October
                elections, has already expelled hundreds of Cuban
                doctors, broken off ties with Venezuela, and pulled
                Bolivia out of multiple international and
                intercontinental organizations and treaties.</p>
              <p>Añez <a
                  href="https://twitter.com/AlanRMacLeod/status/1194606470119202817"
                  target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">describes</a>
                the indigenous majority of Bolivians as “satanic” and
                insists they should not be allowed to live in cities,
                instead, being sent to the desert or the sparsely
                populated highlands.</p>
              <p>Añez also <a
href="https://www.france24.com/en/20191113-jeanine-anez-stand-in-president-vowing-to-pacify-bolivia"
                  target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">declared</a>
                that she is “committed to taking all measures necessary
                to pacify” the population.</p>
              <blockquote data-width="550" data-dnt="true">
                <p dir="ltr" lang="en">"I dream of a Bolivia free of
                  satanic indigenous practices. The city is not for the
                  Indian: they should go to the highlands or the desert"
                  – new US-backed self-declared President of Bolivia
                  Jeanine Añez. <a href="https://t.co/fD7jpnYJHX">pic.twitter.com/fD7jpnYJHX</a></p>
                <p>— Alan MacLeod (@AlanRMacLeod) <a
href="https://twitter.com/AlanRMacLeod/status/1194606470119202817?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November
                    13, 2019</a></p>
              </blockquote>
              <p>Human Rights Watch <a
href="https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/11/19/bolivia-interim-government-adopts-abusive-measures"
                  target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">described</a>
                the law giving Bolivian security forces complete
                impunity to kill dissenters as a “problematic decree,”
                as if Añez had used racially insensitive language,
                rather than ordering a massacre.</p>
              <p>In <a
href="https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/11/19/bolivia-interim-government-adopts-abusive-measures"
                  target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">its
                  statement</a>, HRW noted that “nine people died and
                122 were wounded” during the Cochabamba demonstration,
                leaving its readers completely in the dark about who
                died and who was responsible for the killing.</p>
              <h3>A long history of ‘human rights’ double standards</h3>
              <p>Human Rights Watch was originally established in 1978
                as Helsinki Watch, an American organization dedicated to
                exposing the crimes of socialist Eastern Bloc countries
                and monitoring their compliance with the Helsinki
                Accords.</p>
              <p>Since its establishment, HRW has consistently been
                criticized for acting as a de facto vehicle for U.S.
                foreign policy, employing former U.S. government
                officials in key positions, and <a
                  href="https://nacla.org/article/hypocrisy-human-rights-watch"
                  target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">displaying
                  bias</a> against leftist governments unfriendly to the
                United States.</p>
              <p>A 2008 report on human rights violations in Venezuela
                authored by Jose Vivanco, for example, was <a
                  href="https://venezuelanalysis.com/analysis/4051"
                  target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">immediately
                  panned</a> by hundreds of academics and Latin American
                scholars, who said the “grossly flawed” document “did
                not meet even the most minimal standards of scholarship,
                impartiality, accuracy, or credibility.”</p>
              <p>Indeed, Vivanco openly stated his biases, revealing
                that he wrote the report “because we wanted to
                demonstrate to the world that Venezuela is not a model
                for anyone.”</p>
              <p>In contrast, Human Rights Watch was <a
href="https://thegrayzone.com/2017/12/11/human-rights-watch-honduras-venezuela-kenneth-roth/"
                  target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">relatively
                  silent</a> on the Honduran coup d’état that deposed
                leftist President Manuel Zelaya, and the repression that
                came after, effectively carrying water for U.S.-backed
                regime change.</p>
              <p>As writer Keane Bhatt, who now works as Bernie Sanders’
                communications director, <a
                  href="https://nacla.org/article/hypocrisy-human-rights-watch"
                  target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">argued in
                  2013</a>, “Human Rights Watch’s deep ties to U.S.
                corporate and state sectors should disqualify the
                institution from any public pretense of independence.”</p>
              <p>Likewise, Amnesty International’s image as a defender
                of human rights hides a dark past of being effectively a
                front organization for Western governments.</p>
              <p>As MintPress News <a
href="https://www.mintpressnews.com/amnesty-international-troubling-collaboration-with-uk-us-intelligence/253939/">
                  revealed earlier this year</a>, a co-founder of the
                organization, Peter Benenson, was an avowed
                anti-communist with deep ties to the British Foreign and
                Colonial Offices, propping up the apartheid regime of
                South Africa at the UK government’s request.</p>
              <p>Another Amnesty International co-founder, Luis Kutner,
                was an FBI asset who was linked to the U.S. government’s
                assassination of Black Panther leader Fred Hampton.
                Kutner <a
href="https://www.nytimes.com/1971/07/21/archives/friends-of-fbi-in-a-fund-appeal-gets-excellent-response-to-wide.html"
                  target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">went on to
                  form</a> an organization called “Friends of the FBI”,
                dedicated to countering and combating criticism of the
                bureau.</p>
              <p>While some may be surprised by Human Rights Watch’s
                response to the Bolivia crisis, the organization’s
                applause for the U.S.-backed right-wing coup against a
                democratically elected socialist head of state is not an
                aberration or a mistake.</p>
              <p>HRW is performing its duty in reinforcing U.S. hegemony
                by condemning any leftist challengers in America’s
                “backyard.”</p>
              <hr>
              <p><em>This article was first published at <a
href="https://www.mintpressnews.com/human-rights-watch-right-wing-massacre-bolivia/262887/">Mintpress
                    News</a>.</em></p>
              <div itemtype="http://schema.org/Person" itemscope=""
                itemprop="author">
                <p><br>
                </p>
                <div>
                  <p>Alan MacLeod is an academic and journalist. He is a
                    staff writer at Mintpress News and a contributor to
                    Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (<a
                      href="https://fair.org/author/alan-macleod/">FAIR</a>).
                    He is the author of <a
href="https://www.amazon.com/Bad-News-Venezuela-misreporting-Communication/dp/1138489239/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&qid=1524768350&sr=8-6&keywords=alan+macleod"
                      target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><em>Bad
                        News From Venezuela</em></a><em>: Twenty Years
                      of Fake News and Misreporting</em>.</p>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div> </div>
    </div>
    <div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
      Freedom Archives
      522 Valencia Street
      San Francisco, CA 94110
      415 863.9977
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://freedomarchives.org/">https://freedomarchives.org/</a>
    </div>
  </body>
</html>